Uncovering the Missing Secrets of Magnetism. 92 pages. Free new book

[TheoriaApophasis]

FLIR , thermal IR

Hmmm, is that a 6" giant neodymium that has NOT been touched in days just "sitting there" hotter than the environment???


YUP

Is that thermal reflectance? Nope.





The object sitting there not moving is SPINNING at tremendous speeds.


I took these FLIR pics today

[TheoriaApophasis]

I think he is trying to explain something whereas you are just making statements. You just go around cherry picking and present you basket with nicked ideas as your own.
You are not answering questions, probably because you simply cannot, as you do not comprehend the reasonings behind these copied statements.
Ben

More insane statements on your part, that foolish video is about PHOTONS, which also do not exist.

Theyre a misgrasp that all light , or EM has a Z axis radial dielectric component.


You make lots of claims son, but you cannot back up or support any of them.


I answer all questions on the matter, there are however still 100+ more videos and another 200 pages to add.

Tell you what, go write a book about it.



Tell me again how I would copy ANYTHING from someone I have no agreement with, namely ANY of his videos. Hows that work again?


Pathetic.

Nobody has found the way yet
Ben

Speak for YOURSELF in such matters.

[Ben2503]

Listen son, If youre going to accuse me of "nicked" work, it BETTER BE from someone I agree with, ........and not someone I have NO respect for, nor their conclusions.

at 5:24 to 5:30 of that specious and fallacious video (like the rest of the video) he like MOST, speaks about magnetism as if magnetism is driving magnetism.

He likewise speaks about the "intrinsic nature of magnetic fields influencing his plasma" experiments.

Ergo, hes dead wrong, he has no idea what dielectricity is.

He is committing the fallacy of reification, in giving Prima Causa to magnetism, rather than (hes clueless) knowing (which he doesnt) that magnetism is "the dielectric field"- Faraday, is the RADIATION, the DISCHARGE of dielectricity.


He has reified magnetism as an autonomous entity

He is well meaning, but his conclusions are specious, his premise dead wrong, his intent is well, but intent has no bearing on accuracy or validity of anything.


run along

In my view we are all trying to find a way through a complicated maze. Nobody has found the way yet and it doesn't make any sense to call somebody stupid for trying another road.
Sorry, wrong link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lpI6ikj1G-s&list=UUAB0-C-aaTy1wCMbCFlhHmQ

I think he is trying to explain something whereas you are just making statements. You just go around cherry picking and present you basket with nicked ideas as your own.
You are not answering questions, probably because you simply cannot, as you do not comprehend the reasonings behind these copied statements.

Best of luck
Ben

[TheoriaApophasis]

Mini MagPrinter | Correlated Magnetics

nothing is being programmed, theyre creating multi-pattern polarization regions by inversely polarizing adjacent sections.

the problem is this format lends itself to depolarization at a rapid pace.


Its no diff. than scaling up what a hard drive write head does, except deeper and much much larger



what ticks me off, is their video, because they ZAP the flat disk magnet with LOTS of little circular polarizations, it creates the pattern of 85 - 137.5077 degree etc etc reciprocation that I discovered



you can see it below, but they have NO IDEA what theyre looking at, I noticed it immediately.

[zapzap]

Mini MagPrinter | Correlated Magnetics

[TheoriaApophasis]

I was referring to the work you nicked from David LaPoint

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9EPlyiW-xGI

Ben

Listen son, If youre going to accuse me of "nicked" work, it BETTER BE from someone I agree with, ........and not someone I have NO respect for, nor their conclusions.

at 5:24 to 5:30 of that specious and fallacious video (like the rest of the video) he like MOST, speaks about magnetism as if magnetism is driving magnetism.

He likewise speaks about the "intrinsic nature of magnetic fields influencing his plasma" experiments.

Ergo, hes dead wrong, he has no idea what dielectricity is.

He is committing the fallacy of reification, in giving Prima Causa to magnetism, rather than (hes clueless) knowing (which he doesnt) that magnetism is "the dielectric field"- Faraday, is the RADIATION, the DISCHARGE of dielectricity.


He has reified magnetism as an autonomous entity

He is well meaning, but his conclusions are specious, his premise dead wrong, his intent is well, but intent has no bearing on accuracy or validity of anything.


run along

[TheoriaApophasis]

Would that something else present at the boundary of the magnet be the ether flow following the magnets shape?

Fields dont see magnetic shape, looking under a ferrocell, you will see the same from a sphere, block, etc etc etc magnet



fields see fields, not physical objects, however if that physical object has a special field nature, like a pyramid magnet that 'chokes' magnetic recriprocations, then yes, but its still fields,

what exists with that physical shape is the dielectric capacitance choking the magnetic


comments to PICS below:

[TheoriaApophasis]

I wasn't referring to work that you nicked from EPD, I was referring to the work you nicked from David LaPoint
for those interested check
Ben

Bit of insanity there, I disagree with 95% of the premise of those videos.

Please make a video on your model addressing diamagnetism
Ben

Its easy, grasp this "Super-dielectric" = super-diamagnetic


tough eh?

[nutzNvoltz]

thats a description.


now the explanation


The REAL question is, what is the physical boundary that restricts the magnetism and causes HIGH gauss ratings at the "pointy end"


The physical MAGNET shape isnt constricting the magnetism, rather something else present at the boundary of the physical magnet.


one is translational to the other, but the shape is one thing, what the shape affects is another. Magnetism is secondary to a primary , so what is in the shape that alters the primary and resultantly the secondary.

Would that something else present at the boundary of the magnet be the ether flow following the magnets shape?

[Ben2503]

A: I do mention the source in the book, Dollards PICTURE is even on the last page. So , dead wrong again

B: You said earlier.-------so far I haven't seen anything of practical use in his (Dollards) writings."......... You are the one doing the insulting.

C: I have offended noone, as Proclus said "the unwise cut themselves with the tongue of ignorance and blame others for the wounds"


D: A Yttrium barium CO-ox disk at LN2 temps is a SUPER diamagnetic object, not a "superconductor". Get it?


Dollard nowhere explains how a magnet works, that is all my research. His FULL grasp of dielectricity gave me the final 10% I needed for the ENTIRE PICTURE.


I state that in the book as well.





Thats what the book and 62 current videos are for. If you do not grasp it, that is no fault of mine whatsoever.

Do as you wish.

I wasn't referring to work that you nicked from EPD, I was referring to the work you nicked from David LaPoint
for those interested check

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9EPlyiW-xGI

I agree with Proclus and like to add: A fool thinks he knows it all, a wiseman comprehends he knows nothing at all.

You keep repeating yourself and avoid answering questions, like so many of the old school scientists.

Please make a video on your model addressing diamagnetism, that could answer many questions.


Take care,
Ben

[TheoriaApophasis]

Just from the gut I would say it's the close proximity of the centripetal and centrifugal fields entering/exiting respectfully near the point being driven by a rather large dielectric inertial plane centered... Probably near the center of mass. If we assume the Phi angles you have calculated are constant regardless of physical shape, that's the only rational answer I can come up with.

Honestly, I'm really not too certain with shapes other than the ones you have placed next to your ferrofluid material and taken video of. Still a little tough for me to think like God would.

A step at a time...

I think one picture can explain HIGH gauss fields on a pyramid magnet

(proving I have a sense of humor) ...

[TheoriaApophasis]

you seem to be unable to answer questions and have a strong need to offend people. why is that?
Why do you use material from other people without mentioning the source?
How does diamagnetism fit in your model?
Which part of EPD writings is actually practically used by you?
.

A: I do mention the source in the book, Dollards PICTURE is even on the last page. So , dead wrong again

B: You said earlier.-------so far I haven't seen anything of practical use in his (Dollards) writings."......... You are the one doing the insulting.

C: I have offended noone, as Proclus said "the unwise cut themselves with the tongue of ignorance and blame others for the wounds"


D: A Yttrium barium CO-ox disk at LN2 temps is a SUPER diamagnetic object, not a "superconductor". Get it?


Dollard nowhere explains how a magnet works, that is all my research. His FULL grasp of dielectricity gave me the final 10% I needed for the ENTIRE PICTURE.


I state that in the book as well.

A smart guy like you should be able to give clear answers in plain language that can be understood by simple guys like me.

Thats what the book and 62 current videos are for. If you do not grasp it, that is no fault of mine whatsoever.

Do as you wish.

[Dog-One]

The REAL question is, what is the physical boundary that restricts the magnetism and causes HIGH gauss ratings at the "pointy end"

Just from the gut I would say it's the close proximity of the centripetal and centrifugal fields entering/exiting respectfully near the point being driven by a rather large dielectric inertial plane centered... Probably near the center of mass. If we assume the Phi angles you have calculated are constant regardless of physical shape, that's the only rational answer I can come up with.

Honestly, I'm really not too certain with shapes other than the ones you have placed next to your ferrofluid material and taken video of. Still a little tough for me to think like God would.

A step at a time...

[Ben2503]

This slot machine doesnt accept baseless claims as payment.

additionally, there are roughly 140 more pages to add to the book. Likewise another 100+ videos.

So, you have said absolutely nothing.








That comment alone speaks volumes about your "capacitance"

you seem to be unable to answer questions and have a strong need to offend people. why is that?
Why do you use material from other people without mentioning the source?
How does diamagnetism fit in your model?
Which part of EPD writings is actually practically used by you?

A smart guy like you should be able to give clear answers in plain language that can be understood by simple guys like me.

[ldrancer]

Well, I thought his "explanation" was perfect. And why did you say you were out and then come right back with another post?

just to make sure everything was clear.