Uncovering the Missing Secrets of Magnetism. 92 pages. Free new book

[TheoriaApophasis]

Hi,
try looking at Borderlands and type counterspace.

counterspace is just a 'fancy' way of saying INERTIA, POTENTIAL, ACCELERATION


space is the byproduct of the LOSS of inertia, as expressed in necessitated (ananke) space and time byproducts.



As Dollard himself said "you have NO POSSIBILITY of understanding electricity etc etc ........without a grasp of counterspace"


I knew that before I read his stuff, but hes 100% right, of course.

[sadang]

Just for fun! Or maybe not?

- Mermaid at 3000 feets under water -

The same for electron... which flows trough wire!

[Iamnuts]

Hi,
try looking at Borderlands and type counterspace.

[TheoriaApophasis]

TheoriaApophasis,
I seem to be having a bit of a hard time with linking the words you use

Dictionary.com | Find the Meanings and Definitions of Words at Dictionary.com

[spacecase0]

TheoriaApophasis,
I seem to be having a bit of a hard time with linking the words you use for things and what I have see other places, I hope you can help me,

what do you call electrostatic induction (weather or not it is cause by an electrostatic charged item or something else ) ?
what would you call electric current flowing on a wire ?
what would you call a voltage potential that is not changing ?

[ldrancer]

the more environmental clean a power source they claim to be, the worse it is. Environmental Impacts of Dams | International Rivers

[TheoriaApophasis]

What is it you're trying to state? Without being dismissive of existing things; you do better to present your own assertations.

They are not existing things, as you say, but false inventions reified by pseudo-science.

The fantastical notion of a MERMAID has existed for 100s of years, and everyone has a mental image of what one IS.

Like your (and others) electron, ....is no different than a mermaid.

both are mental fantasies, ....... one dreamed up by drunk sailors

the other dreamed up by mental midgets of hubris filled small minded academia to explain force transference vectors.


both are unreal nonsense.

Science (so-called) is ATOMISTIC BULLSH*T OF THE ABSOLUTE HIGHEST ORDER.

modern BS Science reifies everything as smacking subatomic mystical Unicorn (fantasy) "balls".

Let me attempt to clarify the quaternion rotation representation; This too is a field, but it has no volume... I suppose if a surface or line was defined for rotations, a closed volume across time might be defined, but would it mean anything?

A line is a force vector,......study the POINCARE' DISK MODEL.


The indivisible "point" at the middle of any magnet is the dielectric inertial plane where force nor motion exist, .....they have no premise "there".

A "closed volume" would define complete reciprocation (divergence and convergence).

Or a ball throw up and accelerating back down to 0.

rotation is a spatial implication. No counterspatial field has rotation, only counterspatial convergence which can of course, collapse WITH rotation to full inertia.

[d3x0r]

Youre thinking in terms of CONNOTATION, not DENOTATION,

Common huge error.

In this case how is there a difference? Pretty sure this has all been denoted... and exemplified for connotation....

I'm really saying that the connotations implied are how they are denoted... but isn't everything?

[d3x0r]

Let me attempt to clarify the quaternion rotation representation; This too is a field, but it has no volume... I suppose if a surface or line was defined for rotations, a closed volume across time might be defined, but would it mean anything?

What is it you're trying to state? Without being dismissive of existing things; you do better to present your own assertations.

[TheoriaApophasis]

Inertia across time can be represented with a wave-like equation when a pendulum swings. Nothing at a specific instant can be wave-like.

Inertia has no attribute of time, ONLY divergent fields do.


Time is not a THING, its a posterior attribute of ANOTHER "THING".



Time DOES NOTHING, ACTS ON NOTHING, and IS NOTHING.



Time = NOTHING.


people talk about "nothing" in a sense of REIFICATION


There is no such thing as "nothing" anymore than there is such a thing as TIME.


Show me nothing, nobody can, if you think you SAW it, then you were "IN" it and witness to it, thereby negating the definition of NOTHING, since there was a WITNESS in it or OF it,


You must posit something before you can negate it, and NEITHER SPACE NOR NOTHING can be posited as Subjective entities.



Common error.

Inertia is a force as is acceleration. so why are they applied a different attribute?

Dead wrong, only the LOSS OF INERTIA = force.


Youre thinking in terms of CONNOTATION, not DENOTATION,


Common huge error.

[TheoriaApophasis]

Didn't you learn what particles do in like elementary school or did you forget? not to say that all is particles or that particles are always particulate... but ....
.

There is only ONE fundamental particle in the universe, NO MORE..., the Neutron.


Free neutrons become protons in 7 and half mins.


That said particle is a dielectric condensate, created in galactic formations and otherwise (google galactic jet).

[TheoriaApophasis]

Yes electrons etc are emergant. That's how quantum mechanics defines it too.
.

ELECTRONS DO NOT EXIST, there is no such BS as a "discharge particle" or "charge carrying particle".

[d3x0r]

NOT SO, a Volume is a divergent quantification of only divergent field modalities, such as magnetic or transverse EM.

An acceleration counterspatial field HAS NO VOLUME BY DENOTATION and definition.

Which I contiued on to examplify things that are fields which are non spacital... which you conveniently cut and dismissed

And I knew if I left the word 'space' that would become the resulting response and cut point

Space has no properties (Tesla said this also, exactly), and cannot affect ANYTHING.

Space is a posterior attributional qualifier of field divergent measures.

Right; space is a coordinate system; a constraint... it can be represented with systems that have more than definition for a single point... it doesn't have to be all right angles like a euler system.... and itself has no other property, but is a way to measure relatively to other things.

Inertia has no waves, only force and motion have or can contain waves.

Inertia across time can be represented with a wave-like equation when a pendulum swings. Nothing at a specific instant can be wave-like.

Inertia and acceleration are counterspatial, Force and Motion are divergent and spatial.

Inertia is a force as is acceleration. so why are they applied a different attribute?

[d3x0r]

more wisdom required......
....
Space NOR time are either fields or forces,. likewise they have of themselves NO POSSIBILITY to act on anything, they are posterior measure of and between divergent field modalities. [/B]

Right, they are the constraints on the variables....

Particle physics being a sub-set of rules and paradigms...

Particles, in practice have certain characteristic... they don't move faster than the speed of light. They can aquire excessive momentum for their velocity, which implies that there mass must be larger. But if they weren't actually larger, the amount of excessive particles generated from their collision would be the same. This word 'particle' should really imply in thought 'the fields that define a particle-like behavior' ... there are things that don't behave like other things... considered purely in a non-spacial non time relative way.

Didn't you learn what particles do in like elementary school or did you forget? not to say that all is particles or that particles are always particulate... but ....

you mentioned modality; which is a fancy way of saying 'this domain of parameters based on these constraints'.... which is hella more complicated than saying look; I have a bowling ball, and throw it at pins, and they bounce and react in a particular way. Does it really matter that it was based way lower on something else? The emergant behavior is still the same.

Yes electrons etc are emergant. That's how quantum mechanics defines it too.

[TheoriaApophasis]

A field is a behavior of a volume.

NOT SO, a Volume is a divergent quantification of only divergent field modalities, such as magnetic or transverse EM, or mass, which itself is magneto-dielectric conglomeration of dielectric accretions (neutrons and protons).


An acceleration counterspatial field HAS NO VOLUME BY DENOTATION and definition.


volume is only applicable to field divergences which are ALL force and motional (= loss of inertia).

ex2: A quaternion is a 4 dimensional quantity that describes orientation in a 3 dimensional space

Space has no properties (Tesla said this also, exactly), and cannot affect ANYTHING.


Space is a posterior attributional qualifier of field divergent measures.

right... there are things 'like' particles and *like* waves though... there are things that behave in such a way that a wave model fits... much like inertia does to induction, and spring physics to capacitance.... that doesn't mean a capacitor IS-A spring, but they can share the same base classes.

Inertia has no waves, only force and motion have or can contain waves.

Inertia and acceleration are counterspatial, Force and Motion are divergent and spatial.