Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

William F. Skinner - 1939 Gravity Power

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • MagnaMoRo
    replied
    Originally posted by Aaron View Post
    In this image the crossbar is plain as day...



    In the other image, the entire crossbar that spans almost the entire diameter of the machine rotated clockwise from a bird's eye view. The crossbar oscillates back and forth.

    The other crossbar going to the left and right part of the machine is almost perfectly straight in the same image.

    And in the other image, that crossbar rotates in the same direction clockwise from a bird's eye view and is at a slight angle spanning the entire machine showing the whole thing is like a plus sign that oscillates back and forth.
    Hello Aaron,

    This is what I see:

    Leave a comment:


  • BroMikey
    replied
    Here is a comment

    gconol 6 months ago
    Patent pending my ass .... this is william Skinner's idea. Stop stealing other people's work.


    Oh yeah Aaron I know what i was going to say now.

    When JOHN did the 4 video's he showed how only .5 watts-1 watt

    was needed to move all of those weights in a wobbling fashion.

    I thought it significant that with 4X the weights added that

    under 1 watt was needed to move that much mass.

    If I hooked a scooter motor up to that much weight traveling

    in a circle it would cost me far more than 1 watt. Wouldn't

    you agree with that simple assessment?

    Sure JOHN is way off on the idea but shouldn't it cost more

    than 1 watt?

    Leave a comment:


  • BroMikey
    replied
    Thanks Aaron for being so repetitive

    This is a kindness and patience to repeat such simple
    things over again. I am starting to gain a perspective on
    the whole idea.

    Yes I agree John is deficient in many areas of mechanics.

    When we hear him quote the force and distance formulas

    it sound impressive but how much can he get back before

    it stalls?

    Your comment of circular motion being wrong is duly noted

    and the 180 degree comment. I take it on face

    value and will continue to observe why this is so, knowing

    that you are far more advanced on the subject gives me

    some sort of heads up. Now I can look again and wonder

    how each device functions with an awareness of your

    statements.

    That is the best I can do.

    According to JOHN the weights are always in a free fall

    orbit that is not circular by any means, at least on the

    bottom and the top looks to be circular but then again

    I don't see this part very clearly.

    Could it be that the upper portion is no circular? Looking

    more like an elliptical eyeball pattern?

    Also it looked like a wobbling machine at the bottom

    where the plumbing pipe tee's off.

    The lower section wobbles in a non-circular fashion.

    I see your video and I know I am miles behind you

    so I will expect some sort of directive correction.

    I am catching up maybe?
    Last edited by BroMikey; 06-07-2015, 12:17 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Aaron
    replied
    not a gravity machine and no energy gain

    Originally posted by BroMikey View Post
    Hey Aaron

    Have you ever seen this guy? It looks like it comes from the Skinner
    design? What about it?

    He says and shows an ever increasing amount of weights add to the
    system while the input watts remain the same in his 4 videos.

    Somewhere between .5-1 watt for as high as 2000 watts of work
    equivalent output.















    There is nothing there. Plenty of comments in this thread about it. Almost everything that can be done wrong is being done wrong. Upper shaft circular. Then he ads weights 180 degrees across from each other turning it into a flywheel so that reduces the amount of gravitational potential that can come into the system - doesn't matter anyway because with the circular orbit, the weight stays at the same height.

    2000 watt claim - that is over 2.5 hp. There is no way that is demonstrating almost 2.7 hp worth of work. If so, then he should be able to have that weight turn a little generator to more than make up for his small input and have it run itself.

    I'm glad he is doing some experiments, but I'm not so sure he understands what he is doing.

    Leave a comment:


  • BroMikey
    replied
    Hey Aaron

    Have you ever seen this guy? It looks like it comes from the Skinner
    design? What about it?

    He says and shows an ever increasing amount of weights add to the
    system while the input watts remain the same in his 4 videos.

    Somewhere between .5-1 watt for as high as 2000 watts of work
    equivalent output.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9-KVo4lxHgE



    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5bEvf60qU7Y


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nTnl9n4KiaY


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J0AsR126bSI



    Leave a comment:


  • Aaron
    replied
    crossbar oscillates

    In this image the crossbar is plain as day...



    In the other image, the entire crossbar that spans almost the entire diameter of the machine rotated clockwise from a bird's eye view. The crossbar oscillates back and forth.

    The other crossbar going to the left and right part of the machine is almost perfectly straight in the same image.

    And in the other image, that crossbar rotates in the same direction clockwise from a bird's eye view and is at a slight angle spanning the entire machine showing the whole thing is like a plus sign that oscillates back and forth.

    Leave a comment:


  • Aaron
    replied
    crossbar oscillation

    Originally posted by MagnaMoRo View Post


    This .gif should clear up everything!
    No, it just proves my point. If you don't see that crossbar oscillating, then I don't believe I can have a serious conversation with you.

    Leave a comment:


  • BroMikey
    replied
    Youtube videos MoRo man Contact Yer local PHD today

    This will power the world in 10 years

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SN79z_TndI8

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u1dvSINRylk


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5bEvf60qU7Y


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nTnl9n4KiaY


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J0AsR126bSI


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pK3ODzgzhJ4


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eRfKQswJT54
    Last edited by BroMikey; 06-06-2015, 02:20 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • MagnaMoRo
    replied
    No way is it linear or elliptical

    NO WAY IS IT LINEAR OR ELLIPTICAL



    Centered directly under and behind the BIG belt-driven-wheel on top, there is another small-wheel (or sprocket) laying horizontally (you can see another one centered and protruding out on the right side frame-rail). The shaft upon which this small-wheel (or sprocket) is mounted upon comes down through a bearing-housing that is BOLTED TO THE SIDE-RAIL! The shaft continues down through the frame-rail to an angled-bar that HAS TO rotate around the shaft as a center point. An elliptical orbit can not be created because the side-rails upon which the bearing-housings are mounted do not move!

    There is no other possible way for the mechanism to function other than in a circular motion!

    MagnaMoRo
    Last edited by MagnaMoRo; 06-04-2015, 03:58 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • BroMikey
    replied
    How on earth can we get a 2D circular motion out of this diagram?

    There is not way. In time you will see the 3D aspects.

    Keep looking. Don't stop looking.

    Here is clear as day
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Uyb...ature=youtu.be

    Last edited by BroMikey; 06-04-2015, 03:56 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • BroMikey
    replied
    Dude, that is a terrible picture gif and I am suppose to
    delete Aaron full color video showing engineering level
    explanations for this trashed out shot? Please, don't tell me.

    Not saying that you are not trying, just look again please

    MagnaMoRo man is trying, gotta hand you that.

    It's okay we all botch our first few entries.
    Last edited by BroMikey; 06-04-2015, 03:44 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • MagnaMoRo
    replied
    Originally posted by BroMikey View Post
    Dudes, Check out Aaron

    He is the star of this show boys.

    Aaron has explained it so clear.

    You simply can not ignore these entries.

    Here you go, no excuse.

    sorry guys Aaron is still our main man. He did his
    homework


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JolNozy8UEY

    http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...-power-12.html
    Hello my fellow Detroiter! I did homework too.
    http://www.energeticforum.com/276323-post616.html

    Leave a comment:


  • MagnaMoRo
    replied


    I made a new .gif image shown bellow using these 2 images:
    http://images.britishpathe.com/?id=4...m=5&size=still
    http://images.britishpathe.com/?id=4...m=7&size=still

    Leave a comment:


  • BroMikey
    replied
    Dudes, Check out Aaron

    He is the star of this show boys.

    Aaron has explained it so clear.

    You simply can not ignore these entries.

    Here you go, no excuse.

    sorry guys Aaron is still our main man. He did his
    homework


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JolNozy8UEY

    http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...-power-12.html
    Last edited by BroMikey; 06-04-2015, 02:18 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • shylo
    replied

    See if this works , This is where the gain takes place IMO.
    Notice how the plate is always going down?
    artv

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X