This forum is preserved as a permanent archive. The community continues at eMedia Press.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

North - South

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Ernst
    replied
    Originally posted by cikljamas
    Kneel down before this you stupid ignorant:
    it is spelled:
    Kneel down before this stupid ignorance

    Originally posted by cikljamas
    Kneel down and shut up because you don't know who you are talking to!
    Now we know; you are the protector of the True Christian Faith. You're not Father cikljamas, you are Saint cikljamas. Or perhaps even Arch-angel cikljamas?
    Was it your blood that flowed, was it YOU who protected ME?
    You are even worse than I imagined. You must be the one person in all human history with a negative IQ. If you were to join a group of amoebae, their combined intelligence would drop.
    You have successfully drained Saros of his intellect, so much is clear from your quote.
    Now rejoice! you bleeding moron.

    Originally posted by cikljamas
    Haven't you ever asked yourself: How in the world we got to this point of moral desintegration: SODOMA-FORBIDDEN RUSSIAN DOCUMENTARY
    The answer is no, I have never asked myself that question because as long as there are dangerous fools around such as yourself, incapable of understanding the consequences of their actions, incapable of distinguishing facts from fiction, incapable of understanding who you are, people who need a nation/king/religion as an excuse to kill, in fact incapable of any positive contribution to society, it is bloody obvious, isn't it?
    How can anyone in the right mind (or in any mind at all) compare the rape and abuse of children with two consenting adults having sex?
    This video should be banned all over the world.
    We are living in a free world? What does that mean?
    Are we free to rape our neighbours children?
    Are we free to kill homosexuals, because they don't do what is in our Book?
    Are we free to set up people against each other?
    Are we free to call ourselves superior because of what happened to our ancestors?
    Are we free to kill if some crowned imbecile says so?
    Are we free to kill if some black robed wig wearing dinkle-wink (I should use that word more often) decides so?
    Are we free to torture in another country if our laws forbid it?
    Are we free to "bring democracy" to whoever we please even if we do not live in a democracy ourselves?

    Talking about repenting and kneeling down all the time, cikl? I think you are the one who is most due to do all that. Probably for the rest of your life.

    Ernst.
    Last edited by Ernst; 10-20-2014, 02:50 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • cikljamas
    replied
    Kneel down before this you stupid ignorant:

    Rivers of Croatian blood have flowed and soaked sacred Croatian soil while Croatia had defended Christian Europe from numerous Islamic attacks through centuries!



    Alamo is ridiculous in comparison with this:



    Kneel down and shut up because you don't know who you are talking to!
    Last edited by cikljamas; 10-19-2014, 08:57 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • aljhoa
    replied
    s motikom na suncu


    Originally posted by cikljamas View Post
    Haven't you ever asked yourself: How in the world we got to this point of moral desintegration: SODOMA-FORBIDDEN RUSSIAN DOCUMENTARY


    Originally posted by cikljamas View Post
    Why this documentary is forbidden? Do we still live in a free world?


    Originally posted by cikljamas View Post
    What do you dick-head think?
    1.5G "Fidel's" Flat Earth



    Al

    Leave a comment:


  • cikljamas
    replied
    Haven't you ever asked yourself: How in the world we got to this point of moral desintegration: SODOMA-FORBIDDEN RUSSIAN DOCUMENTARY

    Why this documentary is forbidden? Do we still live in a free world?
    What do you dick-head think?

    Leave a comment:


  • TheoriaApophasis
    replied
    Originally posted by cikljamas View Post
    and some are anything but round.


    thats called atmospheric distortion, dinkle-wink.

    Leave a comment:


  • TheoriaApophasis
    replied
    Originally posted by cikljamas View Post
    nonsense blah blah


    You really give life to this bizarro FLAT EARTH nonsense




    A tripping crack head would be impressed by such self-delusional absurdity



    And God made the Earth flat, and then god said "let this diner plate spinneth round the sun which also flat.


    God looked upon the flat earth and saw that was flat, DAMN FLAT


    Leave a comment:


  • cikljamas
    replied
    Originally posted by Ernst View Post
    Because a shadow is always two dimensional.
    Are you looking to me?

    Leave a comment:


  • Ernst
    replied
    Bingoooooooooooooo

    Originally posted by cikljamas
    WHY IS THAT THE SHADOW ON THE MOON IS NOT ALWAYS A GLOBULAR ONE?
    Because a shadow is always two dimensional.

    Originally posted by cikljamas
    Now what I find interesting, is Round-Earth Theory proponents will often resort to "Bendy Light" and "Perspective Distortion" when it comes to anomalies in their models; implying that you are not seeing what you see and are being deceived by your own eyes.
    Take a glass half filled with water, put a spoon in it and watch it from the side.
    OMG, the spoon is broken!
    Your eyes never deceive you, cikl!

    Originally posted by cikljamas
    Humans have known for many thousands of years that "dark heavenly bodies" exist and are the likely explanation for these eclipses.
    They pass between the earth and the moon on a regular basis but never collide... Indeed a very likely explanation, cikl!

    Originally posted by cikljamas
    Also, keep in mind the moon turns RED when fully eclipsed and does not make any sense if it were caused by a shadow.
    Just as the Sun does at Sun rise and Sun set.... Now think, for once in your life....

    Originally posted by cikljamas
    Al, when are you going to quit heaping stupidity upon stupidity?
    is that a "please don't take my job"-request?

    Originally posted by cikljamas
    Why won't you begin to learn and comprehend facts about the world in which you live, instead of wasting precious time of your valuable life?
    talking to yourself, or to your chickens?

    This irrefutable stuff is SO funny! It is addictive.



    Ernst.

    Leave a comment:


  • cikljamas
    replied
    Al, when are you going to quit heaping stupidity upon stupidity?
    Why won't you begin to learn and comprehend facts about the world in which you live, instead of wasting precious time of your valuable life?

    Moon's eclipses fascinate you, don't they?
    Then start to learn and examine this thread for the beginning:



    Then watch this video:

    Impossible "selenelion" eclipse, Dec 2011

    If you are not familiar with a "Selenelion eclipse", it is when a Lunar eclipse is visible while the sun is above the Horizon. It is impossible for this to happen in the heliocentric model, and the explanation given is due to "atmospheric refraction".

    Now what I find interesting, is Round-Earth Theory proponents will often resort to "Bendy Light" and "Perspective Distortion" when it comes to anomalies in their models; implying that you are not seeing what you see and are being deceived by your own eyes.

    Humans have known for many thousands of years that "dark heavenly bodies" exist and are the likely explanation for these eclipses. Also, keep in mind the moon turns RED when fully eclipsed and does not make any sense if it were caused by a shadow.

    And bingo question for you and Ernst:

    WHY IS THAT THE SHADOW ON THE MOON IS NOT ALWAYS A GLOBULAR ONE?

    Leave a comment:


  • aljhoa
    replied
    Originally posted by cikljamas View Post
    Just sit and watch and enjoy Flat Earth Truth!!!
    Yours or Muslims?

    U are TPTB servant dividing the infidels.
    Muslims' flat earth amalgamates 1.5 billions of "fidels".
    Seems that u r still in pee-jamas.




    Al

    Leave a comment:


  • cikljamas
    replied
    How do you like this argument:

    The visual obstacle from Tunguska measures 7463 km; we are told that the rays of light from the Sun (and it was morning over Siberia on June 30, at 7:20 am) cannot reach, for example, London, at the same time, due to the curvature; then NOTHING could have been observed/seen from Tunguska as well on a globe; an explosion on one side of a globe could not possibly influence in any way visual observations on the other side of the same globe; the visual range limit for the Tunguska explosion, on that cloudless day, is just 400 km.

    Newspapers could be read at midnight in London, photographs could be taken outdoors in Stockholm without flash apparatus; no other meteorological/astronomical phenomenon occurred at that time in the world, no such records exist.

    That is why this is the very best proof that the surface of the Earth is actually flat.


    Many more to come!!! Just sit and watch and enjoy Flat Earth Truth!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • Ernst
    replied
    Al,
    you should modify your animation of the Sun and the Moon travelling over the Earth.
    In this animation the Sun travels over the equator, while (at the equator) the daytime is only half the nighttime.
    In other words: 8 hours light + 16 hours dark. Can you modify the animation so that it is 12 hours light and 12 hours dark? That would be very helpful to our understanding.

    Also, Australia in this animation has only 6 hours of light against 18 hours of darkness. While the Sun travels over the equator, I think that should be 12-12 as well.
    (I know nobody cares about the aussies, but they are still there...)


    Ernst

    Leave a comment:


  • aljhoa
    replied
    Originally posted by aljhoa View Post


    Lunar eclipse - Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia




    Solar eclipse of May 20, 2012 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


    Master @cikljamas,
    if both moon and sun like you "run in circles" and
    the flat earth is below their path,
    what miracles are lunar and solar eclipses?



    Al

    Leave a comment:


  • cikljamas
    replied
    Hi All, just a little reminder for Al and for all other faithful readers of our monumental thread:

    The fact that water is flat like a sheet of paper (when undisturbed by wind and tide) is my " working anchor," and the powerful " ground tackle " of all those who reject the delusions of modern theoretical astronomy. Prove water to be convex, and we will at once and forever recant and grant you anything you like to demand. That this is not only never done, but that no work on Navigation ever published makes the slightest reference to the need for such a correction, and that all triangulation in Navigation is plane, proves incontestably that the surface of the ocean is a plane surface.


    If the earth be the globe of popular belief, the rules observed for navigating a vessel from one part of this globe to another, must be in conformity to its figure. The datum line in navigation would be an arc of a circle, and all computations would be based on the convexity of water and worked out by spherical trigonometry. At sea the datum line is always a horizontal line ; spherical trigonometry is never used, and not one out of one thousand ship masters understands spherical trigonometry.That all triangulation used at sea is PLANE, PROVES THAT THE SEA IS A PLANE.

    From Mr. -Young, the mathematician, we ascend to Professor Evers, Doctor of Laws, surely he we'll be able to enlighten us. In his " Navigation in Theory and Practice," page 56, he tells us that :

    "PLANE SAILING is sailing a ship, or making the arithmelical calculations for so doing, on the assumption that THE EARTH IS PERFECTLY FLAT It is not a strictly correct supposition to take any part whatever of the earth's surface as a plane ; yet when the vessel goes on SHORT VOAYAGES, the results obtained by plane will be sufficiently correct to serve every useful purpose...ALTHOUGH IN PRACTICE SCARCELY ANY OTHER RULES ARE USED BUT THOSE DERIVED FROM PLANE SAILING....The great and serious objection to Plane Sailing is that longitude cannot be found by it ACCURATELY, ALTHOUGH IN PRACTICE IT IS MORE FREQUENTLY FOUND BY IT THAN BY ANY OTHER METHOD."

    Now let us enquire how long the "SHORT VOAYAGE" may be, to have "a plane surface all the way."

    In December, 1897, I met Captain Slocum on board the " Spray " This navigator told me that he had sailed his little craft 33,ooo miles by plane sailing. Rather a LONG voyage, it must be admitted. A PLANE or LEVEL SURFACE for 33,000 miles, and yet the world a globe ?

    Let it be put on lasting record that " in practice scarcely any other rules are used but those derived from plane sailing;" and that although "the great and serious objection' to plane sailing ii that longitude cannot be found by it accurately," yet "IN PRACTICE IT IS MORE FREQUENTLY FOUND BY IT THAN BY ANY OTHER METHOD."

    "Bergen's Navigation and Nautical Astronomy," 1st app., page 4, states :

    "If the course and distance which a ship has sailed on the globe be given, the difference of latitude and departure may be found by the resolution of a right-angled plane triangle."


    We have before seen that " a right-angled-plane-triangle" on a globular surface is impossible. So there is no need to comment on Captain Bergen's statement.

    In " Navigation," by D. Wilson Barker, R.N.R,, F.R.S.E., and W. Allinghara, Plane Sailing is dealt with on page 29 as follows :

    "We may now assume as an axiom that the shape of the earth somewhat resembles that of an orange. At one time people thought differently, but no sane person today would venture to assert that our planet is merely an extended plane. Still we shall not be far out IF WE IMAGINE that the small portion of the earth's surface with which we are concerned in Plane Sailing is ACTUALLY A PLANE. Hence, in Plane Sailing, regarding the small portion of the ocean with which we have to deal AS A FLAT SURFACE LIKE A SHEET OF PAPER, we have always A RIGHT ANGLED PLANE TRIANGLE TO WORK WITH."


    These learned gentlemen say that no sane person to-day would venture to assert that OUR PLANET is merely an extended plane ; and yet they ask the reader to admit their sanity when they furnish data which prove the world to be a plane! Wonderful learning and profound philosophy that fit a plane triangle on to a spherical surface. Surely A GLOBE with a FLAT SURFACE LIKE A SHEET OF PAPER is a new figure , not found in Euclid or any of the works that deal with triangulation. We may well challenge the advocates of the globular theory to produce their globe with its plane or level surface like a sheet of paper, and be certain of their failure.

    The spectre called " our planet " only requires to be planed (just a little levelling) to reduce its surface to a plane ; and before we have finished the process the plane will be very PLAIN indeed!

    Al, thanks for being a faithful follower of our monumental thread! And my THANKS goes for All, not just for Al...

    Leave a comment:


  • aljhoa
    replied
    Originally posted by cikljamas View Post



    Now, why don't you explain to us your parallel rays theory?

    Maybe because you are full of titbit garbage arguments?
    Date------Replies--Views
    10-09-14---587----16370
    10-15-14---588----17000
    This thread had 630 views in 6 days.


    The following 3-pictures show the illusive "Shadow Moon".











    Al
    Last edited by aljhoa; 10-15-2014, 03:21 PM.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X