Newman Motor Finally Explained?

[clarence]

Newman's own recomendation

To ALL,

This is what I am following - for what its worth.

Respectfully ,

Clarence

[Donald Haas]

building newman

150 pounds of magnets and 200 pounds of wire is about the size that I want to build according to one recommendation.

It looks to me like ceramic mags would weigh 150# but neos would only be about 40 if one did according to the handout sheet.

There are a few discrepancies on the sheet. One mentioned above.
One other is the sheet says 140lb coil split into 2 and then it says adding 200lb coils.

I'm looking to build and need a little clarity.

Thanks,
bro d

[Vinyasi]

Reviving Newman from the Dead - site, that is...

https://josephnewman.info

[Vinyasi]

Improved Range per Charge, Simulated in LTSpice, Achieved by Redesigning the EV Motor

Using the Joseph Newman motor as a starting point, I simulated the following circuits as an overly simplified LTSpice model in two modes: full throttle speed supplying 200 amps and cruising speed supplying 50 amps to this two coil simulation of an EV motor. The improved range per recharge of the battery pack is a gain from a 60 mile range to a range of several thousands of miles. Viewer be wary of taking these simulations literally. Also, the neon bulb might best be actualized by the use of a suitable spark gap to handle these high voltages, etc?

JPG screenshots of simulation...

https://is.gd/evfullthrottle

https://is.gd/evcruisingspeed

LTSpice asc files...

https://is.gd/evfullthrottleasc

https://is.gd/evcruisingspeedasc

References...
Rav4EV FAQ

http://is.gd/evcruisingamps

http://is.gd/newmanchap6

BTW, the National Bureau of Standards admits in their report to shorting out the Newman coil by connecting a resistive load in parallel to the Newman coil of lower resistance than the Newman coil. Thus, a current division circuit was established in which a greater percentage of current would want to travel the Bureau's test load's path of least resistance rather than travel the path of greater resistance through the Newman coil and, thus, invalidate the test as being a non-exclusive test of the Newman device.

http://files.ncas.org/nbsreport/introduction.html

[Vinyasi]

Wow. Thanks!

Thanks, vinyasi.

New video: "Joseph Newman's Motor Doesn't Kill the Dipole of Current vs Voltage. It Maintains it in Perpetuity."

30 minute video

Joseph Newman's Motor Doesn't Kill the Dipole of Current vs Voltage. It Maintains it in Perpetuity. - YouTube

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RkjcJqoeCyw

I gotta hand it too you, that's encouraging me to not feel so much like an outsider since I'm in no position to build anything, but merely try and inspire others.

[maxc]

https://youtu.be/ofHWC7KZGqo

[maxc]

The batteries power the circuit. They do not provide the over-voltage for the coil. That's provided by the spinning magnet.

But the coil has to be charged up with voltage in order to acquire the magnet's energy. And the coil has to be massive so as to be able to hold a very large charge of voltage.

The coil does not provide any power. It simply acquires it from the magnet.

The capacitor, if there is one placed in parallel with the coil, helps suppress spikes. Spikes drain the battery pack without providing any gain in the coil. So, if the capacitor is sufficiently large enough, then the spikes disappear.

With this approach, negative current manifests in the batteries, and both the current and the voltage in the coil is greater than what the batteries can supply it, because the spinning magnet is providing a very large AC influence that the coil responds to by acquiring it and transferring it to the batteries. The current, thus produced, neutralizes the current coming out of the batteries so that they can become recharged. And the coil retains a huge charge of voltage to engage the spinning magnet with enough feedback that the magnet is able to accelerate its rotation and thus give even more energy to the coil until the coil can't assimilate any more and finds its plateau of spin rate.

From this assessment, it's possible to disprove any claims of overunity.

On the other hand, it's impossible to ignore the massive importance of a spinning magnet.

As Paul Babcock has said on numerous occasions: "Magnets have energy."

Pray for Newman - Discussion on the talk page of Wikipedia for the article entitled: Decoupling capacitor.

Chapter Six of Newman's Book plus additional material.

ASC file for simulating Newman's Motor in LTSpice.

My discussion of this simulation on YouTube.

New Newman Motor Replication also works without magnet. post 5 Stephen

[maxc]

https://youtu.be/QGshiHopIpw

[vidbid]

New Video by vinyasi: "Newman Motor Doesn't Kill the Dipole" Part 3

Part 3

Okay, this is Part 3. Enjoy.

21:02
by attempting to simulate his device
21:04
could I see this explicitly laid out in
21:09
the tracing the oscilloscope like
21:12
tracings of every single component in
21:16
that simulation and to look at it and
21:20
then try to you know let it gel several
21:23
weeks you know in my brain until finally
21:27
I come to the conclusion you know what
21:28
what I've been suspecting all along is
21:30
true I've got to say it now he has
21:32
created a new definition of maintaining
21:34
the dipole and we must honor him and
21:37
respect him even though he's dead that
21:40
he has accomplished something that even
21:41
Tom Bearden has not accomplished and Tom
21:43
Bearden is pretty smart and here's a
21:46
country bumpkin doing what Tom Bearden
21:49
said to do but in a way Tom Bearden has
21:52
not told us to do it as far as I know I
21:54
mean maybe he
21:54
it just kind of you know I don't read
21:57
all of Tom Bearden stuff so what do I
21:59
know but for what little I've read
22:01
repeated over and over Ken on his behalf
22:04
by others I've never heard this said
22:07
this kind of definition of maintaining
22:09
the dipole you know this would be
22:11
something to ask Peter Lindemann even
22:13
though Peter Lindemann is retired
22:15
so maybe ask somebody else like Aaron
22:17
Murakami I don't know but who has ever
22:20
looked at it this way other than Joseph
22:22
Newman that's my question to all of you
22:25
can you answer that question and tell me
22:27
because I'm curious I'd like to know
22:30
this is the first time I've ever seen it
22:32
happen and I don't want to say I'm the
22:35
only one who has come up with this
22:36
realization I don't want to I don't want
22:38
to think that we have been that ignorant
22:40
all this time but hey maybe so maybe
22:43
this is the time to start thinking about
22:45
maintaining a dipole in a whole
22:47
different way along the lines of Joseph
22:51
Newman just not so utterly simplistic
22:54
you know maybe there's a way to make
22:55
this circuit more sophisticated I
22:56
managed to I added in neon bulb in
22:58
addition to a suggestion to add a
23:00
capacitor but that's it that's all I've
23:03
managed to do and I got improved
23:06
performance very drastically not neon
23:08
bulb improved
23:10
the ratio of performance by a factor of
23:13
a thousand
23:14
so that the energy that it costs the
23:16
circuit by comparison to what it puts
23:19
out is a gain of a thousand times
23:21
greater with the help of that little
23:23
neon bulb that's pretty good
23:25
I'd say that's pretty good something to
23:28
write home about but I can't do anything
23:30
more and it may be that I just don't
23:33
understand that maybe that's it I don't
23:36
know I'm not an electrical engineer so
23:38
I'm bet there is room for improvement
23:39
but Dean you've always found ways to
23:42
improve a circuit and keep taking it
23:44
beyond whatever you know comfort zone oh
23:48
I've done this much so maybe you'll stay
23:50
with us no he took kept taking circuits
23:52
further and further so I bet there is a
23:54
way but I'm no Bedini not not by any
23:58
means I am no Bandini and not a faction
24:00
no chance at all I have no Bedini I
24:04
guess that's
24:05
I have to say and emotion - to get off
24:08
my chest because you know I may not be
24:11
able to develop my simulation any
24:13
further but boy oh boy heck heck heck
24:16
triple heck this is really an amazing
24:19
discovery to think that Joseph Newman
24:23
has satisfied Tom Bearden and taken Tom
24:28
one step further maybe I don't know but
24:30
that's the what that's what I see what
24:32
little I know about Thomas Bearden hats
24:36
off to both of those guys and anybody
24:39
who you know speaks well of Tom Bearden
24:41
because this is really what I'm seeing
24:45
this is the fundamental basis of Joseph
24:47
Newman's device is the fulfillment of
24:50
Thomas Bearden in a way that I never
24:52
could have imagined and maybe in a way
24:55
that nobody else was imagined before
24:56
either
24:57
and I'm sure Joseph knew didn't see this
25:00
maybe or else he would have said so he
25:02
certainly talked at length in his book
25:04
it's a mammoth book 600 pages or so his
25:07
eighth edition about a lot of stuff has
25:10
nothing to do with electricity but if he
25:13
had known this he would have said it and
25:16
so if I didn't read the whole book I
25:17
read a large part of it but not all of
25:19
it and I had I didn't come across
25:21
anything of this sort and nothing from
25:23
dr. Hastings doing analysis either I
25:26
didn't see this my simulation shows this
25:29
so you know even my simulation is lying
25:32
to me while I'm lying to myself by not
25:35
making an accurate simulation devising
25:38
an accurate one or this is true and this
25:41
has been overlooked so take it from me
25:44
we got some thinking to do on this
25:46
subject and talking amongst each other
25:49
to see what more we can get out of it
25:52
it's unbelievable it's like more and
25:54
more layers just kept keep peeling away
25:56
layers of understanding it's and yet
25:59
it's such a simple little thing not too
26:02
many parts to it you just have to
26:05
balance everything just right their
26:07
values to get it to function properly a
26:10
negative current on the battery pack
26:14
um that's the main thing and of course
26:18
you don't short out the coil oh well my
26:21
latest development now that I have the
26:22
capacitor in the neon bulb in place is I
26:24
don't I don't need to sell short the
26:26
coil anymore I can take that out and it
26:28
runs even slightly better without that
26:30
short so now I simply have 50% duty
26:33
cycle on 50% duty cycle off on the
26:36
square waves coming out of the battery
26:38
pack and then the sine waves coming out
26:40
of the rotating magnetic field and the
26:43
tube getting blended together at their
26:46
junction meeting ground of the mass of
26:48
copper coil that might be why it has to
26:51
be so massive because of the impedance
26:53
that's being created on that coil and
26:55
the purpose of that coil is to blend
26:57
those two energies the AC and the DC and
27:00
maybe it has to be massive to blend
27:02
those two energies efficiently instead
27:05
of just wasting at all you know people
27:07
have complained about the impedance on
27:09
the coil but they don't understand or
27:12
appreciate the fact that it's a massive
27:15
coil and the current coming from the
27:17
voltage source the battery pack is very
27:19
minimal so there's that impedance on the
27:24
coil is not really detrimental it's not
27:26
allowed to become very detrimental it's
27:29
detrimental there's no question about it
27:31
but it's not allowed to become very
27:33
detrimental in such a way that the it
27:37
would hamper the the efficiency of the
27:39
circuit overall it still is a very
27:42
efficient circuit despite the impedance
27:46
exhibited in a few places on that
27:48
circuit and the coil is one of them so
27:51
it's a marvel of invention what Joseph
27:54
Newman has managed to come up with truly
27:56
a marvel and a blessing and it's too bad
27:59
he had to suffer so much the pain of
28:02
trying to promote it but you know if he
28:05
really is a soldier who was born on this
28:08
planet to give us gifts of invention I'm
28:11
not surprised that he had the Karma of a
28:14
soldier's life you know not just the
28:15
Korean War or the whatever war he fought
28:18
in I believe it was the Korean War it's
28:20
this other war of trying to promote
28:22
ideas that could do
28:26
and enrich our lives in a mild way such
28:28
as his plastic dumbbells or his flywheel
28:32
to go in the back wheel of a bicycle to
28:35
help you do wheelies but this idea of a
28:40
perpetual motion machine by maintaining
28:44
the dipole in a whole new way he
28:47
literally had a fight tooth and nail and
28:48
he suffered tremendously psychological
28:52
stress from this because he couldn't win
28:56
it was a battle he could not win in his
29:00
lifetime and I don't expect to win in
29:03
mine it's this it's not easy going you
29:06
know trying to promote an electrical rod
29:08
and science in today's world it's just
29:10
there's too many people fighting that
29:13
sort of thing to be able to make it
29:15
happen you know if you do it in your
29:17
garage fine but nobody else wants to
29:20
know what you've done they don't want to
29:22
know let alone talk about it it hurts
29:25
their ears literally I'm not making this
29:29
up
29:29
it really hurts their ears to listen to
29:33
such crap in their view you know why
29:38
should we waste their time if we already
29:39
know it's crap to begin with talk about
29:41
prejudice good grief
29:43
do we say that about Blacks and Jews I
29:46
hope not or women I hope not but we say
29:49
it about devices that are uncanny on in
29:53
how they behave I'm sorry I had a hard
29:55
time shutting up your don't I it really
29:58
pisses me off but there's nothing I can
29:59
do about it except make sure I piss on
30:01
the toilet and not on the floor or in my
30:04
bed okay on that note I'm gonna shut up

[vidbid]

New Video by vinyasi: "Newman Motor Doesn't Kill the Dipole" Part 2

Part 2

Okay, this is part two, so please read. Thanks

11:02
it's picking up the magnetic field of
11:04
this
11:04
spinning bar magnet permanent magnet
11:07
inside that coil we're off to one side
11:09
as that as the case may be and that's a
11:13
dipole the extreme amperage of the
11:17
spinning magnetic field or the magnetic
11:19
field alone but set in rotation motion
11:23
to be able to harness it readily you
11:26
know just like the rotating magnetic
11:27
field of any motor or generator and then
11:30
the other dipole is the voltage coming
11:33
from the battery pack which has no amps
11:35
to speak of so it's a perfect dipole
11:37
that's what this his energy machine is
11:40
it's a new definition to what a dipole
11:44
is or what constitutes a dipole so this
11:47
gives a sheds a whole new light on
11:50
Thomas Bearden who has been stressing
11:52
this notion of don't kill the dipole
11:55
well that's what Newman does he never
11:56
kills it and in my mucking around I
11:59
killed it and just messed things worse
12:03
I still got power but I got you know I
12:06
was killing the battery pack and I was
12:08
killing it very fast why I was killing
12:10
the dipole well his machine when it's
12:12
tweaked right does not kill the dipole
12:14
because all that amps does filter
12:18
through its way through the circuit and
12:21
make its way finally back to the battery
12:23
pack and give it a tiny little reverse
12:25
current to make sure the battery pack
12:27
never drains itself of amp-hours so you
12:30
can have a tiny ant power battery pack
12:33
of a string of I don't know
12:35
three dozen 9-volt batteries or whatever
12:37
Neumann uses to produce a lot of volts
12:40
because you're gonna need those bolts
12:41
and I couldn't figure out why I mean I
12:44
tried lowering the volts and it didn't
12:47
work
12:47
yeah in my simulation I had to have 300
12:51
volts in the battery pack but that's
12:58
because you have to have a dipole of
13:00
high volts on one side and high amps on
13:02
the other of this isolation transformer
13:05
setup that he has going between the mass
13:09
of copper coil and the spinning bar
13:11
magnet inside of it he's literally high
13:14
an isolation transformer going on in
13:18
there helping to create a dipole so you
13:23
know everything else considered in a
13:25
circuit taken into consideration so it's
13:29
a simple circuit to teach a simple idea
13:32
and without having to get complicated
13:34
and lost in the shuffle
13:36
of a lot of details there are enough
13:38
details in this as it is and it's
13:41
amazing nobody's gotten it until now I
13:43
guess because nobody's bothered to try
13:45
to simulate it they're all trying to
13:47
build it I try to understand things I
13:50
want to understand things and only if I
13:51
need to build it will I build it but so
13:54
long as I don't need to build it I won't
13:56
and I'll move on to a new topic and
13:58
study that until I understand it because
14:01
I'm more interested in understanding it
14:03
gives me a lot of background so they
14:05
don't know what I want to talk about or
14:07
think about this subject I'm it's easier
14:11
for me because I have all this
14:13
background of studying various circuits
14:16
that work or various circuits that are
14:18
you know made to look like they work
14:20
within the context of a simulator but
14:23
here's something we know works if you
14:25
trust Newman's sincerity and I usually
14:29
go on that first you know I judge the
14:31
person first not on the basis of what
14:34
he's created I could care less but on
14:36
the basis of who he is and if he is a
14:39
sincere person then only do I study what
14:44
he is accomplished because I don't want
14:47
to waste my time with somebody who's not
14:48
sincere but people who judge Neiman on
14:53
the basis of his device are making a big
14:56
mistake because you can't judge the man
14:59
by his creations do you think he'd go
15:02
around judging the parents on the basis
15:04
of what children have come out of their
15:06
loins it never works that way duh the
15:11
children never turn out the same way as
15:12
the parents duh did totally their own
15:15
person they go their honor
15:17
and they get Emily go well bye-bye
15:20
parent you know I'll make my own life
15:22
and they do what you think you want the
15:25
same kind of treatment you know judge
15:28
your parent judge your parents on the
15:31
basis of who you are as the way you
15:32
treat Newman some of you judging him on
15:35
the basis of what's you know the
15:38
consensus of opinion and authoritative
15:40
opinion about his energy device no way
15:43
you would never do that about your
15:46
parents why do that with Newman oh well
15:48
this is different this is science oh
15:49
really
15:50
good grief so this is that the
15:54
sociological implication that we have
15:57
going on here we got problems we got a
15:59
number of problems going on and it's no
16:01
wonder we're not making headway
16:03
psychological sociological problems in
16:06
addition to our politically correct
16:10
version of science you know turning up
16:13
its nose at Newman or anybody else who
16:16
wants to make a contribution a
16:18
legitimate contribution so everybody
16:21
wants to poopoo simulations as being you
16:25
know impractical not buildable who gives
16:27
a **** the real issue is do you get it
16:32
do you understand Newman and how the
16:34
hell are you going to if you keep coming
16:36
in you nose up at the guy or anybody
16:39
else like myself who's trying to
16:41
understand him and trying to spread this
16:43
around so that more people understand
16:46
him you know I don't make anything I
16:49
don't have to you know feel badly about
16:53
my use of language because that is how I
16:56
feel I've gone out and took the trouble
16:59
to integrate myself with the opposite
17:04
minded point of views of people who
17:07
don't feel the same way I do that's the
17:09
only way I can learn at any rapid pace
17:12
is to mingle with the opposite viewpoint
17:15
and yeah it's ****ty it's very stressful
17:18
but I learn and it's the only way I can
17:21
actually take their oxd and add it to my
17:26
thoughtfulness to propel me for
17:29
at a faster pace is by mingling with
17:31
them and not mingle merely with the
17:33
comfortable position of people who are
17:35
like-minded because on the I'll go at a
17:37
snail's pace I'm not gonna learn fast
17:39
enough it's more comfortable but I won't
17:42
learn at the pace that I learn at so
17:45
it's to my advantage to mix with the
17:47
oppositional point of view and I gained
17:50
a lot of insight that way very quickly
17:52
so you know doesn't mean you have to do
17:55
it but I have to because I want to learn
17:57
as fast as possible because life is
18:00
short we age very rapidly and for the
18:06
amount of time we have allotted to our
18:08
lifespan it is very little we can
18:10
accomplish very little and yet there are
18:13
so many problems in society so many
18:16
misunderstandings so many ignorant
18:18
points of view we have got a lot of work
18:22
ahead of us we got enough work to keep
18:24
everybody busy and nobody duplicating
18:26
what everybody else is doing and still
18:27
have problems left over that need to be
18:29
solved that's my point of view as a
18:31
five-year-old 55 years ago and I still
18:35
hold to that point of view today you
18:37
know I'm a little angry that most people
18:40
just want to do what everybody else does
18:41
and go with the lemming pack because
18:43
they can make more money that way and
18:45
improve their social standing more
18:48
readily but we don't learn much that way
18:50
we don't gain a whole lot that way so
18:53
for the sake of material comforts
18:55
creature comforts I go for the learning
18:58
hands down it's just better this way
19:01
because I'm more concerned about how
19:03
lacklustre is the evolution of society
19:06
that bothers me that it is so mediocre
19:09
and so lacking in evolutionary
19:13
sophistication we nearly lack evolution
19:17
that is what we lack and growing in
19:20
technology does not mean we are growing
19:22
at all we're growing in technical
19:25
details that's it but we lack
19:27
fundamentals growth of understanding and
19:29
that bothers me it bothered me bothered
19:32
me as a toddler it bothers me now
19:34
because I could see it as a
19:35
five-year-old and I still see it nothing
19:37
has changed except the Vaseline weed
19:42
spread over everything making everything
19:44
look glossy and beautiful and it's not
19:48
it's not a little dab of real cream does
19:51
not solve the problem just because we've
19:54
greased our hair doesn't make us a
19:57
better person all we have is grease hair
20:00
that's it so so much for my soapbox but
20:04
it's this this the the pit-hole the
20:08
pitfalls are learning is looking that
20:12
well you know human existence is not
20:14
perfect and what is it how lush leave a
20:16
lot to be desired anywho so this is the
20:22
beauty of Newman's device is that it
20:23
actually maintains the dipole and in so
20:26
doing it's a free it's a perpetual
20:29
motion machine I almost said free energy
20:31
but you know it's you know not free if
20:34
you take all the energy sources into
20:36
account like the energy that went into
20:38
creating those permanent magnets that's
20:40
a lot of energy cost involved sure the
20:43
last a century or more you know and not
20:46
lose a whole lot of strength over the
20:47
course of us each century but still it's
20:51
not for free it comes at a price but it
20:54
is it should have looked like a
20:56
perpetual motion machine is in my book
20:58
because he maintains the dipole and only

[vidbid]

New Video by vinyasi: "Newman Motor Doesn't Kill the Dipole" Part 1

Thanks, vinyasi.

New video: "Joseph Newman's Motor Doesn't Kill the Dipole of Current vs Voltage. It Maintains it in Perpetuity."

30 minute video

Joseph Newman's Motor Doesn't Kill the Dipole of Current vs Voltage. It Maintains it in Perpetuity. - YouTube

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RkjcJqoeCyw

00:00
the reason why the Newman motor the
00:04
Joseph Newman energy machine is a
00:06
perpetual motion machine is not because
00:10
it routes energy output energy back into
00:14
itself that's one way to define
00:18
perpetual motion but there's another way
00:19
and that is the maintenance of an
00:22
everlasting dipole some people are aware
00:25
of this even some of the naysayers you
00:27
know who don't like the direction that
00:32
certain people like to take electrical
00:35
engineering in you know claiming
00:39
machines that are perpetual motion or
00:42
something along that line but they do
00:44
recognize the dipole and the the need to
00:48
maintain the dipole or not kill the
00:50
dipole well what does Tom Bearden say
00:53
about killing the dipole we have to not
00:56
send current back to the source and John
01:00
Bedini he would say Yeah right
01:02
I do fancy switching well I insert the
01:05
word fancy he didn't use that word I do
01:07
switching to prevent the return of
01:10
current to the source I instead send it
01:13
somewhere else
01:16
intelligent switching so but I've got
01:20
another definition of my own by studying
01:22
mice ltspice simulations of my attempt
01:26
to approximate joseph Newman's inner
01:28
energy machine and that is this the
01:31
magnet and the rest of the circuit the
01:34
spinning magnetic field and the rest of
01:36
the circuit are two separate circuits
01:39
that are isolated from each other you
01:41
know just like an isolation transformer
01:43
stands in between two circuits there is
01:45
a reason for that well sometimes it
01:48
comes in handy it does a a good thing
01:50
and in this case what ends up happening
01:53
is that you get a preponderance of
01:55
amperage accumulating at the spinning
02:00
magnetic field and a preponderance of
02:02
voltage at the battery pack which
02:06
already you know Newman uses a high
02:09
level of voltage - any amperage to speak
02:11
of you know a little 9 volt
02:13
batteries strung in a series to create
02:15
300 volts you know but very little amp
02:18
hours you would expect that kind of
02:21
arrangement to become depleted very
02:24
rapidly you know in a matter of minutes
02:26
but they don't because he's supplying
02:28
amperage from the spinning magnetic
02:31
field and so here we have a dipole but
02:34
not the kind of dipole that we would
02:36
normally think or be told is in other
02:39
words pause the voltage at one terminal
02:42
at one pole and negative at the other
02:45
now here we have well we have something
02:49
similar but it's more sophisticated in
02:51
its understanding because when you have
02:54
amperage at one side and volts at the
02:56
other don't you have you know one
02:59
polarity of volts at that other end
03:01
versus the amperage side in a sense you
03:05
do but not exactly it's a little
03:10
different and it's actually very elegant
03:13
but what Joseph Newman has done by
03:16
putting amperes at one end embodied
03:21
within this rotating magnetic field and
03:24
putting volts at the other embodied
03:26
within the string of 9-volt batteries
03:28
he's literally created a dipole and
03:31
because he's isolated the two and
03:34
maintain their isolation he literally
03:37
has a perpetual motion machine machine
03:41
not because he routes energy back into
03:43
the source from the output but because
03:46
he maintains a dipolar not because the
03:48
dipole are the two extreme polarities of
03:51
voltage but the extreme polarity of
03:55
voltage versus amperage this is uncanny
03:59
I've never heard anybody talk about
04:00
maintaining the dipole or don't kill the
04:03
dipole in this respect this is like way
04:06
out of the norm yet my simulation points
04:09
this out that's one of the salient
04:10
features of my simulation is that we've
04:13
got my latest simulation is GT forward
04:17
slash Newman numeral 15 jpg as a JPEG
04:24
you know file or
04:26
a FC the LTC for the ltspice programming
04:31
the software file the text file that
04:33
will bring up the circuit you know
04:35
Newman 15 JPEG or Newman 15 ask ASC is
04:42
dgg IIST a GD /y for that
04:46
those are bring up the two files that I
04:48
have over at my archive.org posting of
04:53
chapters six of Newman's book along with
04:55
a few other pages from the eighth
04:58
edition that have to do with some hints
05:01
on building your own Newman motor I mean
05:04
Newman have figured out well he's not
05:05
gonna Pat my stuff the thing so he might
05:07
as well tell people how to build it
05:10
which Geoffrey Miller over it energy bat
05:13
calm energy be a t-dot-com has done over
05:16
in Philadelphia Pennsylvania anyway for
05:20
quite a number of decades so the
05:22
simulation points out a very unique
05:24
dipole now why I say this you know I've
05:28
noticed this before the amperage is up
05:30
in the Killa amp range you know around
05:33
five killer amps I believe and the
05:36
voltage of course is well 300 volts from
05:40
the battery pack so I say this because I
05:43
was attempting to make modifications
05:45
further improvements you know adding the
05:47
neon bulb was good putting in the
05:50
capacitor is good tweaking the values of
05:53
all the components such as reducing the
05:55
inductance on the spinning magnetic
05:57
field is good right I tried to go
06:01
further I tried to short out the two
06:05
dipoles because I figured well if I
06:07
blend them and then you know tie them
06:11
together and make them that one lead and
06:14
then ground is the other and put a load
06:17
in between or actually no put a
06:19
capacitor in between and then connect a
06:21
load in parallel to the capacitor maybe
06:24
something will happen and something did
06:26
happen I drained the battery pack at the
06:30
rate of five killa amps in other words I
06:33
United the two dipoles and of course
06:36
that's not over unity that just means
06:37
I'm during
06:38
the battery pack a whole lot faster than
06:40
before because before it was one and a
06:42
half million drainage on the battery
06:45
pack and negative no less but in this
06:48
case who was five kill amps positive
06:50
because that's what the killer killer
06:52
amps are at this spinning magnetic field
06:56
it's positive it's not negative so I
06:59
wasn't doing myself any good and but I
07:02
did manage to point out to myself what I
07:07
was already beginning to suspect that
07:09
Newman has invented a new definition of
07:12
the dipole and a new definition or a new
07:15
protocol and how to go about maintaining
07:17
that dipole and it's just uncanny he's
07:20
the more I study Newman you know here's
07:23
this country bumpkin
07:24
you know simple-minded guy who never
07:27
made made it beyond you know a grade
07:30
school education or something but he's
07:32
got street smarts he knows how to make a
07:34
living you know inventing things
07:36
unfortunately it was politically not
07:38
correct to come forward with this
07:40
invention of his it's really a teaching
07:42
tool well at the moment that's all it is
07:45
certainly doesn't have any marketability
07:47
since and nobody wants to market it
07:49
because it's against you know public
07:52
policy to market anything like this but
07:55
it does teach and it teaches very well
08:00
in a very simple way yet these are basic
08:03
fundamental principles that are not
08:06
easily taught unless they are taught
08:08
within the vehicle of a simple ideas
08:11
such as newman's energy machine is no
08:14
other way to learn it I mean I'm not an
08:15
electrical engineer and even still if I
08:17
were I wouldn't be open minded anyway so
08:20
either way it doesn't matter whether
08:22
you're a protagonist or an antagonist
08:25
either way it's going to be difficult to
08:27
learn this stuff because it's not part
08:29
of our social matrix of thinking it's
08:32
not there in our culture and that's well
08:36
yeah because there was so much
08:38
incredible resistance against Newman
08:40
popularizing his machine because it does
08:43
give a mechanical advantage you know
08:46
it's not what I was trying to do was to
08:48
see if I could convert the thing into an
08:50
electrical generator and I
08:51
there's no way to do it because you have
08:53
to isolate the amps from the vaults and
08:55
by doing that it's worthless as an
08:57
electrical generator but it is not
09:00
worthless as a mechanical generator of
09:03
torque it's superb at creating torque
09:07
mechanical torque now I was reading on
09:11
ltspice models of motors and what I
09:15
suspected you know was shared by the
09:17
person who was you know the various
09:18
articles talking about modeling and
09:20
ltspice a motor because ltspice doesn't
09:23
allow you to model it but you can do the
09:25
equivalent and this guy did come up with
09:27
an equivalent model and he was saying
09:29
that voltage is equivalent to torque and
09:31
current is equivalent to speed and that
09:35
doesn't surprise me I learned that's it
09:37
that was in a spiritual textbook that I
09:39
read several decades ago the torque
09:41
versus speed are inversely related to
09:44
each other and then it's easy to see oh
09:45
yeah well voltage is pressure that must
09:47
be torque and you know it's just a
09:49
little thinking doesn't take much you
09:51
know to figure out the equivalence well
09:54
this guy modeling ltspice motors
09:57
electric motors was saying the same
09:59
thing so when you look at Newman's
10:02
energy machine we see torque on the one
10:04
side that's one diet guide pole and
10:06
speed on the other but we don't make use
10:09
of the speed because that's the magnetic
10:11
flux of the spinning magnetic field what
10:15
we make use of is of it is its influence
10:18
it's indirectly influence across a
10:21
magnetic boundary or gap between itself
10:25
and the mass of copper coil that Newman
10:28
keeps boasting is the sole source of all
10:30
the energy in his machine which is not
10:32
true it's a pickup coil it's functioning
10:35
as a magnetic pickup coil just like you
10:37
would have a magnetic pickup device on
10:39
an acoustic guitar you know playing on
10:43
stage and you send a signal to the
10:46
amplifier to amplify that signal but
10:48
it's you've got a pickup coil on the
10:50
instrument in question or you may have
10:52
it on the strings themselves picking up
10:55
the vibration of the strings and turning
10:57
them into magnetic signals in any case
10:59
that's what his massive coil is doing

[boguslaw]

Sorry, I'm not on track with this topic but my intuition tells me that Newman machine is just a bigger version of Richard Willis first prototype (or rather Richard Willis incidentally constructed his first prototype in fashion similar to Newman machine). Try to find photos and compare, you will have very big help for successfully building Newman generator.

[Vinyasi]

Don't kill the dipole of amps vs volts

Here's a new twist to that famous quote of Tom Bearden...

What if a perpetual motion machine requires that we separate high amps paired with low volts on one side of a circuit - whose division is maintained by an isolation transformer or its equivalent - while on the other side of this divider is the opposite condition: low amps paired with high volts?

This is what Joseph Newman has managed to do: he puts high volts in the battery pack and reduces the amps down to a very low negative value, while also demonstrating high current with low voltage in the rotating magnetic field of his spinning permanent magnet.

The massive copper coil is not the source of energy for his device. It makes isolation, described above, possible.

This is what analysis of my simulations of Newman's device shows me: +60 kilo amps RMS at the rotating magnetic field versus +300 DC volts at the battery pack. Additionally, the battery pack exhibits a little over one milli amp of negative current. The spinning magnetic field requires a mere +255 micro volts injected into the coil to sustain this condition (although only -180 micro volts RMS manages to exit that energy source despite its input of +255 uV). That's a dipole of sorts. Not what has been repeated around for several years, now, as coming from the lips of Tom Bearden (I don't know; maybe he, or someone else, has said this already?).

BTW, I do RMS a little differently then the norm. I take the sign value of the average and attach that to the absolute valued RMS.

And then when I tried to kill this dipole by shorting it out, you know what happens? I get a huge positive (not negative) draw of amps at the battery pack equal to the amps in the spinning magnetic field of the rotating bar magnet/s. Such a condition would surely kill off the amp-hours of that puny string of nine volt batteries in a heart beat. That's why there is the need for isolating the two halves of his circuit from each other: to maintain their distinct differences so as to perpetuate the functionality of his device.

http://is.gd/newman15jpg

http://is.gd/newman15asc

PS,
I eliminated the self-shorting of the coil during the last 20% of each duty cycle due to it isn't needed anymore now that I have a capacitor in parallel with the coil/s and a neon bulb alongside of the capacitor. Taking away the self-short actually produces a mild gain! And besides, the only purpose for that self-short was to reduce arcing at the commutator. That has already been accomplished by Newman's suggestion, posted in later editions of his book, to use a parallel capacitor for this very purpose. I think the neon helps the capacitor do its job so efficiently, that the self-short gets in the way of optimization.

[Vinyasi]

Doing the RMS thing....

I don't fully understand RMS versus averaging of voltage and amperage across an electrical component. So, I did the best I could in this latest variation of my attempt to simulate Joseph Newman's energy machine in LTSpice...

http://is.gd/newman15jpg

http://is.gd/newman15asc

And here's a short video on it...

https://youtu.be/qWjcHXuBpxs

[Vinyasi]

Recharging the Batteries with Sufficient Negative Voltage & Minimum Negative Current

This was a flawed simulation which is evident in the zero input of V(in).

The following attachment and videos are corrected and enhanced with a higher RPM and the addition of a neon bulb making possible the reduction of the simulated magnet's input voltage to a wee 255 micro volts using a mere 700 pico henries to transfer its spin energy to the coil. The total input from the spinning magnet is a mere 8 watts to succeed at negating the amperage on the battery pack.

Despite this latest simulation requires a tightly coupled spinning magnetic field and the coil, it may be possible to build this using the design exhibited in the attachment below along with the latest videos.

LTSpice file ...

https://archive.org/download/TheEnergyMachineOfJosephNewmanChapterSix/TheEnergyMachineOfJosephNewmanV11-TightlyCoupledWithNeonBulb.asc

Hosted at ...

https://archive.org/details/TheEnergyMachineOfJosephNewmanChapterSix

Search for my videos on this simulation

Discussing this topic at the Straight Dope forum inspired me to alter this simulation to have more negative voltage on the coil so as to facilitate recharging of the batteries. I have to stop focusing on producing a mere negative current on the batteries if I want them to charge. So, I upped the magnitude of voltage to the absolute value of the batteries plus ten percent times negative one.

Recharging the Batteries