Open discussion for projects on this forum.

[citfta]

Good one Ernst!!

How true you have spoken.

I guess every forum has to have at least one. I think we have more than our share.

Though sometimes I really feel like this:

It does appear that more and more people are starting to catch on to our main attraction though. I see fewer and fewer people standing up for him.

Thanks for your insightful comments.

Take care,
Carroll

[Ernst]

LOL!
You are not open minded enough, bistander!
If you want to create magical apparatus, you should not go to school, not read up on classical physics and not listen to anyone (who you can not understand anyway). Just use your imagination and fantasy and find new uses for old words, talk about vortices (important!), voidance, dimensions, counterspace and spend most of your time elaborating on how wrong established science is and attack all who seem to defend it.
You will have to think out of that box (that one containing your brain) and post thousands of post on forums like this showing of your complete incompetence.
Then, and only then the muses of electrical engineering will come down and filleth thy ears with insanity which thou shalt speaketh until the end of days.




Ernst.

[bistander]

Understanding electricity

...
But of course!!...if the Supply keeps up with the Demand of Currents they would be identical.

You are talking about a circuit which runs stabilized based on source-demand of currents spending goes...the following example in Automotive below is NOT, so, every time we start our vehicles, the current drop is huge at battery, while voltage drop is just Millivolts and as we run down the car, it re-charges back the battery as it takes over majority of vehicle electrical spending.

So, I will put a basic and simple example:

Say you have a Diesel Truck, eight cylinders, which have approx about 900- 1200 psi of pressure on each cylinder...you need to "crank it" to start it up, but it do not starts...now your battery may show a full 12V with a regular V meter, NOT a LOADING Battery Meter to check load!!...but at the time to start the starter motor won't do it...it just do not have the "JUICES" which are called Amps, or Currents, Or Intensity to be able to crank those Eight Pistons at 1200 psi each...which means it have exactly the required V but not the amperage to do the job.

Say Battery was supposed to have 1200 Cranking Amps...but it only have half...600...so can not do it, unless the guy get a parallel boost or charge it overnight.

However, if everything would be fine, the truck driver would turn key and go, start up...at that precise moment of start up the Battery is VOMITING very close to those 1200 Amps, say 900 to 1000. And where did they go?...now tell me they "just" returned "intact" back to battery...because if so...they would never require a whole AND full Battery re-charging system installed "full time" in every vehicle....What did that Heavy Duty Starter Motor cranking those eight cylinders burnt in High Mechanical Torque, plus heat?

Did it loose just Volts?...really?

Then why this Diesel Truck Alternator needs to be such A BIG HIGH AMPERAGE HOG?...and trying to replace it with a 4 cylinder small VW Golf Alternator will never do that job?...BOTH ALTERNATORS GENERATE 12VOLTS...SO WHY CITFTA?

NOPE, I WON'T, I meant exactly what I WROTE,... AMPERAGE, CURRENTS, INTENSITY.

And do NOT come here talking about "WATTS"!!


Ufopolitics

Dear Ufopolitics,

I read the above quote from you and find your misconceptions and lack of knowledge to be very deep. I feel it is so bad that neither Citfta nor I can be expected to attempt to correct you or educate you on basic electricity. You need professional help. If you wish to continue with electrical apparatus design, research or work of any kind in the field, please enroll in an educational program (school or institute) where they offer a certified program in basic electricity and introductory electronics and maybe further courses in electric machinery.

Sincerely,

Bistander

[Ufopolitics]

Hi Ufo,

In English, tooth is singular and the plural is teeth.

Or are you making your own rule here also?

Regards,

bi

Thanks for correcting me there...I will fix it, do not want to confuse Hanon with my terrible English!!

Well, you know that is my weak point...the singular and plurals in the English Language.


Thanks


Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

I've been scolded for disrupting threads by getting after Ufopolitics incorrect and erroneous statements.* So I thought I'd bring this observation over to this thread.

Ufo claims to be an educated engineer but his statements concerning the way electric current is used up, "burnt", "wasted", and "never returns" in a circuit obviously demonstrates a lack of understanding of very basic principles of electricity on his part.**

@Ufopolitics:* You need to revisit Basic Electricity Fundamentals.* Circuit analysis and Kirchhoff's Laws for Current and Voltage would be a big help to you; necessary IMO.

I've seen a lot from Ufo which was difficult to understand (to say the least), but this is unbelievable.**

Regards,

bi

Edit *, **, I've been trying to post this all day. Something screwy with the forum or connection. No idea why it stuck in all the *

Bistander,

I thought that post belong to Citfta...and not from you?

Did You forget to change ID Member Names before posting here?

Anyways I will answer to Citfta, not to you, since was him who posted the above correction.

As you can see I am very "organized"..


Regards


Ufopolitics

[bistander]

Tooth-Teeth

Hello Hanon,

Commutator Bar is just fine, I call it Commutator Element, some people call them Commutator Tooth (Plural, referring to all) or Teeth referring to just one (singular)...other call them Commutator Contacts, etc,etc

Hi Ufo,

In English, tooth is singular and the plural is teeth.

Or are you making your own rule here also?

Regards,

bi

[bistander]

Current

Post # 1140, Thread:** Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera*
...
(Now, I will repeat what I have explained before, Figuera writes on Page 5:* )

Como se ve en el dibujo la corriente una vez ha hecho su oficio en los diferentes electroimanes vuelve al generador de donde se ha tomado;*

*

As it is noted on the drawing, once current has done its job on all the electromagnets returns to generator, where it (current) was taken from;

This whole sentence above... I find it completely wrong, nonsensical and absurd ...the current, once that it passes through all resistors, then through all electromagnets in his drawing...never, just "returns" back to the generator.

That specific current, in just a full cycle running through those 13 resistors and 14 electromagnets, never, but I mean never, ever, could just "return back" to generator, like if there were no losses at all..


In reality, current never "returns", and contrary to that there would be a very high demand from "where it was taken from" (generator, external source)...instead of any return at all.

...

One amp would get burnt in a matter of seconds by going through all those resistors and coils in less than a full cycle of that brush!!!

...

Ufopolitics

I've been scolded for disrupting threads by getting after Ufopolitics incorrect and erroneous statements.* So I thought I'd bring this observation over to this thread.

Ufo claims to be an educated engineer but his statements concerning the way electric current is used up, "burnt", "wasted", and "never returns" in a circuit obviously demonstrates a lack of understanding of very basic principles of electricity on his part.**

@Ufopolitics:* You need to revisit Basic Electricity Fundamentals.* Circuit analysis and Kirchhoff's Laws for Current and Voltage would be a big help to you; necessary IMO.

I've seen a lot from Ufo which was difficult to understand (to say the least), but this is unbelievable.**

Regards,

bi

Edit *, **, I've been trying to post this all day. Something screwy with the forum or connection. No idea why it stuck in all the *

[marathonman]

I haven't really followed Smith that much. i did attempt a replication but was not successful.
i am really into the Figuera device and have devoted the last three years to this. the only reason i know so much is because an individual that has a 5 kilowatt working system (1908) shared a lot of information with me. i had a two core jobber that put out 300 watts with 100 in but was not a self runner as i was using resistive wire and had no core which to store inductive kickback from the receding electromagnet. i have since learned a great deal about part G but have stalled in my final build from financial devastation.
my attempt to pass on this information has failed miserably and resulted in massive flaming on ou and i don't have the energy or the desire to continue this road.

i know in my heart the figuera device works, even proven by William Hooper 70 years later. how i am going to prove it with no money and half a build i haven't a clue. all i know is the rest of my life will be devoted to the final build and the spread of truth.

it's not much, maybe not even to cents worth but it is what i believe in.

MM

[Dave45]

Hubbard was on to something but greed as with most won out, we dont know what we would truly do in that situation. Its best not to get into that position, open source.
Look at Searls magnetic device and the Hubbard device, one uses permanent magnets ond the other coils but they both have the same geometric layout.
hubbard did it.

[boguslaw]

[Sputins]

I am convinced structure is the key to free energy.
We are trying to find an infinite power source to tap into and i believe that source to be the planets magnetic field.
A pattern reoccurs over and over in my search its the hexagonal structure and i beleive this to be the geometric organization of the earths magnetic field.

[Dave45]

https://www.webelements.com/iron/crystal_structure.html

Iron structure

[Dave45]

CRYSTAL AT THE CENTER OF THE EARTH: Anisotropy of Earth's Inner Core
Looks like bee's are very sensitive to the magnetic field.

[Dave45]

Learn research learn

https://www.nde-ed.org/EducationResources/CommunityCollege/Materials/Structure/metallic_structures.htm

[Dave45]

Even the crystal lattice used in solar panels us this geometric pattern https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crystal#