Use for the Tesla Switch

[Bit's-n-Bytes]

At last a photo of the par. to series charger according to Stevan's plans.
I used only 5 large transistors and 4 shotkey diodes.
The charging is impressive.

Very nice Vissie.

Jeff

[nvisser]

At last a photo of the par. to series charger according to Stevan's plans.
I used only 5 large transistors and 4 shotkey diodes.
The charging is impressive.

[StevanC]

Jeremy,
I will come back wen i read it.


Yes i allways look at "what _can_ be done, not what is _supposed_ to happen"


I looked this way when I first cosidered building this device, and I really appreciate You find it done right way/ right thing.

Kind thanks,
Stevan C.

QOTD:
" A Plan for the Improvement of English Spelling
by Mark Twain

For example, in Year 1 that useless letter "c" would be dropped
to be replased either by "k" or "s", and likewise "x" would no longer
be part of the alphabet. The only kase in which "c" would be retained
would be the "ch" formation, which will be dealt with later. Year 2
might reform "w" spelling, so that "which" and "one" would take the
same konsonant, wile Year 3 might well abolish "y" replasing it with
"i" and Iear 4 might fiks the "g/j" anomali wonse and for all.
Jenerally, then, the improvement would kontinue iear bai iear
with Iear 5 doing awai with useless double konsonants, and Iears 6-12
or so modifaiing vowlz and the rimeining voist and unvoist konsonants.
Bai Iear 15 or sou, it wud fainali bi posibl tu meik ius ov thi
ridandant letez "c", "y" and "x" -- bai now jast a memori in the maindz
ov ould doderez -- tu riplais "ch", "sh", and "th" rispektivli.
Fainali, xen, aafte sam 20 iers ov orxogrefkl riform, wi wud
hev a lojikl, kohirnt speling in ius xrewawt xe Ingliy-spiking werld."

[StevanC]

@scratchrobot,
I have to admit, i barely see anything on the scopeshots You posted?

Could You please play with light some more (please?), and replace the photos?

I have strong reasons to believe You have missed the difference (i might be wrong here) as it is subtle and I can't realy tell on Your photos?

?

Stevan C.

[jerdee]

basically the cap being filled is at a higher potential than the battery and is connected in a standard way: plus to plus and minus to minus. Even the transistor/SCR/etc is hooked up the way you would expect for conventional flows...

[scratchrobot]

@scratchrobot,
now try a biigger cap (47n 100n)?

Stevan C.

Today I tried 47n, 470n and 1uf cap's but I don't see a big difference.

47n 470n 1u

Also did something else to reduce the input pulse and now I have 1 Amp in and 3 Amp out

1 Amp to 3 Amp

I also think I can increase the pulse rate now, wil try tommorow.

scratchrobot

[StevanC]

Jea Jeremy,
what's considered "inverted" in an inverted circuit?
how culd a newbee tell?

Stevan C

[Shamus]

Hi Jeremy,

Thanks for that, lots there to think about for sure. BTW, you mentioned that the switch was not inverted on JB's cap pulser patent, is it the same for the PPA and circuits shown in "Free Energy Generation"? Looking at what's labeled as an "Inverted Potential Switch" looks to me to be pretty conventional--basically the cap being filled is at a higher potential than the battery and is connected in a standard way: plus to plus and minus to minus. Even the transistor/SCR/etc is hooked up the way you would expect for conventional flows...

It's been bothering me for quite some time but you're the first person I've ever heard address the issue. Thoughts?

[StevanC]

JeremyB,
thank Your for Your informative post.

While I admit it's way over my head, I will try to study Dollard, as much as I can.

Would we be closer with 30A/5usec?

Stevan C.

[StevanC]

I shunted the LED's and they look brighter now, the output also went up from 2 to 3 Amp's
I don't know if it was there before but I see a negative backwards spike now

[ATTACH]5342[/ATTACH]
Video


scratchrobotStevanC

@scratchrobot,
now try a biigger cap (47n 100n)?

Stevan C.

[jerdee]

Leading Edge Transitions become very important!!

And guess what I found?
I can get higher battery voltage swing, by changing just the slope of the leading edge.
shot.

Stevan and all,

Do this simple experiment! Take a A/V diode plug configuration off a open ended coil to low impedance load. Tune base of coil using an FG. Don't worry about matching impedance at this point. You'll notice that you will hit series resonance with the load...by how sharp the Q is an voltage magnification across load. Q is increased when no more than 60% coil pitch with one layer of wire and no more than 1:1 ratio of diameter to length in size. This coil configuration allows the least amount of self capacity yet maintaining a very sharp longitudinal resonance action. This 1/4 wave becomes Pie/2 times the velocity of light due to the distributed shunt capacity. Very few people know about this special form of a traveling stationary wave. This comes directly from Tesla, Stienmetz and many others!!! Study Dollard!! One way that Tesla did this was through his extra coils! The sharper the transition of the FG at resonance determines the amount electric induction (longitudinal) energy that is reflected in the bidirectional stationary wave. This is the Tesla Wave we are all studying!!! As well as the compound oscillation that Steinmetz was studying! If the load changes...impedance changes...and you will be knocked out of resonance. Play with the loads!!!! Have any of you thought why Tesla had a secondary on his magnifying transmitter? One of the reasons was to have an impedance matching network between the primary and extra coil!!! Hmmm and we all wonder why we can't get the TS to work or JB's systems to work. These type of designs you are building do not work unless you tune to the impedance!!!! This is why so many people fail!!

As you move towards stronger delta changes...you effectively are creating stronger odd harmonics on the open air coil or open path and accelerating the potential. You don't loose resonance!!! This is why JB mentions that this all can be done with very low voltges!!! Think about what a true square wave is! Infinite odd harmonics with instant voltage changes!!! So yes...the stronger the leading edge...the more magnified voltage becomes in longitudinal resonance! We get a great output ratio of return!!! In your case...this allows for a stronger series resonance reflected wave across the battery!! Think stationary wave of a compound circuit in open path!!!!

Every one needs to read "oscillations of a compound circuit" from Stienmentz

Also with this type of wave...the more impedance matching...the more you cancel the transverse component that wants to distort this longitudinal wave and kill the dipole!!! JB strives to make his systems a monopole! Why, one reason is to remove as much of the transverse component from the equation that kills the dipole!!!

If there is anything I can instill in this group. It's that...the information is not hidden or lost!! Just forgotten!!!!

What I'd like to know...is why no one has inverted the switch when dumping the series caps in open path? BTW...this is what is wrong in JB's cap pulsing patent. Am I the only one that sees this?

Back to studying 100 year old books...and throwing out the new.

Hope this helps,
Jeremy B.

[scratchrobot]

@scratchrobot,
I look forward to what You find (scope shots?)

I shunted the LED's and they look brighter now, the output also went up from 2 to 3 Amp's
I don't know if it was there before but I see a negative spike now


Video


scratchrobotStevanC

[StevanC]

@Lero,

I can MOSFETs too :^), if need is such ?

Stevan C.

[ldissing]

HV is the emitter collector breakdown, 55V, 30V, 700V whatever a BJT does stand up against (or not) BJT specific?

Good, we can agree on this one and some others too!

Lero

P.S. I respect you more than you can imagine. You are my hero! Your knowledge of transistors increases every day. Wish I had not disliked analog so much in school.

[StevanC]

@scratchrobot,
I look forward to what You find (scope shots?)