None Electrolytic Splitting Of H2o

[Michael John Nunnerley]

Michael John Nunnerley has been bought off before, in his own admission, on this site , has he been bought off again? The man with knowledge to change the world as we know it, has backed down again? Welcome to Energetics forum the energy suppression forum?

No I have not been bought off, I am still my own person, but have decided to work within a small funded group to get this type of tech: out into the world without sharks wanting to rip off the inventors legs and stop him from running with the invention.

I have given the basics of the way it can be done, there are others such as my e-beam which Alex seems to know how it works and is selling plans

http://www.ems.psu.edu/~radovic/PLW/1963_1_11_Vastola_Carbon.pdf

This is a link to a paper "please note the date" which was so close to making synthetic fuel, the problem was they went about it in the wrong way and was not continued that I know of until I started with it.

The basic concept was right, but the application was wrong, it wasn't until about three years ago that I realised what was needed and took me a year longer to get to a very primative working test model. Even that has changed as it did use a very high vacuum of which Harvey has seen the results of a very bad burn on my arm from a combination of X ray and high RF field.

I had to change from a vacuum to normal atmosferic pressure and still produce the e-beam that I wanted, this has been achieved and does work and I call this the secound generation reactor after the RF reactor. It still uses RF, but also very high voltage to produce the e-beam of very high energy for the reforming of gases and the splitting of the water molecule.

All will just have to be patient, it will be out there in the very near future, but when all the POSSIBLE side effects have been dealt with and building very much simplified.

The one thing that is of concern and that is any approval or certificate that this would need and that is why all the problems will be sorted as near as possible BEFORE it is known how to do it, if not it will die under a pile of papers.

Mike

[Karl]

Michael John Nunnerley has been bought off before, in his own admission, on this site , has he been bought off again? The man with knowledge to change the world as we know it, has backed down again? Welcome to Energetics forum the energy suppression forum?

[Dave45]

Not to change the subject, but if we pull a vacuum on water it pulls the water into a gaseous state could we then expose it to a magnetic or electric field and break it down. A belt driven vacuum pump could be mounted to an engine, then the electronics, run the gas straight to a propane injection system.

[pengrove]

[QUOTE=tutanka;138254]Depend from what reactor you want [/QUOTE

the UV reactor. hows it coming alone? Are you making peroxide yet?

[tutanka]

Ya what happened to the Plasma Reactor plans? Were you guys just all talk or what?

Depend from what reactor you want

[Harvey]

So would changing the frequency of the ultrasonic transducers power supply make the water combustible? See this video water shifts towards combustible here...YouTube - Ultrasonic Nebulizer Array 3000mL per hour Cold Fog Generator WATER BURNS

[$um1]

So would changing the frequency of the ultrasonic transducers power supply make the water combustible? See this video water shifts towards combustible here...YouTube - Ultrasonic Nebulizer Array 3000mL per hour Cold Fog Generator WATER BURNS

[pengrove]

Ya what happened to the Plasma Reactor plans? Were you guys just all talk or what?

[Karl]

Dear Mike,
If you don't have money for build project why don't sent plans to users that want build that project privately without commercial usage? You can sign simply an private agreement with these. Now you return back to work on EB system?? However for your info EB system is been finished!

Hmm, Unfortunately tutanaka I am starting to think you may be correct, the wakening giant that had so much potential is seemingly going back to sleep.
shame

[tutanka]

Alex,

Nobody should have to disclose to the public any
agreements they have with anyone. Even discussing that one exists depending on the agreement can
violate the agreement.

Aaron,
We have different points of view, no one has forced Mike to post in this thread, so if Mike has a problem, any problem, why not say it clearly to those who believe in him. It would be a better show respect towards them because they believe in Mike. I think we should all be more humble in this world. Greetings

[Aaron]

results

Aaron,
Peoples waiting RF system promised some time ago from Mike. That is the point! At today I have read only more words on that fantastic RF system and nothing else. No video no photos.If Mike have changed idea or has signed a private contract should say so. What is the point of posting these pictures now? Seems to play like a cat with the mouse. Should be clear because we're adults and not monkeys. That's my opinion. Regards Alex

Alex,

Nobody should have to disclose to the public any
agreements they have with anyone. Even discussing that one exists depending on the agreement can
violate the agreement.

[tutanka]

Hi Harvey, yes it does look like a helix twist and when it is running it looks even more, that very high sample rate really shows a lot that normally is not seen, "missed between the sample".

This is basic into a dummy load and at very low power, about 9dBm. I must stress this is a square wave, it was just to show what happens when you get two frequencies into resonance with one another, this also applies to my work on the STEAP when you feed two frequencies into a transformer "output transformer", when you get this resonance the current draw goes to a negative zero on the input, but the output voltage goes sky high and that is when you can couple back to source you can get it to run on pure voltage. The current drops also on the RF oscillator as noticed by the cooling fan on my power supply, this I have not measured yet as there is no return path to source.

I must stress here that this demonstration is a hard wired mix, in the RF splitting the mix takes place inside the molecular bonding and thus shattering it.

Do not try mixing frequencies in a sphere, this could evolve into a runaway situation, you have been warned.

Alex apart from not having money to throw at this, design criteria is quite tight and as so is taking a little longer than I planed. This is not the only project I have running, the EB system also is taking my time, but one thing is the principles are near the same.

Mike

Dear Mike,
If you don't have money for build project why don't sent plans to users that want build that project privately without commercial usage? You can sign simply an private agreement with these. Now you return back to work on EB system?? However for your info EB system is been finished!

[Michael John Nunnerley]

Hi Harvey, yes it does look like a helix twist and when it is running it looks even more, that very high sample rate really shows a lot that normally is not seen, "missed between the sample".

This is basic into a dummy load and at very low power, about 9dBm. I must stress this is a square wave, it was just to show what happens when you get two frequencies into resonance with one another, this also applies to my work on the STEAP when you feed two frequencies into a transformer "output transformer", when you get this resonance the current draw goes to a negative zero on the input, but the output voltage goes sky high and that is when you can couple back to source you can get it to run on pure voltage. The current drops also on the RF oscillator as noticed by the cooling fan on my power supply, this I have not measured yet as there is no return path to source.

I must stress here that this demonstration is a hard wired mix, in the RF splitting the mix takes place inside the molecular bonding and thus shattering it.

Do not try mixing frequencies in a sphere, this could evolve into a runaway situation, you have been warned.

Alex apart from not having money to throw at this, design criteria is quite tight and as so is taking a little longer than I planed. This is not the only project I have running, the EB system also is taking my time, but one thing is the principles are near the same.

Mike

[Harvey]

This is the scope shot at 180 degrees out of phase, the first is with the two frequencies very close to the same and the secound is with the split frequency NEARLY in resonance, the third is taken at a very high sample rate to see what is really happening 1Gs/sec.

mike

That third shot almost looks like a helix twist

Are these frequencies operating on an active chamber or are they preliminary tests into dummy loads?

I'm wondering if there will be any capacitance and inductance interaction from the active chamber.

[tutanka]

Over a year ago Tutanka promised us a car running on water. Now he wants to complain about Mike being a couple of months late. When I sat down with Mike in Idaho I was very impressed with his openness and willingness to answer any and all questions we could ask. He never once said he had to leave now or I don't want to answer that. He tried to answer every question and explain as much as was needed every aspect of his project. He was very patient and made sure every question had been answered before he left our group of about 25 or so people.

Tutanka why don't you show us some pictures or videos of your car and then you can say you got it done first. You're making yourself look pretty silly complaining about Mike's progress when you haven't shown us anything but empty promises for over a year.


Carroll

Dear Carroll,
The questions do not have to put me in this moment, this sounds like you should try to justify Mike. The people need answers. Even I can impress you or maybe more like Mike, but would still only words . I want to say first is that Mike has promised to all its RF system, a prototype was to be presented on the day of his birthday but now I have not seen anything. If Mike has signed a contract with any private company and can not disclose the system, just to say it. I've always said that I had an NDA, but maybe you have not read very carefully.