This forum is preserved as a permanent archive. The community continues at eMedia Press.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Stanley Meyer Explained

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • h20power
    replied
    Hi Bussi,

    What I am planning with the 24 volt voltage is only the Darlington trasistor will be connected too the extra battery all other parts of the circuit will get their power from the main 12 volt battery. And with the added circuit you found the 100k and the 10k resistors will be replaced with veryable resistors as if I need to go over/under 1 volt I can do so. Well you should know me by now as I like to run more than two steps ahead

    They say that being one step ahead makes one a genius and being two steps ahead makes one a crackpot, so what does that make me? I just hope the voltages coming from the torque sensing devices have a frequency output that can be easily added to the control circuit. For no one likes to floor it just to go up a hill or when adding passangers or towing a boat. Being a mechanic for over 25 years has it's advantages.

    h2opower.

    Leave a comment:


  • bussi04
    replied
    Originally posted by h20power View Post
    Hi All,

    Now I took a very good look at all circuits and the top one on page 16 is the one we need to use. Looking at #4 circuit the part where it has what looks like a bypass of the controling circuitry is to be a relay or something of the like and is for starting purposes. When you go to start the engine, key in the start poistion, the controling part of the circuit is bypassed and the drive circuit is at full output. After the engine has starte, key in the run position, then it automatically goes to the controling circuitry, and when key is in the off position the circuit is also off. Hope that makes sense to everyone.

    This circuit that Bussi found hooks up to the gate of the Darlington transister. Easiest way to get 24 volts is by adding in a motorcycle battery just for the Meyer add-on's. As you can see crashing my computer only slows me down some it does not stop me

    Time to get your projects up and running people as your energy independence is in your hands,

    h2opower.

    Leave a comment:


  • bussi04
    replied
    Originally posted by h20power View Post
    Hi everyone,

    Now in looking at the circuit pdf Bussi posted page 16 seems to be what we need. Now if someone can take a pic of those two circuit diagrams and post it with Meyer's #4 circuit so everyone can have a look at them together that would be great.

    The reason this circuit is so important is I gives a means to control the circuit for use with a ICE without this there is no means to control the voltage to the GP or injectors.

    h2opower.
    Here you are

    greetings,
    bussi04
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • h20power
    replied
    Hi All,

    Now I took a very good look at all circuits and the top one on page 16 is the one we need to use. Looking at #4 circuit the part where it has what looks like a bypass of the controling circuitry is to be a relay or something of the like and is for starting purposes. When you go to start the engine, key in the start poistion, the controling part of the circuit is bypassed and the drive circuit is at full output. After the engine has starte, key in the run position, then it automatically goes to the controling circuitry, and when key is in the off position the circuit is also off. Hope that makes sense to everyone.

    This circuit that Bussi found hooks up to the gate of the Darlington transister. Easiest way to get 24 volts is by adding in a motorcycle battery just for the Meyer add-on's. As you can see crashing my computer only slows me down some it does not stop me

    Time to get your projects up and running people as your energy independence is in your hands,

    h2opower.

    Leave a comment:


  • h20power
    replied
    Hi everyone,

    Now in looking at the circuit pdf Bussi posted page 16 seems to be what we need. Now if someone can take a pic of those two circuit diagrams and post it with Meyer's #4 circuit so everyone can have a look at them together that would be great.

    The reason this circuit is so important is I gives a means to control the circuit for use with a ICE without this there is no means to control the voltage to the GP or injectors.

    h2opower.

    Leave a comment:


  • h20power
    replied
    Thanks Everyone for the helpful advice. So how is everyones projects coming along? As I don't see anyone posting about their projects, remember the clocking only 19 months left now. As for me I need to get the chip Bussi posted and get the voltage amplitude under control, design the injector modifications, and match up some VIC transformers to anything that need them. My PC going down only slows me up a bit as I use AutoCAD to design things. My point is this, the path has been laid out already as just what needs to be done. You nolonger need me to start your own projects towards becoming energy independent. Don't wait for me as I will not be building things for most who have read this thread and I can not even if I wanted to keep with supply and demand for this technology. Each and everyone of you following this thread should already have all the information you need to get things started. If this technology is to have a chance of making it this time around each and everyone of us are going to have to pick up the information given here a run with it. Keep things close to the patent so if you do want to sell anything all will fall under Stanley Meyer's patents which are now in the public domain. Branch out like a McDonalds chain if you fill the need to do so, for the world is counting on us to bring this technology out, not just me. I hope everyone understands what I am talking about.

    h2opower.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tecstatic
    replied
    Originally posted by sucahyo View Post

    regarding secure, it is useless to rely on openbsd firewall if you still use IE or messenger or edonkey behind it. It is something else if you run native app.

    sorry for too much off topic.
    I fully agree.

    In the case of OpenBSD, I'm quite sure the OS is rock solid when connected to the net -- as long as you don't surf.

    Surfing with any browser breaks the security wall when you allow java scripts to be executed.

    Maybe using a virtual machine could solve the same problem, If you get infected, you delete the virtual machine disk image file, take a copy of the original disk image file, and start the virtual machine again. I have not practiced this, but I know some who use this method. But I would still use an extra computer for surfing.

    Another way to save time is to have 3 identical had disks, then you at regular intervals take a raw copy of the harddisk to the oldest copy of the two spare disks. In case of attack you only have to use the newest copy. Supplementing this with backup of work files since last backup, you loose nothing, except the time to restore.

    IMO this is not off topic as long as h2opower looses precious time because of a broken computer.

    Advice saving time avoiding broken computers is IMO as needed as other technicalities in order to reach the final goal.

    Eric

    Leave a comment:


  • sucahyo
    replied
    I guess I hate both in that perspective:

    Linux: I hate their morality of legitimating hack instead of proper fix in order to implement everything
    Windows: I hate having to support OS that is prematurely released
    BOTH: I hate both are aiming to slowdown desktop. And I hate it when everything work so nicely before get broken on new version of OS. Why do they have to break things on new version? Both give new meaning of living at the edge lol.


    Ubuntu team is nice, but what is the point if the OS core and it's application developer morality aim to mimic microsoft? They can not do much. Maybe that is the reason for why there is BSD Ubuntu project...

    BTW, Mac choose BSD over Linux. Still wondering why Google choose Linux...Either way, Droid is much better than Windows Mobile, still can crash though.

    regarding secure, it is useless to rely on openbsd firewall if you still use IE or messenger or edonkey behind it. It is something else if you run native app.

    sorry for too much off topic.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tecstatic
    replied
    Originally posted by sucahyo View Post
    Ubuntu is a bad idea. it often break on upgrade too. I install 6.06 on my office because of this very reason. Good thing I can install new openoffice on old ubuntu version.

    In case of virus, when kido/conflicker attack ubuntu and windows 98 computer are unaffected . In case you want a complete protection from hostile take over, use OpenBSD at the price of no 3D...

    Windows XP with adequate firewall is enough. Just don't use norton.

    h2opower, make sure the shop do not format your harddisk. There is a way to restore your windows without formatting!. Still have to re activate though, 3 times max for one license.
    With all respect 6.06 is no longer security updated, in case you use it for surfing.
    Also the SW update system has been improved a lot since 6.6 days...

    I have used Ubuntu for 4 years, and I can not acknowledge it "often breaks".

    What I have seen is problems with some graphic cards because rewriting of the X window manager.

    I am very satisfied with Ubuntu, I have a M$ computer also, I maybe turn it on 2 times a year.

    While I got problems almost 2 years ago I also tried OpenBSD. An intrusion detection program detected changed binary files. That is why I chose the live CD solution, as life is too short for doing 10+ OS installs a month. The fastest attack was in 4 hours after a reinstall of a hardened OS.

    But I recognize this is also about "religion" which OS to choose.

    But at least for my part Ubuntu works well.

    For the cost of a CD per try, it is easy to see if the live CD of a specific version is compatible and functional with the PC in question.

    And the live CD gets no updates unless you can rebuild an updated .iso image yourself.

    But 2 times a year a new Ubuntu version arrives, always in April and October, e.g ver. 9.04 and 9.10 in 2009.

    -------------------

    I have no trust in the closed source MS Windows, no trust in Google regarding surveillance, they log more than you imagine. During browsing they download scripts to your computer which is capable of doing whatever they want. I know some Internet experts who debugged such a case of very well disguised code which was discovered by coincidence.

    The Google Chrome browser has been tested, and the verdict sounded that it looked more like a root kit than a browser.

    Also recognize some of the most skilled hackers on this planet has got the choice between a well paid job for "them" or several years in prison for hacking governmental computer installations.

    As an individual you are practically out of reach to cope with this much expertise, That is why I recommend a live CD solution.

    Eric

    Leave a comment:


  • sucahyo
    replied
    Ubuntu is a bad idea. it often break on upgrade too. I install 6.06 on my office because of this very reason. Good thing I can install new openoffice on old ubuntu version.

    In case of virus, when kido/conflicker attack ubuntu and windows 98 computer are unaffected . In case you want a complete protection from hostile take over, use OpenBSD at the price of no 3D...

    Windows XP with adequate firewall is enough. Just don't use norton.

    h2opower, make sure the shop do not format your harddisk. There is a way to restore your windows without formatting!. Still have to re activate though, 3 times max for one license.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tecstatic
    replied
    @Farside
    Thanks, I was not aware of the hidden encryption, but my drives are encrypted.

    @h2opower

    The computer for surfing has no hard disk, so no bad code can be installed and "survive" a boot. That is why it needs 1GByte RAM.

    The password on the BIOS is also necessary to prevent exchange of code, if there is a jumper option for reprogramming the BIOS, be sure it is disabled.

    Unfortunately not all PCs have a safe password protection of the BIOS, one of mine has not. So that computer had its BIOS setup destroyed each time it was used for surfing. It works perfectly when not connected to the net.

    All code resides in RAM, so a possible infection is lost when powering down before a new boot.

    The CD is not that easy to "reprogram" especially when the CD drive has no write capability.

    The CD has checksums which can be verified against the published checksums from Ubuntu with the programs "md5sum" and "sha1sum".

    Eric

    Leave a comment:


  • Farside
    replied
    Thanks for that useful post!

    Also check out a package called TruCrypt.
    It will install hidden encrypted partitions on drives and even USB drives.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tecstatic
    replied
    Thank you for the info

    Now allow me for an advice.

    Life is too short to get your work computer infected/read by "them".

    Try to get an outdated computer for running M$ Windows (but not for Linux). It is required though to have 1GByte of RAM, as you run from a Live CD.

    Go to Ubuntu Home Page | Ubuntu and download the desktop live CD, it is a .iso file.
    Burn the .iso file to a CD and boot the CD live on your "new" PC. When booted you are ready to start Firefox and surf immediately. Free SW for free energy

    Download Ubuntu | Ubuntu

    Now you can surf as much as you like, save downloaded files on an USB stick, even run a mail program if you like so.

    If you get infected, just reboot and you are on your way again.
    Be sure to have password on your BIOS.

    Best of all your workstation newer gets connected to the net, so you avoid incidents like this.

    Just my humble opinion after fighting never ending infections for 2 months.

    Eric

    Leave a comment:


  • h20power
    replied
    Originally posted by natone_m View Post
    What wire sizes were you using for the primary secondary & chokes?

    Hi Natone_m,

    I have used from .071-.132 mm on the chokes, from .140-132 mm on the secondary, and from .280-.560 mm for the primary windings. For the bobbins shown on this thread the chokes and secondary use the same size .132 mm and the primary uses .280 mm wire. It is all on a 1/2 inch core made of #61 ferite. I am not sure why the sizes that I use would interest you for if you make any changes with the spacing, core matireal, and/or the capasitor it is to be hooked too everything changes. Meyer's used a 3/4 inch core and his core matireal was different than I am going to use, but I followed how it is to be made in matching all coils inductances to the primary coils inductance. As for the input and output power I will keep that to myself as it does no one else but me any good, but I will share the first one I built was 1.34 v in and 320 v out and that was with a 3:1 turn ratio.

    h2opower.

    Leave a comment:


  • natone_m
    replied
    A better question

    with the vics you've built in the past what was the highest voltage potential you were able to get and what was the input voltage?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X