This forum is preserved as a permanent archive. The community continues at eMedia Press.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Stanley Meyer Explained

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Vortex
    replied
    Trick question

    "How does voltage preform work?"
    Answer: it doesn't.

    have a good day
    Randy

    Leave a comment:


  • itzon
    replied
    [QUOTE=h20power;47288]If you take a close look at this patent you will notice some odd things: Stanley Meyer: Water Electrolysis -- Canadian Patent # 2067735 -- Water Fule Injection System

    One thing that I notice right off is the polarity of the injector itself. The outside is positive, and yet it bolts to the head of an engine which is grounded. So there is a mistake here, for that would just short out.[QUOTE]

    Negative high voltage is just as easy to make as positive HV. If he was using neg HV that would make the block the positive in this circuit.

    [QUOTE=h20power;47288]But if you look at other technologies the water injectors are more like the Kelvin water dropper set up than anything else. The injectors give the water molecule a negative charge by passing it through a positive voltage zone thus polarizing it just as Stanley Meyer says they do.[QUOTE]

    This part doesn't make sense to me. I understand your comparison to the Kelvin water dropper, but the water never contacts the "whatchamacallit" that the water goes through when it gets charged.

    This is why I think he may have used neg HV at the injector.

    Although I agree with most of your theory, I disagree that the electrostatic filter is not necessary. The highest level of contaminates in the water stated in the SMTB is 40 PPM. That ain't my tap water for sure. I think its going to take some fairly pure water to keep from arcing in the narrow gap of the injector.

    The cat's nearly out of the bag.

    Itzon

    Leave a comment:


  • rdmwc
    replied
    voltage creates electric fields which are electric forces, which push and pull charged objects.

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest
    Guest replied
    Sorry "Master Professor" Tad Johnson(oops, I meant H2O)!

    Leave a comment:


  • h20power
    replied
    First wrong answer keep trying everyone, never be afraid to fail for it's the only way we truly learn. What I am looking for is an answer that science tells us how voltage preforms work, it is not something that can be found in Stanley Meyer's patents and/or books. But Meyer does tell that it is a physical process, that is a "hint" to the correct answer.

    You and some others fall into this category as it relates towards me, the enemy of my enemy is my friend. But I bare no hostility towards all of you, hope you all feel the same way.


    h2opower.
    Last edited by h20power; 03-01-2009, 10:50 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest
    Guest replied

    Leave a comment:


  • h20power
    replied
    Good information as too knowing your foe

    This video shows a very big player that all of us working on water for fuel technologies and all free energy devolopement for that matter is our collective enemy: Merchants of misery

    Know your foe.

    How to ask a question? Here is a video of a fellow Marine on how to go about asking questions: What does it mean to be a citizen? Plus much more information that is key to our survival as Americans.

    I am still waiting on an answer on the above question.


    h2opower.
    Last edited by h20power; 03-01-2009, 07:01 PM. Reason: Added in more need to know information

    Leave a comment:


  • h20power
    replied
    A question for all takers

    First to answer chub's question

    Does the internal combustion engine still require an inlet valve with carburettor if all of the 3 gasses are injected via the fuel injector? Out of what kind of material do you expect the engine block/pistons to be made of? With oxygen at a higher energy state, it will surely oxidise the iron much faster.

    What kind of cheap alternative engines would be suited for testing?
    First question the answer is yes, for the engine has too breath, you can not have an engine run by having it suck air through a straw.
    Second question what materials do I think things should be made up? The intake system aluminium or plastic, the pistons aluminium, and the block cast iron. Yes the iron surely might oxidize, but it should be coated with oil from the oil ring on the piston and that will give it great protection from the oxygen. All Aluminium parts will build up an oxide that will protect it, and plastic will not react with it. The role of the water fuel injectors was to bypass any vehicals fuel system so they could be retrofited to use water as a fuel source. The best engines are rotary and all aluminium or having ceramic in them. I will PM you with more information about fuel systems.

    Now this question goes out to everyone reading this, be it Dankie, Gauss, OUstupid, and anyone else found on planet earth. I will explain the importance of the answer to the question on a later date. But I want everyone to use their brains to try to answer this question.

    "How does voltage preform work?"


    Stanley Meyer says people have to ask the right questions, and is a right question for understanding this question leads to understanding of how it all works.

    I will be waiting to see if anyone can answer this question, and on a later date I will answer it if no one else can and explain it's importance.

    On another note I was very tired when I wrote about the injector so I will add more infomation in there when I get a chance. So, sorry if I left anything out.


    h2opower.

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest
    Guest replied
    Thanks Chasson, finally someone who assists me!

    Exactly what I said about 10 times, he does some HHO inside the water mist ie 0.1% of total mix. That is the negative charge to mate O4+ with.

    About the VIC, everyone should realize they need professional winding help for that.

    Good luck!


    Originally posted by chasson321 View Post
    Thanks h2opower!!!

    For all who doubt its time you did your homework.

    Patent PCT/US91/03476 would be a good place for everyone to start.

    Notice how it begins in paragraph 2, 3 and 4. He cites his older patents,
    4936961, 4826581 and co-pending patent serial no. 07/460859. Though these patents might hold some understanding to processes they are nonetheless old news.

    Now read paragraph 5:

    The invention of this present application represents a generational

    improvement
    in the methods and apparatus useful in the utilization of

    the water as a fuel source. In brief, the present invention is a

    microminiatureized water fuel cell
    and permits the direct injection of

    water, and its simultaneous transformation into a hydrogen containing fuel, in

    a combustion zone, such as a cylinder in an internal combustion engine, a jet

    engine, or furnace.


    Page 7 of this patent also tells you what is put into the injector. Starting on line 10 In the zone(s), there is produced an "excited"... line 11 mixture of vaporized water mist, ionized gases and other line 12 non- combustible gases all of which have been instantaneously line 13 released from under high pressure.

    Thanks again h2opower for showing us the next generation of water fuel.

    Leave a comment:


  • chub
    replied
    Originally posted by h20power View Post
    If you take a close look at this patent you will notice some odd things: Stanley Meyer: Water Electrolysis -- Canadian Patent # 2067735 -- Water Fule Injection System

    One thing that I notice right off is the polarity of the injector itself. The outside is positive, and yet it bolts to the head of an engine which is grounded. So there is a mistake here, for that would just short out.
    Thanks for pointing that out h2Opower.

    From the patent of the fuel injector:

    Figures 2A, 2B and 2C illustrate a type of injector useful, inter alia as a fuel source for a conventional internal combustion engine. In the cross-section of Figure 2A, reference numerals corresponding to identifying numerals used in Figure 1 show a supply line for water 1 leading to first distribution disc 1A and supply line for ionized gas 2, leading to second distribution disc 2A. In the cross-section, the supply line for non-combustible gas 3 leading to distribution disc 3A is not illustrated, however, its location as a third line should be self-evident. The three discs comprise distribution disc assembly 4. The supply lines are formed in an electrically insulating body 10 surrounded by electrically conductive sheath/housing 11 having a threaded end segment 12.
    Does the internal combustion engine still require an inlet valve with carburettor if all of the 3 gasses are injected via the fuel injector? Out of what kind of material do you expect the engine block/pistons to be made of? With oxygen at a higher energy state, it will surely oxidise the iron much faster.

    What kind of cheap alternative engines would be suited for testing?

    Thanks H2Opower

    Leave a comment:


  • h20power
    replied
    Stanley Meyer Water Fuel Injectors

    If you take a close look at this patent you will notice some odd things: Stanley Meyer: Water Electrolysis -- Canadian Patent # 2067735 -- Water Fule Injection System

    One thing that I notice right off is the polarity of the injector itself. The outside is positive, and yet it bolts to the head of an engine which is grounded. So there is a mistake here, for that would just short out.

    But if you look at other technologies the water injectors are more like the Kelvin water dropper set up than anything else. The injectors give the water molecule a negative charge by passing it through a positive voltage zone thus polarizing it just as Stanley Meyer says they do. But the voltage applied is much greater than that of a Kelvin water dropper YouTube - Lec 9 | MIT 6.013 Electromagnetics and Applications, Fall 20 and more like the voltages found in a Taylor cone or Electrospray New Objective : What is Electrospray?
    By applying very high voltages to the water injectors the resulting water mist turns into a plume of ever decreasing size water droplets. Furthermore, electrically charged water droplets that resist coalescing into larger droplets, thereby permitting the water droplets to be mixed more thoroughly with the air.

    Now these highly energized water droplets break down as they evaporate in the air and the voltage divides every time the water droplets splits into smaller water droplets. Table 1 shows just what is needed to explode water making it a fuel source. 1. Water mist. 2. Ionized Gas. 3. Non-Combustible Gas. The high voltage zone is polarizing the water and making it very unstable as a result of too much voltage. The charge is negative so when mixed with the ionized unstable oxygen atoms that has a positive charge the two are attracted to each other. The non-combustible gases are there to retard the reaction thus slowing the burn rate of hydrogen and also lowering the reactions temperature.

    We all know that water is not combustible in our atmosphere, so what the Gas Processor and water injectors do is create an atmosphere in a controlled environment to one that water is combustible in.


    Helping to break the oil addiction in the best way I know how,


    h2opower.

    Leave a comment:


  • h20power
    replied
    Two types of VIC transformers

    Hi Everyone,
    The question came up did I read Stanley Meyer patents? The answer is yes, and I posted it without alteration of any of the words. The all copper VIC in which Stanley Meyer calls it, "VIC voltage circuit," is used for the Gas Processor for it is there that the, "Electron Bounce" phenomena is used.

    The VIC used for the water fuel capacitor is called, "VIC Voltage
    Enhancement Circuit
    " and it goes on to say it is used for the .060 - .010 inch gap of the water fuel capacitor.

    This was taken from the SMTB, and no words where altered or changed in any fashion. But noticing that there are two types of VIC transformers I did and I shared that information with everyone.

    The one thing I did in this thread is to show where the energy was truly coming from to power a 1.6L engine with an hho production rate of only 7L/min. For we all know that is impossible with just hho and hho alone. What wasn't taken into account was the job of the Gas Processor and just what was it doing. When I started this thread no one had even conciderd making the Gas Processor before in all the years after Stanley Meyers death it has never been talked about and/or built. I put science back in the game and did away with talks of magic, but was told that the math and science is meaningless by the same individuals that never even conciderd talking about the Gas Processor in all the years they have been worked on Stanley Meyer's technology.

    I never ask for anything I just gave the technology away for all to have, for like Stanley Meyer I belive in the Bible too, and it says a great gift shall be given unto mankind. Ask yourself, do you pay for a gift that has been given to you? No. That is where Stanley Meyer and myself interpet the Bible differently. He was going to charge $1500 for the technology and I am charging nothing for it is meant to be a gift just as the Bible says it is to be. In all the time since the death of Stanley Meyer has anyone ever talked about there being two types of VIC transformers before or put sense too the use of the Gas Processor? No. I am not asking anyone for anything not a single dime.

    But I am glade that many out there see the value in what I have done, and to them I say, enjoy breaking the chains of energy enslavement for we have lived this way for far too long.

    Thanks everyone


    h2opower.

    Leave a comment:


  • rdmwc
    replied
    well, thanx to h20power, i will have a working gas processor withing 2 months. i have ordered my parts, now im waiting for delivery. i will post my results and possibly pictures when its finished. i will not be using the VIC. I will be experimenting with an alternate source to see if the VIC is absolutely necessary.
    many thanx goes to h20power for bringing this technology to our attention but not just handing it over. I have to say it is much better to be given the general concept or theory of the technology. this way it allows us to use our own brain! wow, just think, we actually get to use that thing on our shoulders!

    Leave a comment:


  • chasson321
    replied
    Pct/us91/03476

    Thanks h2opower!!!

    For all who doubt its time you did your homework.

    Patent PCT/US91/03476 would be a good place for everyone to start.

    Notice how it begins in paragraph 2, 3 and 4. He cites his older patents,
    4936961, 4826581 and co-pending patent serial no. 07/460859. Though these patents might hold some understanding to processes they are nonetheless old news.

    Now read paragraph 5:

    The invention of this present application represents a generational

    improvement
    in the methods and apparatus useful in the utilization of

    the water as a fuel source. In brief, the present invention is a

    microminiatureized water fuel cell
    and permits the direct injection of

    water, and its simultaneous transformation into a hydrogen containing fuel, in

    a combustion zone, such as a cylinder in an internal combustion engine, a jet

    engine, or furnace.


    Page 7 of this patent also tells you what is put into the injector. Starting on line 10 In the zone(s), there is produced an "excited"... line 11 mixture of vaporized water mist, ionized gases and other line 12 non- combustible gases all of which have been instantaneously line 13 released from under high pressure.

    Thanks again h2opower for showing us the next generation of water fuel.
    Last edited by chasson321; 03-01-2009, 01:45 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest
    Guest replied

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X