I see a lot of debate as to whether Bedini style radiant energy offers any true merit.
I'm sitting here playing with my SSG, and looking at diagrams of enhanced circuits wherein additional coils are added, but not energized.
I've also seen videos on youtube of traces of coils putting off juice - while NOT energized.
So, I don't know much, I apologize, but...
I figure if you do a test to see if a bifilar coil can charge a battery, WITH NO CURRENT running through it, that made she some light.
What I mean is, not energized. Induced by magnets, sure.
If I'm not being clear, imagine a windturbine with an permanent magnet alternator wound bedini bifilar style. If the field collapses, and the spikes occur, will they charge the battery, and how effectively? If current isn't doing the work - take the current (supplied) away and let's see what happens.
I'm sitting here playing with my SSG, and looking at diagrams of enhanced circuits wherein additional coils are added, but not energized.
I've also seen videos on youtube of traces of coils putting off juice - while NOT energized.
So, I don't know much, I apologize, but...
I figure if you do a test to see if a bifilar coil can charge a battery, WITH NO CURRENT running through it, that made she some light.
What I mean is, not energized. Induced by magnets, sure.
If I'm not being clear, imagine a windturbine with an permanent magnet alternator wound bedini bifilar style. If the field collapses, and the spikes occur, will they charge the battery, and how effectively? If current isn't doing the work - take the current (supplied) away and let's see what happens.
i'm no expert mind you so i'm probably wrong about the theory but If you want to get the best from radiantly charging batteries they must be conditioned first then the spikes are more readily absorbed. These spikes can come from the diode on the negative of a bifilar coil or both ends of a trifilar coil through a bridge rectifier.
Comment