Tiger's Device 0.150-1Kwt replicant

[MonsieurM]

I thought this would add a little more info:

It was posted by Romo (i hope you don't mind ) and I think it falls in line with what Armagdn03

I have been looking where to fit this information into some of these connective, integrative topics.

Dave, thank you for giving me the oppourtunity to do so.

I have recently scanned a book called "Dielectric breakdown in solids". I hope some of this will be useful for your experiments.

Title page:



As you can see in the table of contents -- I have highlighted some of the topics which simply snagged my attention.

Earlier in the day I was musing over several high voltage phenomena -- and stumbled upon this book by "chance". (I was on autopilot, my focus remaining on the high voltage phenomena -- and I found my feet leading me to the shelf, where the books gold lettering caught my attention)

I would not consider this chance -- that I have found some suggestions and answers to the exact questions which I have desired to understand. Perhaps we can also discuss (elsewhere?) the mental state that al humans can remain in, to "attract" the answers that they seek.

Table of contents:


Thermal Breakdown:



Few things struck me here -- Even higher oscilations than our current electromagnetic spectrum "dampen". Heat is just a wave in the EM spectrum. Higher frequnencies than we can measure can be "recieved" to create EM oscilations. This sounds a lot like tapping into cosmic (read: higher) frequencies with superconductors.

Note: Too quick of alternating currents don't let the dielectric "relax" -- and dissapate heat as waste. Pulse DC too quickly, and it behaves the same as AC. More hints in the book are on this later -- effectively telling me why I need a sharp rise/fall, rapid (microsecond) DC pulse.





When dielectric breakdown ocurrs the "random" breakdown paths, mean that we don't know how to predict where the breakdown goes. Interesting discharge paths in pictures on the left page.

"High frequency" means smaller waves. that tells me that when you have a sharp/fast enough impulse, temperature does not rise as much in the dielectric (wasted energy into heat).

In frohlich's theory...
When the electric voltage potential below the critical value, the "probabillity" of getting "fast electrons" (Electron avalanche = Energy gain). Seeing the energy gain only happens after a critical voltage level has been reached. (Critical voltage level = phase transition into plasma?)

"fast electrons" do not produce heat -- thermal ionization (heat) lags behind.

We should be able to keep the dielectric cold. Cold, means the dielectric is not damaged by thermal decay -- which means we should be able to strike it for repeated energy gains.




AC -- maximum stable temperature
DC -- "infinite" temperature -- as long as it is confined within a small enough space. The average temperature seems normal.





Dielectric becomes a semi-conductor under AC -- Same conditions as DC
The hottest part of the temperature gradient must change more sharply

This tells me what is happening during that unidirectional DC pulse at the apex of the sharp wave gradient.



This confirms (one of many confirmations) what bearden/bedini have been saying about "the spike". When we average values over time -- it seems "normal/linear" -- but during short impulses, we have non-linear situations happening on a small scale.

Theoretically infinite = non linear



Thermal breakdown happens in AC at a "lower value" because the difference between the voltage fluxuations still reach the "critical value" for breakdown to happen.

======================
I see that under conditions of dielectric breakdown -- in discreet unidirectional DC pulses, you create for a fraction of a second -- a plasma, or "superconductor" which receives frequencies at the highest (or above) our current EM spectrum -- Producing a large pulse of energy, and the dampening oscilations ocurring thereafter can produce use-able OU energy.

Dave45, I can find the exact post tomorrow, but 'powerme' suggested a very similar setup to produce dielectric breakdown in a silicon/metglass torrid.

Dielectric breakdown can be induced by only voltage potential -- making that caduceus/pancake coil seem like a good lead.
========================
Will finish posting parts of this book tomorrow.



Glad to be enlightened by other sincere perspectives,
==Romo
========================

Sorry in advance for the long post

[Armagdn03]

MJN posted his circuit earlier where the output (2 x 75 turns) of the toroid/yoke was connected to a center tapped transformer, with the center taps connected to ground. Is this arrangement similar to what you describe?

By pickup coil are you referring to a coil wound on the same magnetic form as the center tap (as per a normal transformer) or a physically seperate coil within the vicinity of the center tap? Thanks for dropping by Armagdn03


Regards

I have no idea what that guy did, or even what a diagram of his thing looks like.

What I do know is that there are ways of stressing the molecular structure of a material (magnetically, dielectrically) which affect the permeability and permittivity of a material. This means that a person can wind a coil (many different ways) which is purposefully not inductively linked to another "pick up" or "secondary" or whatever you may want to call it.

These two coils will share a core, but they will not share a magnetic field coupling

They are tied to the hip instead through the permeability or permittivity of the core.

This is just the tip of the iceberg. If you consider a magnet or ferromagnetic material under influence of a magnetic fiel, treating it like a chladni plate, now you have combined cymatics, or acoustical resonance with the electromagnetic domain.

[Duncan]

no sweat farmhand ,I dont even know what a trolley is a sfor the light MonsuirMs picked up the cuddgle ..and yes Ive seen it before to, not the point at all .. what is, what makes it predominant ...

[MonsieurM]

62 pages of Vladimir Utkin by Patrick Kelly Everything we have been searching

very nice link thanks

[Duncan]

Its like the boys took his finger out of the Dam

62 pages of Vladimir Utkin by Patrick Kelly Everything we have been searching

Thank youanother late night/early morning

[iflewmyown]

The only theory we need ????

http://www.overunity.com/11719/62-pages-of-vladimir-utkin-by-patrick-kelly-everything-we-have-been-searching/msg306053/#new

[Duncan]

http://freeenergynews.com/Directory/...pr-21-2011.pdf

[ren]

Or....

A center tapped coil can have the two ends be one electrical connection with the center being the second.

The magnetic field will flow in two directions through the core. This will cause a reduction in the permeability of the core, yet at the same time will NOT induce a current on a standard wound pickup coil (because half will have EMF induced in one direction, and half EMF in the other direction because of the "center tap" coil).
This means the two coils are not mutually coupled through inductive process, but rather are tied to the hip parametrically, or through the physical properties of the core.

MJN posted his circuit earlier where the output (2 x 75 turns) of the toroid/yoke was connected to a center tapped transformer, with the center taps connected to ground. Is this arrangement similar to what you describe?

By pickup coil are you referring to a coil wound on the same magnetic form as the center tap (as per a normal transformer) or a physically seperate coil within the vicinity of the center tap? Thanks for dropping by Armagdn03

@ Duncan,

I found that video. Watching it again I realized the lines were more dotted so perhaps not what you were referring to. Anyway here it is if you are interested

MVI 3364 - YouTube

Regards

[Duncan]

Through a glass darkly

I like that so much more verbose than my effort!, Yes much better.. (and I use the word Guardedly because its not right but) Impedance matching, would be the word for the Herzian wave. conductance balancing perhaps ? anyway you obviously have it by the throat and can see why TK used that configuration. I suppose EP Dollard could give it units and form but I'll just have to stick with how I see it.
and so we start to see! the HT circuit I suggested earlier was 2 off ignition coils in flip flop so a centre tap could be created . Using a single supply creates a huge miss-match (that's how the information has thundered at me) make of it what you will.

[Armagdn03]

Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel KapanadzeCenter tap - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Just at a glance you know what that circuit does. You know the centre tap is zero volts w.r.t either end of the coil ( you will notice everything here is w.r.t) I would hope with just a little thought you can work out the Phasor diagram of that transformer? Ah but what if everything were to be totally reversed? What if the linear wave was exactly the reverse ? What if the centre tap became power w.r.t either end of the transformer? What if what if
On this page Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

Or....

A center tapped coil can have the two ends be one electrical connection with the center being the second.

The magnetic field will flow in two directions through the core. This will cause a reduction in the permeability of the core, yet at the same time will NOT induce a current on a standard wound pickup coil (because half will have EMF induced in one direction, and half EMF in the other direction because of the "center tap" coil).
This means the two coils are not mutually coupled through inductive process, but rather are tied to the hip parametrically, or through the physical properties of the core.

[Duncan]

Just to make the Boffins cry!

Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

I was contemplating this the other day. It may not be a resonant coil per say but resonance at a different level, quite different from what the natural coil might operate.

Center tap - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Just at a glance you know what that circuit does. You know the centre tap is zero volts w.r.t either end of the coil ( you will notice everything here is w.r.t) I would hope with just a little thought you can work out the Phasor diagram of that transformer? Ah but what if everything were to be totally reversed? What if the linear wave was exactly the reverse ? What if the centre tap became power w.r.t either end of the transformer? What if what if
On this page Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[dragon]

I was contemplating this the other day. It may not be a resonant coil per say but resonance at a different level, quite different from what the natural coil might operate.

[Duncan]

Resonant?

Would anybody like to hazard a guess at what may be resonant for a longitudinal wave? How about if I posed the possibility that it might be exactly opposite?

Something very important for you :

Capacitive Discharge Motor and other free energy files - J Snell

particularly this one http://www.linux-host.org/energy/scarter3.gif

Did you ever thought why there is no OU in normal resonant electronic circuit and why Tesla used a lot of metal balls as capacitances ?????

Let us think clearly for a moment. Assume that OU is possible , why there is no OU in RLC circuit ? For my simple mind something must escape ,sir ! Where can it escape , in what place ? Somewhere there is break, sir ? If there is break like a slop on the hill then energy has to reverse direction or jump over slope, if it jump then capacitance is damaged, if it reverse then it has to stop and speed up in opposite direction. Do you know ANYTHING could do it without time loose and energy dissipation ?
No, sir!

[boguslaw]

Excellent point Bouslaw ! I believe that is why Tesla used "violent unidirectional discharges". His energy sink analogy was simply that, a one way valve that continuously flowed in one direction, converting the energy to another form so it would easily flow or be converted back into it's original source.

Yes,of course, and not only. For example I try to use similiar concept to switch magnetic field flux in no time ! Because I do not switch it he he
I take ferromagnetic atom like iron, I put magnetic flux for it and atom passes it readily using electron spin . Then I take iron nucleus and flip it fast back and forth. Electrons spin is not changed ! But for external observer electrons flip spin apparently to opposite and magnetix flux change poles immediately. At leaast I think that should work in theory. They called it ferroresonance and I call it magnetic flux gating . Yeah, there was many inventors who knew that, not sure how detailed but they manipulated magnetic flux efficiently. Ecklin, Johnson to mention just those two, but the real knowledge had Floyd Sweet (probably he has taken this knowledge from Tesla's associate, maybe Gabriel Kron ?)

[dragon]

Excellent point Bouslaw ! I believe that is why Tesla used "violent unidirectional discharges". His energy sink analogy was simply that, a one way valve that continuously flowed in one direction, converting the energy to another form so it would easily flow or be converted back into it's original source.