The ultimate secret of free energy: Split the postive AND the negative

[Jbignes5]

A reference of interest.

Just read this.. Hmmm...

Magnetic Portals Connect Earth to the Sun - NASA Science

[Slovenia]

Thanks!!

Thanks Dr.!!

Stiffler Scientific

[DrStiffler]

DrStiffler,

Thanks for sharing the circuit.

Your site, www.drstiffler.com, is no longer up. Do you have another site where that information can be accessed? Thanks.

Best Regards,
Slovenia

Stiffler Scientific

[Jbignes5]

Thats because there is a little confusion.

Lets look at the statement. "Split the positive". Does it say negative? Nope. Literally when you look at voltage and potentials there are two components of a positive. The positive voltage and then comes the positive current. Those are the two components of splitting the positive. If one can use the potential and cause a flow twords it then split the current away before that positive voltage balances with the current that is flowing into it then you would be splitting the positive.

It is this very concept that Tesla uses. When Tesla said radiant energy remember he knew little of the medium, he meant potential moves the current twords the conductor that radiated the voltage.

I am betting that the Tesla switch is proof of that concept. It was the result that someone bet him he couldn't get a current flow form from two positive or negative potentials.

[Slovenia]

Thanks

DrStiffler,

Thanks for sharing the circuit.

Your site, www.drstiffler.com, is no longer up. Do you have another site where that information can be accessed? Thanks.

Best Regards,
Slovenia

@lamare
Your idea of modulation was tried a few years back (see the diagram). It was less complicated on balanced coils and did not require an AGC. It proved a concept bu was limited by the design to a few watts.

[DrStiffler]

Electrical Engineer claims breakthrough in free energy research | Before It's News

Please click this up and twitter...

@lamare
Your idea of modulation was tried a few years back (see the diagram). It was less complicated on balanced coils and did not require an AGC. It proved a concept bu was limited by the design to a few watts.

[greenliving]

Welcome, my friend.

You are here because you chose to be here, by whatever reason. Good!

Apparantly, you are looking for some answers. So, here you gotta make a choice.

If you want to know the theoretic foundation to how this stuff works, go here:
Article:Free Electric Energy in Theory and Practice - PESWiki

If you want to get your hands dirty and get something working, then go straight to the jackpot, and find your way frome here:

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/3235-gray-tube-replication-69.html#post109152

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/6227-stan-meyers-secret-preventing-electrolysis-6.html#post109533

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/6227-stan-meyers-secret-preventing-electrolysis-5.html#post108949

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/6227-stan-meyers-secret-preventing-electrolysis-5.html#post109013

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/3235-gray-tube-replication-69.html#post109080

But don't expect a complete schematic or working prototype made by me, or anything like that. You see, I'm just not good at doing that. But I did my homework and you can follow my tracks here and check everything yourself. So, as a qualified Electrical Engineer, I have analysed this stuff and I am fully convinced I found the working principle. So, that would be the secret of Gray, Meyer and Puharich, which originally came from none less than Nikola Tesla. Quite a gift, but it is not my invention or anything. Because of my background I was simply able to finally put the pieces of the puzzle together, so we now know how this stuff is supposed to work, in principle. It's up to humanity to make use of that and you can do that any way you like. No strings attached, no new patents. However, the now expired patents and other information left to us by these three inventors give you all the information you need to fill in the gaps.

So, if you're into the hardware and want to make Tesla's dream come true, the links on top is where you wanna go.

However, if you want to know why Einstein's General Relativity should go to the trash can, what gravity is, or want to know what the Universe really is like, you're welcome to join in for a very interesting ride. If you are in for an adventure, just scroll down, and join in on this thread together with the others that are here. There already are some nice easter eggs to discover, and just like you, I have no idea where this will eventually go. We will just have to wait and see what happens.

So, the choice is yours. And of course, you can also leave right away, if you like.

What I posted here, is really what I think is the truth. However, that is my truth the way I see/saw it at the moment of posting and as you will see, my "truth" changes along my way whenever I find something new to account for. And that's also my motivation for doing this. I just want to know the truth, which is like an oniun. There's always something new to discover, which maybe just what makes life worthwhile. So, take nothing for granted. I cannot decide for you what your truth is like. That's completely up to you to decide, because we have all been given the freedom of choice. So, just go ahead and see what you like and what not.

And most of all: make sure you have some fun on whatever road you choose to go!

If you're curious: this would be my idea of having some fun:
The hack reality howto

Have a nice day, and happy hunting for your truth!



-- Arend Lammertink -- September 1st, 2010.

Oh, one more thing. If you want to do something and have some time to spare, please do consider editing this page:
Article:Free Electric Energy in Theory and Practice - PESWiki


So, if you really want to follow my track, this is where/how things started to come in the right direction, but there were still quite some loose ends and mistakes:

--: August 26th, 2010 :--

Hi all,

Yesterday, I re-analysed Gray's system:

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/6258-resonating-tf-using-bedini-circuit.html#post108329

As you can see in the reduced schematic ( http://www.energeticforum.com/attach...ay_circuit.pdf ) he feeds HF, HV sharp spikes trough two capacitors to the coil to energize. Because of the shape of the spike (fast rising edge, slow falling edge), the capacitor basically functions as a diode, beside coupling the energy trough to the load circuits.

Then I realized that you need to have two identical coils in series if you ever want to be able to induce a useable force in the coils, because otherwise the pulses will cancel each other out.

So far, so good.

Continueing in this line of thinking, the Avramenko plug used by Dr. Stiffler came to mind. If we add this all up, we finally get the ultimate secret to free (electric) energy:

Split the positive AND the negative

Given Bearden's "don't kill the dipole" as explained in my article (under construction) Article:Free Electric Energy in Theory and Practice - PESWiki it is clear that in terms of energy, you can manipulate the electric field for free. So, if you at some point in a circuit are able to pick up the electric field, without drawing current, you can do that for free.

That means if you design your load such that it is completely balanced, you can do what Gray dit much more elegantly. As Stiffler shows in some of his experiments, the AV (Avramenko) plug is a perfect method of "splitting the positive and the negative" in Gray's terms. So, then you basically get to use both edges of the powering signal, albeit that you have do direct them to separate loads.

Putting all this together, it is a matter of feeding a high frequency pulse train trough an AV plug, trough (small) couple capacitors to the oppozing terminals of 4 identical impedances, which can be coils, capacitors, basically anything, including WFC elements. See the attached schematic.

What happens is that the positive edge gets fed trough the capacitors to the positive terminals of Z1 and Z2 in sync and the negative edge gets fed trough the capacitors to the negative terminals of Z3 and Z4 in sync. Hence splitting the positive AND the negative.

If Zx are all power coils with a self resonance frequency of say 5 kHz and the frequency of the pulses is, say 1 MHz, and the voltage of the pulse train is, say 1 V, that means you get 1 kV of real power at the positive terminals of Z1 and Z2 within 1 millisecond, without drawing any current from the "power" line, because it takes relatively a considerable amount of time before the pulses can travel trough the coil, so we get a sort of "step charging" effect inside the coils.

So, if you want to experiment with this: BE CAREFUL. This is an expansion of the basic principle Gray used and he did add his "safety spark gaps" for a reason. If you feed 10 MHz, 10 V pulses to 4 identical coils this way, you are looking at 100 kV worth of power within 1 miillesecond... In other words: this gives you an awesome amount of power!!!




Update: I think the principle can also be used at much lower frequencies if you connect the negative terminals of Z1 and Z2 and the positive terminals of Z3 and Z4 all to signal ground. After all, the net current going trough there is zero, as is the net current coming from the signal wire (which is why this works). Then you should be able to get results with relatively low frequencies, like several kHz for coils or even 10s of Hz for charging capacitors or batteries. What is important is that all impedances are the same. Use identical components for all of them.


Update 2: There's a couple of inconsistences in this post, but the basic principe is correct. Turns out that Z1 and Z2 cannot be capacitors. So, just read on, investigate the material, the links, etc. and you will not be disappointed.


Update 3: Turns out there were quite a few loose ends in what I posted here. So, if you want to go straight to the jackpot, go here:

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/6227-stan-meyers-secret-preventing-electrolysis-5.html#post108949

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...tml#post109013

Wow. This is a very interesting information. Imagine if you can do this. You'll have free energy. Thanks for sharing this information.

[Jbignes5]

Nice example of current.

You are using current and voltage. What we are talking about is only using voltage to form channels for ambient charges or current to flow through. It is what we refer to splitting the positive. But it is a good example of magnetic induction. The magnet raises the potential to a higher level. Now try this one. Have parallel rings with identical setups like you have. Only put a magnet in boost mode on one ring. Then hook a load in between the two halves of that parallel circuits.

Anyone care to guess what will happen? Would the load see a potential difference? Would the amp draw go higher?

Let me know it would be an excellent experiment.

When one splits the voltage from the current the voltage becomes like a vacuum. It makes it very hungry for the charges flow or current and will attract the charges like creating a depression in the space around it. This is like what happens in nature when a low pressure moves across the face of the earth. This low pressure has an abundance of the dielectric in it and has a lower amount of charges in it due to the high dielectric count. This causes the charge heavy areas to flood in a bit from the edges causing a movement from high to low. This is also what is responsible for wind and our weather patterns. Specifically storm activity. With the eye of that being the inlet to a great conduit of charges flowing twords the earth. As the conduit gets bigger it attaches to our core and gets a small spin from it. Giving it great destructive power from it. Of course the sun has a bit with it also but I think that would be obvious. Take from that what you will.

[sebosfato]

check this
YouTube - Magnet effect on pulsed current .m4v

[Jbignes5]

Another obscure reference to ponder.

If we go with the idea that there is an underlying medium, we must also go with the idea that like a turntable that medium is moving or spinning or visa versa. If we take a small ball and drop it onto the surface of the turn table (medium of the universe) and observer that the ball starts to rotate and fly outwards from the center of that disk. In this case the medium is the disk and it should be moving with all matter spinning or rolling on top of that medium.

If you remember that the medium is not directly connected to matter or has flexible connection (virtual) we can see that there would be a slip of the matter as it gets rotated by the medium it is on or in. It could also be postulated that these connections will link and bind to the rotating links of threads when combined with the idea that the magnetic field is oriented 90 degrees from the dielectric field and could be responsible for these threads. This is also based on the idea that the disk in this case is of the dielectric components of all movement in the universe.

This action could also be manifested in the real as what we call a black hole. When junctions of these twisting conduits that links all collections of real masses grow to such a level that they collect matter and energy through a complex drag system. The additional charges it does drag into the connection gets extracted from the matter and sucked into the conduit to the next node or junction. They appear to be connected because they are really connected. But I think this connection which first forms in the center of our universe is all connected to the arms that are rotating in two directions at a time. Like revolving spoke on a wheel. Weather or not we can figure out is the driving of this rotation starts in the extremities of the medium or from the center the process is clear when you look at the action of our universe.

Now you are asking well how does these lines of force or dielectric medium do what they do and spins two ways. Well the medium has two actions one of supplying the rotation and one of moving in a spiral on that disk. This is done by the mere shape of that fundamental particle that gives this invisible realm its ability to enact force on the real. A pyramidal crystaline particle. It gives so many action at once that it can hold itself together like a string of pearls does. Replace the pearls with pyramids and you will start to see my point. Lets say they were magnetic pyramids and used the same dynamics of magnetics but of a monpolistic nature. Just from the shape wh have a difference of magnetic emissions of the shape itself. When stacked end to tip they grow stronger and hold together with relative ease but if one was to twist the pyramid on the end of the string it would motivate the rest of the string to twist albeit in a delayed fashion. Also if one tries to bend the string it would have elastic tensions now and will tend to go back to it's original relaxed state. When two like strings are brought together they would parallel themselves to a relaxed state also.

What happens when a string has a good mix of different sized dielectric pyramids. Well branching is now possible. This is what I like to call a density change and usually self organizes within the length of the string. Branching has two factors that I can tell. Previous conduit capability and availability of the proper sized pyramid at that area. If not enough form or get pulled into the string from what is available at that location it will create two threads but of smaller thickness. This is all governed by this pyramidal shape and the fundamental composition of the particle which I am assuming is a crystal because of the ability of the crystal to channel only voltage when struck. This voltage is the guiding light to charges. Which are fundamentally made up of other smaller medium like particles but with order and never ending movement.

This kinda looks like string theory to me but there is a slight diffence in that the strings (conduits) or loops (charges) also have a disorganized condition or commonly what I refer to the medium in general. This also leads me to believe that charges have two modes to travel in space. On their own accord following a path designated by the larger particles (field,weak) and in the particle itself (current, strong) if they are in fact just geometric shells of a pyramid this would permit the ideas. The pyramid I suggested is actually a Sierpinski triangle - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
If we look in the section of, Analogues in higher dimensions, We find that proof. The particle has an huge surface area with tons of space to allow charges to collect and be sheltered from the flow of the particle in the finner medium. It is self generating from that flow and easily exchangeable with the density that it is flowing in. I think that the blue pyramid is actually the shot of the charges that are in the red pyramid but there is still some doubt in my head as to that conclusion.

If one wants to look at experimental evidence of the ability of the conduits to exchange a spin to another unconnected body all one needs to look at is this:

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/4026-one-magnet-no-bearing-bedini-motor.html

By using one magnet or drive magnet they can drive many many satalite magnets. This driving mechanism is has very little interaction to the main speed of the drive magnet. I have to admit that this was the first time I cam to the conclusion that there has to be a tether or conduit being formed from the rotation of the drive magnet. Once established it does have limits to drive the outer satalite mags but the loss isn't a big one as far as I can tell. When pulsing the drive coil it strongly reacts to the drive magnet and then twists the conduits that are established to the satalites imparting the twist movement to the satalite mags.

So to sum up my theory on this whole process what happens on the natural front is much different then what we concluded and have used this last 100-150 years. The cost of the natural process is near nil because that process is being driven by a fractal stacking of much larger processes already in motion for the mere value of the potential of the one true source.

When people talk about the vortex it is only a byproduct of the actual event driving that vortex. These twisted conduits are the reason for that vortex and the vortex is just the eddy of those conduits. These eddies are organized by the flow of the conduits from wide end (outer,further) to small end (inner,closer) to the driving source. In the case of the coupled magnets by the tether the magnets would be the drain and the vortex the swirl in the aether with the conduit connection being the connection in between two sources. I believe that we have only seen the vortex because thats all that we can observe in the real form but it is not what drives the machine we think of as nature.

Please read the whole document contained here and you will have an understanding of just how much Tesla saw...

"Experiments with Alternate Currents of Very High Frequency and Their Application to Methods of Artificial Illumination"

[lamare]

Fantastic read indeed. Thanks Lamare

Thanks a lot Jetijs, this means a lot to me, coming from you.

I have added a new section to my article about how to control the resonance mode of the driving coils: Article:Free Electric Energy in Theory and Practice - PESWiki

[Jetijs]

Don't forget to check out Lamare's peswiki file too. He has taken a lot of information from the energetic threads and added it to that one document. It's a fantastic read. The link to the document is:
Article:Free Electric Energy in Theory and Practice - PESWiki

Fantastic read indeed. Thanks Lamare

[lamare]

Electrical Engineer claims breaktrough in free energy research

Electrical Engineer claims breakthrough in free energy research | Before It's News

Please click this up and twitter...

[Jbignes5]

Hmm the nature of charge is an interesting read. I like the concepts execpt for the fact that charge in his view is unity. Well charges can unify it takes momentum to do that. That is because they are separate in the medium that they flow in. Charges are merely movement contained. Like you have suggested earlier it is a grouping of the medium itself that forms a unit. When anything in the medium groups or flows into itself like that charge, it creates a division of that scale of the particle or size. It filters out unlike sizes of those particles thru this action or flow. The medium can flow because this medium has continuity of scales or sizes. Lets take water for example. That condensed medium has a flow no matter how small the scale you look and the further you look, you will always see smaller particulates moving within those flows. Also the further you look into this medium of water the further that two particles flowing in that medium can influence another particle through proximity to the other particle. Now it can appear that they are connected by that medium and that connection is a bidirectional connection. These connections are formed by the medium as is is much smaller then the now huge displacement of that medium. I'm sure that as your scale or view changes yet again that there is a finer particles flowing in between each particle from the previous scale. This is the fractal you reference. The one thing that I'm trying to understand now is just how far does that fractal go.

Over 50 years ago we thought that the light microscope was that limit to the fractal but it turned out that there were other ways to view particles and even atoms outside our capability to view them with that technology at the time. As our view has been changing and becoming more in focus we are finding out that our old "laws" don't fit so well because they were of course a pure postulation of what we could see. Our view of this world below our own is showing us that we are in error but we are not correcting our official view on that.

All matter in this and the much smaller universes forms on the boundries between flows of the medium. These areas are eddy points between these flows. Matter then condenses or divides the medium and takes on that shape of the little area that it divides between all those flows. This turns it into a flake of matter or kinda a diamond shape. This matter is a division and that division has divisions of its own as well. Matter is neutral at that level and acts much like iron does when exposed to a magnetic field. As more matter lines up between two flows it statically attracts through the rest of that matter and is usually called cling. At that point matter is easily disturbed and is very loosely bound by the division it creates in that space. This can be akin to how islands of sand react to the flow that goes over it and cuts it over time. As time goes on the sand mass seems to change. It is sort of the same process but on a much smaller scale and the flows are surrounding the matter so the dynamics change. It is the same concept but the ratios of sand or matter are in reverse. Meaning the medium is the largest and the matter is the smallest ratios.

I was thinking yesterday after I wrote about the waves you reference and how matter should have a wave signature. If these charges that enter the outer shells of the atom or gross matter (skin effect) filter out of the layered matter then it would have that unique signature of that filter. The charges follow the same squirting when collided effect that I mentioned before ,as evident by the corona discharges pictures. As they travel around the flakes and out that the matter are merely flakes and form a pattern. That would make squirts of parts of the charges that are traveling into the matter filter out in between the flakes and that just might be the fields that designate what that matter is. This squirting would have a characteristic signature that is unique to that matter. This could be proofed by the sound and salt experiment that has been used to show self organizing properties of sound when acting on the shape of the salt they used on the vibrating plate. This will allow like signatures to better operate with another like atom and they hold together more tightly then if another matter with a different signature would. When two different signatures are loosely connected it might not separate and get swallowed up by the additional formations of gross matter. This would be an impurity.

I am having a problem with the last part. What I am seeing in my head is not what I am trying to relate. It is hard for me to accurately describe that picture I am seeing. I am refining the last part as I find more examples in the larger to back that up and you will have to bear with me on this refining process.

[Slovenia]

PESWIKI Document

Don't forget to check out Lamare's peswiki file too. He has taken a lot of information from the energetic threads and added it to that one document. It's a fantastic read. The link to the document is:
Article:Free Electric Energy in Theory and Practice - PESWiki