F.M.Chalkalis gravity system a donation!

[Matthew Jones]

I ran his Math across a couple of people who are into that stuff. Its not valid, thats part of reason he catches alot of negative attention.
Basically it boils down to a really complex math problem involving angular velocity and angular momentum. You have 2 states, start up , and run.
You cannot apply the same math to run that you would under start up. He has problem with that. Once the pendulum is in motion your input is only responsible for a very small portion of the rotation.

Now I am not saying the effect isn't valid but you should do an electrical conversion.
Use a generator and an adjustable load. If you want valid numbers.

I have already experimented with the pendulum and I am sure there is something to it But his math is really wrong and very odd for the condition he is calculating.

Don't make the same mistake of making claims on his math.

Also to stop the shaking you could just get some boards on the ceiling and wedge two longer boards between the ceiling and floor. Make sure you have tension. That should help alot. If you can anyway.

Nice work
Matt

[n84dafun]

...Basically it boils down to a really complex math problem involving angular velocity and angular momentum. You have 2 states, start up , and run.
You cannot apply the same math to run that you would under start up. He has problem with that. Once the pendulum is in motion your input is only responsible for a very small portion of the rotation.

Now I am not saying the effect isn't valid but you should do an electrical conversion.
Use a generator and an adjustable load. If you want valid numbers. ...

I'm not sure exactly how he came up with his equation either. If anyone can suggest a better equation to figure out the energy of a rotating mass at steady state rotation, that would be great.

I'm thinking of using the other motor used in my Lockridge motor project. Maybe use the modified motor as my drive motor and unmodified motor for the output generator.

-brian

[n84dafun]

Almost there

Here's my Chalkalis EM Replication with generator on system but not attached to the shaft:

Chalkalis EM Replication with Generator - YouTube

By the way, there's a new video from Chalkalis himself: F.M.CHALKALIS DRIVING SYSTEM CHANGES 2011 - YouTube

[Matthew Jones]

That starting to get real neat.

Nice work bud.

Matt

[W32]

F.M.Chalkalis Energy Multiplier. A donation!

Hello World,
keeping my promise i am bringing you the latest news from Mr. F.M.Chalkalis blog.

Energiewende - Ein Brief an Greenpeace | Politaia.org
Free Energy SuppressionF.M.CHALKALIS DRIVING SYSTEM CHANGES 2011 - YouTube

You can find the letter and all links on chalkalis.blogspot.com
W32

[W32]

Dear n84dafun and Knovos,
I do congratulate you for your hard work as well as your enthusiasm.
Though, I have to say you are not paying much attention to the specifications.
1)I doubt that your frames will manage to hold the forces even in such smaller scale replicas
2)You have more that 20% losses because of your NON aerodynamic shapes.
3)Mr. Chalkalis uses two pulses on every rotation, which is the 085% of the perimeter
4)The elastics on the driving system have to be with air tubes, not solid, in order to be soft enough.
We must agree with Mathew Jones, because in order to calculate the actual power we must use the new laws of MechanoDynamics.
Best regard
W32

[n84dafun]

Generator Test

Here's a video test of my generator. I'm going to need some pretty high gear ratios to achieve the high RPM the generator requires for significant power output. The gearing will definitely reduce the overall efficiency of the whole system.

Gererator Testing - YouTube

[W32]

F.M.Chalkalis Energy Multiplier 2012 News

Hello World & Happy New Year!
I would like to inform you about the 2012 news on Mr. F.M.Chalkalis's Energy Multiplier. I would suggest you read the letter and then watch the video.

Friday, January 13, 2012

ETHELOTIFLIA

(Willful Blindness)

Link to the document on Google Docs"Nexus" is the best way to make you understand why in the past I wrote that if my space allowed it, I would have used heavier weights or longer arm or even both and certainly longer lever.

All efforts are welcome in our fight but in smaller size constructions the results (the effect) will be invisible causing disappointment and misleading evidence. Please do not derogate from the specifications.
Good Luck to everyone.

Fotis Miltiadis Chalkalis
Video: http://www.youtube.com/F.M.Chalkalis 2012 Update

Best wishes to all
W32

[Cloxxki]

(all, I also added my comments on Youtube, please help me understand or correct me if you can)

Any theoretical support or founding for your theory please?
Why would pressing down under a given angle offer a gain?
A simple rough calculation would be greatly appreciated.

I have seen your work, replications, but have no clue what your invention is about. I don't see why there would be any sort of magnification from an inpulse as your propose.

Thanks,
J

[W32]

F.M.Chalkalis Energy Multiplier 2012

(all, I also added my comments on Youtube, please help me understand or correct me if you can)

Any theoretical support or founding for your theory please?
Why would pressing down under a given angle offer a gain?
A simple rough calculation would be greatly appreciated.

I have seen your work, replications, but have no clue what your invention is about. I don't see why there would be any sort of magnification from an inpulse as your propose.

Thanks,
J

Hello Mr. Cloxxki, I just wanted to inform you that there is an answer from Mr Chalkalis on your youtube comment:

"Dear Sir,
Your comments lead to the assumption that you did not read or understand the description of the experiments shown in the video. The published analysis of the presenting forces in every stage of the pendulum rotation would have answered all your questions.
I am sorry you cannot understand." CHALKALIS

W32

[Cloxxki]

If anyone on the forum understands this technology, and define it in a few sentences, please do for everyone's benefit!

Am I crazy to see very significant input of work through the toothpicks, and very typical leverage breaking the piece of wood?

[aljhoa]

Any similarities?



Physics Of Skateboarding

Al

[W32]

If anyone on the forum understands this technology, and define it in a few sentences, please do for everyone's benefit!

Am I crazy to see very significant input of work through the toothpicks, and very typical leverage breaking the piece of wood?

[Cloxxki]

Respectfully, it sounds to me like you are confusing accumulated kinentic energy through repeated pulses input with torque. There is no OU unless you offer an explanation. I strongly fear that your misunderstanding of physics has led you to claim OU from an utterly simple device with complicated instructions.

All I saw in the recent video, was an overly complicated pendulum which needed a very signifant push just to keep going. The fact that the pulses were below the breaking limit of 2 toothpicks doesn't tell us anything.
First the pendulum was lifted over top center, and then it received repeated long pushes.

A normal pendulum is expected to make multiple rotations after such a lift and subsequent pushes. If anything, the pendulum suffers from high drag. Not that drag will ever stand in the way of overunity, it should easily overcome it.

Anyone, please tell me I am mistaken when I address the issue of energy vs. torque as the inventor seems to use it as proof of OU?
I only have highschool level of physics, but a good idea is usually easily explained to me. I am not dumb. At least my mom told me I'm not :-)

[W32]

Any similarities?



Physics Of Skateboarding

Al

Mr. aljhoa, I would like to express my sincere congratulations on your Excellent reply!
Mr. Cloxxki, The aim of argument, or of discussion, is not victory, but progress.
Thank You!
W32