gravity waves found

[Bruce_TPU]

hi...i did better this time...http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Pr2FFcb46E....also bruce, #2 is in the mail...i went ahead and paid the postage ive got the ups tracking #, i can tell you when to expect it...i wish i could be there at THE moment you see it!.....david

Hi David,

That is very good news! I am looking forward to it. You certainly did not have to pay the postage!! I will pay the postage to the next person that it is to be sent to.

When can I expect it? Please PM me.

Kind regards,

Bruce

[david lambright]

this one should do it!!

northwind suggested infrared a while back...i tried an old cheapy scope but it was too blurry...i think it is time for a FLIR GF series cam ?...thanks mark...david...YouTube - infrared video

[Cloxxki]

like this looking Measuring instrument
small and cheap
and belive there will be somekind of Oscillation at scale

While I like it, it cannot determing a difference between a stationary 4th stage 1950s rockets, and the same when spinning around its axis.
Yet, thrown into vacume by a given propulsive force, both will result in different orbit paths. Which according to Newton, should not happen. Spin does not affect weight.

Also, 2 repelling magnets can be forced together. They'll fall, I think is was, slower, than the magnets seperately. But this should not happen. Yet it does.
Something's amiss, and both spin and magnetism seem to be playing their roles in it.
David is getting visual (of all the wavelengths we do not see) effects from "mere" locked magnetricity. Spin was likely added by Ed's setup being on bearings?

[zapniv]

I read (some) on DePalma's research, and Brown's puzzling rockets flying "too high". It comes down to this : spin matters, for gravital "pull".
We cannot measure a weight losing mass/weight as we spin it on a scale (and it doesn't even matter for free fall speed and time), but it WILL exhibit changed parabolic paths, and thus heights/velocities. Hence, acceleration and weight are not fixed.
David feels changes when holding masses above his device, but the scale can't tell. G either is lowe/higher without a change in static mass, or the constant at which a gravital pull acts on a mass, is NOT a constant.

Perhaps David could experiment with dropping wooded rods and steel balls (for similar Air drag per frontal air surface), and see if anomolies occur.

like this looking Measuring instrument
small and cheap
and belive there will be somekind of Oscillation at scale

[Cloxxki]

I read (some) on DePalma's research, and Brown's puzzling rockets flying "too high". It comes down to this : spin matters, for gravital "pull".
We cannot measure a weight losing mass/weight as we spin it on a scale (and it doesn't even matter for free fall speed and time), but it WILL exhibit changed parabolic paths, and thus heights/velocities. Hence, acceleration and weight are not fixed.
David feels changes when holding masses above his device, but the scale can't tell. G either is lowe/higher without a change in static mass, or the constant at which a gravital pull acts on a mass, is NOT a constant.

Perhaps David could experiment with dropping wooded rods and steel balls (for similar Air drag per frontal air surface), and see if anomolies occur.

I'll vent this brain fart. What if the constant of 1 applies "normally" for what we think is the 3rd power (component) of gravital speed. Being, rate of acceleration change. This might only be measured when covering ground. Think of it as the level of attachment to the fabric of space. If Ed could decimate this factor, he might "break through" the typical unwillingness for a rock to change position. To the observer, it would appear to be an impulse magnifier, while really the rock is could be seen as to work more with the operator.
This may be father off : You know how a child can make himself really heavy if it doesn't want to be picked up? Impossible to measure. I would not be picked up if I didn't want to be.

Back to Ed and David.
David and replicators find 4 poles on the locked device. Ed's second level shows a four-part "clover". The shape of it may need to be tuned to the shape of the first layer, perhaps not every 4-pole PMH is the same.

Did anyone ever get the Ford T magnet setup such as Ed used to lock PMH-style?

I tend to think like Witsend, more power to make the effect obvious! Unless the magnetricity flowing once locked is a different kind of current than we're used to, and especially if its conversion is limited to material, design and dimension parameters. Ed at least seems to have used more mass in his 1st layer setup, being 4 Ford T magnets, am I correct? He must have had a reason to not suffice with one. There must be a limit to his invention, bound by size, mass of his device.

[witsend]

AT LAST.

ALSO. You first apply the current one way and then reverse it. Is this required?

sorry Dave. This is the only question still needs answering. When you're ready and sorry to be a pest.

Rosie

[witsend]

...until then i will keep experimenting AND working on my thesis on gravity, matter, space etc...david

I have a thesis that requires photons to interact with the aether field. But my aether fields are just a magnetic field in differing scales and at differing values of complexity. Which is why I'm so delighted to see all this evidence.

Not to detract from your own thesis here Dave. I would LOVE to get familiar with it. Can you enlighten us?

Just a reminder here Dave. I think we'd all be glad to understand your thinking behind this.

sorry. I seem to have edited where I wanted to post. But here it is again.

zapniv - WELCOME. It's nice to see this thread attracting new members.

[zapniv]

this wave is what heat and all EM spectra travel on. if 2 candles are placed 180 degrees apart on a disc, the flames point towards the center of axis, away from the artificial gravity created by spinning. an energized PMH [leedskalnin] is spun,and artificial gravity over 1G will push the orbit of force out and since magnetic current flows to metal , dense metal like gold held at plane,now this force streams off bending light like a heat wave!...i will post a video as soon as i can. i have unlocked the mystery! check this out..if you hold a metal weight over the center of mass, its weight increases! this model works...more soon. p.s. i do have the only working model, i need to share this with the world!

hey dude
good work
and if you use Hanging Fish Scale for weight measuring i think it would work better and make a video about that?
mmmh i wonder not antigravity but just opposite thing"heavier gravity"

[Harvey]

Hi Harvey,

I was wondering if you might post a sketch of your aluminum foil set up, maybe a step by step. I would very much like to test this myself to see this paramagnetic response, for if it acts as you say, it may be just the what I need to act as a semi-shield on my magnetic V-gate wheel. thanks

@ David, Thanks for all your hard work here. I have been with you from post #1 and wish you the best of luck.

Thanks to all here,
Gene

My apologies for the delay - I've been out of town and busy but here we go:



Foil Sandwiched in Stack of 5 cylinder magnets



Stack laying to complete magnetic circuit


Trimming the foil after it is treated - Cut 1


Just completed cut 3


Four Cuts Done


Removed top of stack and set aside



Aluminum shows Giant Paramagnetic effect


Video:
YouTube - Giant Paramagnetism In Aluminum Foil

Cheers,

[david lambright]

you should see it live!

i am glad you saw it!...i believe too much input power is over kill...i have a ferrite and steel pmh that will lock with one wrap of wire....every one seems to like magnetic aluminum foil so i will post another video soon...if there is any thing you think a vid would help explain let me know...thank you for all your kindness....i said you would not be disappointed!! ...david

[witsend]

...until then i will keep experimenting AND working on my thesis on gravity, matter, space etc...david

I have a thesis that requires photons to interact with the aether field. But my aether fields are just a magnetic field in differing scales and at differing values of complexity. Which is why I'm so delighted to see all this evidence.

Not to detract from your own thesis here Dave. I would LOVE to get familiar with it. Can you enlighten us?

[david lambright]

juju

no worries...there is no suggestion too small or idea that is too "out there"...i welcome them all...jet is having a hard time with his replication...i hope bruce will help shed light on this new technology, when #2 arrives...until then i will keep experimenting AND working on my thesis on gravity, matter, space etc...david

[witsend]

hi...i did better this time...http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Pr2FFcb46E....also bruce, #2 is in the mail...i went ahead and paid the postage ive got the ups tracking #, i can tell you when to expect it...i wish i could be there at THE moment you see it!.....david

AT LAST. I saw it Dave. Thanks for this. Frankly I was rather relieved that the Schlieren method showed nothing. Else, indeed - it would have been the movement of air. VERY NICE. Do you see distinct colours as well? Are there things that the camera does NOT pick up? Until now I had no idea what you were on about - except that even my poor eyesight could pick up that massive distortion in one of your early videos.

VERY EXCITING. My own tests are designed as controls. I'll be posting them soon but still knee deep in winding transformers. Proud to say that I've now wound 3. My first. It's fun but leaves the fingers cut - here and there. Still very intrigued with that 'lock'.

Are you sure that continual current application doesn't increase the magnetic fields? I notice that I can get the iron to 'cook' and it's well magnetised after ten minutes or thereby - subjecting it to a hefty current flow. Perhaps I'm tending to 'over kill'. I'll try your quick 'spark' and see what that does.

ALSO. You first apply the current one way and then reverse it. Is this required?

[erfinder]

waste peoples time?

i dont believe this...

I am being so misunderstood? i dont understand... maybe i should stop posting, cause i only have good intentions, and somehow...

forget it, im much stronger than this!


sorry about all this stuff david lambright, i admire you very much and i dont want do disrespect you work! sorry to all

I'm listening to you my friend....and I understand what you have presented...the feeling you express concerning the clover I experienced about 4 years ago.. I made all kinds of drawings....however during this time I always felt that something was missing, and no matter where I looked I found no answer..till one day I came across this website Welcome to John Bedini and saw the image titled "Monopole Motor Magnetic Field". Now... For the record I don't buy into everything that comes out of this camp...however, this image is a perfect representation of how the lotus mandala can be produced when magnets are placed in the "monopole" configuration. Become a believer in that fact! Build a monopole rotor, and view it with a large magnetic field viewing film.

The image on the aforementioned website in my opinion should not be taken as the last word on how the Leedskalnin generator magnets are configured, no one can know with absolute certainty how they are magnetized.....(if i were the owner of Coral Castle and I knew Ed's secret, a magneto magnetizer would be all that is needed to permanently mislead anyone who visits with a compass! Bet money on that....) The interesting thing is that it can only go one of two ways, either the poles are bucking, or they aren't. I'm putting my trust in the latter....we know what bucking fields can do....

Regards

[david lambright]

one more time

hi...i did better this time...http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Pr2FFcb46E....also bruce, #2 is in the mail...i went ahead and paid the postage ive got the ups tracking #, i can tell you when to expect it...i wish i could be there at THE moment you see it!.....david