gravity waves found

[david lambright]

Gravity Waves Found

the only way Ed could have did the things he did is if his generator was really a gravitational dipole generator. reading Jeongs stuff, it makes sense. the center of mass shift has to be what he was after. the way he describes dipolar magnetic current, N repelsN, attracts S, so dipole gravity follows the same rules as magnetism? Eds photo of him w/ his hand on the generator, he is collecting energy from the equator and at the poles. that way there is a differential he could now utilize. like linear and radial energy being N and S poles of the same field. a PMH holds a force, everybody knows this. it is di polar and bi directional, existing in the metal of a PMH. analogy; from a point a line becomes a circle. it seems that the metal he used allowed near superfluid velocities of flow. i believe this is why there is optical distortion around these devices. he separated the poles with a centrifuge, [he only needed to achieve over 1 G to fully divide the poles] and really make dipole gravity. an iron wire will hold this energy. by limiting either one of the poles, using a single wire ran through a bottle wound with wire, the surface areas being different was able to achieve directional flow of energy at remote locations. [i hope this makes some kind of sense]. he could use either pole, like he could control which pole was flowing from a wire. like water in a hose , polarized energy, flowing from the wire, either more N or more S flowing back to the earths field. lets say that S is the pole and N the equator. they ARE the same energy, one being a line, the other a spinning disc. there is a point where these are equal in energy. an infinite point on a scale. adding either pole would tip the balance.a cut stone; adding more N attracts more S into the stone. N being the heavier end of the scale attracts more S. S being the other side of the scale pushes against gravity. think about how heat "rises". we see energy dissipating like a mirage from a heat source, always rising. adding more N would reverse this until the "dissipating energy" would flow from the opposite side of the stone AGAINST earths gravity. this is why i saw what looked like "heat" distortion UNDER the stone in one of his photos. there must be a universal field, there also must exist an infinite place, from which every thing we are and know arises. a zero point that is as deep as the universe is vast.

[DensoHax]

Hey David, is it possible for you to do the pendulum test? Because, one thing is certain, the university will ask you for measurable proof.

Regards.

[Iotayodi]

if it is nothing they will show why, if it is what i say, well, we will see what they have to say about that too. thanks

They may say its nothing but that doesnt put in stone for me. If your getting a force feedback with a handheld laser aimed at a rotating magnetic field,I want to hear why its nothing.
Im still waiting for materials to build something simple for you for experiments concerning this. When I build it I will have a lot of questions for you.

[david lambright]

i am still skeptcial

but hundreds people have seen this in person and at least ten people have replicated these devices and have seen and felt the same things. this is new. this is real. the videos suck. seeing this in person would remove some of the skepticism. my next step is oregon state university's physics dept. if it is nothing they will show why, if it is what i say, well, we will see what they have to say about that too. thanks

[Iotayodi]

What do you find interesting in the new videos?

Just that I can see the distortion which I couldnt in his first ones.

[DensoHax]

Thats where he made the statement. It was just a handheld consumer laser light,

So there's no video of the laser.
What do you find interesting in the new videos?

[Iotayodi]

I didn't find the video where he aims a laser at the machine, the link you give me is the first page of this thread.

Thats where he made the statement. It was just a handheld consumer laser light,

[DensoHax]

I didn't find the video where he aims a laser at the machine, the link you give me is the first page of this thread.

[Iotayodi]

Can you post the link?

"when i aim my laser at the device,from 10 feet away, i can feel a force pushing back !!"

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/5690-gravity-waves-found.html

[DensoHax]

Which can be a problem working on a limited budget.
I can see the effect now with his newer videos. Its his laser experiment that really interests me.

Can you post the link?

[Iotayodi]

But with the data I see, there's not much unless it's measured correctly.

Which can be a problem working on a limited budget.
I can see the effect now with his newer videos. Its his laser experiment that really interests me.

[Cloxxki]

I agree, more substatial measurement is needed than odd video effects.

Your 1) suggestion is for sure cost free, but may more show anything, with with a real local gravity enhancer. We cannot decide beforehand how it works. We don't even really understand gravity itself, although some like to, while disagreeing.
A variation though, would be to balance under a pivot, and winch that up quickly, to add inertia. It might pull to one side if the device has gravitic effects.

Dave and replicators, please stop the theory and do a couple simple tests. Find a way to measure what you are "sensing"!

[DensoHax]

I'll give you some free ideas that should take about a couple of hours of testing and really it's so easy you should do it.

1) Balance a beam on a post (form a T structure with some wood with a pivot on the middle of the Top bar on the T) .. Align your device under one side of the T (once the T has been balanced and it stay's horizontal) .. What happens?

2) Your future video, take a laser pointer and point to where you actually see something, at the instant you see it. Your camera should be centered on what you see, not far off like all your other videos (no offence).

3) Make a pendulum, again on a stand (it's important that you provide structure to your tests); swing the pendulum and put your device 1, under the pendulum, 2, on left side 3 on the other side. You should see some change in the frequency, the height of the bob or you will see nothing. A pendulum don't change in frequency, remember, it keeps time. So this is a good test because a pendulum is supposed to be constant. Again video tape this.

4) Please, put your device on a table, with an ambiant lighting that is not directed directly on your setup. Don't put your device on the ground where you'll certainly feel cold drafts.

5) Document every test and every event and every thing you do, in a book, with the Date and Time of event. This seem useless, but it's actualy a pretty good reference.

6) Get a car battery, fully charged, upscale your models.

7) If your device is creating light, no doubt it will show in the dark.

8) Put a compass near your device at all time in every tests.

9) Get an infrared Temperature sensor (hand gun thermometer on dealextreme, they are cheap and useful.. There is also a ton of useful cheap instruments there) .


I understand that you might not have the background, so don't take this as an offence, I'm trying to help. But with the data I see, there's not much unless it's measured correctly.

[DensoHax]

And let me point this out .. It's been what.. 2 years since the OP posted the first message?

Ok.

Why I didn't see a bigger device with bigger power source somewhere? Lack of funding?? :P

If there's an effect there, wouldn't it show up MORE with a bigger device, harder metal, bigger metal mass, bigger battery, bigger dimensions?

Shouldn't cost a lot to try....

[DensoHax]

Hey,

After reading thru almost every pages and comments, this is my opinion.
Some background : I played with PMH too and I find it quite interesting.

I don't know if the OP is just too excited about this or what, but IMHO there's nothing special there.

If you guys are giving this any credibility at all, you're gullible as hell!

There's nothing in these videos except compression artifacts, absolutely trivial optical illusion, video processing artifacts and noise etc..


Nobody was able to confirm the supposed effects, there is no science in this, only thing I see is people "feeling" things, and yet, those same people say that science is wrong and shady. What is shady here is the simple fact that there's nothing measurable.



>> all the methods you describe are needed to validate these findings. my problem is severe lack of funds.