This forum is preserved as a permanent archive. The community continues at eMedia Press.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

My proposed explanation for the great pyramids.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Aaron
    replied
    mortar

    Stealth,

    And the mortar used on the pyramids is superior to anything used in modern
    times. There was quite a bit of research into it and I don't recall if they ever
    were able to replicate its superior strength.

    Leave a comment:


  • Stealth
    replied
    The contractor that observed the pyramids at Giza was one of the very few who build skyscrapers in large metropolotan cities in the US. He is well versed in the construction of large buidings. He claimed it was not possible, with our current technology and machinery to construct a pyramid of that proportion with the size blocks that they contain. it was aired on Discovery last year. There was an entire episode dedicated to solving the mysteries of the pyramids. They only used the very best sources in their series. They used a scientist, construction contractor,geologist, and sonar unit operators to test several parameters of the stones for hardness,cutting methods, transportation methods, and labor required to build one. They claimed that even with our current machinery it would not be pheasible to build one in the 20 years claimed by the Egytians. Furthermore, it was decided that it was impracticle to get within a foot of precision in east-west, and north-south oreintation. Most skyscrapers are as much as two feet out of square. That is an acceptible measurement in that size of structure. Good Luck. Stealth

    Leave a comment:


  • Aaron
    replied
    The Great Pyramid

    Originally posted by Jbignes5 View Post
    and placing Larger then life stones in the age of 10,500 bc. This is the current estimate of the pyramids that is now accepted the world around.
    Who accepts this in mainstream academia? They have fought this for
    years and maintain the pyramid is about 4000 years old, which is beyond
    ridiculous. I find it hard to believe any of them on any serious level are
    openly discussing this much older date. What the Egyptians don't want
    is to admit that the builders of the pyramids were not their ancestors.

    I believe the pyramid is 12000-14000 years old seems like common sense
    when looking at just a few factors. Orion was rising above the horizon at
    a certain time of the year only back during that time frame of which the
    Giza complex is a mirror image of the Orion constellation. 3 pyramids are the
    belt and the sphinx is m42 or m43 (orion nebula location).

    Other complexes around the world correspond to mirror images of
    constellations in their part of the world that rose above the horizon at the
    same time of the year back during the exact same time period. I think
    the time of year was one of the solstices.

    All of these ancient civilizations were synchronized in duplicating the
    constellations in the layout of their complexes.

    -----------

    That flying dome minaret vid could be a rope trick. In any case, acoustic
    levitation has been accomplished in the lab so it is not debatable whether
    or not objects can be levitated with sound. There are reports that the
    Tibetans have done this by surrounding rocks placed onto a platform that
    is shaped like a concave dish. They have musical instruments surrounding
    it and are able to levitate the rocks up to hundreds of feet in the air on
    top of a plateau. There is no video evidence of this, just the reports.

    Leave a comment:


  • Aaron
    replied
    1 year per side

    Originally posted by HairBear View Post
    the fact that the length of each side of the Great Pyramid at the base is 365.2422 Hebrew cubits, the exact number of days in the solar year, including the extra day for each leap year.

    Nephilim, Hebrew for giants, that are mentioned in verse 4. The fathers, also are referred to as Nephilim, which also means "the fallen ones."
    I thought that 3 sides were equal in length and 1 side was longer to account
    for leap year - using 1.001" as the inch used back then.

    From what I studied, Nephilim actually means "Earth Born" and those that
    were Earth Born happened to be giants.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jbignes5
    replied
    I understand what you are saying Hairbear. My reference was actually a religious debate as to who is correct. I meant that we should stick with what is said not guess or enter into a philosophical debate about angles or such.
    I meant that we should stick to what is presented to us not ignore what is said in the bible. Even though I think that it is a retelling of the main features of our history the other stuff that is presented could be most attributed to a belief system and not a historical record.
    Don't get me wrong there are things that talk about messengers that could be clues as well when they are taken in context and not out of a "god" like attitude that they tended to do with things that were mostly unexplained to their own reasoning.
    I didn't mean to disclaim the bible at all and that was not my real intention at all. What I was trying to say is that we need to filter out all the "god" talk and such because this is a belief system when we are looking for facts.
    I have and will reference the bible in my chats. That doesn't mean that I can not look at the situation and say that knowing what we know today that a bush that all of a sudden catches fire doesn't have a real explanation other then it was mystical.

    Leave a comment:


  • HairBear
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • Jbignes5
    replied
    In all the arguments.

    I would rather take the bible out of the equation here since it can be proven that all or most of the stories have come from the Sumerian's texts. Well at
    least the biggest stories, Creation of the world and the flood. So since it was predated to an Earlier society we must refer to the Earlier societies tellings of that.
    The one problem with dating rocks is that you can not date them to when they were milled or cut and then placed. One way to date them would be done due to the erosion of the structures themselves. The sphinx is the best one to date in this method because the outer casing stones of the pyramids were stolen to be used in building the new civilizations structures.
    By using that method of dating the sphinx seems to have wear marks or erosion from rain on it to date it in the 10,500 bc year range. Well before the Egyptian eras. So debate on that can be dropped all together.
    What we have here is a nomadic tribe finding a structure and city that had already been there. It could be that they built some or part of the city around the huge god like structure and thats about all they did. Ra could have been a caretaker left over to make sure the Pyramid continued what it's purpose was. In doing so the populous elevated his standing as a God. Weather he was in on that who knows but one thing is clear he influenced their society maybe giving them some insights into his own technology along the way.
    I hate to see this important thread degrade to a name calling and shouting match. Lets just stick to the facts. The facts in this case is the bible is a copy of a much older Sumerian texts. Back then the bible didn't have 1 author. It had many. But the clearest message we get from the bible through Jesus is that the rules had changed. The old way was not correct anymore and the new way was of love and compassion. A clear message that should be followed above anything else. It was an attempt to correct mans misdirection and misuse of religion.
    Ok so lets stop the religious debate and bring this back to the fact findings we have in front of our eyes. The Sumerian texts predate anything we see in that time with many offshoots creating a belief system. Remember my talk about man in his purest form? Show him a lighter and you are a fire god. Use medicine to heal his people and you are a god of healing with miraculous healing powers.
    Focus people on the facts and all this dogma disappears.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jbignes5
    replied
    Originally posted by Aaron View Post
    Little better video:
    YouTube - The Flying Dome(Minaret)

    Shows more of the beginning.
    In the begining with the roof as a background you can see the white ropes at the proper angle to get it to the top of the tower. Since the video is in such a bad compression it is very hard to make out the ropes. They were chanting because this was a religious ceremony and they were overjoyed that their temple was getting a new dome. Nothing surprising there. In fact even if you take out the ropes theory the dome rocks back and forth at a set place as it is being lifted.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jbignes5
    replied
    Ummm...

    Originally posted by ANTIQUER View Post
    Hi Stealth;

    Largest tower crane in the World - 100 tons at 100 meter radius

    Still think we couldn't do it?
    Two of these placed on opposite sides of the base would lift the heavier stones into place. Then helicopters could easily lift the smaller stones used above 200 ft. and place them. Stepped scaffolding would allow workmen space to stand and work. The casing stones would be applied from the top down as the Egyptians did it.

    To quarry the sarcophagus is not that difficult. Nowadays they use wire blades with carbide or diamond coatings which are hundreds of feet long. They leave practically no marks to grind out. The core would be removed in much the same manner as the Egyptians did it, but using modern drills. This is done on the quarry site before removing it, to cut down on the weight. Then transport it to the site you wish to grind and polish it, again using modern grinders and polishers.

    The only real problems are the money and the will to do it. Cheops and Khufu did not have those problems, or OSHA looking over their shoulder accompanied by a bevy of lawyers looking for workman comp. claims. etc. etc.

    Any expert who says this can't be done today simply means no one is set up to do it on a production basis and has no incentive to do so as there is no other use for the tech. and it would be too expensive for them to set up for one-time use. But it can be done.

    If we can put men in space, build the Verrazzano Narrows suspension bridge in N.Y., the Hoover dam, the huge dam complex in Holland, etc., we can certainly build a tall pile of tight-fitting rocks.

    Al
    There is a distinct difference in pouring cement and doing what needed to be done in cutting, moving, and placing Larger then life stones in the age of 10,500 bc. This is the current estimate of the pyramids that is now accepted the world around.
    Lets look at the Biggest item of all in that area? It is a statue that is around 1000 tons. And instead of moving the statue they built the museum around it. It is one piece and a big piece at that. Roll that around on sand and it becomes very impossible to move. In fact it fell over and they still can not find a way to get it back upright.
    Last edited by Jbignes5; 03-22-2010, 01:24 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • CaptainScat
    Guest replied
    Originally posted by Aaron View Post
    Little better video:
    YouTube - The Flying Dome(Minaret)

    Shows more of the beginning.
    thanks aaron, seeing the beginning i'd have to say that is quite a bit more interesting.

    Leave a comment:


  • Aaron
    replied
    better vid

    Little better video:
    YouTube - The Flying Dome(Minaret)

    Shows more of the beginning.

    Leave a comment:


  • Aaron
    replied
    Zikirullah

    Originally posted by sucahyo View Post
    What do you think of this video (not angel, but in topic):
    YouTube - Pemindahan Kubah Masjid Di Desa Kailolo Indonesia
    Here is the google translation of the video description:
    Google Translate

    Perhaps the Great Pyramid was done in the same fashion.

    Says: "With God's grace and grandeur of the dome of the old mosque 'was lifted and moved' to the new minaret with zikirullah only. "

    Zikirullah seems to translate to:

    "Remembering Allah in Abundance"

    So probably means it was moved "in His name" or something to that
    effect.

    Would love to see a high resolution video of that.

    Leave a comment:


  • Aaron
    replied
    The Great Pyramid

    Originally posted by sucahyo View Post
    Can anyone here post the quote from Bible which mention Egypt? What is the nationality of messenger like Moses, Solomon, Jesus, etc. Do they talk with ancient egypt language? Do they ever have war with ancient egypt etc.

    If ayone has book link on King Solomon technology or sound/song I would really appreciate it. But I believe that King Solomon do not write magic books.
    In that that day shall there be an altar to the Lord in the midst of the land of
    Egypt, and a pillar at the border thereof to the Lord, and it shall be for a sign
    and for a witness unto the Lord of Hosts". ISAIAH 19, 19-20.

    That is the great pyramid.

    If you take that verse in Hebrew and convert it to the numerical equivelant,
    it is identical to the height of the pyramid in inches. The pyramid was built
    according to the sacred inch that is 1.001" compared to today's 1.000".
    1/1000 of an inch longer than today's inch and all the measurement
    make sense. 5449 inches and in Hebrew, each letter of that verse has a
    numerical value, which adds to 5449. The 5449 is accounting for the
    "missing" capstone peak.

    I think acoustical levitation or other methods could have been used to
    build the pyramids.

    The Egyptians back then were not the same people as the modern day
    Egyptians. The "Christian" teachings originated from the ancient Egyptian
    teachings and those original "Egyptian" teachings were carried by the
    Upanishads into the Himalayas.

    The story goes that the ancient original Egyptian teachings were by those
    that survived the sinking of Atlantis.

    In either case, I think everyone would find the book of Apollonius of Tyana
    very interesting. Was a life story written by Philostratus - commissioned by
    Empress Domna - wife of Severus. That life story was in the Library of
    Alexandria and was taken out before it was burned and was protected for
    many years and only surfaced a couple hundred years ago. Early 1900's,
    the life story of Apollonius was very well known and studied. Today, hardly
    anyone knows about him.

    Anyway, I have almost 100 year old copies from the original Harvard press
    written by Coneybeare. It is an original Greek translation. One page is
    English and the other Greek. You can get cheaper copies these in modern
    paperback, but there is nothing like reading through a very old book like
    this.

    As a note, in the biblical verse, how can it be in the "midst" and at the
    border of Egypt at the same time? Giza means Border And Giza really isn't
    in the literal middle or midst of Egypt, which midst is a very subjective term.

    In any case, it is all very interesting.

    The Great Pyramid is my favorite building on Earth and I've accumulated
    quite an interesting library of books on the subject from Peter Tompkins
    (all originals) to you name it. I also have some interesting stories from
    my friends that have taken naps in the king's kofer in the King's Chamber
    and more.

    One friend had his friend climb on his back in the King's chamber and
    scraped some crystals off the wall. To make a long story short, it seems
    it was actually under water up to 1/3 or 2/3 to the top - possibly. Crystals
    were analyzed the top lab used by the Air Force - he was very connected.
    High potassium content in the crystals, which was some signature of
    limestone having potassium leached from it by sea water or something,
    that is just what I recall from a conversation 10 years ago or so.

    Anyway, interesting topic!

    What is for sure is that it was never a burial pyramid but was used for
    initiations and the entire geometry of the Earth and more is completely
    recorded in all its dimensions.

    Leave a comment:


  • CaptainScat
    Guest replied
    Originally posted by sucahyo View Post
    What do you think of this video (not angel, but in topic):
    YouTube - Pemindahan Kubah Masjid Di Desa Kailolo Indonesia
    it's interesting.

    Leave a comment:


  • sucahyo
    replied
    Originally posted by CaptainScat View Post
    do you have a source on angels that is not mythology?
    What do you think of this video (not angel, but in topic):
    YouTube - Pemindahan Kubah Masjid Di Desa Kailolo Indonesia

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X