Holcomb Energy Systems - the Holy Grail may have arrived

[bistander]

Never listen to the provocations of American, Russian and other "professors" who are at the service of the system of global world capital.

In addition to accumulation, a battery is also a regulator of the network voltage when it is included in a DC circuit. A good example of the work of this device in the electric circuit of any car. A simple voltage regulator is used for its charge level.

It is enough to put an ammeter in the battery circuit and see what role it fulfils at a given moment of time (load charge or source-discharge).
About condensers, the variant suggested above, to the garage master who has made a self-propelled generator will be unavailable and to buy a set of condensers with capacity of at least 10 Farad is a very expensive event.

10 Farad is 10000000 mkF if to take a condenser 35V/10000 mkF you need 1000 pcs one piece costs about 2.5-3 dollars, that is 2500-3000 dolars
Ordinary starting battery 65 A*h has a cost in the range of 72-156 USD. At the same time at start-up there is no need to charge the battery, unlike condenser batteries, which still need to be assembled into a proper assembly.

276312984820 is the item number for eBay of this:


For a few dollars more you can purchase the capacitor which I showed.
bi

[bistander]

Hi all,

Just watched an interesting video about the subject company.

https://youtu.be/fb8_ub7CmdA?si=faFtB16VY_VJdybn

bi

[straggl3r]

....off topic

[straggl3r]

.....off topic

[bistander]

A true conundrum! Seeing the world the way that it REALLY is, versus how one would like it to be, makes it clear that "PROOF" of free-energy is heavily censored.

That is illogical. Where is proof of your statement? Guess you'll say it is censored.
bi

[straggl3r]

....off topic

[Rakarskiy]

Not illogical. But I should have expanded on it to include that a lot of the censorship is actually in the form of mental blocks preventing people from seeing how things work.

Beneath the video The lawsuit that is ROCKING the 'Free Energy' community (youtube.com) I left my own message adding links to my materials: a video of an experiment with a similar system (very flimsy from a garage handyman in self-driving mode) Electromagnetic generator OverUnity (youtube.com) ; to my blog where I explain the principles of the Holcomb system Wise Eye OverUnity: Over Unity - Holcomb Energy System (rakatskiy.blogspot.com) . This guy deleted it, that's all you need to know about this author.

[straggl3r]

....off topic

[bistander]

Ran across this interesting tidbit.

https://youtu.be/Zp9jG1FFgso?si=ddBL2atk-gWqVmw2

bi

[straggl3r]

.....off topic

[bistander]

I find two things interesting here:
1) Why would a debunk video cut-off during the inventors debug process?
2) Why do these types of inventors go through all of the money and effort to patent tech that would cut into (or destroy) the billion dollar (Trillions?) a year energy industry? Don't they (free/discounted energy inventors) know that the for-profit energy industry doesn't take kindly to anyone who would interfere with their gravy train?
Thanks for the link.

To question 1)
I don't know but I see someone else has same concerns on the forum where I found that clip. You could check it out. Reference
https://investorshub.advfn.com/board...e_id=174020899
post #5031

To question 2)
Why?
Because, IMO, these types, as you put it, actually believe in themselves and their "inventions". Or they perpetuate as a scam the idea even after they realize the fallacy.

Don't they know?
Know of conspiracy theories? I guess that what you're saying.

Maybe we can find a video debunking these conspiracy theories.
bi

[straggl3r]

........off topic

[bistander]

I don't know about the world that you live in, but in my world people don't take kindly to people messing with their money. Not conspiracy theory, just reality.
It seems ridiculous for the inventors to invest so much money in a scam. Why? If they'er scamming it will eventually be found out.

I don't see "them" waging war against solar pv, wind turbines, or electric vehicles which are valid technologies that will, or already have, disrupt the fossil energy monopolies. Why do you, conspiracy theories, think "they" care about fake science scams? Get real.

Some people believe in fake science, some believe scams will work, or they'll not be caught. People are often fooled.
bi

[straggl3r]

............off topic

[Rakarskiy]

I don't think the technology is not working! The question is how they are trying to make it work (unfortunately there is no sufficient demonstration of the possibilities). Any synchronous electromagnetic generator does not tolerate reactive sources (reverse energy) that are present in the circuit with the loads that the generator provides power to. The Holcomb generator is no exception. This system has a very serious output voltage regulation problem. I have explained these difficulties to two replicators of a similar system (via transistor control and collector-brush assembly). So the best solution is to use it as a charger. The second is an accurate calculation of the system - magnetic circuit. Variant of the design, which is demonstrated in the video I have doubts. Rather in the variant from the video with capacitors, Holcomb tries to make an asynchronous generator, in the design of which there is little confidence, for the solid-state variant (in the end it will be a transformer). A proper Holcomb solid-state machine will be more expensive, even with full equipment, compared to an electric generator driven by an internal combustion engine of similar power. It is clear that they tried to make the construction cheaper, but I think in vain.

The asynchronous generator

The asynchronous generator works in the braking mode: the rotor rotates in the same direction as the stator, but its speed is initially higher. The rotational speed of the magnetic field always remains unchanged and only the rotor speed can be controlled. Such generators are not vulnerable to short circuits and are well protected against external influences (dust, low temperature, moisture, etc.).

The disadvantages of the asynchronous generator can be called the mandatory presence of capacitors and the dependence of the output current frequency on the stability of the diesel or petrol engine. At the same time, the cost of such a device is lower than synchronous, but it is used less often. Asynchronous generators are recommended for connection of devices that do not require high starting voltage and are resistant to voltage fluctuations.

Induction generators use a squirrel cage rotor (the same as in an induction motor).
If my assumptions are correct, they are wasting their time. In synchronous generators, the magnetic field of excitation has a constant component. It does not matter whether it is a permanent magnet or a controlled electromagnet, the result must be a constant looped magnetic flux.

The best thing for the technology is not to get involved in global energy (they will not be able to replace large-capacity power plants), but to focus on autonomous devices for water transport, for example. If ageing ambitions prevail, the future is not bright.