This forum is preserved as a permanent archive. The community continues at eMedia Press.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Hubbard Coil

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Dave45
    replied
    does ozone just create a shield or does it absorb the radiation.

    Leave a comment:


  • MonsieurM
    replied
    Why Is the Earth So Hot? Radioactivity Is Half the Answer | News & Opinion | PCMag.com

    it still leaves open the question of what's generating the other half?
    The inner Mantle:

    Inner core - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    There is an East-West asymmetry in the inner core seismological data. There is a model which explains this by differences at the surface of the inner core - melting in one hemisphere and crystallization in the other
    the other alternative based on the above theory would be a radioactive north pole and a crystal south pole from which you add extra oscillating crystals to amplify and collect energy thus created

    see also http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...tml#post148135


    Last edited by MonsieurM; 07-19-2011, 11:58 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • MonsieurM
    replied
    Originally posted by boguslaw View Post
    Your first idea was much more interesting. I don't know why so much people insist in using radioactive material.
    I just wanted to add a little info related to radioactive material:

    Why Is the Earth So Hot? Radioactivity Is Half the Answer | News & Opinion | PCMag.com

    About half of the heat that the earth generates itself is due to radioactive decay, scientists have concluded. While a recent study published in Nature Geoscience by the Japan-based KamLAND collaboration (which runs an important radiation detector) has shed light on processes deep within the bowels of the planet, it still leaves open the question of what's generating the other half?

    similar radioactive elements resonate the same, right; if he used radioactive elements, a big if, wasn't it to recreate this:

    John W. Keely
    ...When these harmonics form unisons or direct harmonic relations the two vibrating aggregates and their chords of vibration are said to be sympathetic to each other. This unison of frequency dictates that what happens to one vibratorily happens to the other simultaneously.
    then amplify it with oscillator crystals
    Last edited by MonsieurM; 07-19-2011, 11:44 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • wrtner
    replied
    Originally posted by MonsieurM View Post
    Did anyone figure out the two words in Hubbard's article...
    The newspaper is in Seattle.

    If anyone lives there, or knows someone who does, it would
    be really good if they were to make an appointment to view
    the archives and see for themselves. Maybe photograph the
    page.

    Leave a comment:


  • MonsieurM
    replied
    Did anyone figure out the two words in Hubbard's article...

    Leave a comment:


  • MonsieurM
    replied
    Originally posted by morpher44 View Post
    As Rodin has been saying, "everything is a coil".
    That is a pretty profound statement.
    Indeed...

    check these posts out:





    Leave a comment:


  • MonsieurM
    replied
    Originally posted by morpher44 View Post
    I just realized one reason PHI appears in Hubbard's coil
    diameter relationships.

    Its because he selected to put 8 cylinder coils around his central coil.
    Starting from the center of each of these 8, if you draw a line
    to the center of the coil, you have a distance that can be derived
    by dividing the circle up into 8 equal angles - 45 degrees.
    Then using algebra, you can find the inner core diameter
    relative to those outer coil diameters.
    The ratio works out to be 1.613 ... which is very close to PHI.

    Had Hubbard selected to put only 6 coils around his central
    cylinder, I think that central cylinder would need to have
    the SAME diameter as the outer cylinders.

    PHI may be significant here for another reason, but it make
    sense for it to appear here due to the simple fact that he
    selected to use 8 coils around his core.
    Funny you mention the number 8, a while back i posted this :

    i hope this sentence will inspired someone when building a circuit: from the same link as the previous post


    Leary began to divide the 8 circuits into 24 phases[
    from this post: http://www.energeticforum.com/146336-post73.html

    Leave a comment:


  • MonsieurM
    replied
    Originally posted by morpher44 View Post

    Btw, Hubbard became one of the fathers of LSD.
    Alfred Matthew Hubbard - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    -- morpher44

    search lsd users and fractal figures...

    Why are fractals so common in hallucinogenic trips? : Drugs

    as the saying goes: To understand a man, you've got to walk a mile in his shoes, whether they fit or not.


    this maybe the reason for lsd consumption, he understood that the universe is fractal...

    personally i don't prone the use of lsd (or any man made drugs)

    Last edited by MonsieurM; 07-09-2011, 03:37 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • MonsieurM
    replied
    Originally posted by morpher44 View Post
    I've been reading all I can find about the so called
    "Hubbard Coil".

    Alfred M. Hubbard: Coil Generator

    Hubbard never got a patent, and yet we find
    these patents:

    Paul M. Brown - 4,835,433
    Spitting image of the Hubbard coil.
    Apparatus for direct conversion of ... - Google Patent Search
    Mr. Brown was killed in a car crash:
    Mike Kremer - The strange Legacy of Paul M. Brown Ph.D

    William N. Barbat - Self-Sustaining Electric-Power Generator Utilizing Electrons of Low Internal Mass to Magnify Inductive Energy
    Pub No. US2007/0007844 A1 Jan. 11, 2007
    Self-sustaining electric-power ... - Google Patent Search
    William Barbat: Self-Sustaining Electrical Generator; United States Patent Application # 0070007844

    Both of these and perhaps other seems to use Hubbard's
    coil as a nice 3-stage transformer design.

    Why do we in the real-world not see Hubbard's coil in working
    systems?

    I would like to see some replications of Hubbard's coil, respecting
    his thoughts on golden ratios, etc.
    If I get some time, I'll attempt to replicate it myself.

    I think it may be true that this design has certain "optimum" characteristics
    that are useful ... even if you are using plane-ole vanilla AC currents
    (i.e. no radiation).

    Btw, Hubbard became one of the fathers of LSD.
    Alfred Matthew Hubbard - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    -- morpher44
    This sound like fractal all over, i like the info morph44 thank you




    ps: check out this thread a lot of info that might help you:





    ---------
    ps another hubbard thread: http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...ur-help-2.html
    Last edited by MonsieurM; 07-10-2011, 10:43 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • boguslaw
    replied
    Do you have Joseph H.Cater book ?

    Leave a comment:


  • wrtner
    replied
    Originally posted by morpher44 View Post
    I hadn't found this one before.
    This looks similar to the Hubbard coil.

    The self sustaining electric generator
    Not Carter but Cater; Joseph Cater. [Important for googling]. A considerable
    mention in Patrick's Chapter 5:


    Cater wrote a book called "The Awesome force". I'll try and find a
    link.

    Leave a comment:


  • dragon
    replied
    great antenna...

    I haven't played around with the 7 coils I made up a whole lot as yet but last night I was working with another coil set up and the "what if" kicked in..

    I connected it to the little oscillator I had, running at 2.7mHz and found it puts out a very large field. It easily lights a series of 12 LED's on an AV plug without any connection. I was driving the center coil with only 1 wire and the outer 6 coils were wired in series - all connected or basically shorted. Kind of interesting as it would light just about anything on the table connected to an LED... and as well you could touch anything metal with an "LED on a stick" ( LED with an AV plug) and it would light.

    I removed it from the circuit and installed another coil I've been working with ( standard nothing fancy ) and connected the Hubbard arrangment to the scope and moved it around the area the scope leads would reach. It seems to be an excellent antenna this way as well.

    After shutting down the circuit I had the hubbard arrangement still connected to the scope and noticed some really small hatching in the line and adjusted the voltage... it was still picking up something in the area and showed a rather choppy sine wave of about a 1.5 volt p-p. It's quite possible it was picking up the CFL running overhead. Interesting none the less... almost 8ft away from the CFL and oscillating at 1.5 volt. One heck of an antenna, and a uniqe air core transformer.
    ________
    Last edited by dragon; 01-19-2012, 03:31 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • morpher44
    replied
    Inside a Capacitor?

    The other patents that are similar to the Hubbard Coil
    talk about ionizing the area where the coil resides to produce
    a sort of "lighter" mass photon or some such.
    There is mumbo jumbo about radiation, etc.

    Ok... forget the radiation ... what happens if I put the coil
    directly INSIDE a capacitor.

    "Coilpacitor(TM)".


    YouTube - Hubbard Coil - In a Capacitor?

    Leave a comment:


  • morpher44
    replied
    Hubbard Coil - Experiments with Mutual Induction

    YouTube - Hubbard Coil - Experiments with Mutual Induction

    Leave a comment:


  • dragon
    replied
    Originally posted by morpher44 View Post
    Looking from the top of the coil down I used CCW for all.
    I'm guessing that as long as all coils are same direction, that
    mutual induction will work most effectively.
    However, it may not make a noticeable difference.
    I wound up the 6 coils today, havent had alot of time to play with them but I did manage to run a couple tests...

    First I wired them one coil to the other - top/top then bottom/bottom and so on but it seemed to cancel each other out then wired them top to bottom standard series and it worked well. That was why I asked about the coil windings, the 2007 patent showed it CW then CCW wiring them top/top-bottom/bottom... at least thats what it looked like to me.. kind of confusing looking at all the coils in the drawing.

    Laying next to a coil that was driven with 5 volts and 3ma at 2mHz the outer coil connections would light 12 LED's in series very nicely. The series LED's are on an AV plug.

    I used a function generator to drive the center coil, 10v p-p at around 5ma. Brought it to resonance at about 690khz and the 12 LED's would light nicely in close proximity to the outer coils - no contact was made.

    The scope showed an almost perfect sine wave with around a 350 volt peak to peak output at resonance connected to the output leads on the outer series coils.

    Definately some potential here. I'll probably play around with these as they are for a bit before I wind the outer shorting coils...
    ________
    Last edited by dragon; 01-19-2012, 03:28 AM.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X