Magnetic monopole arises when magnets repell each other.

[sucahyo]

Anyone recognize this machine?

I never see it, can you give clue?

It looks like acceleron wheel in hotwheel 3D animation movie, where the doctor name is Peter Tezla. "we are not ready yet", "the spike blown out the fuse of entire North America", "free energy", the film maker must be one of us LOL.

[Inquorate]

on what magnetism is?

I posted some stuff on magnetism in bodkin's primary state of matter thread page 3. This thread hurts my head too, but magnetism is what I understand least so I try to keep up :-)

[Iotayodi]

Anyone recognize this machine?

[Iotayodi]

Some really nice links there! Heres a fairly new discovery.


Discovery of a new magnetic order: Skyrmion Lattice in a Chiral Magnet: Forschungsneutronenquelle Heinz Maier-Leibnitz (FRM II)

[sucahyo]

magnetic flux is it's atom shape?

image from:
The Tom Bearden Website

There is similar image of the atom which posted 100 years ago, occult chemistry. It should not be ignored .........

CHAPTER I - THE NATURE OF MATTER

[Vortex]

Moving images for your mind

The fellow from nanomagnetics.us was on this forum at one time, maybe he's still reading. He found my post about the lens and joined.

I think there's still a thread about the lens or viewing the magnetic fields (I might have even started that thread)...just search.

amigo WOW
Seems you guys over looked this.
This is amazing stuff, live, real time videos of MOVING Magnetic Flux fields.
Not a computer simulation.

Image taken via a Flux Resonator of a circular magnet



Connect the Dots!

Warning: watching moving magnetic flux fields are highly addictive
Videos Your choice: YouTube: YouTube - SirZerp's Channel OR Blip.tv: SirZerp on blip.tv
(download these videos and watch them frame by frame stop action!!)

Downloads: of nanomagnetics stuff, videos, PDFs, Etc.

Also worth a look-see is Understanding magnets - with EFD and the SPM lens

Enjoy
Randy
Keep on

[Iotayodi]

Ive been looking for a certain magnetic configuration for about 3 weeks when I ran across your one model. Im not looking for a monopole myself. If the Higgs Boson is found then we may know if one exists.
My thoughts are strictly on the first "machine" thousands of years ago which there were 5 of them,and if there is a way to produce electricity from the same type of configuration. Your model is similar to it. Ill relate this to you later. I need drawings made up. Lets see if anyone can guess what "machine" this is.
My ideas were simplistic starting with 90 degree planes and the most powerful magnetic field I know of which is a black hole. Then by happenstance to the "machine". This is all speculative and Im no Physicist .
Im going to give you some links fyi to think about and it may or may not give you ideas.
With the newer wire technology's its possible that we should be using these types instead of plain copper.
Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd.｜Superconductivity Web Site BSCCO Wire
If your study is intense then you need some type of magnetic software. The programs are not cheap.
Magnetism 3D
Im partial to the magnetic string theory for a few reasons. Including talking to my Astrophysicist nephew. The utube shows it.

Big News about Black Holes! | Starts With A Bang!
Space Today Online - Deep Space -- Black holes are fuzzballs
YouTube - Einstein's Idiots # 9 -- The secret Law of Attraction
I thought this was interesting. Beam of electrons moving in a circle in a magnetic field (cyclotron motion). Lighting is caused by excitation of atoms of gas in a bulb.

Ill have my model drawings made up and post the link.

[sucahyo]

It is already an overunity device

That's a waste of magnets if you ask me. If you want to experiment with this setup you'd be better off using a toroidal wound coil at the perimeter. You'll get a much better circular field and don't need to fine tune so many pieces.

But it would need electricity then, and wouldn't be self running like what the video show, it already move without additional power and using just magnet. If we conect the middle blade to generator, we get electricity for free. I don't think using coil will allow us easily achieve that.

And I think tuning the coil to make it self supporting is a lot harder than fixing magnet position, and I don't think making a small version is achievable. I think stacking magnet next to each other is a must or else the blade will stop.

I think the problem of using coil on similar configuration:
- hard to figure out which side of pole is strongest, may change location.
- too many variable to tune, like resonant, wound type, core type, wire type, etc.
- need electricity and a way to efficiently capture it to be able to self sustain
- positioning the coil maybe a lot harder to do than magnet.
- bulky, in video the replica is smaller than hand palm.
- more expensive if we consider the use of special core, special wire, resonance detection tool cost, etc.

If this already work, I think exact replication is better than improvising it without knowing if we can replicate it or not.



About your graph that show no force at the middle of moving magnet pole, I think Howard Johnson magnetic flux explain it. It make sense if there zero zone between north pole and there is no force at the middle of moving magnet pole.

[broli]

I just read your thread... it is absolutely amazing.. But at the same time it hurts my mind. It is not so simple to me. It is really good stuff. Keep up the effort. You could be on to something very good, but maybe many people find it hard to understand.

Thanks for the praise. But hurting people's mind is not my intention . If you went along my same path all these things would have made sense. This is why it's important to try and do your own thinking even if thousands have done it before you.

The only problem I currently have is the lack of experimentation means. I realy envy the people here who have acces to big labs and machinery. But I hope this will change soon.

[BinzerBob]

As an addition here is how the strength of the field looks like if you were walking on the plane away from 0.



You would see there's a bulge which makes kind of sense as it had to start from 0. But if you decrease the distance of the poles this bulge would get higher and higher until the field truly looks like an electrical charged monopole.

I was also wondering why my threads aren't popular. I barely get to discuss these subjects with people so they just die off. Aren't they good enough? Or are they stupid? Or something else?

I just read your thread... it is absolutely amazing.. But at the same time it hurts my mind. It is not so simple to me. It is really good stuff. Keep up the effort. You could be on to something very good, but maybe many people find it hard to understand.

You know back in the day before the company I worked for closed, I presented to them the solution to what they were looking for for the last 20 years. They did not understand it, and did not listen. Until 5 more years passed by, and they still were scratching their heads, then decided to try one of my solutions. They realized it was bang on, but it was also too late for them (in part because they did not listen, but also because of other things too).

Keep up the good work.

[broli]

Device that work the same principle as Howard Johnson, mentioned by derrickjmanderson at:
Imhotep's Lab Interactive FAQ • View topic - Recommended Fan to use for conversion

The one who built the device is Juan Carlos Aviles Moran :
Magnetic Repellency Unit (U.R.M)

link by derrickjmanderson, translation:
Translation result for http://freedom.over-blog.es/

alternate


video:
YouTube - IEVE //// free energy magnetic mill juan carlos aviles moran
YouTube - juan carlos aviles moran

That's a waste of magnets if you ask me. If you want to experiment with this setup you'd be better off using a toroidal wound coil at the perimeter. You'll get a much better circular field and don't need to fine tune so many pieces.

[sucahyo]

Device that work the same principle as Howard Johnson, mentioned by derrickjmanderson at:
Imhotep's Lab Interactive FAQ • View topic - Recommended Fan to use for conversion

The one who built the device is Juan Carlos Aviles Moran :
Magnetic Repellency Unit (U.R.M)

link by derrickjmanderson, translation:
Translation result for http://freedom.over-blog.es/

alternate


video:
YouTube - IEVE //// free energy magnetic mill juan carlos aviles moran
YouTube - juan carlos aviles moran

[sigzidfit]

Heat aka (no-heat) and Spin

If I recall correctly Joe Newman had some interesting diagrams relating to magnetic spin effects in his books.

The patents on the xogen hydrogen generator say it has the ability to selectively produce H atoms of varying spins. Haha.

Relating to heat which I reckon represents a differential. Perhaps these and those referenced by them will provide a clue or two.

Magnetic heat pumping
Patent number: 4069028
Filing date: Nov 30, 1976
Issue date: Jan 17, 1978
Inventor: Gerald V. Brown
Assignee: The United States of America as represented by the United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Magnetic heat pumping - Google Patents

Magnetic heating and cooling systems
Patent number: 5231834
Filing date: Aug 27, 1990
Issue date: Aug 3, 1993
Inventor: James E. Burnett
Magnetic heating and cooling systems - Google Patents

IMPROVEMENTS IN PYROMAGNETIC MOTORS
Patent number: 3551709
Filing date: Jun 25, 1968
Issue date: Dec 1970
Inventor: Kemenczky
IMPROVEMENTS IN PYROMAGNETIC MOTORS - Google Patents

PYROMAGNETO-ELECTRIC GENERATOR
Patent number: 428057
Issue date: May 1890
Inventor: Tesla et al.
PYROMAGNETO-ELECTRIC GENERATOR - Google Patents

[Vortex]

I googled thermomagnetic.

Thermo-Magnetic Motors.

YouTube - Thermal magnetic engine

Peace
PJ

yes sigzidfit, this is a good example of how heat robs a magnet of power.
The hard question is why does it lose power? ...
Heat is an energy that generally "add to" not "takes away" power.

A vortex cools .. adding heat would rob the vortex of it's relative coolness.
But I do not think it is that simple. .. heat would SLOW the vortex down!!
Correctly answering why will give answers to how the power Becomes what it is, maybe where it is coming from too.

[Vortex]

3D model of the 4 flux vortexes

That book make me come up with a couple of question.

- How the vortex created in a tubular magnet. If it keep changing position, then tubular core is the worst design of making magnet out of electric. Should we make them flat or square instead?
- How do force / make sure the biggest magnetic vortex in one corner of an electromagnet.
- Getting the most electricity out of a magnet have to be angled according to the location of biggest vortex?
- Would star with 4 corner shaped magnet better than square or circle?

Firstly let's review the 3D model of the 4 vortexes

Ref link.

Flat or square does not matter (as I think you are thinking shape) ..
a vortex is cone/spiral shaped and the shape of the magnet will not change
the basic shape of the vortex.
There will still be 4 .. count them .. 4 vortexes to each magnet.

I have questions too:
A vortex is not a static structure, it is in motion, continuously.
How fast is magnetism?
Where is the "Stuff" coming from that is sucked into the TOP of each vortex?
Where is the "Stuff" going that, ah, disappears at the BOTTOM of each vortex?
The "Stuff" is the ? magnetic current ? polarized then ..