Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Mechanical Engine

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Michael John Nunnerley
    replied
    what I have also found

    @all
    Over the last week or so I have been quiet on this thread, d'nt worry I have been busy and I came to more or less the same conclusions on the point of working on only the first 90 degree quadrent, all the work has to be done here from 12 to 3. I am at the moment trying to adapt this type of principle to what I was doing before and it is looking very, very promising. Will let alll know when I am a little more advanced

    Mike

    Leave a comment:


  • john_g
    replied
    Originally posted by CloudSeeder View Post
    @john_g: Yeah, I'm sure you understood page 2 and I imagine Peter does also. It looks like Greek to me. And the balls might work plenty good too if you want to build one. It looks like fun.
    CloudSeeder

    I get it up to a point, but couldn't get the timing of the counterbalance to work, seemed it needed to move more often to keep the cycle going. That was last night., I will look again today. Some of the translation is unclearly written which dosn't help.

    However I can see that by using the counter balance the problem of shifting weights upwards is no longer a problem , and addition energy is being putinto the system - Know what I'll be starting today.
    Last edited by john_g; 05-07-2009, 08:29 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • CloudSeeder
    replied
    @john_g: Yeah, I'm sure you understood page 2 and I imagine Peter does also. It looks like Greek to me. And the balls might work plenty good too if you want to build one. It looks like fun.

    Leave a comment:


  • CloudSeeder
    replied
    If the 8 hammers were just 4 pounds apiece, 8 x 4 = 32, so 32 pounds of hammers spinning at such a fast speed I'd be surprised if it wouldn't jerk Haystack Calhoun off his feet. It took a brave man sure of his arm and grip strength to attempt stopping it. It would be like jumping a steer in a rodeo. And ya better be wearing some good gloves.

    Leave a comment:


  • CloudSeeder
    replied
    @john_g: Yep, it's a good thick read alright. It's becoming right clear what Mr. Bessler did. Also, it says near the end of the pgh it had TWO SMALL AXLES, so the wheel had a split axle, meaning he was using the internal radius all the way to the center, possibly through the center for a seesaw effect.

    Page 1, last pgh: Weights strike at right angles to the axis. So they hit at 3 o'clock.

    Page 2: Somehow Jan Rutkowski makes a leap from falling weights to they have to be balls, but we know from several on this thread it was likely hammer shapes leaning over past 12 o'clock and smacking solid at 3 o'clock. It could be that the ball system would work, I don't know because Pg 2 leaves me in the dust.

    But I seriously doubt falling balls would achieve a hard speed of 26-50 revolutions per minute and lift a man off the ground when he grabs the wheel to bring it to a stop. Eight maul-sized 8-lb. hammers would because of every 8 hammers you'd have 3 striking the down side one at a time in a constant succession and the 4th one entering the fall as the bottom one was exiting for the ride up.

    Jan said the wheel itself was very light, so the hammers would basically be turning their own weight. Looks like somebody ought to be able to take it from there. How hard can hammers be? They lean, they fall.
    Last edited by CloudSeeder; 05-06-2009, 11:06 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • john_g
    replied
    Hi All

    Some great progress being made here.

    The link below I found today - haven't seen it mentioned before.

    In part 1/2 he explains how he thinks the Bessler wheel worked, which appears quite plausiable. If nothing else, he shows using a inverted mushroom weight operating on a seasaw that then opens up new ideas for moving weights - Well did for me anyway!

    Maybe his input would be helpful?

    Gravity Wheel


    Regards
    John

    Leave a comment:


  • CloudSeeder
    replied
    @Inquorate: Yes, so either the design needs work or the design could need for something extra. Perhaps a "leading weight" positioned closer in towards the hub and slightly advanced ahead of the boards. That might serve to assist "pulling" the weights into what they do.

    I'm using a similar "counterweight" operating instead as a "forwardweight". It will show very obviously in the video I'm currently working on.
    Last edited by CloudSeeder; 05-06-2009, 08:20 AM. Reason: I'm using a similar "counterweight" operating instead as a "forwardweight".

    Leave a comment:


  • Inquorate
    replied
    update

    the resonant transfer of pendulum kinetic energy from 6 to 12 is dependent on having light wheel/lever and light pendulum weights. and it doesn't seem to produce enough energy gain at that weight to self sustain.

    will keep you all posted

    Leave a comment:


  • CloudSeeder
    replied
    Hmm. Actually, SPEAG was a better device as actual devices go but only being able to use them at one place on the entire globe was the drawback that makes Gravity Wheels of all kinds better. One thing that made SPEAG so great was that being horizontal, I had the arms shaped like airplane wings. So when it got past 200-250 miles per hour wing speed it was expected to go airborne and quite weightless, ignoring gravity and raising the weight off the bearings, achieving frictionless. That was where I expected it to pay all the bills (aka be making more electricity than it was using to power the central hub motor). This is the first time I've ever said much about it to anyone... It's real good to see it back in a different form.

    @Inquorate! If you use heavier weights you should be able to shove it harder & maybe see a less jerky motion.

    Leave a comment:


  • CloudSeeder
    replied
    Maximum Gravity Effect on Inquorate's Wheel

    @ Inquorate: One thing I left out of my lengthy analysis your newest idea here: YouTube - shifting resonance in pendulum's swing and my post => http://www.energeticforum.com/53544-post501.html ... taking another look at what it is doing, it's quite a wonderful design! What Inquorate has done is gotten the entire swinging pendulum arm to be exerting centrifugal force all the way to the bottom max 6pm.

    For the arm at the top, the arm~weight combination is hanging inside the radius of the "wheel" (where it exercises the least influence), as opposed to at the bottom where it is swinging outside the radius which is then become an extension of the main middle board throwing an extra-length Leverage-force-in-Motion at the hub (and into the opposite side at the top since the hub-fulcrum can't move). Being hanging straight down as it goes past 6 o'clock the arm~weight~board combination is at the most pull of centrifugal force. It could be that the centrifugal at maximum gravity 6 o'clock is so maximized it just plain over-dominates the centripetal, holding the weight temporarily to an extremely limited swinging.

    But what happened to the centripetal force, go to the top?

    The opposite actions are happening at the top board.
    The centripetal is being slam braked from moving
    at the bottom by the centrifugal+gravity!

    At the height of its ascension there's the least gravity pull of any other position it will go through, which is conversely maximizing the centripetal, but since the board with its weights are hanging by a pivot the centripetal force is being converted into and can only throw a swing into the unit. That must be it Inquorate! =>

    The centripetal braked at the bottom is adding to the centripetal at the top to
    push the top board, a mirrored 180 degree flip = a Force direction reversal.
    It jumps the Y axis from bottom-left to top-right,
    a quadrant jump of energy, a reflection.


    I lack the Calculus and Electronics to write the equation but I see a falling and rising sine wave in a circular device. It looks amazingly like pictures I saw in the Grob Electronics Theory book we had at ECPI in 1987. The weighted pendulum arms are "cutting across the lines of magnetic flux". Yeah, I have seen this before. WoW! Inquorate, you've made somewhat of a vertical version of my device I called S.P.E.A.G. in my 1989 novel. Whew. SPEAG was tough. Yours is easier therefore better. SPEAG was location-crippled, only for working at the geomagnetic north pole; yours will work EVERYWHERE. Yeah man, I know exactly what you did now AND IT'S MARVELOUS. SPEAG was electrical with coil windings on its spinning cores as it passed over spaced metal cylinders sitting on end, plus it was spinning horizontal.

    Your device is a vertical+mechanical version of mag-electric SPEAG.
    My hat is truly off to you now for sure. You have applied
    a rule of magnetism to non-magnet weights.
    Star Trek Moment:


    You have captured what has to be captured by these Gravity Wheels => MECHANICAL UNHAPPINESS. Your device wants to stop at the bottom with a Passion but is then pulled back up for yet another spin against its will hahahaha. SPEAG didn't do that. You've gone beyond SPEAG. You've gone all the way to plaid <> you have nailed

    THE UNITY OF OPPOSITES LOCKED IN COMBAT BY A CIRCLE.
    You'll see it after you rub your eyes some more.
    You did a cross-platform with a twist.
    ....
    Last edited by CloudSeeder; 05-04-2009, 03:43 PM. Reason: THE UNITY OF OPPOSITES LOCKED IN COMBAT BY A CIRCLE.

    Leave a comment:


  • CloudSeeder
    replied
    The Next Step

    @All: Some of us are getting close to the next step, showing the Gravity Wheel as a real engine that will do Work. Most of our devices so far are spinning on a center hub & roller bearings. With mine I'm doing something different. I got one of these hard 5/8-inch diameter dowel rods from the hardware and my device is going to be built around it directly attached. The ends are sticking out so that is where the roller bearings will be. 5/8 dowel rods works out real well because a lot of rollers and clamps & such comes with a 5/8-inch inner diameter for a very snug fit, also very 90 degree squared.

    This makes a solid spinning axle not just the wheel. On that axle I can mount an additional gear to turn a generator or lift a weight on a chain, something that will show in the camera very clearly the device is Ready and Able to do Work.

    It would be nice if I could find a couple small sprockets and some plastic bike chain. I don't want to use up the energy lifting the chain. Any ideas where I might obtain such stuff is greatly appreciated. I may have to make some of this stuff out of wood. Think I'll run by a few stores today and see if I can get a woodworking set for small work, like a tiny drill press with a router attachment. Anybody have any ideas which store?

    Without needing a bank loan i hope.

    Leave a comment:


  • CloudSeeder
    replied
    @Marxist: Yep, it's obvious you've been likewise taken in => YouTube - kniehebel01m4 <> but, it does look worth building. Hmm, maybe you can attach the rods to the green weights with rather stiff springs?

    Your choice of wheel material will be important. Perhaps you can use some of that lightweight stuff that has holes drilled all over it, peg board. That way you need to move anything around you're In Like Flint. I bought some pieces of poplar to use for mine but I should have got peg board. I'll get some today.

    It is a bit scary, taking the first step onto the Moon surface. I've lined up a camcorder to use. It's all one day at a time eh?

    Leave a comment:


  • marxist
    replied
    looking out

    Originally posted by CloudSeeder View Post
    ... LOOK OUT MARXIST! .....
    Yes, ok I'm trying to.
    In the meantime you look here, please:
    YouTube - zoanthropos's Channel

    Please consume them slowly slowly. Frame wise in slow motion. Especially the very beginnings and the ends.
    Hope we'll manage to get over the hill.

    Leave a comment:


  • CloudSeeder
    replied
    It's magic. He's whipping us with a magic stick. Fairy dust sprinkled on camera lens. LOOK OUT MARXIST! He's puttin a darn spell on everybody that looks at his video. Now he's got you. Oh, the humanity.

    Leave a comment:


  • marxist
    replied
    there is something there.

    Hi Inquorate,
    just want to confirm CloudSeeder 's notion, that you have found something there. I don't know what it is, but try to not let it go.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X