This forum is preserved as a permanent archive. The community continues at eMedia Press.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Big Joule Theif

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Bodkins
    replied
    Originally posted by Rectified View Post
    Or could one say, everything in the comos is made of Ether, are the magnetic fields the result of resistances to the movement of the Ether?

    Rectified
    YESish
    all matter is ether

    Leave a comment:


  • shlodo
    replied
    Originally posted by sucahyo View Post
    Would bridge rectifier increase input power?
    Sucahyo,

    On my JT it does not draw more with the bridge. In fact when the battery is connected Amp draw decreases. I am charging with big 12V 12Ah batteries so u can see a clear difference when its connected or not connected.
    I do not know how this compares to simply using 1 diode.

    but with a bridge u would imagine u can capture forward and backward current/voltages

    -shlodo

    Leave a comment:


  • shlodo
    replied
    Back EMF vs Radiant Spike (Potential Spike)

    Originally posted by Joit View Post
    Why? Talking about Radiant does makes me crazy.
    I can see BEMF at my Scope, but no RADIANT!
    The BEMF will never be higher than the forward EMF. its the collapsing field that causes a radiant spike. If u see a huge voltage spike for a split second then that is the "radiant spike". u can charge with the BEMF but u will never get more out than in.
    as the EM field CHANGES in the coil, energy is sucked from he vacuum resulting in a large spike in potential. This is true for Bedini Motor, Joule Thief, Teslas Impulse Technology, imhotep radiant osc., Ed Gray motor.

    Here's a quote from Aaron who is on the forums (found in Aromaz joint research thread):
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    "back emf vs potential spike - Aaron"

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Hi everyone, happy newyears - 14 hours for me to go

    Anyway, here is the very literal and specific difference between back emf and the radiant spike.

    The back emf is lenz's law - it is the counter current created to oppose the forward current in a coil for example. The back emf is what happens simultaneously while we charge the ignition coil.

    Then after the power is shut off from the coil and the magnetic coil collapses - that spike that comes back is this inductive spike, transient spike, voltage potential spike, time potential, radiant spike. It is what comes after the forward charge on the coil and back emf have both already stopped happening.

    The back emf is what slows down the charging of the coil - there is no back emf there when the power is disconnected, that is why the magnetic field collapses so fast - there is no counter current (back emf) there to hold it back."
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------
    I have a great video of John Bedini explaining all of this, I just need to convert format and I'll upload.
    If anyone is interested in learning about Radiant Energy I highly recommend this:
    Energy from the Vacuum Science Series

    I guess it doesnt really matter wat we call it as long as we can use it, but I know wat Bedini and Tesla would call it... (sorry if im too off topic )
    -shlodo

    Leave a comment:


  • Rectified
    replied
    Originally posted by Bodkins View Post
    Everything in the comos is made of a Magneticfield.
    Or could one say, everything in the comos is made of Ether, are the magnetic fields the result of resistances to the movement of the Ether?

    Rectified

    Leave a comment:


  • Jules Tresor
    replied
    Hello Lidmotor,
    I was thinking that you could try to put your 5W solar panel behind the CFL to see if there is little power to collect
    And may be making a reflective foil on the other side of the CFL to try to collect more power for the solar panel.
    Congratulations for your work !
    MDG

    PS: 50 mA x 2 Volts = 0.1 Watt consumption ... only ! for 2 LED, and 1 CFL, and one battery charging, and now a small cap charging through the Peltier module ... add the solar panel ... You are going efficient man ! That's the less we can say

    Leave a comment:


  • sucahyo
    replied
    Originally posted by Lidmotor View Post
    I played around with the bridge rectifer on the back end of the JT and got results like Slayer. The BEMF voltage goes way up. I have my system running on a non-stop test run (50 hrs now) so I did not want to disturb it to much and only tried the bridge on the transistor that was free then took it off.
    Would bridge rectifier increase input power?

    Leave a comment:


  • Bodkins
    replied
    Originally posted by Joit View Post
    Why? Talking about Radiant does makes me crazy.
    I can see BEMF at my Scope, but no RADIANT!

    And anyway, getting the EM back or Radiant, means for me, you get a stronger Magnetfield push back,
    Everything in the comos is made of a Magneticfield.

    lidmotor thanks, got a video uploading which i will put on the primary phyics thread that will help explain what happening.
    you say hot and cold about plates this is very important.
    Well done
    Last edited by Bodkins; 02-19-2009, 08:00 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lidmotor
    replied
    One for Bodkins

    I played around with the bridge rectifer on the back end of the JT and got results like Slayer. The BEMF voltage goes way up. I have my system running on a non-stop test run (50 hrs now) so I did not want to disturb it to much and only tried the bridge on the transistor that was free then took it off.
    The real news was what I did with a Peltier module and an earth ground connection. I put the Peltier under the big toroid coil, used a diode, a bridge rectifier, an earth ground, and using a cap-- showed it charging in this video. This ones for you Richard. Long live the EARTH GROUND.

    YouTube - Peltier charging on a CFL Joule Thief

    Lidmotor

    Leave a comment:


  • Joit
    replied
    Originally posted by Bodkins View Post
    Thank god for that its been driving me crazy all this bemf talk!
    Why? Talking about Radiant does makes me crazy.
    I can see BEMF at my Scope, but no RADIANT!

    Anyhow its for me a Family. You get EM field, and this can make Current.
    Its like say generating something, need a Field, and current what comes out.

    And anyway, getting the EM back or Radiant, means for me, you get a stronger Magnetfield push back,
    doesnt mean, that this carry Current without Inductor.
    Looks pretty like no Current with no Inductor from the EM Field alone. Anyway, we need someone to declare that. :P

    And for charging Batteries, i would prefer the Bedini style, that you connect the Charge with '-' to '+'Run,
    that the Minus of the charge get a chance to decharge too.
    I played a bit around with it, but still not sure, wich one works better, but for now i stay with the Bedini Style.

    And i could slap my Head, sure would a Recifier be better for collecting the "....." (Insert right word here)
    or change 4 Diodes to a rectifier.
    I hope you guys dont forget to collect it with more then one Diode.
    Unfortunatly it looks like for Leds is there no different, but for charge, i saw a big Jump with 2 or more Diodes at charging Speed.


    Edit Right now i wonder about a new Set of Accus, seems they dont get a lot Load from the Spikes,
    maybe a Reason, why you should charge them first time with a Standard charger, to put Electrons in?
    Last edited by Joit; 02-18-2009, 11:22 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • slayer007
    replied
    shlodo was talking about using rectifiers instead of diodes.
    And I agree with him I think rectifiers do work a lot better.

    Going acroos the emitter and collector of the 3055.
    With a diode I get 6v with a rectifier I get 15v.

    Here's a video I seen on you tube.

    YouTube - How back emf has a dual polarity.

    I was thinking maybe recifiers are picking up the BEMF both ways.

    @ lidmotor I liked the way you had the leds lighting off the 2222 nice work.
    I just thought it was strang picking up the - BEMF off the 2222.
    just some thing else to look at.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bodkins
    replied
    germanium transistors

    Originally posted by Xenomorph View Post
    @Slayer007:

    What do you think of trying germanium transistors like gadgetmall has been doing?
    If i am not mistaken their lower base-emitter voltage of 0.3V might help
    reduce the amp draw too. It might however maybe also reduce what comes out of the secondary too much, just a thought, could be wrong.

    EDIT: On the other hand the 2N222 and 2N3055 combo seems rock solid, not sure if germaniums would reach their efficiency.
    I have some send me your address will send them

    Leave a comment:


  • Bodkins
    replied
    Originally posted by shlodo View Post
    @Everyone

    Hi Guys, I just want to clarify the back emf issue....

    John says its not the BEMF we want to capture. The BEMF is the counter Electro Motive force and is always lower than the pulse voltage (Lenzs Law). Hence, cant get more out of the BEMF than wat we put in.

    Bedini says its the radiant spike that we want to capture not the BEMF. (I think the term BEMF is used in patents to get them through the patent office).

    the coil is energized and As the coil collapses the high voltage spike is sucked fom the vacuum and we can capture it with a diode, like we are all doing.

    He also explained that by putting a bridge rectifier across any pulsed coil will extract this spike (we have been using 1 diode off the emitter). This is the essence of Teslas impulse technology. It appears that on Bedinis larger motors this method is used, instead of the single diode trick from the monopole SSG circuit he released on the internet.
    Thank god for that its been driving me crazy all this bemf talk!

    cheers lidmotor try it with a diode may see a difference

    Leave a comment:


  • Lidmotor
    replied
    Circuit modifications

    Originally posted by slayer007 View Post
    Here's a better drawing of the circuit.
    Xee2 at OU redrew it for me.

    I penciled in a couple spots were you could pick up the - bemf
    Comming off the emitter I get 6v off the base I get 9v.
    This is off a 1.5V AA battery.

    Both going back to negative source for the positive.
    @ Slayer---Thanks for the circuit update. I noticed that you added a 10uf cap. I will try that. On my setup I am coming off the collector of the 2n2222 to LEDs, then to a charge battery, and back to the emitter of the 2222. This way the flourescent bulb stays on and I can still charge. If I come off the 2n3055 collector for the BEMF it pumps really good but it kllls the flourescent unless I turn the power way up. I've had my the system running now for 38 hours straight at a 50ma draw swapping 2 pairs of 1.2V NiMH back and forth every 12 hours. This method is what I did on my other JT experiment. Just turn it on and let it go. Forget about the meters---Just see how long will it run. This should run for several days which is pretty impressive for a 13 watt flourescent tube circuit running on 4 AAs. It is the back end charging that makes the difference. I am not convinced that it is simple BEMF charging that is doing it though. It seems that the batteries want to come back and when you hit them with this low amperage high spike of "energy" it is like the jolt encourages them. This is what Shlodo is talking about and what John Bedini says. BEMF may be the wrong term for what is happening here.
    @ Bodkins----I tried the earth ground experiment yesterday that you suggested and it didn't work for me ----but that doesn't mean that it can't work for someone else. I did stick my Peltier module under the toroid coil and got that weird induction charging to happen. It increased with the earth ground connected. So there is something there.

    Cheers,

    Lidmotor

    Leave a comment:


  • Xenomorph
    replied
    @Slayer007:
    Still working on trying to get the amp draw down more.
    What do you think of trying germanium transistors like gadgetmall has been doing?
    If i am not mistaken their lower base-emitter voltage of 0.3V might help
    reduce the amp draw too. It might however maybe also reduce what comes out of the secondary too much, just a thought, could be wrong.

    EDIT: On the other hand the 2N222 and 2N3055 combo seems rock solid, not sure if germaniums would reach their efficiency.
    Last edited by Xenomorph; 02-18-2009, 01:47 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • shlodo
    replied
    Originally posted by slayer007 View Post
    The bigest CFL i tried so far is 13w.
    It gets bright but its not at full brightness.

    Still working on trying to get the amp draw down more.


    @ shlodo

    I tried rectifiers and they do work very well.
    I ran it from the collector and emitter tho.

    I'll have to try it from collector to base.
    I seen the base of the 2n2222 had a lot of voltage sitting there to.
    Sorry slayer I meant to say collect and emitter, not the base. base wont work.

    -shlodo

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X