That was unexpected.... (Magnacoaster)

[gotoluc]

The "mystery" part is just a thermal cut-off...


Guy

I think we have a winner

Looks much like the same component that is on Richard's coil.

One more piece of the puzzle solved

Thanks to Altair

Luc

[gotoluc]

Look at my youtube site, CENTRAFLOW, and look at the favorite, BOYD BUSHMAN part 1

Hi Michael,

yes! good video ... it confirms that two magnets with the same pole pressed together has a special effect.

Here is the direct link to the video: YouTube - Boyd Bushman Part 1

Thanks for sharing

Luc

[darkwizard]

is right

[vrand]

Mike,

Floyd Sweet refers to motional field as well...not sure if the same one but that is the reference that I've read.

Aaron, yea Floyd Sweet refered to the motional electric field theory of operation in his early writings, then jumped on the Tom Beardon/Maxwell/Heavyside theories later on.

Floyd Sweet: Space Quanta Magnifier / Vacuum Triode Amplifier ~ Collected papers, diagrams, photos & videos

Sweet conditioned his ceramic block magnets that AC pulsed the magnets magnetic fields, to his bifilar coils, that cancels the magnet component of the EM and leaves the electric component. Nice design. The problem has been, and continues to be, on how to "condition" the soft ceramic magnets.

-Mike R.

[slayer007]

This picture is from OU it's one of richards motors.

Some one else all ready labled it.

After seeing this I deleted my last post lol.

It looks like it could just be a very basic pulse motor.
In the picture I see a very basic pulse motor with no transistor and a home made reed switch.

It also looks like there is some type of generator or a dc motor for a generator inside.

I think the extra magnets help to strengthen the coil to push the rotter.
And also strengthen the BEMF in the coil.

[vrand]

This picture is from OU it's one of richards motors.

Some one else all ready labled it.

After seeing this I deleted my last post lol.

It looks like it could just be a very basic pulse motor.
In the picture I see a very basic pulse motor with no transistor and a home made reed switch.

It also looks like there is some type of generator or a dc motor for a generator inside.

I think the extra magnets help to strengthen the coil to push the rotter.
And also strengthen the BEMF in the coil.

This photo also shows that the stator coil/magnets combination is in the respulsive mode, either N-N or S-S, as the rotor NIB magnet poles are not attracted to the stator magnet poles.

See how the two magnets never lined up in the photos. This reminds me of the Robert Adams motor setup.

-Mike R.

[gotoluc]

This picture is from OU it's one of richards motors.

Some one else all ready labled it.

After seeing this I deleted my last post lol.

It looks like it could just be a very basic pulse motor.
In the picture I see a very basic pulse motor with no transistor and a home made reed switch.

It also looks like there is some type of generator or a dc motor for a generator inside.

I think the extra magnets help to strengthen the coil to push the rotter.
And also strengthen the BEMF in the coil.

Hi slayer007,

sorry but I'm quite sure this is not one of Richard's builds. This was posted by someone else as an attempt copy of Richard's circuit and unit. I know it looks convincing but this is not a working unit. Please read the original post from where this picture came from.

You may want to edit your post in order to not mislead others.

Thanks

Luc

[vrand]

Thanks Mike, great article on Hooper's theory.

Here's another oldie but goodie

AETHER CONTROL via an understanding of ORTHOGONAL FIELDS
8/2/98 by Rick Andersen

http://gravitation.org/Start/Experim...l%20fields.pdf

Rick explains nicely the magnetic A-field vs B-field in solenoids vs toriods, aether, gravity vectors and electron/moving charge.

-Mike R.

[slayer007]

Hi slayer007,

sorry but I'm quite sure this is not one of Richard's builds. This was posted by someone else as an attempt copy of Richard's circuit and unit. I know it looks convincing but this is not a working unit. Please read the original post from where this picture came from.

You may want to edit your post in order to not mislead others.

Thanks

Luc

@ Gotoluc


The picture is from MC site It should be one of his builds.

Here is the link to the picture from his site.

http://www.magnacoaster.com/magna/assets/images/DCP03115.JPG

[patmac]

In another copy, that picture describes each part.

Appearently inside red box there is a DC MOTOR, then what is the generator there? The rotor with little coil or DC MOTOR in the red box.

Or well DC motor on the red box is used like generator.

[rickoff]

The latest on Richard Willis and Magnacoaster

Hi folks,

I have received a reply regarding my latest inquiry to Richard Willis of Magnacoaster, and will present the reply herein, but first I want to show a review of the claims that Richard has made. Here is what Richard Willis claimed during his Dragons Den presentation in December of 2008 (quotes begin at 2:42 of the 8:15 YouTube video found here): http://www.youtube.com/watch?gl=GB&hl=en-GB&v=vvfi9ZpXKOY Regarding financial deals, Richard said:







----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It would be rather difficult to prove or disprove any of the financial deals that Richard claims to be underway, but one of his latest YouTube videos shows a very modest manufacturing facility that he has now moved into. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2So6uW1n8Ps&feature=channel_page






Hmm, rather contradictory, isn't he?


Rick

[rickoff]

The latest on Richard Willis and Magnacoaster, continued




-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
March 27, 2009
To Richard Willis, [email protected]



I don't quite understand your answer. On Dragons Den, you clearly stated that your device had been tested at Waterloo University with 2600% over-unity. Now you say, "we were planning to do some testing at Waterloo." So would I be correct in assuming that no tests were actually done there, and that this is the reason why no one at WU has been able to confirm such testing? All I am asking for is the name and contact information of someone at WU who can confirm the testing that you mentioned.

As far as the patent information goes, if you have in fact filed a patent application then you are protected against the possibility of anyone reproducing, and profiting, from any sales of units manufactured. Full disclosure of patent information, including both granted patents and patents applied for, is available to the public in online worldwide patent office searches, so there is no way to keep a patent application "hidden." Of course it is possible that a handful of people would attempt a replication of your device if such patent information could be found, and there is no law preventing such replications if done for personal experimentation and validation of the patent concept. Such replications, if proving that your concept is valid, should be viewed by you as very desirable independent confirmations of your technology. Such confirmation could only help to promote your device and boost sales, so it makes no sense to me that you appear to be unwilling to release information contained in any patent application. As things stand, there is really nothing that I can find which supports any of the claims that you have made. All I have seen is some YouTube videos showing a purported device, and a few light bulbs lit up briefly, and that tells me nothing. Anyone could produce the same results by placing a battery inside the black box. Could you at least send me a document image showing test conditions and test results as verified by an independent testing facility? That would be much appreciated. If you have no documented independent test results that you can provide to me, would you be willing to allow your device to be tested at your manufacturing facility (at no charge) by
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Best regards to all,

Rick

[gotoluc]

@ Gotoluc


The picture is from MC site It should be one of his builds.

Here is the link to the picture from his site.

http://www.magnacoaster.com/magna/as...s/DCP03115.JPG

Hi slayer007,

sorry ... you are right! it is one of Richard's builds. It is the picture with the labeled parts that was done by a Overunity user as an attempt to explain Richard's circuit.

Luc

[vrand]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
March 27, 2009
To Richard Willis, [email protected]



I don't quite understand your answer. On Dragons Den, you clearly stated that your device had been tested at Waterloo University with 2600% over-unity. Now you say, "we were planning to do some testing at Waterloo." So would I be correct in assuming that no tests were actually done there, and that this is the reason why no one at WU has been able to confirm such testing? All I am asking for is the name and contact information of someone at WU who can confirm the testing that you mentioned.

As far as the patent information goes, if you have in fact filed a patent application then you are protected against the possibility of anyone reproducing, and profiting, from any sales of units manufactured. Full disclosure of patent information, including both granted patents and patents applied for, is available to the public in online worldwide patent office searches, so there is no way to keep a patent application "hidden." Of course it is possible that a handful of people would attempt a replication of your device if such patent information could be found, and there is no law preventing such replications if done for personal experimentation and validation of the patent concept. Such replications, if proving that your concept is valid, should be viewed by you as very desirable independent confirmations of your technology. Such confirmation could only help to promote your device and boost sales, so it makes no sense to me that you appear to be unwilling to release information contained in any patent application. As things stand, there is really nothing that I can find which supports any of the claims that you have made. All I have seen is some YouTube videos showing a purported device, and a few light bulbs lit up briefly, and that tells me nothing. Anyone could produce the same results by placing a battery inside the black box. Could you at least send me a document image showing test conditions and test results as verified by an independent testing facility? That would be much appreciated. If you have no documented independent test results that you can provide to me, would you be willing to allow your device to be tested at your manufacturing facility (at no charge) by
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Best regards to all,

Rick

Nicely written Rick

Thank you for sharing your correspondences with Mr. Willis.

I am waiting to hear from some people who ordered a unit. They visited the shop and came back with a positive feeling that the tech was real. I will post to this group, on what they receive and their testing results.

-Mike R.

[gotoluc]

Hi slayer007,

sorry ... you are right! it is one of Richard's builds. It is the picture with the labeled parts that was done by a Overunity user as an attempt to explain Richard's circuit.

Luc

@everyone,

looking at the picture slayer007 posted above and now knowing it was actually one of Richard's builds and not an attempted replication by someone, I realize that a very important component is missing!... anyone noticed that there are no rectifiers

I have made many tests to try to replicate his effect but I never tried it without diodes... could this be actually creating internal resonating pulses inside the battery itself, since it has no rectifiers?

Anyone care to share

Luc