Free Energy is here

[amigo]

I went to register on the MouseRebellion.com forums and a few hours later I was banned because they think I'm someone else:

Sorry amigo, you are banned from using this forum!
Nice try. IP spoofers can't play here.

I did no spoofing, my IP is static, and got banned for just being from Canada I guess. So big thanks to all the boneheads here who were arguing over who's ego is bigger - you are all pathetic.

[Aaron]

hi Amigo

Hi Amigo,

We just got through with this and want to move on and hope you do to. I think there is a more productive way to communicate to the members in this thread. I will send you a PM in a minute - please read it.

[amigo]

Aaron,

I have never been shy to speak my mind and that was on my mind at the time. But, I have moved on because I was only an observer in the thread until I became a casualty...

Thanks.

[Vortex]

Allcanadian - Off Topic Help

I found how to PM and posting here was not required
.. I deleted this msg?!

[Aaron]

sending PM's

Hi Randy,

I just posted this for you:

http://www.energeticforum.com/forum-help-support/3194-how-send-pms-private-messages.html

Hope that helps!

[Vortex]

Hi Randy,

I just posted this for you:

http://www.energeticforum.com/forum-help-support/3194-how-send-pms-private-messages.html

Hope that helps!

"Aaron has exceeded their stored private messages quota and can not accept further messages until they clear some space."

Thank you.
I found out how right after posting...
Isn't that always how it happens?
I tried to delete the msg using the DELETE button but could not
get the dang msg to delete.

Randy

[Aaron]

box cleared - try again

Hi Randy,

I just cleared my box so you should be able to send a PM to me if you would like.

[DavidE]

[Sephiroth]

Eagerly awaiting the pdf AC I have run out of ideas to get this to go over COP1 and now the solder fumes are hurting my brain

(Sephiroth runs off to invent self soldering componants)

[Sephiroth]

Oh, and as a side note, I did an experiment to support the theory posted below...

From what I understand from the pdf, Allcanadian is suggesting that the energy of a magnetic field formed by an inductor is independant of the energy put into the circuit. The only losses are resistive and leave the circuit as heat.

I believe the energy from the magnetic field is possibly formed by the negentropic properties of the vacuum.

Or, as allcanadian suggested in another thread about jo newman's research, the magnetic field is formed by the allignment of the copper atoms when they are exposed to voltage. Eitherway, the magnetic field is independant of the energy input into the system and is formed by the surroundings space making it an open system.

I really like the concept of this circuit and on paper it works very well. I will give it a go tonight! Thanks allcanadian!

remember the experiment I did earlier in the year called "Conservation of Charge Violated?" ? First I showed that discharging a cap into another cap is inherently 50% efficient but by pulsing it through an inductor the efficiency increased. Well I don't believe that it is more efficient, but rather energy has entered from outside the circuit to compensate for the losses.

Well I adapted the circuit by starting with two 33,000uf caps and a 40,000uf cap. One of the 33,000uf caps was charged to 10.4 volts and the other two were shorted. I attached the two 33,000uf caps in parellel on a solid state oscillator circuit so the charged cap would discharge into the uncharged cap through the oscillator and then the flyback from the collapsing field was channeled into the 40,000uf cap instead of the capcitor that was wired in parellel.

the two 33,000uf caps ended up with 5.75v and 4.57v which equals 10.32v in total which is what you would expect if you short two caps together. So even pulsing a cap into another cap through an inductor is 50% efficent! The charge will be preserved but half the energy is lost.

BUT I was also capturing the flyback in the 40,000uf cap which charged to 3.95v. That 3.95v (0.31205 joules) is the energy that was collected for free from the collapsing field.

Soooo... the main problem is the inefficiency of directly discharing a cap into another cap. Half the energy always appears to be lost. If it is possible to discharge a cap into another cap without this loss (or at least greatly reduce it) without relying on the flyback then this will go over COP1.

But perhaps there is more to AC's circuits then we know

[gmeat]

Eagerly awaiting the pdf AC I have run out of ideas to get this to go over COP1 and now the solder fumes are hurting my brain

(Sephiroth runs off to invent self soldering componants)

Hi Seph,


I agree,Where did AC go?.I also cant seem to get any success in this setup.I have come accross an interesting affect that I dont understand though.I took three caps in series through an inductor and shorted them out and interestingly the middle cap always goes to a negative reading while the cap with the positive terminal just before the inductor will retain about half of its voltage while the cap just after the inductor will either be no voltage or a slightly negative voltage .I'm not sure I understand why this happens.Anyone have an explaination to this ?


-Gary

[Sephiroth]

If I understand how you have it set up, then if you have three caps in series where one cap is fully charged and the other two are empty, then the charged cap will reverse charge the other two... they need to be in parellel to go into positive charge.

[gmeat]

If I understand how you have it set up, then if you have three caps in series where one cap is fully charged and the other two are empty, then the charged cap will reverse charge the other two... they need to be in parellel to go into positive charge.

No, All caps are equal in voltage then hooked up in series


-Gary

[Sephiroth]

hmmm... then that is odd

are they all the same capacity?

[gmeat]

hmmm... then that is odd

are they all the same capacity?

No.All caps are 200 volt rated but the cap with the positive terminal just before inductor is 560 Uf and the middle cap is 200 Uf and the cap with the negative after the inductor is 330 Uf.I'm not sure that this matters as I just took note to the affect and am still wondering why this happens.I'll have to try swithing things around a bit and let ya know if there is a difference.I'll try again with all identical caps


-Gary