This forum is preserved as a permanent archive. The community continues at eMedia Press.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Imhotep's Radiant Oscillator Video

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Lidmotor View Post
    Thanks Ren for taking the time to explain how the cap pulser works. It does what I thought it did. I have tried charging up a cap and manually switching it into the charge battery. My fingers got really tired! It looks like this automatic pulser circuit is something that I can now figure out how to build. If I have any more questions I will use the appropriate thread and keep this one clear for Imhotep oscillator discussion. By the way I noticed that people are having trouble with heat and burning out transistors. Been there done that. You are right that you have to watch the resistance on the base of the transistor and put a fixed resistor in with the pot. On my latest circuit I got away with a 100ohm resistor with a 1K wire wound pot. It was just trial and error but the TIP3055 transistor I'm using runs cool. I'm also dumping alot of heat (still) into the 25ohm rheostat that I use so I put hefty heat sinks on the front and the back of it and it is working.

    The last thing is that I also am also seeing very strange charging readings. The thing is though, I really don't trust these digital ammeters. I think that they give false readings with this type of circuit. You really have to do charge/discharge testing to see what's happening and that takes time.

    Thanks again for the help.

    Lidmotor
    Cool, glad it helped. Try get an analogue gauge specifically for the voltage level of the batteries your using. It may be a bit hard if you are using lithiums or such with unusual voltage levels, but the one I have is 11-15v.

    Try different sized caps too. The common consensus is a medium to large capacitance is better.
    "Once you've come to the conclusion that what what you know already is all you need to know, then you have a degree in disinterest." - John Dobson

    Comment


    • Ammeters Unreliable

      Originally posted by Lidmotor View Post
      Thanks Ren for taking the time to explain how the cap pulser works. It does what I thought it did. I have tried charging up a cap and manually switching it into the charge battery. My fingers got really tired! It looks like this automatic pulser circuit is something that I can now figure out how to build. If I have any more questions I will use the appropriate thread and keep this one clear for Imhotep oscillator discussion. By the way I noticed that people are having trouble with heat and burning out transistors. Been there done that. You are right that you have to watch the resistance on the base of the transistor and put a fixed resistor in with the pot. On my latest circuit I got away with a 100ohm resistor with a 1K wire wound pot. It was just trial and error but the TIP3055 transistor I'm using runs cool. I'm also dumping alot of heat (still) into the 25ohm rheostat that I use so I put hefty heat sinks on the front and the back of it and it is working.

      The last thing is that I also am also seeing very strange charging readings. The thing is though, I really don't trust these digital ammeters. I think that they give false readings with this type of circuit. You really have to do charge/discharge testing to see what's happening and that takes time.

      Thanks again for the help.

      Lidmotor
      Lidmotor,

      I totally agree with you, the digital ammeters are not reliable to measure the recovered energy. There are a number of reasons for this. The most obvious reason is that all digital equipment operates by taking samples of data at a specific rate. Most of these sample rates are relatively low for normal meters, and therefore miss the peak events, or only capture them once in a while, in a high frequency environment like this. If your oscillator is running at a fixed rate, you should be able to see a secondary wave moving through the data as the sample rate of the meter and the oscillation rate of the system interact. It looks random at first, but then you can see it.

      The second, and not so obvious reason is...... there really is NO SUCH THING as a meter that measures CURRENT. The meter is actually a milli-volt meter that MEASURES the voltage drop on a "calibrated resistor" called a shunt. Then, the current in AMPERES is calculated assuming that OHM's LAW is applicable in this situation. For "normal electricity" coming from a battery or a generator, this current "measuring" arrangement works very well, but it is very important to understand that this is NOT a direct measurement of current. It is the measurement of a small voltage drop across a resistor in the circuit, and the calculation of current based on Ohm's Law.

      When an inductive collapse is applied across such a situation, the initial voltage spike can produce voltage gradients across the shunt far in excess of the nominal conditions. If the digital sampler happens to "pick" one of these moments, the meter readout will show "extremely high currents" which, in fact, do not exist. This, and other anomalies, are artifacts of the meter.

      If you are running a capacitor charge and discharge circuit, the very best way to calculate the recovered energy is to put your scope (or volt meter) across the capacitor and measure the high and low voltage in the cycle, and calculate the number of Joules stored in the capacitor in each condition. The difference is the amount of energy, in Joules, you are delivering to the battery under charge during each discharge. Then, determine how often the discharges occur to determine the rate of energy delivery, from which a figure of Joules per second (watts) can be calculated.

      John Bedini and I figured all of this out in 2003. Even then, the battery can charge much faster than the "watts in" figures suggests is possible, depending on a wide variety of other factors. This is why John has always said that the true energy content of the inductive collapse cannot be measured with the equipment we currently have.

      Hope this helps.

      Peter
      Last edited by Peter Lindemann; 09-02-2008, 04:36 PM.
      Peter Lindemann, D.Sc.

      Open System Thermodynamics Perpetual Motion Reality Electric Motor Secrets
      Battery Secrets Magnet Secrets Tesla's Radiant Energy Real Rain Making
      Bedini SG: The Complete Handbook Series Magnetic Energy Secrets

      Comment


      • Solid State High Voltage Sources for CFLs

        Alternate sources of solid state high voltage power supplies for single wire discharge lighting:

        1) Neon Transformers, Neon Power Supplies Page2Ramsey Electronics

        Comment


        • Comment


          • Actually, i've only written one single article on this subject. You may have seen the same one in different places; or other articles i've written that have nothing to do with it.

            How your power is billed, Apparent or Real, is determined by your local power company. And there are ones in the U.S. that do charge Consumers by Apparent Power... As is still the case with my old home town in NE Ohio.

            Also, there is serious question as to the accuracy of really reading Real Power by old-style mechanical meters. These in the most part were designed over 40 years ago and the technology to do this accurately is about 25 to 30 years old now. Looking at the schematics of the old G.E. mechanical models it is hard to see how they could do so; there are 10's of millions of these mechanical models still in service all over (the ones with the old turning disk).

            But you would be correct in that if your meter reads in Real Power, and is a newer digital model, that you are not being charged NECESSARILY more for poor PF. But there are other factors: Like how far away your meter is from your home (trailer parks, condos, and apartments can be a significant distance away). If so, the line losses will be somewhat greater when there is poor PF. Also, i am currently investigating how some models of meters read the 4-wire setup, with 1 Common 1 Neutral, 2 Hots (split 115v adding up to 230V).

            Since i wrote the piece, i have gotten some other info: Energy Star finally got back to me regarding PF, and they verified that they do not use it as a criteria for awarding the Energy Star logo to devices. And i got emails back from a total of 7 manufacturers of appliances, and none have PF Correction either. I also got some private messages from Engineers who have worked in the field and were wondering about this for their whole careers; never understanding why it has been so ignored.

            I also later found a website that is for the CFL manufacturer's association. They have standards set for different "Quality Tiers" (prices); and for all of the 120V models (over 20 brands/models.. All apparently built in China and India), the best PF was .6 and most were .5 or .55 .

            Also, as i am waiting for a friend to loan me some electronic test gear in the mail, i am still planning a minor correction about the phase shift of CFL's; in that at least in some cases there is current-leading Capacitive phase shift, caused apparently by the ballast and not Inductive current-lagging as was stated (although the Inductive shift is still true for appliances using AC motors). Also, that because of the cheaply-made circuits being balanced on the head of a pin as far as impedance goes, it would be very difficult to PF Correct them ourselves, and a total circuit re-design would be needed. Since we know that 230 VAC models sold in Europe can do this, then we know that in mass production it would not be overly costly to do so. Once i get a better handle on the waveforms myself, i will correct these errors.

            Another person recently told me that waveform distortion is causing the poor PF. This is not so: The current (I) waveform need not be sinusoidal, only in phase with the V . "Harmonic Distortion", something different entirely, WILL cause poor PF but that is not an issue here.

            I thank you for your interest Please check out the "Free Energy and Open Source Energy Movement" articles: There are subjects of significantly greater importance there. You can see them all here at Peswiki (User contributions - PESWiki.

            Perhaps the most important thing about that CFL article is how we can modify them for much greater efficiency ala **~Imhotep~**'s circuit (which keeps getting constantly improved by the other great experimenters here and at Overunity); to be nearly-Free Energy devices. This will have impact in the Third World... Or even with us here in the "first" if it keeps getting better and better as it has... It could prove to be really significant

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Bodkins View Post
              i think it changes the balance of the circiut have you tryed parrell thedude did some stuff with that, watch him stuff too i find his funny.in one hes peeled the shin off his finger riping off tape from his wheel and now keeps getting little shock on his little pinkys(sorry dude but its funny)lol
              good luck
              My skin was thin... it grew back. :P lol!

              I really would love to get back to contributing here. My cat ( named "Dell", appeared in my first SSG video ) passed away yesterday and I'm having trouble focusing for the moment. I'll be back and hopefully able to add to the discussion here soon.

              Looks like there are some new opinions on the block, great so see more and more joining in here. Lots to read, so for now that is all i will do.

              Thanks to everyone here, keep it coming.
              EnergeticTube.com - Where technology goes Live!
              ETaffairs.com - Your Portal Here on Earth

              Comment


              • How your power is billed, Apparent or Real, is determined by your local power company. And there are ones in the U.S. that do charge Consumers by Apparent Power... As is still the case with my old home town in NE Ohio.

                Also, there is serious question as to the accuracy of really reading Real Power by old-style mechanical meters. These in the most part were designed over 40 years ago and the technology to do this accurately is about 25 to 30 years old now. Looking at the schematics of the old G.E. mechanical models it is hard to see how they could do so; there are 10's of millions of these mechanical models still in service all over (the ones with the old turning disk).
                I would be interested to hear more about that little town in NE Ohio and how they manage to charge for apparent power. Would you care to divulge the name of the utility company ?

                The design for mechanical meters is more like 100 years old, with the technology remaining essentially unchanged since the beginning. In essence the rotating aluminum disk acts as an induction motor. (in a single phase meter) two coils drive the disk, one connected across the line (voltage) and the other in series with the line (current). The induction disk performs the multiplication of (instantaneous) volts X (instantaneous) amps and the revolution counter (the dials you see) perform the integration. Over the years there have been a few lawsuits challenging the accuracy of these meters and in all cases the meter technology has been upheld as inherently accurate. Basically if the meter is built correctly and is not worn out or tampered then it will read real power accurately. Unlike modern electronic meters, the mechanical meters have no failure modes which work in the electric company's favor. As far as I know there has been no way to even measure apparent power consumption on a continuous basis until the advent of the modern electronic meter.

                I'll continue the discussion as long as you want, but we should probably do it elsewhere, as it really isn't directly pertinent to Imhotep's lighting circuit...

                Comment


                • PFC posts

                  I'm not sure if Imhotep minds these detailed power factor correction posts in this thread but since it is such a deep intense topic that could take on a very big life on its own, why not someone start a : Power Factor Correction
                  thread? That would be a good title for it.

                  The work on the radiant oscillators and lighting CFL's is an incredible project and I wouldn't want to make it a challenge for experimenters to have to find the relevant posts.

                  IF Imhotep wants me to, I can move PFC posts to a new thread.
                  Sincerely,
                  Aaron Murakami

                  Books, Videos, ESTC Conference Info, Blog, etc. https://emediapress.com

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Peter Lindemann View Post

                    ...snip...

                    The most obvious reason is that all digital equipment operates by taking samples of data at a specific rate. Most of these sample rates are relatively low for normal meters, and therefore miss the peak events, or only capture them once in a while, in a high frequency environment like this. If your oscillator is running at a fixed rate, you should be able to see a secondary wave moving through the data as the sample rate of the meter and the oscillation rate of the system interact. It looks random at first, but then you can see it.

                    ...snip...

                    Peter
                    Hi Peter,

                    Couldn't we use fast ADC for sampling and how much bandwidth do we really need? Most of the effects are sub-MHz since I'm yet to see a circuit that goes above 50KHz if at all, unless someone's running a real Tesla setup with 1us-level impulses.

                    As you know there are many ADCs, pretty affordable at that as well. Many of them will do 5-20Ms/s without issues, perhaps we could hook one up to a micro-controller and output values to a LCD display for real time measurements, or log to the USB port...
                    Are the ravings of a lunatic signs of a genius?

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Aaron View Post
                      I'm not sure if Imhotep minds these detailed power factor correction posts in this thread but since it is such a deep intense topic that could take on a very big life on its own, why not someone start a : Power Factor Correction
                      thread? That would be a good title for it.

                      The work on the radiant oscillators and lighting CFL's is an incredible project and I wouldn't want to make it a challenge for experimenters to have to find the relevant posts.

                      IF Imhotep wants me to, I can move PFC posts to a new thread.
                      Because the pf correction applies to all electronics and not just the irol I think that would be a great idea Aaron that way it doesnt confuse the new scientist coming and replicating the circuit. Excellent idea


                      Nikola Tesla

                      http://www.imhotepslab.com

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by thedude View Post
                        My skin was thin... it grew back. :P lol!

                        I really would love to get back to contributing here. My cat ( named "Dell", appeared in my first SSG video ) passed away yesterday and I'm having trouble focusing for the moment. I'll be back and hopefully able to add to the discussion here soon.

                        Looks like there are some new opinions on the block, great so see more and more joining in here. Lots to read, so for now that is all i will do.

                        Thanks to everyone here, keep it coming.
                        No problem mate, Shiva has 2 cats that she is very attached to herself, a spunky little female and a little male. We thought we lost the male a few months back but 3 months after he disappeared he showed back up with mild amnesia and skin and bones. But she nursed him back to health and hes out and about now like nothing happened. Shiva always gets concerned now when he takes off on his wild adventures for a few days at a time. Loosing a pet is like loosing a piece of the family. We send our condolences .


                        Nikola Tesla

                        http://www.imhotepslab.com

                        Comment


                        • Simple IROL for the simple people

                          Thedude my condolences also on the loss of your cat. I lost a dog last year and it was hard. Imhotep and Aaron please do consider keeping this thread going straight ahead as an IROL project. Specifically consider the people like myself who know somethings but are a little "electronics challenged". I am starting to get messages from people on Youtube who have seen the videos and want to build this but don't even have a clue where to get the parts or where to begin. I'm sure many people come here looking for the answers.
                          Thanks Peter for explaining about the digital meters and how they work. Also for telling about your work with JB and what you discovered. I see this project as a possible proof to the world of some interesting phenomenon. People have a hard time relating to a bunch of spinning magnets on a wheel but show them a standard CFL that lights up on miliamps and can run for hours on a couple of AA 12v battery packs and they get real interested.

                          Lidmotor
                          Last edited by Lidmotor; 09-03-2008, 02:15 AM.

                          Comment


                          • New 2 the forum

                            Hello,

                            I just wanted to say that I am in the process of building an IROL. Ashtweth brought this great useful discovery to my attention and sent me some stuff. I wrote Lidmotor on the youtube after watching his videos and realizing he is in the U.S. I want to build self contained units for an agricultural village that I am building here in Mexico. This is a need for us down here. I have been looking up the prices of solar panels and found some cheap 5 watt panels on ebay that I might order. I am waiting a minute to see what all you smart jokers come up with. All I can do is get a list and a schematic and take it to my electronic friend to get it cranked up. So not much to contribute besides that I will put this to good use down here with the Aztecs and Totonacos. I will put together the original and go from there. Thanks for letting me and others benefit from all the work put into this. One quick question? What is the final word on the buzzing relay is the 555 better and does not buzz or what is the best way at this point?

                            Jason

                            Comment


                            • My cat ( named "Dell", appeared in my first SSG video ) passed away yesterday and I'm having trouble focusing for the moment. I'll be back and hopefully able to add to the discussion here soon.
                              Sorry to hear about Dell, Dude.

                              I too have a cat in my life that I love dearly.

                              Carl

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X