Imhotep's Radiant Oscillator Video

[nat1971a]

Actually if i remember right Tesla does mention that the transmission occurs via resonance of the coils...i.e the vibrations in the transmitter transmit via resonance. Tesla also advises that he had to tame down his lectures on resonance due to peer pressure

[gotoluc]

Hi Luc,

Many people have wondered if it is a vacuum or if there is gas in side or just ambient air. I think it is just air.

Bedini knew Gray and saw these motors many times and took meticulous notes. The tubes were specifically built just like in John's notes. I believe if there was anything like a disguised bulb that it would definitely not have gone unnoticed by John. I would be rare for something to slip past him. The details of the rods, how they were connected, etc... are too specific to be bulbs I believe.

If there was gas inside or not, I don't know. I think it is air and that is what my tube has...just air and I had a magnet repel a couple inches so that shows me not what the tube originally had but at least with air, this kind of effect can be had.

Thanks for the reply Aaron. I do remember now seeing one of Peter's videos where he explained John's notes of the tube construction. I just thought that maybe at the time John could of been threatened by some to not share it in its raw form so he disguised it.

Just a wild guess on my part and tossed it in. Anyways, you are years ahead of me on this

Luc

[Bodkins]

YouTube - Bodkins 37.AVI

YouTube - Bodkins 38.AVI

YouTube - Bodkins 39 Time.AVI

[Aaron]

time, light, gravity and existing potentials

I like the thinking Bodkins on the time differences.

The time is slower at the ground than air because the aetheric density is higher. Light moves slower there that it does away from mass.

Any mass displaces the aether from center outwards just like putting a bowling ball in a bathtub will displace the water outwards.

The aether rebounds back towards the center pushing down on anything holding it to the ground. A ball in the water has water pushing back towards where the ball is from all sides, not just from the top.

If you have a piece of wood and a piece of lead, you lift the wood, it is lighter. If both are 1 cubic foot in size..same size different weight.

The "matrix" or innerspace of the wood has more "open space" than the lead...the lead has less "open space."

If you take a net with 1 square inch mesh and swoosh it through the water, there isn't much resistance. (wood)

If you take a net with 1 square mm mesh and swoosh it through the water, there is a lot of resistance. (lead)

As the aether is rebounding back to the center of the Earth, it moves through the wood with less resistance and the lead with more resistance (more to push on). That is why the lead is heavier..lifting up against more resistance to the downward aether and the wood is lighter.

What happens to the aether when it hits the middle of the earth? You get something that looks like Lighty's avatar. I believe creation of sub atomic particles that rise to the surface...otherwise, it would just hit an equilibrium and gravity wouldn't exist since it is an active push constantly moving.

With the earth rods and batteries, there are two immediate sources of potential to add to circuits...the first one here is like what John Bedini shows on one of his Stubblefield pages:

Stubblefield

"Nathan Stubblefield used earth magnetic currents. this is not current as we know it. Electricity is a wasted product of this magnetic current."

The second is the aetheric potential that is pushing down on a material and has it's own relevant interaction with the atomic/matrix of any particular material inducing a radiant potential (gravity power).

This seems to be a bit different from creating a simple dipole, it is conducting the already existing moving potentials.

Now with time, the more dense the aether at ground, the slower time, the less dense, the faster the time.


If you wound up a rubber band powered propeller and put it in a bowl of water, it would unwind pretty quick. The ability for LIGHT to propagate in a low density aether is faster.

If you wound up a rubber band powered propeller and put it in a bowl of gelatin slightly hardening, it would unwind very very slow if at all. The ability for LIGHT to propagate in a high density aether is slower.


If you're in the low density aether area perceiving time, it would look normal to you because your perceptual apparatus (visual apparatus based on photon energy and not virtual photon energy) would be subject to the speed of light in that area...so of course would look normal.

If you're in a high density aether area perceiving time, it would look normal to you because your perceptual apparatus would be subject to the speed of light in that area...so of course would look normal.

Now with mass moving in aether, a spherical ball displaces it symmetrically and pushes down towards the center of displacement equally. There is no movement. If you took a bar of soap and squeezed down equally around it, it would just stay there.

Now squeeze it slightly offset and it will move in the direction where there is the LEAST amount of push.

Two pieces of matter can't occupy the same space..I don't believe that but that belief suits this purpose... BUT Two pieces of matter can influence the same aether between them.

If you have a gigantic ball and super small ball next to each other in outers pace...big and small enough to have real gravitation effects that can be witnesed... The small ball will move to the big one and the big might be slightly moved to the small.

What is happening is that the bigger mass dominates the space around it and has the strongest aetheric rebounding effect to it...meaning...it is REDUCING the amount of aether rebounding to THAT SIDE of the small mass. That means that small mass has ASYMMETRICAL push on it now and it will move to the direction of the LEAST push...towards the larger mass.


Anyway, all these things are perfectly predictable by a fluid aetheric model like what I put in my book for example. I don't think I have encountered anything that can't be predicted by it.


Based on this model, I was able to walk straight up to Imhotep's original oscillator, put a plug on it instead of a light and start charging caps with one wire...the model let me see how the batteries on front and back had to be just right to maintain the intake and exhaust pressures.


This all PERFECTLY applies to all these light experiments.


If anyone read this far, thanks

There are negative "pushes" as well.

[broli]

I sure read that far but imo we have to be in your head Aaron to understand what you just said.

All I can comment on is the drawing you have. From what I read Tesla's Colorado Springs tower was meant to actually harness the aether flow from earth but mainly the flow that's coming from space (his cosmic rays...nothing to do with gamma rays or w/e "scientists" think he was talking about)

The drawing reminded me of that. I believe he wanted to give the aether from space a better conducting path than the athmospheric/geological one. If pulsed at specific rates (his resonance) the setup will give most efficient results. In doing so the aether preferred his path and he could gain tremendous energy from this. I think before doing this he was also afraid of runaway effects that could lead to huge catastrophes. But he made the necessary precautions and again found out a boatload of new properties of the aether.

[Jetijs]

You guys are going a mile a minute. I can barely keep up
Thank you Aaron for that time difference explanation - makes sense

[Bodkins]

Cheers Arron
jetijs whats a minute

[Inquorate]

@Aaron

Got exactly what you're talking about. I've been getting all sorts of ideas about aetheric model and what it explains. I 'll keep posting them to my blog I guess. Got an inkling about how aether is a dynamic fluid, incompressable gas, and elastic solid, all in one.. Gotta wait for it to download fully :-)

[Bodkins]

Great vid Lidmotor. This is what I did with the original Imhotep oscillators. But instead of a bulb, I put a sparkplug where the bulb goes to act as a wastegate to get real disruptive punches. I was able to charge a cap to 100+ volts no problem and pretty fast too. I could also do it one wire from any of the 4 terminals on the input or output batt.

I had that cap connected to another cap and had it trigger when the neon pulsed triggering the base of an scr or transistor at about 90v for one experiment and it worked perfectly. It can charge batts too. If you have a bulb instead of a spark plug, the radiant kickback is not nearly as strong but there is a tradeoff. The main benefit for not having the light is IF you want a cap charge fast and high with pure radiant. If not, then the bulb is the best practical use.

Lidmotor do you see what arron it saying in respect to the charging


(Based on this model, I was able to walk straight up to Imhotep's original oscillator, put a plug on it instead of a light and start charging caps with one wire...the model let me see how the batteries on front and back had to be just right to maintain the intake and exhaust pressures.)

Please Have a go I dont have the time (Kids Work Christmas). We did all that work on cap charging with neons Come Brother its there.
The Pigeons will Thank You

[DavidE]

Time potential naturally interacts to balance vector differentials.

By managing relative vectors (*synchronous resonant link), one can attract time potential.

**Time potential is natures unlimited workforce.







*Universal Oscillations.
**Or whatever you wish to call it.

[Lidmotor]

One wire charging

Lidmotor do you see what arron it saying in respect to the charging


(Based on this model, I was able to walk straight up to Imhotep's original oscillator, put a plug on it instead of a light and start charging caps with one wire...the model let me see how the batteries on front and back had to be just right to maintain the intake and exhaust pressures.)

Please Have a go I dont have the time (Kids Work Christmas). We did all that work on cap charging with neons Come Brother its there.
The Pigeons will Thank You

Bodkins and Aaron----I tried this circuit the same day that it was posted here and played around with it for a few hours. I could not get it to charge a cap. It looks like a dead short circuit to me. I must be missing something or perhaps the diodes that I was using (1n4007s) were wrong. Maybe I should have been using a battery instead of a cap? It seems like it would just short out a battery.
I may have another go at it. Time right now is short because of the holidays. Today I have to put up all the decorations. Wife's orders.

Lidmotor

[Bodkins]

I think from the ignition coil with mircowave diodes I will Give it a Go when i can

[Aaron]

plug

Lidmotor do you see what arron it saying in respect to the charging


(Based on this model, I was able to walk straight up to Imhotep's original oscillator, put a plug on it instead of a light and start charging caps with one wire...the model let me see how the batteries on front and back had to be just right to maintain the intake and exhaust pressures.)

Please Have a go I dont have the time (Kids Work Christmas). We did all that work on cap charging with neons Come Brother its there.
The Pigeons will Thank You

I should clarify that when I said I put a plug on the circuit instead of a light, I meant spark plug (acted as a waste gate that gave disruptive bursts). But the one wire coming off the battery went through the diodes like in the diagram..another plug I guess.

I highly doubt Averemko invented that concept but may get credit for it because most people know about that. I found that on my own by using a full bridge and connected the DC out to the cap and just connected the one wire to one side of the AC input. Then I looked at what it was and just used two diodes form then on out. I think others have figured that out too.

In one video I posted in the past on a Gray tube healing machine that John taught me how to build, I could charge the home made cap with it and I could charge it with one diode or none...and connected to only the + on the cap. 80v in a fraction of a second.

[Aaron]

one wire charge

It looks like a dead short circuit to me. I must be missing something or perhaps the diodes that I was using (1n4007s) were wrong.

Just for a brief test, put a spark plug in place of the CFL. 1n4007's are fine. Put your finger by the battery terminals and see if you feel little shocks...if so, you're getting good kickback. Put one wire from any battery terminal you feel that and attach as shown in that diagram.

[Aromaz]