An Inquiry in to the Alien Reproduction Vehicle

[Gambeir]

John Iwaszko said that the mind of God is Geometrical; that energetic matter produces effect through geometry. Recently I received a message acknowledging that Mr. Iwaszko was in the early stages of developing a unified energetic field theory depicting the cross correlations of energetic fields: Cause & Effect.

I have asked to share this illustration and am awaiting his reply. What we are missing is what John has been working to solve; a means to visualize these fields, to understand their relative positions as energies, as opposites as Ying is to Yang, and I think that once this idea is communicated there will begin a new path to follow in understanding energetic systems. In Chinese philosophy, yin and yang describes how seemingly opposite or contrary forces may actually be complementary, interconnected, and interdependent in the natural world. So I wouldn't say that it's merely the product of a vortex, a stirring alone, rather it is that the vortex is a dynamical moving field interacting with it's surroundings, but which ultimately is about the shape of energetic space as energies must have the proper geometry to produce an effect.

John Iwaszko's site and his page on the life long search for antigravity
Anti-Gravity – AurumSolis Technologies

[sinergicus]

howard menger free energy motor

In the book I posted earlier , are decribed a little free energy motor ,magnets based , that was constructed by howard menger under alien inspiration ..here is an document with details and sugestions about how to make and tune it ...https://www.scribd.com/doc/18003630/...or-Free-Energy the spining disk magnet
is not clear to me how is polarized... from picture seems to have special polarization with north outside around circumference and south inside ..any opinion ?

P.S.Here is a pdf of menger motor to download it directly.. no need to have account at scribd to download the plans... http://www.rexresearch.com/menger/mengermotor.pdf

[Ufopolitics]

he leaves out details needed.
he talks of the carbon rod, but not if the magnetic coil went over it, but he does imply it did go around the carbon.
he talks of the brass cap, but not if it was used as an electrical connection or a pivot point for the disk to spin on.
lots of details are not there.

Hello Spacecase,

Please go over the last paragraph...the guy could not even replicate his own experiment the next day...the best success at a second duplication attempt only achieved a glowing disc that never took off again...

I am reading the whole book...it is a beautifully written and put together piece of literature.

Related to the "Technology"...it is just about the way to stir the AETHER with absolutely ANY of its millions of "components"...neme it electrons, photons, ions...orgone...or whatever...it IS DEFINITIVELY NOT about ANY SPECIFIC COMPONENT...BUT THE "SHAPE" We utilize to do the job...when the "magic" opens up...

The Shape?...simple...A SPIRAL...A VORTEX...And what can do that?...a COIL.
But a coil could also serve as the "capturing" mean.


Regards



Ufopolitics

[Gambeir]

Thanks for the interesting post sinergicus. I'm not a big follower of UFO History and this story was unknown to me.

[Gambeir]

Excellent video Gambeir!

It is amazing to see the connection between the two vortexes under the water with the tint!!

Principle of Space Travel?

Great material!


Regards


Ufopolitics

Thanks, well at about 4 minutes she explains that the vortex is transferring matter. One of the things about this is that it gives you a visual frame of reference to better visualize a wormhole; which is a vortex tube for all practical purposes.

One of the things to take note of here is that matter is accelerated even though it's moving at a constant speed by virtue of centripetal force as it transits the vortex tube. This is one of the reach around solutions to FTL Superluminal travel with standard physics.

https://www.khanacademy.org/science/physics/centripetal-force-and-gravitation/centripetal-acceleration-tutoria/a/what-is-centripetal-acceleration

*Changes in the direction of motion of an object still count as acceleration.*
This is probably an important fact to remember when trying to create a Non~Newtonian Gravitational field.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modified_Newtonian_dynamics

Centripetal means to the center. Now if you look at this illustration there's the obvious Triangle once more staring you in the face. :0 Shock and awe~

Image credit: Openstax College Physics

The directions of the velocity of an object at two different points are shown, and the change in velocity, vΔ, is seen to point directly toward the center of curvature.

I took this information from the Kahn Academy.

https://www.khanacademy.org/science/physics/centripetal-force-and-gravitation/centripetal-acceleration-tutoria/v/centripetal-force-and-acceleration-intuition

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=460&v=vZOk8NnjILg[/VIDEO]

[spacecase0]

Hey guys ,now few time ago I found a book wrote by Howard Menger that was in contact somehow with aliens... he described an experiment he made by following alien instructions.... here is a part from that book describing his experiment : chapter III The Experiments
his book here :Howard Menger: FROM OUTER SPACE TO YOU ..now my question is : can somebody with native english language figure out his explanations? for me is not clear his description....the sistem seems to be very simple in construction and I think are involved orgonic energy because of blue glowing ...

he leaves out details needed.
he talks of the carbon rod, but not if the magnetic coil went over it, but he does imply it did go around the carbon.
he talks of the brass cap, but not if it was used as an electrical connection or a pivot point for the disk to spin on.
lots of details are not there.

[sinergicus]

howard menger antigravity system

Hey guys ,now few time ago I found a book wrote by Howard Menger that was in contact somehow with aliens... he described an experiment he made by following alien instructions.... here is a part from that book describing his experiment : chapter III The Experiments
Although I would like to take personal credit for it, I believe the space people were responsible for my performing an amazing experi*ment early in 1956. Of course inventiveness runs in my family. Both my grandfather and great-grandfather were artists and inventors. I like to feel that I am similar to them in that respect.



Although I had not thought too much about inventing things, early in life I had wanted to become an artist; but it was impossible for me to obtain the necessary training. Perhaps I sublimated this urge in the more prosaic occupation of sign painting.



Often in the sign shop, after working hours, however, I would putter around, trying to make new things.



On one such evening I had just finished a sign and was cleaning the brushes prior to going home when the telephone rang. I said, "Hello!" into' it, but there was no response; so I said, "Hello!" several times. Still no reply, so I put it down. Immediately, however, I had the urge to lift the receiver and listen again. I did so, and there was no dial tone; the circuit was still disconnected.



I listened for a few moments and was about to replace the receiver when I heard a high-pitched buzzing sound coming from it. I put it back to my ear, but after a few seconds it stopped. Then I put the telephone down and forgot about it.



As I was preparing to lock up I received a sudden and strong impulse to remain in the shop. Then almost mechanically I began to move about, pick up pieces of wood, other materials, and set about con*structing something—just what I didn't know. Whatever I was doing, I seemed to be controlled and directed, working as if I had a set of blueprints right in front of me and knew exactly every move to make.



I set the materials I had assembled on the bench. Using a 24-inch plywood base, I drilled a hole halfway through the center. In the hole I placed securely the carbon rod of a broken flashlight cell. Next I obtained a large nail of like diameter and wound the nail with 50 turns of very fine copper wire. When I had slid the finished coil off the nail, the unwound ends of wire remaining measured about eight or 10 inches. I soldered two extra connections: one from the top and one from the bottom; two of the ends were connected to a small pen flashlight battery. I stapled some of the wires to the plywood base to hold the assembly in position.



Next I took the small brass cap off the larger flashlight battery cell and glued it in the exact center of a 10-inch aluminum disc, which had been put on the jig-saw and placed in a balanced position directly on top of the carbon rod. I do remember definitely that four ends of the wire pointed at the edges of the disc directly opposite each other in the form of a cross, and approximately one-eighth of an inch from the edge of the disc. All of the equipment was set up in accordance with an imaginary shape of a pyramid.



Then I made two connections at the bottom of the apparatus, which apparently completed the circuit—for the disc immediately was en*veloped by a bluish, spinning light! Then, to my utter amazement, it rose from the platform, crashed through the 12-foot ceiling, which was made of aluminum paper, apparently bounced off the peak roof and then came down again through the same hole through which it had made its ascent!



It crashed with more force than the weight of the aluminum would normally permit, almost completely destroying itself so far as recon*struction of that particular model was concerned.



I was so surprised and shocked I sat down in complete silence and thought for several minutes.



Did the electrons which came from the small battery start some*thing in the atmosphere in the form of some type of energy which took over, once the machine had been "primed"? The small amount of power from the battery surely never could have moved the object in any way.



I was too shaken to do any more work that night, but the next morn*ing I tried to duplicate the experiment,—without success. I just couldn't remember where I had been apparently shown to make the various connections. Later I was able to duplicate the experiment to the extent that the disc glowed; but never did it move. I am writing this with the hope that some open-minded physicist or electronics engineer will, in my brief account above, detect a key which will open the door to some type of free primary energy which the space people say is avail*able all around us, waiting to be tapped. his book here :Howard Menger: FROM OUTER SPACE TO YOU ..now my question is : can somebody with native english language figure out his explanations? for me is not clear his description....the sistem seems to be very simple in construction and I think are involved orgonic energy because of blue glowing ...

[Ufopolitics]

This is a video by "Physics Girl" demonstrating Falaco Solitron's in a swimming pool. I ran in to the video a while back and it's worth watching "if" you are going to take the time to truly ponder the implications. One thing she does is to add coloring to the vortex so that you physically see the vortex. At the end of the video she also goes on to explain the shadowing on the bottom of the pool using optical explanations.

I find it interesting that these shadows on the bottom of the pool are created by optical effect of what are, in reality, swirling vortex's located far away, and if one were to question the reality of black holes then here might be a place to begin; just saying as this demonstration also seems to show a means to create a cloaking effect.

Falaco Solitons - Cosmic strings in a swimming pool.
R. M. Kiehn

http://coll.pair.com/csdc/pdf/fal10305.pdf

About 4 minutes long.
[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pnbJEg9r1o8[/VIDEO]

Excellent video Gambeir!

It is amazing to see the connection between the two vortexes under the water with the tint!!

Principle of Space Travel?

Great material!


Regards



Ufopolitics

[Gambeir]

This is a video by "Physics Girl" demonstrating Falaco Solitron's in a swimming pool. I ran in to the video a while back and it's worth watching "if" you are going to take the time to truly ponder the implications. One thing she does is to add coloring to the vortex so that you physically see the vortex. At the end of the video she also goes on to explain the shadowing on the bottom of the pool using optical explanations.

I find it interesting that these shadows on the bottom of the pool are created by optical effect of what are, in reality, swirling vortex's located far away, and if one were to question the reality of black holes then here might be a place to begin; just saying as this demonstration also seems to show a means to create a cloaking effect.

Falaco Solitons - Cosmic strings in a swimming pool.
R. M. Kiehn

http://coll.pair.com/csdc/pdf/fal10305.pdf

About 4 minutes long.
[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pnbJEg9r1o8[/VIDEO]

[spacecase0]

I don't have any good way to post pictures on the web.
the websites that let you upload them for free don't seem to run on my computer.
but I have been taking pictures of most of what I do.

I have a document on pumping plasma that has a great picture of this, but can no longer find it on the web.
they used a solenoid coil that was wound with 6 separate wires, kind of like if you had a 6 conductor ribbon cable that you wound one layer thick to make the solenoid. they grounded all the wires at one end, at the other end, they drove the 6 wires with a 6 phase power supply.
so, are you thinking to take a solenoid like that and wind it into a toroid ? because I have been wanting to try that lately (with a large regular solenoid coil outside the entire thing to keep the flow from escaping the toroid to much)

I only have hardware to do 4 phases if I want good wave shape and variable frequency (up to 20MHz), but pretty sure that 4 phases would work just fine

and not sure why you could not just drive one wire full power DC in series one at a time. but will think about that for a bit. and I do have that hardware already built that will run up to about 5MHz and will run a few hundred watts of power.

for higher frequencies that are not going to need to be variable, I use a coax cable delay line.

the magvid test I did is as follows, (mostly copy and paste, so sorry if it reads poorly)
I am using 2 single wave loop antenna at 90 degrees (set inside each other), this makes a sphere of ~9 inches across. the center magnet I have is 18 inches across (and is at right angles to the 2 antennas), so the unit fits inside nicely.
my central coil is about 580 turns of 19Ga copper wire that is about 29 ohms, I am putting about 4.8A into it. (so you really only need the 580turns and 4.8A to calculate my magnetic field
so through the center of my coil is about 1120 gauss (0.112T) I can put more power into this coil for limited amounts of time. I am powering it with AC wall power through a veriac, bridge rectifier, and capacitor. (so DC out at about 140V, but can turn it up to ~200V)
the 2 loop antennas are about 29 inches long each if stretched out, they are wrapped into a circle with one turn.
using a ~6 inch long section of RG-6U coax cable as a 1/4 wave delay for one of the antennas
antennas are driven with a radio on the 70cm radio band, I had about 35W max.

don't know if you noticed, but the lower half of the ARV central core is just like the back part of a CRT. only the beam hits electrical contacts that then connect to the capacitors.

[Ufopolitics]

Ufopolitics,
I think you have it with the particle accelerator being the starting point.
ever seen the magvid idea ?

http://blog.lege.net/Mathias_Bage/GLCRA-MAGVID-annotated.pdf

it is basically an open air particle accelerator.

Hi Spacecase, thanks!

Yes I went over the MAGVID...in the first pages where he shows the magnetic poles rotation or electron deviation...somehow he's got it right as that both poles are counter rotating (even though he's got it reversed) but the main point is that after assembling both poles he still sees it as both are counter rotating (on his first and second diagrams, plus all later on development of whole paper) .

I have shown this very clearly on the CRT Thread, where both poles -independently against CRT Screen- show counter spins, HOWEVER, when looked as a WHOLE MAGNET (simply using two CRT's for each pole facing each others...diagrams on thread), then we realize that it is JUST ONE SINGLE-DIRECTIONAL SPIN.

I built a small one that runs in the 70cm radio band,
did not see anything from it, but then I only can put about 30W of energy into the RF field, and that is likely way way to little power.
I chose that band because it would make the device small enough to build with what I already had on hand, and if energy density was an issue, it is not much space to fill with power. so guess I will be trying another size here next, but I don't have a larger DC electro magnet, and funding will likely stop me there, but maybe someone has some wire lying around that I can use, I am still asking around.

Would love to see some pics of your work above!!

what gets me about the idea of the particle accelerator moving ether, is that the ARV should do the same thing, but with electrostatic energy and not magnetic energy, and it really should not matter what one you use to get there if you set it up correct.

For an effective P.A. it is required the magnetic fields to drive/bent the beam, plus a HV Electric Field to provide the acceleration, and in the case of electrons, then we could use a small Tesla ignition coil to reach the HV Positive Ring -set in different stages on the beam traveling path- to accelerate electrons towards it.

I tried the electrostatic method, but only have 19.5KV to play with at the moment, and that was not enough voltage to see any effect.
in the past I had got a slight gravity effect from tests run at about 50KV.

the only common element I have seen in my tests lately is that they seem to need more power into the field than I seem to have. it strikes me as something that does not work well on a small scale with low power.
then again I could be shaping the filed poorly.

I see Electrostatic as a very antiquated method, plus too expensive to build and get parts.

An easy and very simple small particle accelerator to perform primary tests would be a small 12V CRT..

In actual Particle Accelerators, the beam travels in a circular path (forming like a Ring), passing through the HV Ring Accelerating Stages, while bent to keep the curve right with electromagnets...still here the Beam is traveling LINEARLY.

My point is to make the Beam to Spin while moving forward -following same linear path- through the HV Acceleration Ring Stages.

Making the Beam to Spin could be achieved with a small belt of electromagnets excited in a sequence...understand?


Regards


Ufopolitics

[Gambeir]

Ufopolitics,
I think you have it with the particle accelerator being the starting point.
ever seen the magvid idea ?

http://blog.lege.net/Mathias_Bage/GLCRA-MAGVID-annotated.pdf

it is basically an open air particle accelerator
I built a small one that runs in the 70cm radio band,
did not see anything from it, but then I only can put about 30W of energy into the RF field, and that is likely way way to little power.
I chose that band because it would make the device small enough to build with what I already had on hand, and if energy density was an issue, it is not much space to fill with power. so guess I will be trying another size here next, but I don't have a larger DC electro magnet, and funding will likely stop me there, but maybe someone has some wire lying around that I can use, I am still asking around.

what gets me about the idea of the particle accelerator moving ether, is that the ARV should do the same thing, but with electrostatic energy and not magnetic energy, and it really should not matter what one you use to get there if you set it up correct.

I tried the electrostatic method, but only have 19.5KV to play with at the moment, and that was not enough voltage to see any effect.
in the past I had got a slight gravity effect from tests run at about 50KV.

the only common element I have seen in my tests lately is that they seem to need more power into the field than I seem to have. it strikes me as something that does not work well on a small scale with low power.
then again I could be shaping the filed poorly.

Great post Spacecase0.
What about the Steele Braden Motor Spacecase0? What's it doing? Might we reconsider how this electrostatic motor works?

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/16565-steele-braden-generator.html

The rotating electrostatic petal design is akin to looking at the ARV's capacitor bank. With the Steele Braden Electrostatic Motor it is being fired in an intermeshing sequentially layered pattern. This is very much like the ARV's layout, and if the idea's of John St. Claire are accurate (and if I understand this correctly) then this motor design should be creating a series of tiny wormholes similar to the St. Claire space ship and so acting to produce an attraction on hyperspace with the correct polarity set up.

[spacecase0]

Ufopolitics,
I think you have it with the particle accelerator being the starting point.
ever seen the magvid idea ?

http://blog.lege.net/Mathias_Bage/GLCRA-MAGVID-annotated.pdf

it is basically an open air particle accelerator
I built a small one that runs in the 70cm radio band,
did not see anything from it, but then I only can put about 30W of energy into the RF field, and that is likely way way to little power.
I chose that band because it would make the device small enough to build with what I already had on hand, and if energy density was an issue, it is not much space to fill with power. so guess I will be trying another size here next, but I don't have a larger DC electro magnet, and funding will likely stop me there, but maybe someone has some wire lying around that I can use, I am still asking around.

what gets me about the idea of the particle accelerator moving ether, is that the ARV should do the same thing, but with electrostatic energy and not magnetic energy, and it really should not matter what one you use to get there if you set it up correct.

I tried the electrostatic method, but only have 19.5KV to play with at the moment, and that was not enough voltage to see any effect.
in the past I had got a slight gravity effect from tests run at about 50KV.

the only common element I have seen in my tests lately is that they seem to need more power into the field than I seem to have. it strikes me as something that does not work well on a small scale with low power.
then again I could be shaping the filed poorly.

[Gambeir]

Reviewing just this last page is almost overwhelming. I wanted to go back to Sputins comment for a moment however.

It seems the first requirement, is to throw Einstein and his theories of relativity out of the room. One can also investigate Stephen J Crothers reasoning on the problems with Einstein. – One can also hear Stephens story of being expelled from the University of New South Wales (Australia) for simply challenging Einstein’s conception of the gravitational field…

Again, this is just more and more modern evidence a controlled academia, one which once more is demonstrating it is a manifestly corrupt system since where ever questioning is verboten and punishable then deception and evil must reside, for this is their native habitat and unquestionable authority is the most desired of comfort zone of absolute power.

Wheeler’s concepts on Dielectricity and Magnetism seems to help explain what’s going on, once you learn the language.. Magnetism being caused from the loss of inertia of the Dielectric inertial plane / /Counterspace / The Aether, according to Wheeler.

Ken says “Gravity is an incoherent dielectric acceleration” and (there is no such thing as “anti-gravity)”. And to counter act gravity you need an “Omni-directional coherent field array” (OCFA).

Or a vector-less coherent field array…

So how do you make such an array? – Apparently there is a design?

What Wheeler seems to be doing is assigning a dielectric plane to the Aether. So I ask does it make sense and the answer is that yes it makes sense.

However in my mind the dielectric plane would itself not be counter space precisely, because the dielectric plane would actually be the Aether, and which is space itself, and space is like a partition which separate the mono~poles of a falaco soliton like Universe. So the way I'm envisioning counter~space is that it is actually an opposite mono~pole, and where the dielectric plane is space itself, and which then acts as the divisor between the two planes. This would then naturally have to be a dielectric by nature. So Wheeler's ideas makes sense in my mind..

Falaco Solitons

https://arxiv.org/ftp/gr-qc/papers/0101/0101098.pdf

Next, the Aether as described by Steven's writings fulfills the description of instantaneous action across space, as outer~space consists of a frozen warehouse (space is itself this warehouse) of vast galactic power reserves due to the nature of superconductivity (frozen/super~cold outer~space) to forever seize and store forever any energy emitted in to it, and this space is described by Aether Theory as a super super~fluid exhibiting a super~fluidity which penetrates all forms and which is thus a push/pressure emitted from the galactic core, and again because of it's composition is actually moving billions of times faster than light speed as described by Dr. John Milewski as a kind of superlight.

https://web.archive.org/web/20090130074537/http://www.hbci.com/~wenonah/new/milewski.htm

So now we also have Aether Theory supported by superlight theory, and both describe gravity as result of pressure or pushing; only mass provides some shielding or shadowing effect and earth is surrounded by billions and billions of large bits of matter.


Wheeler says[B] “Gravity is an incoherent dielectric acceleration.”
Incoherent because of shadowing effect from countless bodies in universe, and creating an incoherent shadowing pattern of pressure fronts, so Wheeler is supportive and also assigns the dielectric plane to this super superfluidity of super light.


*Note from previous posts that accretion disks are proven to intake this super~cooled medium and exhaust cosmic energy jets of plasma. Demonstrating that vast reserves of galactic energy reside in the super cold recesses of space. The release of this energy evidently involves a cyclonic vortex of counter~rotating accretion disks sucking in surround space and breaking the dielectric medium which otherwise prevents the combination of assembly.


Paul Dirac predicted in 1931 that the north and south poles of a magnet could exist independently and behave like electric charges.

Scientists Create Synthetic Dirac Monopole (pub 2014)
Scientists Create Synthetic Dirac Monopole | Physics | Sci-News.com
Synthetic electromagnetic knot in a three-dimensional skyrmion
Synthetic electromagnetic knot in a three-dimensional skyrmion | Science Advances

Also FYI, given that a Pythagorean triangle of 36 –108– 36 degrees, shown on Plato’s divided line, which is also the same angles that of the water molecule. Which seems to tie into a whacky theory that says: Everything in the Universe is Water, or a frequency or memory of Water. (But that’s another story)…

[Gambeir]

I would like to add another conceptual idea on to something I said previously, and which may be useful for others thinking about the origins of reality. First I said the following;

Using a comparative analysis I think we can see commonalities beginning with the words of Telsa and stretching forward to Ken Wheeler; where counterspace is the opposite pole of a magnetic field. Meaning we are living in a monopole of a total magnetic field, and which would then define Universe as we know it right now, and with the other side (counterspace) being the other magnetic pole of Universe. (not to be confused with the hyperspace of John Qunicy St. Clair; which is only the factual movement through a vortex pinch point between these monopoles which is otherwise referred to as a wormhole).

Counterspace is the other monopole, and the wormhole that that leads from our space to counterspace is in reality a bloch wall. In other words, a magnetic field is a manifestation of hole, or natural bloch wall, between our own magnetic monopolar space and that of another monopolar space: Both spaces effectively being magnetic monopoles. The wormhole being a Bloch Wall between the two. A wormhole is then factually a Bloch Wall and which is bleeding the polar field from the other side and thus creating a complete magnetic field in our own space. If this is correct than counterspace is factually a more accurate description of this field and not hyperspace which would be the resultant of moving through and with in the bloch wall, and presumably then returning back inside our own monopole field. Movement in the constriction of the vortex pinch point of the bloch wall is hyperspace specifically.

Now another approach to this is to consider a sort of mirror image approach, and ya know mirrors are really strange things when you think about them, and so if realities exist opposite one another then there may be no direct links to one another. The connections may not be as simple as two vortex's connected by a cosmic string.
Buzz Blog: Falaco Solitons: Particles at the Pool

Instead we may be a shadow soliton or the shadows of other soliton's may bleed through. Perhaps the basis for the idea of "dark light" springs from an understanding similar to the statement by Ufopolitics and our reality is the product of condensed shadows drawn out of Universe.

In this image you see there are shadows of the connected soliton's reflected in the bottom of the swimming pool. Are we nothing but the shadows of another world? Is this where life comes from? I'm reminded greatly of "The Allegory of the Cave." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegory_of_the_Cave

I'm also reminded of Tesla's statement that gravity hides in the shadows.

https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/cbda/693475be1d30782678e5547e151d6ef3f37f.pdf