An Inquiry in to the Alien Reproduction Vehicle

[Gambeir]

Imagine the ion drive using saline “like” “blood” flowing around the entire power unit or ship creature thing that is artificial intelligence and alive to the point as it is an extension of your body like a finger
Would a doctor of veterinary medicine refer to a human doctor or vice versus?
What about the chlorophyll incorporated into the water purification system that requires true light for a naturally healthy transport?
The biological functionality would be like a planetary cycle but on a smaller scale.
The unit should be a micro star system like a micro wormhole but just the opposite.
The power is all natural and creates life.
Now build it.

Sorry for the slow reply; having some home issues which are delaying my attention.

First of all; why artificial? There is at least one known report I read from the 1920's/30's of a barnstormer encountering what was, evidently, a sky creature of some kind. Maybe someone has a link to that story?

My point is simply that if there is a way then you can count on nature having already found it long ago: Those video's of pulsating orbs in and around the space station do not look like machines. They look like some kind of critter. I like your take on superfluidity of counterspace as a kind of blood, because the wormhole to consciousness is represented by a falaco soliton, and you can be sure about that because of a large involvement right now in R&D in medical research focused on soliton's of all kinds; though most of these people are clueless what the objective of their work is actually about.

http://coll.pair.com/csdc/pdf/fal10305.pdf

[Pot head]

Okay man, think about space displacement when it comes to three dimensional realignment, i.e., movement through the heavens.
Saline like superconducting fluids are a different animal and the physics are a better overall Q than the current superconductors available to the public sector.
This setup is a vacuum of space propulsion unit with superconducting coils allowing space to be used as the flow of magnetic focusing.
Magnetic focusing i.e., gravity amplifiers.
The ion drive would be initiated and you start up the shields to protect the craft, the gravity field is focused in the correct orientation to aid the ion drive.
The gravity amplifiers are powered up and you go to full potential.
How fast is not the question but how long does it take to move the mass up to full speed potential?

[Pot head]

I used rubbers and helium and then aluminum tape in odd shapes then I released thousands of them over an enemy combatant, the radar equipment registered an all out invasion and revealed there strategy.

[spacecase0]

Thanks for re-posting. I've been occupied and haven't had time to respond as I would like, so more later after some home problem solving, but I've also been looking at 3D printing on a large format, along with laser sinstering 3D machines.

A logical solution to making a vacuum balloon is with a 3D printer. Keeping weight down is primarily accomplished by increasing depth while using a lighter fill material. Airplanes and boats have been accomplishing this by using balsa sheathed with aluminum and composites for a very long time. Structural strength using interlocking blocks that produce a vacuum seal and forming an arch structure to create a sphere is an entirely logical approach.

Just off hand I know that a 39/40 foot diameter balloon filled with hydrogen will lift about 1,000 lbs. This is what a Japanese balloon bomb was capable of lifting. Any vacuum balloon of the same diameter should lift at least the same amount. A vacuum balloon is an engineering, materials, and manufacturing problem, and today we have all the tools to make an honest attempt at creating such a balloon. Computers, 3D printing, and materials like carbon fiber and kevlar are now all off the shelf accessible materials.

the topic may have made the news

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-06-22/mystery-orbs-turn-out-be-top-secret-darpa-experiment

[Pot head]

[Gambeir]

https://www.o-boot.com/en/project/

Lightweight pressurized "sheet sandwich" wall for a "vacuum" spherical container will not backle under 14.7 psi or less.



Why Inflatable? - SUP on the fly


Goodyear Inflatoplane

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZjUxlfMbdhs

Al

Thanks for re-posting. I've been occupied and haven't had time to respond as I would like, so more later after some home problem solving, but I've also been looking at 3D printing on a large format, along with laser sinstering 3D machines.

A logical solution to making a vacuum balloon is with a 3D printer. Keeping weight down is primarily accomplished by increasing depth while using a lighter fill material. Airplanes and boats have been accomplishing this by using balsa sheathed with aluminum and composites for a very long time. Structural strength using interlocking blocks that produce a vacuum seal and forming an arch structure to create a sphere is an entirely logical approach.

Just off hand I know that a 39/40 foot diameter balloon filled with hydrogen will lift about 1,000 lbs. This is what a Japanese balloon bomb was capable of lifting. Any vacuum balloon of the same diameter should lift at least the same amount. A vacuum balloon is an engineering, materials, and manufacturing problem, and today we have all the tools to make an honest attempt at creating such a balloon. Computers, 3D printing, and materials like carbon fiber and kevlar are now all off the shelf accessible materials.

[Gambeir]

If you are using saline for electricity conduction, then salt water planets are great for landing.
To travel a great distance without necessities is illogical so use a system that is extremely simple in its form.
To recharge from salt water?

You're a mind reader Pot head. I have to put together some illustrations to consider that came to mind because of Spacecase0's comment.

[Pot head]

[aljhoa]

On the matter of physical balloons;

In 1670, a Jesuit Monk, Francis Lana, suggested an aircraft based on the principle of creating vacuum balloons in his book Prodromo dell'Arte Maestra.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vacuum_airship

https://www.o-boot.com/en/project/

Lightweight pressurized "sheet sandwich" wall for a "vacuum" spherical container will not backle under 14.7 psi or less.



Why Inflatable? - SUP on the fly


Goodyear Inflatoplane

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZjUxlfMbdhs

Al

[Pot head]

Think

If you are using saline for electricity conduction, then salt water planets are great for landing.
To travel a great distance without necessities is illogical so use a system that is extremely simple in its form.
To recharge from salt water?

[spacecase0]

not sure,
usually magnetic things find a static state near a magnetic field and just stay there, would have to think about how that could be done.

[Gambeir]

here is an idea,
let us say that you get a gravity field generator working,
how do you power it ?
you need to extract power out somewhere to run the thing.
and all of what we see so far of the fluxliner and other tests with spinning magnetic disks don't show any clear way to extract energy.
I was wondering this when I remembered the fluid spotted in the central core of the ships told about from abduction stories.
so, if I were trying to get power from something that had an unequal gravity field, I might set up tubes in a loop with some heavy liquid and use its motion to turn a generator (some sort of water wheel type setup), and the heavier the liquid, the better it would work, so mercury would be ideal.
I think this idea fits pretty well with the entire design and what little we have been told from ones who saw it all working.

What about just an un~equal magnetic field spacecase0?

[Gambeir]

here is an idea,
let us say that you get a gravity field generator working,
how do you power it ?
you need to extract power out somewhere to run the thing.
and all of what we see so far of the fluxliner and other tests with spinning magnetic disks don't show any clear way to extract energy.
I was wondering this when I remembered the fluid spotted in the central core of the ships told about from abduction stories.
so, if I were trying to get power from something that had an unequal gravity field, I might set up tubes in a loop with some heavy liquid and use its motion to turn a generator (some sort of water wheel type setup), and the heavier the liquid, the better it would work, so mercury would be ideal.
I think this idea fits pretty well with the entire design and what little we have been told from ones who saw it all working.

I think you've unraveled the power system of the ARV with that idea. Makes a good deal of sense to me because it also fits Wheeler's explanation of electricity as longitudinal dynamic polarization; like a line from a magnet pulled outwards it would then form a curled line.


"Electricity is Ether in a state of dynamic polarization; magnetism is Ether in a state of dynamic circular polarization upon itself, is the radiative termination of electrical discharge; dielectricity is the Ether under stress or strain. The motions and strains of the Ether give rise to electrification. Phi times Psi gives Q; ‘electrons’ do not mediate these electrical and magnetic forces or their likewise the Ether fields. There are no electrons, negative charges, special-dimensions, warped space (resoundingly denied by Tesla and others), and no photons; only charge, induction and radiation/discharges and their relational spins, all as mediated through the Ether."
Ken Wheeler

[spacecase0]

here is an idea,
let us say that you get a gravity field generator working,
how do you power it ?
you need to extract power out somewhere to run the thing.
and all of what we see so far of the fluxliner and other tests with spinning magnetic disks don't show any clear way to extract energy.
I was wondering this when I remembered the fluid spotted in the central core of the ships told about from abduction stories.
so, if I were trying to get power from something that had an unequal gravity field, I might set up tubes in a loop with some heavy liquid and use its motion to turn a generator (some sort of water wheel type setup), and the heavier the liquid, the better it would work, so mercury would be ideal.
I think this idea fits pretty well with the entire design and what little we have been told from ones who saw it all working.

[Gambeir]

Until further verification by physical means the following is my final conclusion beginning with the fundamental idea behind the ARV and the Alexey Device as explained by Ken Wheeler and Henry Stevens. Stevens because he concisely explains the fundamental ideas about the Universe applying a pressure to surrounding space, and Wheeler because he explains what that pressure really is as a dielectric energy field which ultimately is the causation of not only magnetism, but of gravity as we understand it.

The physical evidence supporting how gravity really works was suppressed, ignored, and ridiculed, and thanks to the criminal accomplices in the colleges and universities, the mass media, and corporate military contractors, the true and somewhat simple idea behind what causes gravity was never made public.

The dielectric field is what creates gravity in the form of magnetic fields in matter. It is the inwards accretion of counterspace which is a dielectric energy field that spins counter space into a coherent dielectric line of force which we see as a magnetic line of force. The dielectric field is ultimately horizontal to the surface of a planet as the magnetic planes are perpendicular to the surface. This is why I and others have had confusion over whether these are repulsion machines or if they are false mass drives. That confusion has been created by imagining that there are repelling electrons being ejected towards the earth in the form of negative charged particles, when in reality it is the re-orienting of the gravitational dielectric induction field which is taking place. Otherwise Mantim Lee's analysis would have to be correct, and with that kind of power to weight ratio the Alexey would have been on Mar's in 30 minutes or less. Therefore some other explanation has to exist, and so it does.


There are two magnetic planes in the ARV which also have two dielectric planes that work to change the direction /orientation of the dielectric fields induced weight. Weight is a quality of directional inertial force created when the surrounding dielectric counter spatial field acts upon matter producing an inwards accretion plane, and the greater or more energetic this accretion plane is, then the greater a given mass will weigh; previously and mistakenly called gravity, the creation of weight is hinged upon this understanding and is modifiable through other means. A magnet proves this is correct and the inertial accretion plane is visible with a ferocell. It is also testable while gravity seems to be entirely theoretical and mathematically based conjecture.

The bottom plates in the ARV have a dielectric conductor in the form of quartz, which is also is a piezoelectric material, and so the idea here is that using this material allows for the electrification of the dielectric field and the lines of force which are produced. I assume this is needed because it adds propulsive power as force applied in the same way that an electric current may exert a force. Electrification enhances and simplifies control and manipulation via a secondary magnetic field which in the ARV is the smaller electromagnet that surrounds the upper crew compartment.

One magnetic plane along with it's own dielectric inertial force is acted upon by a second magnetic plane with it's own dielectric inertial force, which when applied correctly alters the direction of the mass inertial force. In other words, it changes the direction of gravity to put it simply, although really the less you revert to using that outdated idea the better off you will be.

I think you can see this in both the Alexey and the ARV designs. When you look at the Alexey it is nearly an inverted ARV with the dielectric inertial plane overhead instead of underneath as in the ARV. You should question the odds of this happening by accidental design.