"Citfa" got me booted off the OU site falsely maintaining that BEMF current traveled in the same direction as the initial EMF. Now "Tinman" is using my theory that BEMF current is reversed and traveling in the opposite direction.
Here's "Tinman's" latest version:
"If the coil is ideal,then the CEMF should always equal that of the EMF,by way of the induced currents by both-correct.
So this being the case, at T=0,there would have to be a current rise,and that rise in current value must start from 0. Through the transition to 800ma?second,it must first produce a current value much less than that--it must start from a value of 0. As soon as a current rise started taking place,due to the EMF(before the maximum value of 800ma/second),it would induce a CEMF that results in producing a current that is in opposition to that of the EMF induced current."
Here's what Tinman had to say about it in November of 2015: "No Synchro,the current dose not reverse direction"No Synchro,the current dose not reverse direction-->only the voltage across the coil/inductor inverts. You apply a current in one direction to build the magnetic field around the inductor= current to form magnetic field. Then when the supply current is cut off,the magnetic field collapses,and creates a current flow=magnetic field changing in time to create current flow through the inductor. As the magnetic field around that inductor has not inverted (swapped polarities),then the current flow remains in the same direction.
Brad
Here's "Tinman's" latest version:
"If the coil is ideal,then the CEMF should always equal that of the EMF,by way of the induced currents by both-correct.
So this being the case, at T=0,there would have to be a current rise,and that rise in current value must start from 0. Through the transition to 800ma?second,it must first produce a current value much less than that--it must start from a value of 0. As soon as a current rise started taking place,due to the EMF(before the maximum value of 800ma/second),it would induce a CEMF that results in producing a current that is in opposition to that of the EMF induced current."
Here's what Tinman had to say about it in November of 2015: "No Synchro,the current dose not reverse direction"No Synchro,the current dose not reverse direction-->only the voltage across the coil/inductor inverts. You apply a current in one direction to build the magnetic field around the inductor= current to form magnetic field. Then when the supply current is cut off,the magnetic field collapses,and creates a current flow=magnetic field changing in time to create current flow through the inductor. As the magnetic field around that inductor has not inverted (swapped polarities),then the current flow remains in the same direction.
Brad
Comment