Single Wire Power - A Search for Ambient Power to do Wwork

[mikrovolt]

My music talent is limited mostly listener.

A music of the spheres module on Vb3 also a liitle melodyne
weaves in and out between

https://youtu.be/aEyQISBzhBA?t=99

https://youtu.be/Gs2bQxid2ZE?t=4833

[dR-Green]

Back to the standing waves (music or frequency)again.

Very good, appreciate your contribution. The practical transmission line.
the directional coupling method to sample the signal content.
locating the BNC connection point ?
http://www.energeticforum.com/attach...ransformer-jpg I do remember Sputin's.
If you have time to video a demonstration of sampling.
Looking for an example like this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M1PgCOTDjvI

Your website so people can find the kits, plans, software.

Making a directional coupling ? If I recall correctly you use 30 Ohm.

Do you mean a video showing filtering the (square) waveform and producing new waveforms from pure sine waves?

In the meantime, this video shows how the sound/waveform changes purely through changing the intensity of the harmonics. The drawbars/sliders he pushes in and out along the top of the organ each control the volume of a specific wavelength/octave and/or harmonic, so by adjusting the volume of one of those harmonics the resulting waveform can change completely (at about 17 mins in the video).

Tony Monaco Hammond B3 Settings and Sounds! - YouTube

[mikrovolt]

A square wave sounds like a square wave because of the harmonic spectrum of frequencies that is produced by a square waveform. A pure sine wave is theoretically a single frequency and has no harmonic content.

By analysing the spectrum of a square waveform and making note of the harmonic frequencies, one may easily put together individual sine waves playing all the same frequencies at the same amplitudes to reproduce what looks and sounds like a square waveform. This is the essence of synthesis, sound design, and how digital synthesizers try to reproduce the sound of acoustic instruments. Any sound/waveform can essentially be broken down to a collection of sine waves.

Also because of this, you are unable to distinguish between square and sine waveforms at the higher frequencies purely because in order to identify a square waveform you need to be able to hear the harmonics. If the harmonics are beyond the frequency range of your hearing then the waveform is filtered, and you are left with a sine wave.

P.S. your telephone speaker is unable to reproduce the low fundamental frequency of the male voice, and yet you accurately identify a person as a male when they phone you. This is due to the harmonics or overtones that the male voice produces, which are different to a female voice, and so your brain automatically analyses the harmonic spectrum to find the nearest matching pattern = human male. Your brain is filling in the physical gap that the inadequate speaker has created. You can filter the fundamental frequency and your brain can identify sounds based on the harmonics just fine. But if you filter out the harmonics then it's like removing colour from vision, you'll never be able to tell the difference between a violin and a harmonica.

Furthermore, a square waveform with a short pulse has less harmonic content than a longer pulse, in case anyone was thinking "impulses" and "more harmonics" simultaneously would produce magic, they are contradictory.

Back to the standing waves (music or frequency)again.

Very good, appreciate your contribution. The practical transmission line.
the directional coupling method to sample the signal content.
locating the BNC connection point ?
http://www.energeticforum.com/attach...ransformer-jpg I do remember Sputin's.
If you have time to video a demonstration of sampling.
Looking for an example like this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M1PgCOTDjvI

Your website so people can find the kits, plans, software.

Making a directional coupling ? If I recall correctly you use 30 Ohm.

[ET-Power]

Great thread beginnings Bob

This is what we need, we need simple learning tools and this is one
JOHN BEDINI uses all of the time. Get an energy pump/converter
running and use the double diode off one wire and collect off a
node.

Energy collectors with antenna work great around my oscillators.

This is why we use the word "Conversion" or method of conversion.

We need to start slow from the beginning of things like this. What is
going on there?

I was listening to John B way back when and he was at the chalk
board explaining this and asked the same thing. The answer is easy.

We have no idea what energy is and how it works, that is the goal
of the question. The energy will travel in both directions not just
one way even though we are taught that a diode makes it SO!!.

Aaron just showed this in his latest Gray Tube video instruction.

Aaron is well aware of most of our ignorance on this and is the
most patient instructor I know. Check out Aaron's video explaining
how the diode doesn't work like we think it does. It is charging
backwards sometimes.

It may not be a one wire experiment but it explains more than
any video or instruction I have seen this year about the nature
of energy.

Also one wire and wireless go hand and glove.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lp-KOgU9n78

Very thankful for that share BroMikey!

Yes, Aaron is very patient and understanding of how to calmly and efficiently communicate with people who are new to this world, while at the same time giving all the details an experienced individual would need to know.

GREAT TEACHER WITH MUCH PATIENCE!

[BroMikey]

Thanks Bob

The lights on the input appear to be dropping in power when the
1 wire connect takes place.



Here is another 1 wire job


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qm1O2-gQPPk


https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC4gDE7umjeq0uvP5gETepvw/videos

[Bob Smith]

Here is a recent single wire experiment.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DaLru9prUgM

Great video find, Mike!
It does a good clear job of illustrating SWP principles.
A couple of things to note:

- running the transmitting ignition coil at Resonance
- virtual ground (plastic coated aluminum foil)

Resonance has some important effects on electricity. I will get into the resonance element in another post.

The virtual ground essentially places one leg of the circuit's window of potential difference in the ambient (dielectric) medium . This stresses the ambient/dielectric/aether, causing it to supply necessary charge to bring equilibrium to the pulsating potential difference in the system, thereby powering the circuit.

The ambient/dielectric/aether is a huge reservoir of charge

This is a great illustration. Thanks for sharing it.
Bob

[BroMikey]

Here is a recent single wire experiment.




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DaLru9prUgM

[BroMikey]

If I am not mistaken Peter L. did an SSG using the 3 battery system
and left some of his multifilar connections open. Many have witnessed
some gains.

In Peter's case the run time was extended for a variety of possible
reasons, including this one. It would be great to see a circuit
verify that this open connection actually draws in energy.

When I put 4' or 8' fluorescent tubes into one side of the socket
it will light up even before I connect the other side. But that HV
open air connect even though lit is not free.

Any video that hides the input and output values is an insult to
honest experimenting when claims are made of FREE ENERGY.

This is my personal opinion, as I am not interested in a goose chase.

Put up the data or shut up If people want to tinker that is fine
just call it that. Any competent investigator knows when he or she
has exceeded the norm's of the present model's.

Good Day.

[Bob Smith]

member Whoopy has done some experiments here

Pulling energy from the ambient energy field using a coil capacitor

his movie here

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OEaDoVnibj8&feature=youtu.be

all comments welcomed and appreciated

respectfully
Chet K

I watched Woopy's video with some interest. I believe he is demonstrating the phenomenon we were discussing in this thread. There is tremendous opportunity in this kind of configuration due to the endless supply of charge that resides in the ambient medium (what some call the aether). Because of this tremendous reservoir that is available to those who know how to tap into it, there is a corresponding tremendous resistance to see progress in development for this kind of simple technology. I would encourage readers to read thru the thread, and not get bogged down in the digressions. The quote below summarizes in very simple terms what I and some others believe this single wire power (SWP) approach is all about.
Happy Easter
Bob

The Single Wire Power (SWP) effect is one means to tapping an endless reservoir of ambient electrical charge that can do real work. Lets try to rein in things to keep that our focus.

As I see it, one of the most important elements of the SWP effect consists in creating a wide window of potential difference within a circuit. This window, when activated in pulsed fashion, stresses the aether and causes the aether/ambient to respond with a charge to restore equilibrium.

One example (taken from the work of Don Smith): If we look at a capacitor, we encounter a window of potential difference between the input and output sides. If we pulse the input side with a high enough charge, the dielectric will respond by supplying a charge to the output side.

I'll leave it there for tonight.
Bob

[Duncan]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jmtzVITUWgk

but I see no harm in investigating a little bit turning a few knobs and switches

[Bob Smith]

The Single Wire Power (SWP) effect is one means to tapping an endless reservoir of ambient electrical charge that can do real work. Lets try to rein in things to keep that our focus.

As I see it, one of the most important elements of the SWP effect consists in creating a wide window of potential difference within a circuit. This window, when activated in pulsed fashion, stresses the aether and causes the aether/ambient to respond with a charge to restore equilibrium.

One example (taken from the work of Don Smith): If we look at a capacitor, we encounter a window of potential difference between the input and output sides. If we pulse the input side with a high enough charge, the dielectric will respond by supplying a charge to the output side.

I'll leave it there for tonight.
Bob

[BroMikey]

Hi Dave --- single wire and whatever may arise, It seems a refreshing and free flowing thread and its nice to see you reading it.


.................. as I wrote earlier I have managed (by buggering about with shape and spacing) to get a gallon tank boiling using 18 watts of real power

............from Peters pictures I see he is using tap water and hence quite high 'real power' consumption relative to the deionised water (I am now using). does it matter if I circulate deionised water through my radiator ? I think not a jot its only the heat exchange I require

I watched some of the video's where Aaron talking in conference
helped me to realize so many ways to disassociate water some with
infinitesimal amounts of power which sort of reminded me how one
wire power transfer might relate to these subjects.

Thanks for the great thread.

[Duncan]

sorry thx - to err is human

Hi Dave --- single wire and whatever may arise, It seems a refreshing and free flowing thread and its nice to see you reading it.
so sorry thx I should have been clearer. Its actually the three still photgraphs shown in the research article on the web page I linked to I was considering re- boiling, - to wit ----


and

and obviously boiling furiously


It is assumed (at least by me) that current is directly proportional to (real) energy consumption in this case.
the energy graph Peter is experiancing seems very similar to that which I demonstrated with a couple of spoons.
I have no intension of building anything like Peters boiler for tea cups but rather try to focus on that huge energy drop down when boiling occurs . maximise the effect and extract heat from a gently boiling tank. a balancing act sure but I think (or perhaps hope) its worth a try . as I wrote earlier I have managed (by buggering about with shape and spacing) to get a gallon tank boiling using 18 watts of real power . can I extract into a radiator ? can I reproduce the thing ? I don't know yet thx but I hope you get the gist of whats caught my attention and why the fact it isn't a straight line power graph is important, after all nothing like this is possible with resistance heating . from Peters pictures I see he is using tap water and hence quite high 'real power' consumption relative to the deionised water (I am now using). does it matter if I circulate deionised water through my radiator ? I think not a jot its only the heat exchange I require

[DavidE]

Is this the SWP thread? Or am I lost?

[thx1138]

Boiling water at altitude

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_iiWGel3q50

Its only required that we make something simple and reproducible that is obviously COP >1 but of course that's easier said than done

This video actually shows that he is not boiling water. The water is not going through a phase change from liquid to vapor. Although we see some kind of vapor rising from the bowl, the temperature of the water that he shows is 66C. The charts that show at what temperature water boils for a given altitude usually start a bit above 70C for an altitude of around 9000 meters (29527 Ft). It's safe, I think, to assume he is nowhere near that kind of altitude. Even at 3000 meters he would need to get much nearer 90C to cause water to boil. Considering the size of his electrodes I don't think he is causing a plasma between the plates. What he is probably showing is electrolysis.
https://www.google.com/search?q=boil...FeFE_ninoQM%3A