This forum is preserved as a permanent archive. The community continues at eMedia Press.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Uncovering the Missing Secrets of Magnetism. 92 pages. Free new book

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • TheoriaApophasis
    replied
    Originally posted by tachyon View Post
    I've actually thought about the magnetic flux lines being one with space some........just another way to calculate things it doesn't bring new results

    In conventional motor design and calculations that is true.


    However the far reaching implications in other arenas, other designs, ...is immense and mind boggling.

    Best of all (well, not best, but wonderful ) it takes relativity and its insane reifications OF SPACE "as something" that "does something" etc etc.

    ....and flushes it at the speed of C-squared right down the toilet.

    Leave a comment:


  • tachyon
    replied
    I've actually thought about the magnetic flux lines being one with space some months ago in order to explain some thought experiments and the nature of induction in coils, to tell you the truth this is just another way to calculate things it doesn't bring new results just make you more flexible in terms of motor design e.t.c..... elinas ise re?
    Last edited by tachyon; 07-08-2014, 07:29 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • TheoriaApophasis
    replied
    Originally posted by sadang View Post
    I like your theory, even just for the simple fact that it does not agree with current electromagnetic theory. I'd be glad to know that has a practical application, that brings something new in a practical way, not just theoretically. I got to page 41 and so far everything you wrote is ok for me, many common things to Keely, Russell, Shauberger, Meyer, Grebennikov, and also many others who have sustained dynamic helical of ether as fundamental dynamics of universe.
    After I'll finish reading the whole article, I will return with some questions, comments, suggestions if I deem necessary. Of course if you agree.

    Kind regards, I am already well into the 3rd edition


    New sections including formulas,
    and a section on field incommensurability
    section on divergent and convergent gradients etc.
    And a section on 'fields vs. space'

    Something amounting to 40+ more pages.



    However I'm currently busy building a new type of motor. (and its killing me).

    Today I was experimenting more with some instrumentation on a borrowed 6" by 2" thick Neodymium magnet

    Id buy one, but they're $800 EACH

    1 Neodymium Magnet 6 x 2 inch Disc N48 Huge Strong | eBay


    It is just an "INSANELY DANGEROUS" beast.... Its one magnet that could just about KILL YOU.

    I already have 100s of magnets, I dont need one of these titanic beasts.
    Last edited by TheoriaApophasis; 07-08-2014, 06:56 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • sadang
    replied
    I like your theory, even just for the simple fact that it does not agree with current electromagnetic theory. I'd be glad to know that has a practical application, that brings something new in a practical way, not just theoretically. I got to page 41 and so far everything you wrote is ok for me, many common things to Keely, Russell, Shauberger, Meyer, Grebennikov, and also many others who have sustained dynamic helical of ether as fundamental dynamics of universe.

    After I'll finish reading the whole article, I will return with some questions, comments, suggestions if I deem necessary. Of course if you agree.

    Leave a comment:


  • TheoriaApophasis
    replied
    Originally posted by Netica View Post
    You have decided to attack the Pope, Mother Mary and effectively God and all who believe in God in the first few pages of your book.
    I thought it was supposed to be about Magnetism.

    Mmm, nope. Intro is only 2.5 pages long. The other attack I got was for attacking the fool Richard Feynman.

    Nobody should EVER "try to be all things to all people"

    If you don't like the intro, don't read it. However what you refer to is merely ONE sentence

    You certainly didn't pay for it

    Logically , attacking 1 to 2 sentences out of 110 pages, is patently absurd.
    But thats ok.

    Additionally, I made no such 'attack',....... what you refer to was merely an analogy to the "Cult of Quantum" explanation of magnetism as regards "Virtual photons". (i.e. nonsense).

    If however, you assume I am some atheist, nothing could be further from the truth.
    However none of THAT, has anything to do with magnetism.


    I've never judged any book by its cover, OR its intro. This might be a rule to follow.
    Last edited by TheoriaApophasis; 07-08-2014, 03:50 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Netica
    replied
    You have decided to attack the Pope, Mother Mary and effectively God and all who believe in God in the first few pages of your book.
    I thought it was supposed to be about Magnetism.

    Leave a comment:


  • TheoriaApophasis
    replied
    Originally posted by Bob Smith View Post
    TA, looking forward to reading your book, particularly in light of these comments. I don't know whether you'd subscribe to them, but your stance vis a vis QM and Special Relativity seems consistent with what I've seen in the work of Robert Sungenis (anti-Copernican), with which I find myself sympathetic.

    I will have a 3rd edition out in less than a month. Afterwords there are maybe 40+ pages to add with math and some finer more 'dry' points.


    Two quotes from Dollard with 'corrections' (so to say) in parenthesis:

    There is only ONE DIMENSION of Space *(within a field)*(CENTRIFUGAL FIELD)*(CENTRIPETAL FIELD) (per sq.
    centimeter).


    Hence we have FOUR primary dimensions in electrical engineering. These are:
    1) Time
    2) Space .....*(FIELD BARRIER, Ether pressure graidents)


    I have about 100 pages to write on this WITH mathematical proofs, most of which come from OLEG JEFIMENKO himself. Too bad he died not too long ago.


    How did I 'discover' that there are no fields in space? ....I came across countless discoveries along the road, and they all pointed at one unknown pointA field CANNOT,NEVER HAS terminated in space. Space is IN a field, but not the inverse.

    Counter-voidance is spatial compression, or what the commoner calls "magnetic repulsion" is spatial compression. Of course these are polarized Ether-fields, but what is being compressed is space itself, as given definition by polarized field gradients at maximum counter-voidance ('repulsion').

    As even Dollard admits, Ether always seeks self-voidance, ALWAYS, IN counterspace.
    rather than the interaction of fields, we have their attributes influencing conjugate fields (mag on dielectric fields etc.)


    This of course is , almost, one of those "chicken or the egg" situations, but still all math and evidence points to the Space itself OF a field, rather than the field itself. Namely, ALL fields ARE Ether-modalities by definition, logically and reductively so!

    Convergent fields (conterspatial) and divergent fields ('spatial', or polarized). Note also that in electromagnetic waves electric and magnetic fields are in phase, that is, simultaneous in time, and hence, according to the principle of causality (which states that the cause always
    precedes its effect), the two fields cannot cause each other (by the principle of causality, the fields should be out of phase if they create each other).
    MINE:
    This is why the insane fools of GR and QM (Or as Dollard calls it "Quantum Mysticism")have created a "mystical" effect precedes cause nonsense. They dont grasp that time and space are attributional to fields and field interactions, and they have no existence autonomous OF or from fields themselves.

    Ive always called it the "Cult of Quantum"





    OLEG JEFIMENKO

    jefimenko
    (October 14, 1922, Kharkiv, Ukraine - May 14, 2009, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA) - physicist and Professor Emeritus at West Virginia University.

    Biography
    He received his Ph.D. at the University of Oregon (1956).In 1956, he was awarded the Sigma Xi Prize. In 1971 and 1973, he won awards in the AAPT Apparatus Competition. Jefimenko has constructed and operated electrostatic generators run by atmospheric electricity.
    Last edited by TheoriaApophasis; 07-04-2014, 02:59 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bob Smith
    replied
    TA, looking forward to reading your book, particularly in light of these comments. I don't know whether you'd subscribe to them, but your stance vis a vis QM and Special Relativity seems consistent with what I've seen in the work of Robert Sungenis (anti-Copernican), with which I find myself sympathetic.

    I couldn't help but see your logic in describing the aether or Stiffler's spatio-temporal lattice simply as field. It would seem to me that in this way, we have one pervasive energetic reality, perhaps with different gradations and expressions. Again, looking forward to reading what you have to say.
    Bob

    Leave a comment:


  • abdlquadri
    replied
    thanks

    Thanks alot.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bob Smith
    replied
    Thanks TheoA,
    I'll save it next time that way.

    Phos aletheia
    Bob

    Leave a comment:


  • TheoriaApophasis
    replied
    Originally posted by Bob Smith View Post
    Here's a trick that might help when the download stops. For me, once the doc started downloading, I went to page one and then hit the bottom button on the page to scroll to the end of the doc. Each time it stopped, I scrolled back about 5 pages or so, and it re-started.

    Bob

    Kind regards Bob, having and working with PDF now for countless years, the trick of ANY sizable PDF download is to NEVER click on the link rather..

    "right click" then "save link as"

    however better options exist here:

    OTHER OPTION is a torrent download of the book here:




    YET ANOTHER option is download from archive.org here:





    I have other PDF works that are 1.2 Gigabyte PDF files, and to even dare think of opening them online is 100% impossible regardless of ones www connection. Always "save link as", never open them.


    Kinds regards to you for same, Peace.


    Lux et Veritas

    Leave a comment:


  • TheoriaApophasis
    replied
    Originally posted by Hrothgar View Post
    I'm up to page 91 and have noticed 2 errors. on page 69 the left most frame depicts a spiral vortex that is counter to your vortex description as it will sync in "N to N", "N to S" and "S to S". I altered the picture below to this to more accurately show compatible / incompatible vector.
    Page 91 has a reference to ether as air as you have mentioned before but it has no quotes.
    No, it is that a 2D representation of a moving double reciprocating vortex is a near impossibility, that "interior view" is meant to show ONLY the dielectric inertial planes relative position to the double conjugating centrifugal and centripetal vortex.

    You are correct that that VERY limited image is not the correct magnetic vortex accurately represented in 20+ other diagrams in the work.......however that is on purpose in intent; it is merely meant to demo the relative location of the inertial plane.

    There is no "spiral (singular) vortex" in or OF any "magnet", that is why you incorrectly consider that very limited image as "incompatible"

    There is 1. circular reciprocation both centrifugal then centripetal 2. magneto-dielectric field-precession (explained in detail) 3. radial centripetal inertial plane as the 'driver' of this conjugate system


    Its rather that the image is (that one only) extremely limited.

    diagrams focus in on certain aspects, and NOT every diagram illuminates everything going on AT ONCE
    Last edited by TheoriaApophasis; 07-01-2014, 06:31 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Hrothgar
    replied
    finished skimming

    On page 97 you ended the sentence centrifugally when I believe centrifugal may have been better grammatically.

    A good read, except for all the angst. I hope you can see my point on the following sentences. Written word is not speech, as such it leaves emotional subtext almost entirely for the reader to determine. That said, you overtly insult and ridicule the seekers of knowledge for going to the shiniest beacons of "truth" which is a good portion of the audience you should be aiming your efforts to enlightening not bashing. You also bash early scientific minds for winning a popularity contest. Truth is only recognized when it is convenient or valuable to do so. Example Einstein didn't undo Tesla, J.P. Morgan did. Tesla also lost to himself, his AC power provided a tool of profit so grand that by the time he even thought of wardencliff it was too late. Einstein and the rest gave PRACTICAL understanding of manipulation, as such not truth but profitable. Your notable judgement of others leaves readers open to negative assumption of your personality which detracts from the truth presented. other than that cheers
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • Bob Smith
    replied
    Here's a trick that might help when the download stops. For me, once the doc started downloading, I went to page one and then hit the bottom button on the page to scroll to the end of the doc. Each time it stopped, I scrolled back about 5 pages or so, and it re-started.

    My computer crashed a few days ago due to another problem, so I'll have to download it again at some point.

    Again, TheoA, thank you for your generosity. I'll put in a payment as soon as I get my computer back and can download it again.
    Bob

    Leave a comment:


  • Hrothgar
    replied
    I posted the file on Amule

    I posted the 14meg version on Amule.TheoriaApophasis - Uncovering the Missing Secrets of Magnetism
    Last edited by Hrothgar; 07-01-2014, 04:18 PM. Reason: corrected spelling error

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X