Uncovering the Missing Secrets of Magnetism. 92 pages. Free new book

[sadang]

Hi Ken,

I finally arrived at the final of your work. Very interesting, very logic and correct, but only seen trough a shift of thinking paradigm, from an empty space born from nowhere and filled by actual science withh infinite type of virtual particles, fields, laws and rules, back to a space born from the interaction of ever helical-vortexial dynamic etheric fields. Only words of appreciations from me!

Even if right now I don't have a comprehensive and deep understandings of all implications of what you explain, the main ideea with which I think should start this book is the existence of the ether, as an universal 0 reference, from which everything arise and to which everything tends. And that this ether is not spatialy located somewhere outside of us, because there is no an "outside" concept except the one defined in an utopic empty space.

Avoiding to comment too much on the edge of your work, not until I read at least one more time, I would like to draw your attention to some personal experiments with magnets.

In the picture below is the interaction of the magnetic field of a cylindrical magnet, placed on a CRT with luminophores in delta. As you can see the image resultant is of a two overlapped colored triange (conform with triangular shape of luminophores), which reverses their color (blue-purple), at reversing the polarity of magnetic field. I made these experiments some years ago to prove for myself the helical movement of the magnetic fields, and also the change in their CW and CCW direction, according to their polarity.

Next week I'll repeat them again, to confirm for myself the dielectric-inertial plane, by its effect over the CRT image. I'll keep you informed about this. Or maybe you have some suggestions for this kind of experiment!

Thanks,
Danut

[TheoriaApophasis]

Hi Ken,
The phrase is: "My brain is only a receiver, in the Universe there is a core from which we obtain knowledge, strength and inspiration. I have not penetrated into the secrets of this core, but I know that it exists". Do you have knowledge about it, belong's it to Tesla, when was it used and so on!

Thanks,
SaDAng

It doesnt "belong to tesla" , not meaning he didnt say it, but its an ancient (just another analogy than a radio reciever of course) analogy.

Its a 100% Emanationist allusion to which Boskovich (however there were no receivers in his time) refers to 'receiving light from afar'

Tesla just applied the logical "brain is a radio tuning into a frequency"

I use the analogy all the time to refer to Neoplatonic theology of there "is a signal COINCIDENT to the radio but no signal IN THE RADIO"

and "no little people inside the TV set " etc.

[sadang]

Hi Ken,

I still read your book and try to deeply understand the real meanings of the common terms used to describe the magnetism as you see, understand, interpret and describe it, before begining to express some of my questions! But for now I would like to bother you with an older puzzle of me related to one of Tesla's words. It is about a phrase that I meet everywhere on the internet, but nowhere in the Tesla's writings or other references to Tesla's work.

The phrase is: "My brain is only a receiver, in the Universe there is a core from which we obtain knowledge, strength and inspiration. I have not penetrated into the secrets of this core, but I know that it exists". Do you have knowledge about it, belong's it to Tesla, when was it used and so on!

Thanks,
SaDAng

[TheoriaApophasis]

I appreciate your work on the basis of the statement but am really looking for the citation to see where it fits in that timeline.

You're using the wrong approach, like an academic, looking for linear influence.
X influenced Y, who got it from Y

(which is kinda what I did above)



In genuine philosophy for example, things are examined circularly.
meaning around what or who its centers and how X circle influences X.



Tesla said it to his close buddy George Sylvester Viereck,

[thx1138]

Citation

@TheoriaApophasis - Good stuff. Thank you. I've seen some of it before but it's starting to make sense now. Especially the vortex math.

Since my early days (teenager I guess) I've always been interested in functional simplicity and spent some time back then looking at the Buahaus design theory. Functional simplicity to me is the design of the universe and the basis of beauty which is explained by The Golden Ratio.

One of the things I was looking for regarding Tesla's quote was a citation - the context in which he said it. I've spent the last three years studying the works of Tesla and, although I see the quote all over the internet, I've never seen a citation from which I can determine the context in which he made the statement.

During the last three years of studying Tesla's work I put together a few documents in chronological order about how his ideas changed and developed over his lifetime. I appreciate your work on the basis of the statement but am really looking for the citation to see where it fits in that timeline.

Again, many thanks.

[TheoriaApophasis]

I know exactly where Tesla got them from, from his "bible", THEORY OF NATURAL PHILOSOPHY by Roger Boskovich

You can see him reading it here:



WHICH Bosckovich got it from the 5 vol. set of the PERIPHYSEON

I scanned those extremely rare books in years ago, theyre HERE:
PERIPHYSEON by Eriugena 4 VOL SET. Incredibly RARE | Scribd


which all came down from the Neopythagoreans.
You can read about it HERE:
Iamblichus the Theology of Arithmetic


3 is generation, 6 is excess (excessius in Latin) and 9 is transcendence.


3 6 9 are also the 3 "super" numbers of electricity and magnetism.

magnetism, dielectricity and frequency (or precession) 3

6 pressure zones in a 360 degree revolution of ANY magneto-dielectric system, 2 centripetal, 2 centrifugal, and 2 dielectric
6 is also the number for SPACE or Xaos in ancient greek Pythagoreanism, the "excess byproduct of a field (the Chora, or Khora)".


9 is also the INCOMMENSURATE number of FIELD PERFECTION, you can see it in my book here about the field geometries:

https://archive.org/details/magnetism1small

Page 36:
(all angles of magneto-dielectricity in a binding conjugate system add to 9)
108
72
54
36
18

and of course.....Taaa-Daaaaaaa 360 degrees (in rotation = produce electricity).




9 is also the "divine number of the Pythagoreans" which make up the 1-1-Phi triagle which is 108 degrees, 36, and 36 (again, all are totaled to 9 , 9 and 9).

I wrote a intro to this discovery that needs a LOT of updating. Just an article years ago on a serious discovery I made in the ancient greek of Rep. 509d-511:

https://archive.org/details/PythagorasPlatoAndTheGoldenRatio

(sadly, that article is only half finished and half-polished).





Long before Christianity came along, there was a Pythagorean "trinity", Monad, Nous, Xaos, Hyle (matter/mass), On (Being 'man)

same as the golden ratio 1 1 2 3 5 ............ 1 and 1 (Monad and Nous).... 2 and 3 (magnitude-matter/mass) ... and 5 "man" (On [in the Greek], ie being)

1 and 1 are 'principle-attribute' (i.e. coeternals)
2 and 3 are 'principle-attribute' (i.e. coeternals)
5 is the product of 1 1 2 3

(1 1 2 3 5 8 13..........etc. golden section, golden ratio. )


Which I coined about 10 years ago (to keep it simple!) "Monad, Mind, Magnitude, Matter, Man" Monas, Nous, Xaos, Hyle, On
1 and 1 are "1 thing" 2 and 3 are "1 thing" 5 is "1 thing"


That is the ancient "Pythagorean 'trinity' "



(I have a lot lot more on this, but wont bore you )



See this video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W5mJeRtjPvY

[thx1138]

@TheoriaApophasis

I've often wondered why Dr. Tesla went to the trouble to patent his fountain.
TESLA PATENT 1,113,716 FOUNTAIN

Mother Nature does not calculate, does not do math, she only knows of three pairs, spatial-counterspatial, centrifugal-centripetal, and charge-discharge. With these three conjugates, the entire cosmos is painted in full detail.

That covers the 3 and the 6.
3X1 = the fundamentals: space, force, & charge
3X2 = the fundamental conjugates
3X3 = ?
Any ideas about the 9 or is the quote hogwash invented by numerologists? Without the context it is meaningless jibberish.

[thx1138]

Deleted duplicate post

[TheoriaApophasis]

I haven't studied feynman very much but it's the virtual photons that pisses off everyone that I know for sure :P

Thats only part of it. They explain EPR away with "particles traveling from the future to cause effects on the results"
Sometimes these insane folks in QM academia say "sometimes its like there are ghosts affecting the results"- Susskind


negative momentum particles that 'cause gravity'
Unicorns, angels, leprechauns....... maybe Zeus did it?

Math doesnt zero out? NO PROBLEM, create a NEW PARTICLE which MAKES it zero out.
Taa-daaa (well, nature doesnt work that way). Nor does rationality and common sense.


GR and QM contains an enormous pantheon of BS so absurd, so insane, so irrational that a drunkard on crack would (and should) scoff.


Human creatures believe these demonic fools because they're "peer reviewed" demons. Which merely means If the person under you writes the SAME STUFF (in agreement) then its "professionally peer reviewed" nonsense.
Its like 2 dung beetles agreeing how much they love the smell and sight of fecal matter.

Quackademia brain washing the sheeple

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BvUD6MWufIc

Nikola Tesla-Leonard Susskind, professor theoretical physics, and priest of the cult of Quantum R. Feynman



Mother Nature does not calculate, does not do math, she only knows of three pairs, spatial-counterspatial, centrifugal-centripetal, and charge-discharge. With these three conjugates, the entire cosmos is painted in full detail.

[tachyon]

I haven't read much of feynman but I have his book an online version is here FLP Vol. II Table of Contents so I don't have an opinion about your writings. He seemed smart to me because it's hard to understand him lol :P

[TheoriaApophasis]

Unpredictable results are not paid any attention.

Indeed so, I have been saying for years and in a lecture that NOBODY

A: goes looking for something they DENY exists to begin with

B: goes looking for answers regarding something they ASSUME (due to academic hubris which is TITANIC) they already know the answers to.

To understand magnetism based on ether dynamics is really mind boggling! To understand the world, seen and unseen, based on ether, means to change totally the current paradigm of thinking.

When I get flack from those in the Cult of Quantum, I remind them that their "crowd" has produced NOTHING, invented NOTHING, and their writings offend even a drunk fool.


If it was created, designed or inspired , it was made by Tesla, Faraday, Maxwell, Steinmentz, Heaviside etc etc.Here is the REAL TRUTH of the matter well put: - Robert B. Laughlin


What GR and QM have done, in their insanity, is reify an attribute of a (or any) FIELD, that being space, "as something" that "does something" and "acts on X"


Its like saying "anger" kicks a rock (i.e. space did it)
The answer is ...... "no, you demented fool the PERSON (Aether) WITH the attribute of anger (space) kicked/moved the rock".
Nikola Tesla (referring to Ether science)

[sadang]

However the far reaching implications in other arenas, other designs, ...is immense and mind boggling.

This is exactly for what I like alternative theories! Because the answers in the actual scientific paradigm are totally useless and circular answers. Really far from the real, simple and beautifull explanations, just descriptions of some only predictable results, explained in terms as more complicated as possbile as to not understand anything and just give the impression of depth of thought and research. Unpredictable results are not paid any attention. This model was used and aplied by J.J. Thomson when imposed (by Cavendish Laborator and its financial supporters) the electron as a particle. The same was used by Milikan when imposed the value of the electric charge of the same electron as particle (against the Ehrenhaft who using the same path of thinking proved the existence of magnetic monopoles, magnetic current and the helical movement of magnetic flux). The same method was used by Menshutkin from University of Petesburg when in 1907 removed the ether form Period Table of Mendeleev (to prepare the field for the new relativistic paradigm). Also the same method was follwed for the original 20 ecuations of Maxwell, which today are just four, and by which is modeled the entire actual sci-tech world, and examples can continue. I'm tired and disgusted by actual science, its founders and their way to interpret the experimental results, and to neglect what was not according to their predictions.

To understand magnetism based on ether dynamics is really mind boggling! To understand the world, seen and unseen, based on ether, means to change totally the current paradigm of thinking. The horizonts are truly infinite as space, time and... speed! And all these are merely limiting human terms, which are in fact manifestations of eternal and everlasting and eternal ether.

[TheoriaApophasis]

Edit Duplicate post


(this site has a serious issue double posting when using Firefox)

[TheoriaApophasis]

what's interesting is how this relation relates xD to space contraction of earth itself and how this preserves energy in the end I will let you think about it, think xD about what happens when particles fall down to earth, in a sense the voltage potential of earth can be deduced from it, about the photons you say I remember some guy Lapoint making videos about this structure but some say photons are really fast (time diluted) electrons which may be more true than this.

Feynman is a smart dude btw

what do you mean "However the far reaching implications in other arenas, other designs, ...is immense and mind boggling." about mass and gravity?

Nope, Feynman was a lobotomized insane asylum patient and a genuine mental midget.


I suggest you look AROUND you, at your TV, computer, lights, etc etc etc etc. All that was invented by Tesla, Faraday, Steinmetz, Heaviside, JC Maxwell and some others.

The idiots in the religion of quantum generate NOTHING but piles of fictional TRASH. 99% of them do NO experiments, they create NOTHING, then invent NOTHING and their writings would make a drunkard scoff in protest.

The ONLY difference between these insane fools of GR and QM and Arthur C. Clarke, for example, is that Arther C Clarke ADMITTED he was a fiction author.
Translation?? "When we dont understand something, we make up insane fictional quasi-plausible answers" Humanity has placed, as dept. chairs in countless universities and likewise, heads of mathematics and physics, people who are quite literally insane,Answer received? Yes, here we have it:The one good thing about Feynman is, that he isn't generating anymore quantum insanity "Negative momentum gluons" etc etc. Poor sad science fiction writer that he was.



If Feynman was still around, I would 'kiss' him with a tire iron.

I HAVE his books, I HAVE his videos. He is genuinely a fool of the highest magnitude. Like Carl Sagan, he was nothing but a "Hollywood scientist".
Smooth talker, personable, makes jokes. 100 Charisma points, and 0 wisdom points.

Such a statement (as above from Richard Phoneyman) deserved a backhanded slap with brass knuckles.

[tachyon]

what's interesting is how this relation relates xD to space contraction of earth itself and how this perserves energy in the end I will let you think about it, think xD about what happens when particles fall down to earth, in a sense the voltage potential of earth can be deduced from it, about the photons you say I remember some guy Lapoint making videos about this structure but some say photons are really fast (time dilluted) electrons which may be more true than this.

feynman is a smart dude that makes everything overcomplicated

what do you mean "However the far reaching implications in other arenas, other designs, ...is immense and mind boggling." about mass and gravity?