Uncovering the Missing Secrets of Magnetism. 92 pages. Free new book

[Hrothgar]

Trouble in paradise

I can't finish the downloads the large one stops at 13.4meg and the small one stops at 12meg. they both act as though they have completed by dropping the .part file.

[TheoriaApophasis]

I can't finish the downloads the large one stops at 13.4meg and the small one stops at 12meg. they both act as though they have completed by dropping the .part file.

The issue is at YOUR end.

Do NOT OPEN the link, right click then "save link as"


Just tested BOTH for download a second ago.................., all works fine.

OTHER OPTION is a torrent download of the book here:

http://kickass.to/uncovering-the-missing-secrets-of-magnetism-2nd-edition-6-2014-t9272462.html

YET ANOTHER option is download from archive.org here:

https://ia902502.us.archive.org/31/items/magnetism1small/magnetismsmall.pdf

[wattsup]

@TheoriaApophasis

I sent you a PM.

Thanks.

wattsup

[ewizard]

TheoriaApophasis, Thanks again for all your work on this and the additional info. So far everyone I've seen has had some trouble downloading it (talk on another forum). I tried it myself and it erred out many times but with the browser I use (opera) I was able to 'resume' it each time until it finished. So if people can't get it with their current browser grab opera (best browser IMO - been using it over 20 years!) from Opera browser - The alternative web browser - Download free and give it a go. If it stops just click on the downloads tab and then right click on the download and choose 'Resume'.

Thanks for your response to my first post but I think I missed an answer in there. Just asking for your opinion : Do you think one can make a free energy generator based on magnets?

[TheoriaApophasis]

TheoriaApophasis, Thanks again for all your work on this and the additional info. So far everyone I've seen has had some trouble downloading it (talk on another forum). I tried it myself and it erred out many times but with the browser I use (opera) I was able to 'resume' it each time until it finished. So if people can't get it with their current browser grab opera (best browser IMO - been using it over 20 years!) from Opera browser - The alternative web browser - Download free and give it a go. If it stops just click on the downloads tab and then right click on the download and choose 'Resume'.

Thanks for your response to my first post but I think I missed an answer in there. Just asking for your opinion : Do you think one can make a free energy generator based on magnets?

I have called 2 other contacts.......they report downloading both links without any trouble.


Just tested BOTH for download a second ago (yet again)................., all works fine.

OTHER OPTION is a torrent download of the book here:

http://kickass.to/uncovering-the-mis...-t9272462.html

YET ANOTHER option is download from archive.org here:

https://ia902502.us.archive.org/31/i...etismsmall.pdf

I have downloaded both links remotely off Safari, Firefox and Chrome without any issue.

do NOT OPEN the links, rather "right click" and "save link as"

I have much experience with PDF, and this is always the recommended methodology.



~~~~~~~ Just asking for your opinion : Do you think one can make a free energy generator based on magnets?


Magnetism being a spatial polarized radiation of either electricity in termination, or the inter-atomic volume from proton spin, one of the few plausible methods of 'extracting' movement would be a centrifugal capture supra-diamagnetic device.

Contrary to "nature abhors a vacuum" the case is that "nature abhors pressure gradients" ...

ultimately meaning that, as is currently the case, one requires a prime mover of a polarized field against a dielectric barrier = electrification. Be that wind, nuclear, etc etc.


There is ONE option which needs to be explored that a ratio of 1 to Phi counter-precession at an input of 1 with a resultant output of (at or near) Phi (1.618033) is possible from magnets.

Such a device would only require a small input of counter-precession to the centrifugal field yielding ~1.5-~1.6X output.

So, in short, no. But in specific YES, knowing how to create precession (and therefore movement) at a rate much greater than the input counter-precession, it is possible.

Other possibilities, logically so, exist, but are not known (well, a few are but need to be tested).


The premise for the article was understanding the nature of same, rather than any premise for free energy extraction.


Some people focus on the "WHAT"......... I would let others focus on the "HOW (to use this information to......)".

[Hrothgar]

Still reading

I'm up to page 91 and have noticed 2 errors. on page 69 the left most frame depicts a spiral vortex that is counter to your vortex description as it will sync in "N to N", "N to S" and "S to S". I altered the picture below to this to more accurately show compatible / incompatible vector.

Page 91 has a reference to ether as air as you have mentioned before but it has no quotes.

[Hrothgar]

I posted the file on Amule

I posted the 14meg version on Amule.TheoriaApophasis - Uncovering the Missing Secrets of Magnetism

[Bob Smith]

Here's a trick that might help when the download stops. For me, once the doc started downloading, I went to page one and then hit the bottom button on the page to scroll to the end of the doc. Each time it stopped, I scrolled back about 5 pages or so, and it re-started.

My computer crashed a few days ago due to another problem, so I'll have to download it again at some point.

Again, TheoA, thank you for your generosity. I'll put in a payment as soon as I get my computer back and can download it again.
Bob

[Hrothgar]

finished skimming

On page 97 you ended the sentence centrifugally when I believe centrifugal may have been better grammatically.

A good read, except for all the angst. I hope you can see my point on the following sentences. Written word is not speech, as such it leaves emotional subtext almost entirely for the reader to determine. That said, you overtly insult and ridicule the seekers of knowledge for going to the shiniest beacons of "truth" which is a good portion of the audience you should be aiming your efforts to enlightening not bashing. You also bash early scientific minds for winning a popularity contest. Truth is only recognized when it is convenient or valuable to do so. Example Einstein didn't undo Tesla, J.P. Morgan did. Tesla also lost to himself, his AC power provided a tool of profit so grand that by the time he even thought of wardencliff it was too late. Einstein and the rest gave PRACTICAL understanding of manipulation, as such not truth but profitable. Your notable judgement of others leaves readers open to negative assumption of your personality which detracts from the truth presented. other than that cheers

[TheoriaApophasis]

I'm up to page 91 and have noticed 2 errors. on page 69 the left most frame depicts a spiral vortex that is counter to your vortex description as it will sync in "N to N", "N to S" and "S to S". I altered the picture below to this to more accurately show compatible / incompatible vector.
Page 91 has a reference to ether as air as you have mentioned before but it has no quotes.

No, it is that a 2D representation of a moving double reciprocating vortex is a near impossibility, that "interior view" is meant to show ONLY the dielectric inertial planes relative position to the double conjugating centrifugal and centripetal vortex.

You are correct that that VERY limited image is not the correct magnetic vortex accurately represented in 20+ other diagrams in the work.......however that is on purpose in intent; it is merely meant to demo the relative location of the inertial plane.

There is no "spiral (singular) vortex" in or OF any "magnet", that is why you incorrectly consider that very limited image as "incompatible"

There is 1. circular reciprocation both centrifugal then centripetal 2. magneto-dielectric field-precession (explained in detail) 3. radial centripetal inertial plane as the 'driver' of this conjugate system


Its rather that the image is (that one only) extremely limited.

diagrams focus in on certain aspects, and NOT every diagram illuminates everything going on AT ONCE

[TheoriaApophasis]

Here's a trick that might help when the download stops. For me, once the doc started downloading, I went to page one and then hit the bottom button on the page to scroll to the end of the doc. Each time it stopped, I scrolled back about 5 pages or so, and it re-started.

Bob

Kind regards Bob, having and working with PDF now for countless years, the trick of ANY sizable PDF download is to NEVER click on the link rather..

"right click" then "save link as"

however better options exist here:

OTHER OPTION is a torrent download of the book here:

http://kickass.to/uncovering-the-mis...-t9272462.html

YET ANOTHER option is download from archive.org here:

https://ia902502.us.archive.org/31/i...etismsmall.pdf

I have other PDF works that are 1.2 Gigabyte PDF files, and to even dare think of opening them online is 100% impossible regardless of ones www connection. Always "save link as", never open them.


Kinds regards to you for same, Peace.


Lux et Veritas

[Bob Smith]

Thanks TheoA,
I'll save it next time that way.

Phos aletheia
Bob

[abdlquadri]

thanks

Thanks alot.

[Bob Smith]

Source: TA in http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...tml#post260670

TA, looking forward to reading your book, particularly in light of these comments. I don't know whether you'd subscribe to them, but your stance vis a vis QM and Special Relativity seems consistent with what I've seen in the work of Robert Sungenis (anti-Copernican), with which I find myself sympathetic.

I couldn't help but see your logic in describing the aether or Stiffler's spatio-temporal lattice simply as field. It would seem to me that in this way, we have one pervasive energetic reality, perhaps with different gradations and expressions. Again, looking forward to reading what you have to say.
Bob

[TheoriaApophasis]

TA, looking forward to reading your book, particularly in light of these comments. I don't know whether you'd subscribe to them, but your stance vis a vis QM and Special Relativity seems consistent with what I've seen in the work of Robert Sungenis (anti-Copernican), with which I find myself sympathetic.

I will have a 3rd edition out in less than a month. Afterwords there are maybe 40+ pages to add with math and some finer more 'dry' points.


Two quotes from Dollard with 'corrections' (so to say) in parenthesis:

There is only ONE DIMENSION of Space *(within a field)*(CENTRIFUGAL FIELD)*(CENTRIPETAL FIELD) (per sq.
centimeter).


Hence we have FOUR primary dimensions in electrical engineering. These are:
1) Time
2) Space .....*(FIELD BARRIER, Ether pressure graidents)


I have about 100 pages to write on this WITH mathematical proofs, most of which come from OLEG JEFIMENKO himself. Too bad he died not too long ago.

How did I 'discover' that there are no fields in space? ....I came across countless discoveries along the road, and they all pointed at one unknown pointA field CANNOT,NEVER HAS terminated in space. Space is IN a field, but not the inverse.

Counter-voidance is spatial compression, or what the commoner calls "magnetic repulsion" is spatial compression. Of course these are polarized Ether-fields, but what is being compressed is space itself, as given definition by polarized field gradients at maximum counter-voidance ('repulsion').

As even Dollard admits, Ether always seeks self-voidance, ALWAYS, IN counterspace.
rather than the interaction of fields, we have their attributes influencing conjugate fields (mag on dielectric fields etc.)


This of course is , almost, one of those "chicken or the egg" situations, but still all math and evidence points to the Space itself OF a field, rather than the field itself. Namely, ALL fields ARE Ether-modalities by definition, logically and reductively so!

Convergent fields (conterspatial) and divergent fields ('spatial', or polarized). Note also that in electromagnetic waves electric and magnetic fields are in phase, that is, simultaneous in time, and hence, according to the principle of causality (which states that the cause always
precedes its effect), the two fields cannot cause each other (by the principle of causality, the fields should be out of phase if they create each other).MINE:
This is why the insane fools of GR and QM (Or as Dollard calls it "Quantum Mysticism")have created a "mystical" effect precedes cause nonsense. They dont grasp that time and space are attributional to fields and field interactions, and they have no existence autonomous OF or from fields themselves.

Ive always called it the "Cult of Quantum"





OLEG JEFIMENKO

jefimenko
(October 14, 1922, Kharkiv, Ukraine - May 14, 2009, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA) - physicist and Professor Emeritus at West Virginia University.

Biography
He received his Ph.D. at the University of Oregon (1956).In 1956, he was awarded the Sigma Xi Prize. In 1971 and 1973, he won awards in the AAPT Apparatus Competition. Jefimenko has constructed and operated electrostatic generators run by atmospheric electricity.