North - South

[Raphael37]

02.03.2013. this guy started the thread with this question:


Will compass work in Southern Hemisphere?

My wife and I will be going to Patagonia next week for ten days. From there we go to Antarctica for three weeks. Will be doing some hiking but just day stuff. Here is a question for all of you as I can't seem to find a straight answer on the Internet - does a compass work in the southern hemisphere? Will the magnetic needle still point north? This is not a huge issue for me but just wondering. Thanks for your help!

03.25.2013. after he had come back he wrote this:



Here is the picture of his compasses:



How do you comment that?

I would just like to add this:

Let C, fig. 87, represent a dipping needle on the "equator"

of a globe. A mere inspection of the diagram is sufficient to make it demonstrated that the needle C cannot be horizontal, and at the same time pointing towards the north pole N. If a ship sailed east or west on the equator where the compass is horizontal, it is evident that its north or south end would describe a circle in the heavens equal in magnitude to the circumference of the earth at the equator--as shown by D, E, F.



fig. 87

My point is that there is no south pole whatsoever!

21 pages later ... do you discuss the swastika at all in this thread?
why not?

you should
the swastika wants to teach you about the system that ye are struggling with

really it does

[aljhoa]

32961 Views on April 22, 2015

41892 Views on June 30, 2015

aljihoa you are suggesting that clkjames theory about a flat earth is based on a particular religious POV?

2D in 3D

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=93LcNAuWTiM&feature=player_detailpage#t=1375

Al

[ldrancer]

earths not flat. your takign the bible literally.. the wrong. your getting all this off that guy who makes fun of nasa going to the moon when they didnt and he uses this, trick as a way to prove, they lie.

[HuntingRoss]

I find this thread fascinating and I am only two pages in. I have checked most of the links provided and find my head bursting to respond in part. Ignorant that my comments may already have been covered in the remaining ten pages, I apologise in advance.

Experiment 7.

Zetetic Astronomy, Earth Not A Globe: Chapter II. Experiments Demonstrating the True Form of Standing Water, and Proving the Earth to be a Plane: Experiment 7

Figure 17 depicts a board B B aligned with the horizon and states -

If the eye be now directed in an angular direction to the left and to the right, there will be no difficulty in observing a length of ten to twenty miles, according to the altitude of the position; and this whole distance of twenty miles of sea horizon will be seen as a perfectly straight line.

Figure 18 depicts what should be seen if the earth were a globe with a declination from horizontal of 66 feet at each end with 20 miles between.

Experiment 8.

Zetetic Astronomy, Earth Not A Globe: Chapter II. Experiments Demonstrating the True Form of Standing Water, and Proving the Earth to be a Plane: Experiment 8

Large underground aquifers exist today that may represent remnants of the waters that burst forth during the global flood.

What would cause the water above ground to become subterranean ?

Those buildings that you can plainly see are supposed to be under hundreds of feet of water.

This image is similar to other diagrams and descriptions in the text described in the first two pages of this thread, so I shall use this image only to address my observation.

The image does not prove a flat earth by itself, it just disputes the commonly held belief that the earth curves at 8 inches per mile. Clearly to some degree the buildings lie beyond an horizon. Does this mean the earth curves at say 2 inches per mile or 1 inch perhaps ?

What would cause the observable to contradict the accepted ?

--S--

There is a theory which I find equally interesting and relates directly to a possible explanation for the two quotes above.

The Expanding Earth Theory https://www.google.co.uk/search?clie...UTF-8&oe=UTF-8 which is pretty self explanatory.

Water that could engulf the earth might become subterranean if the globe were to expand AND a commonly held belief that the globe declines by 8 inches per mile may be incorrect if the globe were expanding.

I shall conclude with this -

A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it. Fifteen hundred years ago everybody knew the Earth was the center of the universe. Five hundred years ago, everybody knew the Earth was flat, and fifteen minutes ago, you knew that humans were alone on this planet. Imagine what you'll know tomorrow.

Men In Black - 1997.

[ldrancer]

i wanna think that the whole, universe, big bang is expanding theory, crap, is like thinking th eearth is flat. yo8u havent seen the edge of it so you don't know. so it's not, it just goes on and on like common sense would say.

[HuntingRoss]

[aljhoa]

41892 Views on June 30, 2015

44758
Views on July 26, 2015

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjehvTBrsNA[/VIDEO]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjehvTBrsNA

I thought this was interesting.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/cc/LRO_WAC_Nearside_Mosaic.jpg/600px-LRO_WAC_Nearside_Mosaic.jpg

Vidbid,
are above elliptical craters the proof of Flat Moon?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barycenter

Al

[aljhoa]

moon elliptical craters miracle

p-brane quotes
p-brane quotes
45454
Views on August 2, 2015

Al

[aljhoa]

46062
Views on August 10, 2015

-
See more at: Cosmic Disclosure with Corey Goode and David Wilcock | GaiamTV - Seeking Truth

Cosmic Disclosure | GaiamTV

Al

[aljhoa]

46062
Views on August 10, 2015

50306 Views on Oct. 13, 2015



Spatial ability is the capacity to understand and remember the spatial relations among objects. This ability can be viewed as a unique type of intelligence distinguishable from other forms of intelligence, such as verbal ability, reasoning ability, and memory skills. Spatial ability is not a monolithic and static trait, but made up of numerous subskills, which are interrelated among each other and develop throughout your life.

Spatial Intelligence Test

2D vs 3D

"Matrix Stars"

Al

[aljhoa]

50306 Views on Oct. 13, 2015

55098 Views on Jan. 21, 2016



A view of the Grand Canyon taken from an altitude of
approximately 30 kilometers on a World View balloon test flight in
October 2015. The company hopes such views will entice customers
to purchase $75,000 tickets for commercial flights starting in 2017. -
See more at: Arizona county to build new headquarters for World View - SpaceNews.com

Al

[CANGAS]

You honestly think that defines earth? 6 miles? Its laughable.
The earth is 25,000 miles round.

The dirt of earth is maluable. Some parts rigid...some parts FLAT.
It could VERY easily be a 6 mile stretch of flat land formation that water is laying on.

Why has NO ONE EVER repeated this experiment on the ocean?
Drive two sail boats miles apart, take telescope with camera, EASY to prove a flat earth.
Both boats should be fully visible.

Funny...NO ONE CAN PROVE IT...Because the earth isn't flat.

The dirt of earth is maluable. Some parts rigid...some parts FLAT.
It could VERY easily be a 6 mile stretch of flat land formation that water is laying on.

No. On a spherical planet, regardless of the shape of the underlying dirt bed, the surface of the water is expected to have a concave shape.

CANGAS

[mikrovolt]

Our perspective is that of having two eyes and not functionaly correct.
The argument is relative. This video is a crude simulation might help to develop such a perspective.
This is not what we were taught it is non-euclidean. something like looking through a fish bowl.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=xHvAqDuWG2M#t=323

[CANGAS]

I don't know about the pictures, but certainly they don't prove a round Earth. Any space observation made from the surface of the planet is not a valid proof of what really happens in space, it is only evidence of what appears to happen viewed from our perspective.

The only way to prove that would be to leave the planet Earth and actually see it from a great distance. However, in my opinion this hasn't be done yet and the photos from space are all fake. One might want to think they are genuine, but definitely it is not guaranteed. In fact, even if we indeed took photos from space that alone shouldn't be considered definite proof it is round even if it appears that way. As I mentioned a long time ago, the whole topic is very abstract as we cannot verify any of the claims.

However, Cikljamas may be right even though his arguments are not always very strong. The idea that the Earth is flat has a long history. Furthermore, it could also be true that some time in the Middle Ages it was deemed necessary to fool the world that the Earth is round for various, mostly religious reasons. This explains all the fakery concerning the matter in question.

Many years ago today I was a photography expert. My main camera was a Canon FTQL 35mm SLR. I had a small collection of lenses including three fisheye wide angle lenses. The fisheyes easily produced images of non-spherical objects that looked like spheres or balls. I took a number of photos of ordinary flat plots of land that produced images looking as if the horizon was rounded or spherical whereas to my naked eye the horizon was normal flat and level.

In this thread I have seen several photos that I recognized as being, because of a number of tell-tale visual effects, shot with a fisheye lens which show a curved horizon and are touted to be proof of a convex planet. Ain't really good proof! I can use a fisheye lens and make your house look like a sphere...


CANGAS

[CANGAS]

@ Hrothgar, have you ever heard Eric Dollard saying: "No one knows how the Sun works"? So who am i to know something that no (other) human being knows? Watch: The Sun is not a Nuclear furnace raging at millions of degrees. It is Electric and Cold!

The link seems to require a password.

What is the password?

CANGAS