Use the Force Luke ... Use the Force!

[tachyon]

if you took the time to explain this "wardforce" properly I'm sure people wouldnt be so negative I visited your blog and some videos but there's no explanation and there's no proof for extra energy .
every element has magnetic properties depending on it's electron configuration.. Al has [Ne]3s2 3p1 this electron in the p subshell gives it paramagnetic properties

[GSM]

If you want to learn, educate others about how forward and backward motion is controlled without changing any Poles. This means that the Poles are not the real cause for these reactions. Ask your self, does Aluminum have Magnetic properties? If you say no, then there is much more to learn.
Energy-Ingenuity.com
PS I may not be back for a while, just as the last time.

You are going away again; this your idea of educating people about that which they were not taught in school - like so much else we are not informed about !
I am so NOT impressed Steven !
Think you are the only one who has devoted so much of your life to this topic, and the free dissemination of novel ideas ?
There are some very clever people here - much more so than me.

You know it does not matter what your magnetic LANGUAGE is which makes you understand the phenomenon you write about; you are still not providing enough information for others to be able to interpret it within their own concepts !

Of course neither core nor magnetic poles have to PHYSICALLY move in order to generate electricity, this because it is the electron spin-orbit axes of the matter within those poles which can become realigned, or precess, or even rotate (alternate) instead, and thereby allow magnetic poles and their field lines to move with respect to or within physical coils and cores.
(This is exactly what I am working on myself in relation to prior Wesley Gary and Lester Hendershot type designs.)

And yes, of course (again) these same electron spin-axis realignment inductions do apply to the 'non-magnetic' metal Aluminium, and even !-glass-! if energetic enough, so please don't think that others are not capable of understanding.

I thought of filing for Patents many years ago, but then I realised that I could ALWAYS come up with some way of achieving a same outcome of someone else's idea by not invoking their Patent rights, hence others could do the same with my own self judged 'novel' ideas, hence I kept my funds to make progress.

Expensive Patents are nothing other than TPTB control methods to ensure tax collection via their productive usage, and whereby they give themselves a first chance to examine all inventions in order to claim state possession on grounds of 'security' for any device which might interfere with their greed and misapplication of tax funds, and now - via the EU in Cyprus - outright THEFT.

Don't know that I can say more; distractions through lack of explanation help no one.

Cheers ................ Graham.

[barbosi]

I cannot watch your clip.

If you cannot put it on youtube, can you make it available for download?
Sorry but the realplayer streaming is a poor choice, and as any streaming it may be limited to certain areas. Hence your exposure is limited.

Regards.

[Energy-Ingenuity.com]

I would recommend you look deeper into this for yourself...Don't accept someone elses view. If you do your homework, you will find that there is more to this.....much more.

Regards

erfinder,

If the video is still up, I show energy (torque and current) being generated moving a piece of steel past BOTH POLES in a circle and going back and forth. This is not caused be changing Poles, it is caused by Wardforce. Now I am getting into what I am writing about, which is telling how to manipulate (control) Wardforce.

The next book will be telling about how these Galileo Thermometers are changed. When I get resources, I hope to answer this question in a more Scientific manner, telling what has changed. It could be demonstrating "Global Warming". Whom do I show these reactions? The same one which have seen Wardforce isolated?

Don't you think everyone should know about Wardforce? Your child may discover something much greater than what I have, if given the chance to know that other things exists which People know nothing about, yet. What else exists that no one has looked for?

This is the reason no one has found Wardforce before. How can you find something, if you are not looking for it? It cannot be seen, touched, or held and you are not looking for it. You will not to find anything like that.

Thank you for trying to understand. When you try to explain, this is when you learn.
Steve
If we don't teach others what you have learned, what good does it do for the future of our children, or mankind?

[Energy-Ingenuity.com]

How energy is produced

You are going away again; this your idea of educating people about that which they were not taught in school - like so much else we are not informed about !
I am so NOT impressed Steven !
Think you are the only one who has devoted so much of your life to this topic, and the free dissemination of novel ideas ?
There are some very clever people here - much more so than me.

You know it does not matter what your magnetic LANGUAGE is which makes you understand the phenomenon you write about; you are still not providing enough information for others to be able to interpret it within their own concepts !

Of course neither core nor magnetic poles have to PHYSICALLY move in order to generate electricity, this because it is the electron spin-orbit axes of the matter within those poles which can become realigned, or precess, or even rotate (alternate) instead, and thereby allow magnetic poles and their field lines to move with respect to or within physical coils and cores.
(This is exactly what I am working on myself in relation to prior Wesley Gary and Lester Hendershot type designs.)

And yes, of course (again) these same electron spin-axis realignment inductions do apply to the 'non-magnetic' metal Aluminium, and even !-glass-! if energetic enough, so please don't think that others are not capable of understanding.

I thought of filing for Patents many years ago, but then I realised that I could ALWAYS come up with some way of achieving a same outcome of someone else's idea by not invoking their Patent rights, hence others could do the same with my own self judged 'novel' ideas, hence I kept my funds to make progress.

Expensive Patents are nothing other than TPTB control methods to ensure tax collection via their productive usage, and whereby they give themselves a first chance to examine all inventions in order to claim state possession on grounds of 'security' for any device which might interfere with their greed and misapplication of tax funds, and now - via the EU in Cyprus - outright THEFT.

Don't know that I can say more; distractions through lack of explanation help no one.

Cheers ................ Graham.

A Patent is a "new process" or "an improvement on a process". This means you get a Patent so that EVERYONE knows what and how you are doing it.

Current is caused from a change in amplitude and torque is caused from Wardforce. I demonstrate this on video, give a list of materials needed and where to get them, give drawings which are hand drawings and CAD, paid all that money for a Patent, had this patented published... All so that you and your children can have the opportunity to learn about Wardforce.

This is how you want to help, keep others from looking? If someone as dumb as I am, with nothing, can build a device isolating Wardforce. Then with all this FREE information, (listed above) YOU can see for yourself.

On the DVD it is long enough that it is explained and demonstrated better. How much more do I need to GIVE? FREE all this knowledge...
Over 80,700 visitors in 21 Months to my website. The Texas State Board of Education, will make my discovery part of the (TEKS) Teas Essential Knowledge and Skills.

I give the short answer, Wardforce is part of the Magnetic Field that is not a Pole at all. The long answer is on my website, DVD and in the book that I am writing. How many ways and times, do I need to show and say, what I have been telling you for years?

Steve
Energy-Ingenuity.com

[Energy-Ingenuity.com]

TSBOE video

I cannot watch your clip.

If you cannot put it on youtube, can you make it available for download?
Sorry but the realplayer streaming is a poor choice, and as any streaming it may be limited to certain areas. Hence your exposure is limited.

Regards.

RealPlayer is their choice, Texas SBOE, this video is provided by them. I do not have this video. I have tried to save it, but it want save to my computer. I did see a man that I work with watch the video in the last week.

Energy-Ingenuity.com

[barbosi]

I have tried to save it, but it want save to my computer.

I have tried to watch it, but it want play to my computer. Does this sound similar?

I did see a man that I work with watch the video in the last week.

Was this man watching it Guatemala? Or Uganda? Or Bahrain? Or Slovenia?
When you talk about future of "our children" are you reffering to texan ones only? I don't think so. As I said, it may be that the government led teaching institutions may have restricted access to the streaming on several parts of the world (for security reasons maybe).

If you really care about humanity at large, please take your time make a plan and make a proper presentation. Please rest assured I won't insist on the issue anymore, it's your call. As you say, teach the world not just TEKS. The return it will be in the measure of your gift.

Regards

[Duncan]

Calm down folks there seems to be an adversarial tone not so much “creeping” as leaping in here.
Steve personally I have no doubt your your machine does what you see and say. For others on this thread it behoves that I convert and reposted your video so they can see it Wardforce - YouTube
As you say you are not a professor or a Dr however I'm certain you are sincere and you have obviously spent huge amounts of money and time on your project I might add so have hundreds if not many thousands of like people over the years.(me too) Like you Steve I have spent many years researching and building I've built a lot of pup's and also quite a few machines that do what the inventors promised they would. I'm quite happy to state here and now Steve (regardless of if you believe it or not) that the Mayer car … the Moray system and a huge percentage of the rest “did and do” exactly what the Inventors said. I could list a hundred if not a thousand such machines Tptb (The powers that be) know of them and they know the science behind them . Lets for a moment assume “Wardforce” got out of the box first (which it won't) not quite yet anyway, There are I promise you hundreds of far more deserving cases for the prize money or prestige in the queue in front of you and have been for many years, the same would go for erfinder for all the mysterious “there's oh so much more”.. well publish it then! Its Ironic Steve that you project to the education committee that your system would “generate wealth work and prosperity for America” when in fact if your system (or any other free energy system) was accepted today .. the American economy would collapse in anarchy tomorrow. It would certainly take my little bug hole (Britain) with it!and create world wide chaos, of course the truth you have found will come to light .. all truths do eventually. But the “eventually” gives the real owners of America “The real owners”...
George Carlin on "the American Dream" - YouTube
time to move all the real assets and technology out .. I'm sure you don't need me to tell you where to its obvious! The Idea of me projecting American History to an American is obviously very tongue in cheek Steven but you may be wondering what forces keep these wonderful machines “locked up” So for the sake of your wallet, the safety of your family and loved ones particularly the children you profess to be helping. I hope you find the time to read and digest the implications of what I posted here

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/4833-american-ruling-class-160.html#post241912

I, like many others here Steve have made machines that are COP>1 and if I could get to an applied mathematical resolve for why they work I would publish immediately . Scraping bits off things or abstractly winding coils .. doesn't answer . Although It does challenge the “mental block” That many people have and weakens the dam wall a little bit more. Which is why I keep posting such work as yours . I find with the machines like yours that go COP>1, at the core of the mathematics you are faced with the bug bears of .. chaos, infinity and/or the infinitesimal. Of course if you can make it so simple Joe soap can make a viable powerful machine in his garage .. quickly, for buttons , non of that applies and nothing will stop your machine. Except your demise, (which would be pretty quick)
In the land of the free .. in fact as far as free energy goes I think its land of the free “Mortal coil”
Opie & Anthony: Stan Meyer's Water Car - YouTube
Of course I don't want to try and insist my simple view of recent American history is correct and perhaps a pukka social historian could draw a better picture . However I have been in the position of watching folks killed in front of of me by this malignant force so … beware ! I Include the following links and clips also Steve that you might better understand the politics of “free energy” and why I keep posting viable systems .. just like yours
Because of the skewed dollar / money slight of hand … when huge amounts of oil were discovered on American soil .. well you can imagine Steve “free or cheap energy” is the very last thing tptb wanted … here is an American Baptist minister telling us the result of exactly that.. again sorry its an aged video
The Energy Non-Crisis- Lindsay Williams -Truth about Oil and Oil prices - YouTube
Of course I have no crystal Ball I can't see the future , here is a possible American and World future as portrayed in the film “The end game”
EndGame HQ full length version - YouTube
There is as I said Steve huge forces at play .. it has even been suggested that some forums .. a little bit like this one .. are opened, operated , and populated by paid opposition … (just imagine that) in order to control so called “free energy” information. And as for patents being any sort of proof .. I'm afraid its almost the reverse, anyway Steve I'm sure this will give you a taste of the forces at play
'Energy Suppression -- An Invisible Galaxy of Inventions' by Christopher Bird
I'm sure you must be aware of some of them even if you don't really want to believe .. I guess Its why people release little bits of information at a time ! It just moves the bar up a little bit for tptb.
you can be pretty sure at the core of forums just like this one … folks start to sort the wheat from the chaff and know pretty much the white hats and the black hats .. also be aware Steve that for every member reading this there are 10 “guests” and even the member might just want some project to “make his own” or be a member of the opposition, just waiting take a pop at you and keep your system "in the box", In the meantime I'm delighted you have come on thread and explained a little of your work!

[erfinder]

the same would go for erfinder for all the mysterious “there's oh so much more”.. well publish it then!

No offense Duncan but each time I have tried, you come in and hit start throwing the "stochastic resonance" stuff around the room.....when you do that I get bored, and stop talking.....I have yet to see stochastic resonance being used to generated infinite harmonics and wave forms other than sine. Now I'm not knocking this phenomena, but I am suggesting that there's more out there. I do not wish to compare apples with oranges...I would like to share without being told to look at stuff that I have already seen, the majority haven't seen what I am sharing, when I get to share that is....!

Another thing, I'm not a specialist in this field, as many of you are, many of you might not be specialists in the true sense of the word, however, you articulate as if you are! Articulation isn't my strong point. There are a few on this forum who are strong in this area, and they have a powerful presence, however, they are weak in other areas, they can get the word out, but the word they are spreading is hollow.....My not being able to articulate as I should makes it difficult for me to present my view. At any rate...you don't have to demand of me to put it out there, all you have to do is allow me to do so.


Regards

[GSM]

Thank you Duncan for uploading that video.

Hi Steven,
*YES*
this is about our children
BUT
I do not see any guidance from you for them.

Educators do not give a **** (my asterisks) about our children, only their own self ascendeny via peer review = peer control !
Patent Officers do not give a **** about our children either, only their control of rights to make profit !

However there is one thing none of them can control, and that is the fundamental laws of physics, no matter who discovers them, and whose name the *scientific peer group* agree to *honour* via those discoveries, through naming units of measurement or physical laws after proponents.

This guy is one of my 'heroes' -
Professor Eric Laithwaite gives a demonstration of a large gyro wheel - YouTube

Look at that effect - it is what happens to electrons and their fundamental magnetic centres too !!!!!

Eric lectured his findings to the prestigious Royal Institution in London, and immediately this became the ONLY lecture in their 200 year history to NOT be written up and noted within their historical archive !!!!!

Why ? Because he had challenged Newton's Laws of Motion.

Many years later when orbital (electron) mathematics became translatable to his induced gyroscope rotation (already electron spinning *axes*) force translation of motion (current-magnetism) into action along a third previously unenergised axis, could it be realised that he was not actually challenging Newton's Laws, but was adding to them !!!!!

In the meantime he was banned from public lecturing, though was allowed to continue with his industry funded research projects.

Steven, you will not get anywhere challenging Lenz's laws, yet at the same time are you sure you ought not be adding to them instead ?

Personally I don't give a damn for whoever the *scientists* state I should regard as being discoverers or inventors by using their names. They state that Schottky invented transistors; what about Moray who was denied Patents based upon the *opinion* of Patent agents. It is the same with so many supposed firsts throughout our history, in that the 'truths' maintained by our peer groups and rulers are not Truths, but Lies maintained in ways that can become 'evidence' in 'legal' Courts.

Steven, I don't give a damn about Lenz Law or Wardforce. All that counts is fundamental physical activity and truthful impersonal reporting of same.

I put it to you that your device, which you are attracting attention to, embodies the same operational fundamentals as did Gary's, Hubbard's and Hendershot's before. Also, that like Laithwaite before you, by engaging in challenging the body of science itself (where Patents are meaningless anyway) you yourself are constructing the brick walls which authorities will ensure are used to protect all our children from your unacceptable challenges and ideologies !!!!!

By claiming yourself the discoverer of something you have called 'Wardforce', which you have not clearly and openly explained for everyone to study, you have ensured that that which you have stated already belongs to our children, will not be granted scientific airing nor identity.

Yes - we are now in an Internet world, and because of the way that experts and politicians have totally screwed up this present world, things are going to change big time, and we will reach the point where our children need energy to maintain survival - via the open sharing of knowledge - where this knowledge of fundamental universal physical behaviours and relationships cannot be bound by any 'scientific' name or authorship.

So Steven, I still look forwards to reading an explanation of your Wardforce concept and your deduction of its activity, so that I can mentally appreciate the fundamental physical electron-magnet bound relationships your device-patent cannot fail to embody.


Cheers .............. Graham.

Wesley Gary. Look at his single armature alternating through series/parallel field coupling; two pulses per single motion.
His source field was a magnet ending with pole pieces, and longer = more powerful.
Heck there could even have been more armature cores around his source field exactly as Hubbard demonstrated.
Hendershot's buzzer pulsing was an inverse of Gary field/movement, and all this is history -
even if not scientifically recorded for the benefit of our children !

[erfinder]

Thank you Duncan for uploading that video.

Hi Steven,
*YES*
this is about our children
BUT
I do not see any guidance from you for them.

Educators do not give a **** (my asterisks) about our children, only their own self ascendeny via peer review = peer control !
Patent Officers do not give a **** about our children either, only their control of rights to make profit !

However there is one thing none of them can control, and that is the fundamental laws of physics, no matter who discovers them, and whose name the *scientific peer group* agree to *honour* via those discoveries, through naming units of measurement or physical laws after proponents.

This guy is one of my 'heroes' -
Professor Eric Laithwaite gives a demonstration of a large gyro wheel - YouTube

Look at that effect - it is what happens to electrons and their fundamental magnetic centres too !!!!!

Eric lectured his findings to the prestigious Royal Institution in London, and immediately this became the ONLY lecture in their 200 year history to NOT be written up and noted within their historical archive !!!!!

Why ? Because he had challenged Newton's Laws of Motion.

Many years later when orbital (electron) mathematics became translatable to his induced gyroscope rotation (already electron spinning *axes*) force translation of motion (current-magnetism) into action along a third previously unenergised axis, could it be realised that he was not actually challenging Newton's Laws, but was adding to them !!!!!

In the meantime he was banned from public lecturing, though was allowed to continue with his industry funded research projects.

Steven, you will not get anywhere challenging Lenz's laws, yet at the same time are you sure you ought not be adding to them instead ?

Personally I don't give a damn for whoever the *scientists* state I should regard as being discoverers or inventors by using their names. They state that Schottky invented transistors; what about Moray who was denied Patents based upon the *opinion* of Patent agents. It is the same with so many supposed firsts throughout our history, in that the 'truths' maintained by our peer groups and rulers are not Truths, but Lies maintained in ways that can become 'evidence' in 'legal' Courts.

Steven, I don't give a damn about Lenz Law or Wardforce. All that counts is fundamental physical activity and truthful impersonal reporting of same.

I put it to you that your device, which you are attracting attention to, embodies the same operational fundamentals as did Gary's, Hubbard's and Hendershot's before. Also, that like Laithwaite before you, by engaging in challenging the body of science itself (where Patents are meaningless anyway) you yourself are constructing the brick walls which authorities will ensure are used to protect all our children from your unacceptable challenges and ideologies !!!!!

By claiming yourself the discoverer of something you have called 'Wardforce', which you have not clearly and openly explained for everyone to study, you have ensured that that which you have stated already belongs to our children, will not be granted scientific airing nor identity.

Yes - we are now in an Internet world, and because of the way that experts and politicians have totally screwed up this present world, things are going to change big time, and we will reach the point where our children need energy to maintain survival - via the open sharing of knowledge - where this knowledge of fundamental universal physical behaviours and relationships cannot be bound by any 'scientific' name or authorship.

So Steven, I still look forwards to reading an explanation of your Wardforce concept and your deduction of its activity, so that I can mentally appreciate the fundamental physical electron-magnet bound relationships it cannot fail to embody.


Cheers .............. Graham.

Wesley Gary. Look at his single armature alternating through series/parallel field coupling; two pulses per single motion.
His source field was a magnet ending with pole pieces, and longer = more powerful.
Heck there could even have been more armature cores around his source field exactly as Hubbard demonstrated.
Hendershot's buzzer pulsing was an inverse of Gary field/movement, and all this is history -
even if not scientifically recorded for the benefit of our children !

You keep bringing up Wesly Gary, I have not had the opportunity to attempt a build, your view is different from others that I have come across, can you elaborate on what it is you believe is taking place in that machine? Have you been able to test this out on your bench, and if so, are you willing to present it?

Regards

[Duncan]

No offense Duncan but each time I have tried, you come in and hit start throwing the "stochastic resonance" stuff around the room.....when you do that I get bored, and stop talking.....I have yet to see stochastic resonance being used to generated infinite harmonics and wave forms other than sine. Now I'm not knocking this phenomena, but I am suggesting that there's more out there. I do not wish to compare apples with oranges...I would like to share without being told to look at stuff that I have already seen, the majority haven't seen what I am sharing, when I get to share that is....!

Another thing, I'm not a specialist in this field, as many of you are, many of you might not be specialists in the true sense of the word, however, you articulate as if you are! Articulation isn't my strong point. There are a few on this forum who are strong in this area, and they have a powerful presence, however, they are weak in other areas, they can get the word out, but the word they are spreading is hollow.....My not being able to articulate as I should makes it difficult for me to present my view. At any rate...you don't have to demand of me to put it out there, all you have to do is allow me to do so.


Regards

Yeah I guess that sounded a bit abrupt erfinder .. I really don’t think there are such things as professionals in this subject … just different levels of miss understanding in each of the major subject branches .. I cant explain very well what's going on ether (for what its worth) although I have cobbled together several bits from different “trade sets” radio .. High voltage power engineering .. antenna theory .. which seem to work together. But as for putting a mathematical code to it well I haven’t managed that .. yet. and as you point out the language and the units are not there. Perhaps if you open a thread specifically to your machine ? I'm sure many would be interested including me. The “tasters” have certainly grabbed my attention .
“Publish and be dammed” Duke of Wellington
as for “stochastic resonance” Hector D Perez Torres inventor of the Roto Verter is the blade responsible for that description applied to resonant background. Many rungs up the ladder from me!
Kind regards Duncan

[GSM]

You keep bringing up Wesly Gary, I have not had the opportunity to attempt a build, your view is different from others that I have come across, can you elaborate on what it is you believe is taking place in that machine? Have you been able to test this out on your bench, and if so, are you willing to present it?

Regards

Hi Erfinder - see picture below.
Wesley used two different rate springs to neutralise the different physical forces of attraction between series-parallel field alignment induction positions so that only very light self empowering mechanical force became necessary to maintain generation.

Wesley Gary Neutral Zone - Video Dailymotion

With stronger neodi magnets Gary's flat unwound polefaces are not essential because the field will pass right through a deep and full length overwinding.
I have used soft and poly foams around a fully overwound solenoid (large old relay coil) to do the same, and overcome attraction forces so that effortless movement intiates pulsed Gary output, with me observing one or other of two reverse connected LEDs pulsing alternately, and the quicker the movement the more continuous/brighter the light, and as you can see in the video the magnet's field is not rotated, even though linked rod flux reverses !
Gary's generator had alternating switches at far left - removed for obvious reasons - think about it.
Hubbard had a modulated centre 'core' simultaneously 'Gary' pulsing eight fully overwound surrounding end 'located' output cores, but the rest of several distinct possibilities remain unspoken.

Cheers .................. Graham.

[erfinder]

Hi Erfinder, see picture.
Wesley used two different rate springs to neutralise the physical force of attraction difference between series-parallel field induction positions so that only very light self empowering mechanical force became necessary to maintain generation.

Wesley Gary Neutral Zone - Video Dailymotion

With stronger neodi magnets Gary's flat unwound polefaces are not essential because the field will pass right through a deep and full length overwinding.
Using soft and poly foams around a fully overwound solenoid does the same - overcomes attraction so effortless movement intiates pulsed Wesley Gary output.
Gary's generator had alternating switches at far left - removed for obvious reasons.
Hubbard had modulated DC centre core field surrounded by '8' output cores, but the rest remains unspoken.

Cheers .................. Graham.

In your opinion wouldn't a motor based on this principle "as presented" by Wesly would be rather weak? A generator might be interesting, if the proper feedback mechanism was utilized..?

"difference between series-parallel field induction"

What are you saying here?

Regards

[GSM]

In your opinion wouldn't a motor based on this principle "as presented" by Wesly would be rather weak? A generator might be interesting, if the proper feedback mechanism was utilized..?

The Gary motor was small scale, but Hubbard's and Hendershot's developments were most definitely home power sized !

"difference between series-parallel field induction"
What are you saying here?
Regards

Hi erfinder,

If you have a horseshoe magnet then please *hands-on* replicate the Gary effect as per my video.
If you have a bar magnet then give it a pair of pole face extensions using steel bolts.
I used a ferrite rod in the video because a soft iron core was not handy, but a transformer laminate would do.
The stronger your magnet the further away it can be to induce the core field reversal shown.
Overwind = output voltage generation without the typical cogging or force reaction effects from rotation.
As I said, increasing magnet field strength very effectively modifies the distance for series-parallel induction alternation.
!!!!! The field need not be fixed strength. !!!!!

Please - you need to try all this for yourself.

Cheers ............... Graham.