Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Open Source Issues?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Just like a ham radio
    those days dont have a lot of tech stuff such as iphone pcs ipad
    and are reported to telecom dept for interference complaint

    totoalas

    Comment


    • #47
      I keep several different circuits running 24/7 and my tv or wireless network do not seem to be effected.

      Comment


      • #48
        Really, you mean I can get an Intel I-7 3rd Generation CPU circuit in "vacuum tube" form? Wow! It could survive a EMP blast, sweet! However the 1.4 billion vacuum tubes must have taken awhile to setup. Really? Every circuit huh?


        Originally posted by boguslaw View Post
        Friends, every electronic circuit was already invented before....in vacuum tubes time or in early transistors....

        Comment


        • #49
          Wow, threats coming from a senior member. This place sucks.

          Originally posted by wayne.ct View Post
          It seems to me that different people have different levels of appetite for risk. Perhaps you currently have enough money that you don't care if you give away the product of your time and mental effort after you have created something with unique and valuable properties. Or, on the other hand, perhaps you simply don't care if other people make money off an idea that you had and freely shared. On the other hand, I was issued a US patent on one of my inventions and IF you infringe my patent and IF I have enough time and money to go after you and IF I decide I want to take the time and make the effort to enforce my rights and IF I can find an attorney that can properly represent me, then and ONLY then, I will see you in court.

          So, you think I'm greedy? Maybe so. Just don't be cocky and press your luck too far.

          Comment


          • #50
            Originally posted by jonabel1971 View Post
            Really, you mean I can get an Intel I-7 3rd Generation CPU circuit in "vacuum tube" form? Wow! It could survive a EMP blast, sweet! However the 1.4 billion vacuum tubes must have taken awhile to setup. Really? Every circuit huh?
            please don't be too pedantic I meant every basic/elementary electronic circuit. However you are correct, some slight modifications are "novel" , thought I suspect that every oscillator type was invented in vacuum tubes first... I'm talking about Slayer and SEC exciter context.

            Comment


            • #51
              My definition of FE technology does not use any form of energy source to produce usable energy. Using water, some other esoteric material are just alternative energy technologies.

              I'm waiting for a genius who really understand new laws of physics how to build simple, practical FE power generator and disclose it for general public.

              There are many individuals who don't know the basic 101 of mathematics and physics. And they think they would be able to invent a remarkable FE device. Yeah! It sounds great.
              Whether it's in open source format or in-house secret development, I wish good luck for them. I mean it.

              My experiences of open source software in computer since early 1990s told me people can make money for providing service to end users. To have ownership over open source product is impossible. The original inventor will be remembered by community members. If the inventor is really capable, he/she can have decent living as a project maintainer, such as Linus Torvalds, Richard stallman, etc. Some people make good money utilizing open source software. I personally worked for a brilliant engineer who became millionaire later on.

              Hive intelligence is lack of creativity. Considering its massive amount of knowledge and experiences, resources, it has been the mavricks who bring out paradigm shifting theory and inventions.

              We need individuals like a brilliant scientist like Stephen Crothers in open source FE community. What if Stanley Meyer comes back to 2013? He could achieve what he dreamed of for sure.

              Comment


              • #52
                Originally posted by freepenguin View Post
                My definition of FE technology does not use any form of energy source to produce usable energy. Using water, some other esoteric material are just alternative energy technologies.

                I'm waiting for a genius who really understand new laws of physics how to build simple, practical FE power generator and disclose it for general public.

                There are many individuals who don't know the basic 101 of mathematics and physics. And they think they would be able to invent a remarkable FE device. Yeah! It sounds great.
                Whether it's in open source format or in-house secret development, I wish good luck for them. I mean it.

                My experiences of open source software in computer since early 1990s told me people can make money for providing service to end users. To have ownership over open source product is impossible. The original inventor will be remembered by community members. If the inventor is really capable, he/she can have decent living as a project maintainer, such as Linus Torvalds, Richard stallman, etc. Some people make good money utilizing open source software. I personally worked for a brilliant engineer who became millionaire later on.

                Hive intelligence is lack of creativity. Considering its massive amount of knowledge and experiences, resources, it has been the mavricks who bring out paradigm shifting theory and inventions.

                We need individuals like a brilliant scientist like Stephen Crothers in open source FE community. What if Stanley Meyer comes back to 2013? He could achieve what he dreamed of for sure.
                They are here or there but the essence is whoever succeeded after years of labour will rather turn it into a profit...the world need change but every person going straight to the solution is ridiculed or suppressed like Stanley Meyer . Vide Paul Babcock lecture

                Comment

                Working...
                X