Hello, Tom Wlazlak - EttCM energy technology - systems

[Tom Wlazlak]

If something of a energy technology was made to be workable that did not use energy to make energy; ( Is that worth taking about on a energy forum? )

[Aaron]

Of course it is. You emailed me about it before? If you want to share it in a forum, feel free to post images, videos, details.

[Tom Wlazlak]

#2.jpg
To Start with this is the EttCM coil design it produces about 3.84 times more output power of attraction than a normal electromagnetic coil at the same input watts
Dc. constant current - ( no pulse power needed )
#6.jpg
This is a testing prototype motor tested on 12 / 7 / 2022
The input Dc current is 70 watts
The output of the EttCM coil produced 230 angler torque conversion from Permanent magnetic power
The electrical input is not used as output power only conversion of permanent magnetic power to energy output power;

There is no limits to how much power this technology can produced;
Easily can be developed to run ( Cars, Truck, Trains, Large Ships, or anything that uses energy to run on )

What happens next?

[Tom Wlazlak]

Well; Personally; This is introducing myself; because this is who I am first; The question; for my life is it possible to build a perpetual motion machine?
( The answer is simple YES: it is possible to build a machine that works like a perpetual motion machine; running on using no input energy to run; )
The main idea is using a new concept called (( Cooldynamics )) that is the potential force that makes Thermodynamics energy; possible;
also it is the -( Creation of new Energy )- to make the energy thermodynamics uses that can not be created or destroyed only changed once it is a form of energy;
Saying; if New energy was not created the friction of the universe alone would have stopped all energies; a long time ago; and we would not exist at all;
Cooldynamics; is the Potential energy of Gravity; and magnetic forces; that produce kinetic energy of movement making atoms of mass that were not moving - into new energy of movement; or motion; Atom exist; if not moving is not energy; but the atoms not moving still exist; in not moving NO energy is present; Electrical energy is weigh in motion - that is all energy is ( Weigh in motion only ) no magic; (( Weight in motion )) E = the speed of light ( times ) the mass of Weight or EttCM The formula for energy - really -
All energy is weight in motion; if an atom is not in motion to another atom of mass of weight; there is no energy to that atom of weight; ( saying )
if an atom is in motion and gives its motion to another atom the first atom is ( no longer energy of motion ) becoming - dead weight - the second atom receiving the energy of motion was dead weight but is now energy of motion; That is thermodynamics energy; changed from one to another;
Cooldynamics; is force that produces the non-moving dead weight of the atom to become in motion that was not energy to start with; being Created energy from no energy of motion; once it becomes new created energy of motion it can give its energy of motion to another atom of weight again; making it dead weight; again;
once it is dead weight; Something must make it move again; Cooldynamics (( Creates energy from no energy )) thermodynamics changes the moving energy form one form to another;
This idea changes nothing in physics; the concepts already apply; just no one has though this concept in science as a concept before; thinking about it does make sense;
Again; Without new energy being created; everything would have stopped a long time ago; Because Gravity is NOT energy and kinetic energy of movement is made from Gravity; common sense; says; this has to be true; in Physics and Science;

( The Learning and Teaching tool - to learn Why - it is possible to make a perpetual motion machine; ) if the Physics people learn how it is possible; maybe it will become possible ? Well; it turns out that the technology already exist; So; Teaching anyone; still; make no difference; the technology already exist; that can not be undone;

The common sense lack of knowledge on the subject; allows anyone to say what they truly believe to be true to themselves; as impossible; no knowing makes that possible
To them and them alone; All fun Stuff;

Din ma - Tom

[Aaron]

Can you post a video walk through of it running with a sequential explanation of what is happening at each step in the process?

[Tom Wlazlak]

hello Aaron, A video, would be nice; however; There are no videos I have produced of my work ( personally ): however; there were interviews done where I have shown and talked about my technology items; on the internet; explaining in a basic format of the working of the type of permanent magnetic powered system used;

What I normally do is present drawings and photos of the EttCM energy technology and show and tell about the test done in a step by step process;
A video really would not show the details of how the technology works; Because the systems are not in the realm of normal knowledge and understanding;
it makes it someone difficult to pass off this information; because people do not wish to learn the basic knowledge needed to go to the next steps needed to make
a workable EttCM energy machine work; ( people tend to think they are smart enough to understand; ) but only having about 10 percent of the total knowledge needed
to make it work; ((( they simply fail ))) And when that happens; they lost interest in following up to find out why they failed;

making a coil is only 2 percent needed to make the technology work; and the coil is shown above; showing a video of the coil shows nothing more; than the photo shown; - There is lots of information shown on the designs of the working of the Energy to torque Conversion Motion - systems; but normal education in engineering and physics does not cover what is needed to know the rest of the 90 percent needed to know; to make the system work;

I spent my life testing and learning how and why things do and work as they do; about 90,000 hrs. put into what is needed to understand what make a workable system workable;

It seems the world does not want to know; past their basic understanding of simple Physics and science; ( they simply believe they know enough already )
But again; how many years have people tried to make something works on using its built in power source __ and failed -- All of them + worldwide:
Why has everyone failed to make a workable type of free energy technology?? Simple"" They do not know how; ( I know how ) but people do not want to learn from

Me; -- ( They think they are smart enough -- already --- ) So this is why I have workable technology on my shelf that no one has seen: Well limited anyway;
i have show some people; but like the interviews on the internet; show; 10 percent; ------ 90 percent is for the ones that have the common sense; to ask the right questions;

That is what separates; The ones that think the are; from the one that know they are not; and would like to know what they know they do not; The common sense people; ( the one in a billion ) A very hard to find ONE; The one that has uncommon sense;

((((((( Aaron; -- Presenting anything on my technology on any forum; presents a common problem; ( do people understand what they are looking for in the first place?)))))))

Without the knowledge of how a workable technology has to be done in order to be workable; the lack of the basic knowledge; makes it impossible to present in the first place;

Because everyone does not have the knowledge of understanding ( what is needed to make a workable technology --- WORK --- ??? Where does one that has a workable Technology go; to show how it works;?? Not on a forum where the people do not know they do not know;

I know this is true; Otherwise: I would not be the only one on the planet to have the only working system on the planet; that no one what to learn how it works;

I mean;;;; There are 11,000 guest viewing a day on this forum; //// and about 8 members viewing per day; and only 54 or so views on a workable type technology have viewed;
There is something wrong with the math on this viewing thing;
I have been doing this for over 56 years now; Why does no one know how to make a workable technology yet??? (( Something is very wrong ))

All efforts; fall short of delivering The message; ( If someone has made a workable technology ) Why is it being NOT - shared / talked about // mostly hidden form everyone worldwide; by even the energy forum people that are looking for the working technology for (( many // many //// many Years) is there something wrong with this formula?

For Me - personally - it has been a ONE man full time job using my own resources for 56 years to give this working technology knowledge to the world;
( Being kicked in the teeth by the world on the whole; ) for doing so;

Asking the stupid question; Why would anyone go through this to give something of such value; for free; to the people that are not smart enough to understand what they could have if only they were not so stupid themselves; fighting tooth and nail keeping from themselves - I am sorry; This is the truth;

Welcome to my introduction; This is who I am and what I am doing; fighting the people of this planet to give them something they say they want; by fighting not to have it at all;

This is why I say; NOT VERY SMART -- Being the total truth; Why am I doing this in the first place?? makes no sense; common or otherwise;

Din ma - Tom

[Ve-Ter]

Tom,

I found this video:

Short summary of how I currently understand it (please correct anything wrong):

• Input shown on supply: ~85–90 W
• No-load speed: ~640–686 rpm
• Output estimated ~295 W mechanical from static pull test → ~3.3 : 1
• Principle: permanent magnets do the real work, coils only provide timed ~4? boost + near-perfect cancellation (not classic over-unity).

Four quick questions when you have a minute:

1. Has torque/output ever been checked dynamically under actual rotation with any kind of brake or load (prony, fan, pump, etc.) instead of just the static pull test?
2. Has input power ever been measured with a scope + current shunt (or a proper DC power analyser) to confirm true average power under pulsing, or are we only going by the power-supply display?
3. With the highly inductive pulses and mechanical commutator, what does the power factor look like, or have you ever logged instantaneous V ? I to see the real energy per cycle?
4. Has anyone you know put a measurable load on one of these and recorded both input change and useful shaft power?

Even a 30-second clip with a small brake or a scope trace on the input would answer almost everything for most of us.

Thanks again for openly sharing all the info.

[Tom Wlazlak]

hello my good friend - Ve-Ter; You know; A person worth talking with; is worth more than all the tea in China. of course if you take a chessboard and double 1 grain of rice per each square there would not be enough rice in china to cover all the squares; on the chessboard; ( knowing the answer to a question is simpler if the question asked is answered in the first place. )

many people confuse what they personally know as what has been taught to them in error to what is really happening; missing the answer to the second question; saying NO Load;; is wrong;
When a horse runs at 30 miles an hr. that is the top speed of 1 horsepower the horse can produce; no one is riding the horse; is that being said the horse is under NO load ?

Of course not; The friction of the environment causes the maximum speed to being what is possible to the horsepower produced; at any given speed;

Point being the maximum of the motor is the friction of the environment just as the horse can only go 30 miles an hr. the speed of the motor can only go 600 rpms at the angler torque produced;
fancy testing leads only to a false calculation on this form of testing device; The friction of the environment ( plus ) any other form of friction device leads to ( What ? ) too much water in the soup.

Bad mixture; of misunderstand what the prototype testing motor was designed to do in the first place; ( Testing ONLY the coil output power under real time applications ))

In answer to the other question; Yes The system was tested many different ways; All tests were withing 5 percent of each other; So the input watts to the output angler torque confirm each other; in all the many different types of tests done to the same conclusions

There is lots of drawing and data shown on many different places on the internet; ( I have been around for a few years now ) talked to most everyone doing this type to work;

Easy to see and find - simply look up my names used; Dr. Wlazlak - EttCM energy technology or Tom Wlazlak - magnagravity - way too much information on me I think;
But you will also find; I do not write things myself; The things shown on the internet have been place there by others. NOT me personally. All quotes; about what I have said;

Of course if you would like to see how to produce a workable Perpetual motion device; using gravity and magnetic force alone; send me an email. like I said; I have talked to most everyone; already; There is a lot of unknown information; not shown on the internet anywhere; but I do share some of that unknown to good friends; if asked; of course;

Something about my background; Vast amount of knowledge in Engineering industrial equipment, designing and building most everything; designing Electrical automated systems; and lots of fun stuff like that: ( I am now retired - but I still have a fully equipped Lab. fab. shop. and Self funded - meaning I never ask anyone of any type of donations to do my research and development projects; It is wrong to ask other for money on something that is not given back - in any way ever - I just have a much higher standard of morals on that subject; never borrow; what you can never pay back; That is the - prime directive in my world;

Well; getting back to the question asked; Yes I have many minutes; but in the in between time; I have hours. and days. also- years. Saying; I don't mind answering questions;

but one at a time is much nicer; Than all at once; That only leads to much more confusion; in the confusion that already exist; about what is being said about this form of technology;

Din - ma Tom

[Ve-Ter]

Hi Tom,

At 680 rpm on 85–90 W the rotor is absolutely doing real work. It is already developing exactly the shaft power needed to continuously overcome every internal loss: bearings, air drag, eddy currents, brush friction, magnetic hysteresis, etc. That’s the motor’s natural balanced speed, just like the horse hitting a certain speed, but not pulling anything more than itself. The power is real; it’s just all being consumed inside the machine itself right now.

What is still missing (and what almost everyone keeps asking for) is simply to move a portion of that developed shaft power to an external, measurable, variable load so we can see three very basic things:

• How much the input current/watts rise when we deliberately extract, say, 50 W → 100 W → 150 W of useful work
• Direct measurement of that extracted mechanical power (prony brake, belt to a fan or small generator, rope + spring scale, etc.)
• How the overall efficiency behaves when we actually pull usable work out of the shaft instead of letting it all dissipate internally

Even a super-simple setup that lets you pull just 50–150 W continuously while logging input watts would instantly answer practically every remaining question for the wider audience.

Thanks again for the patient explanation, for confirming the multiple test methods all agreed within 5 %, and for openly sharing decades of work. I’ll go through the drawings and older data posted under both Dr. Wlazlak – EttCM and Tom Wlazlak – magnagravity; clearly a lot there already.

[Tom Wlazlak]

hello again; my friend, Again; The video made showing the 85-90 watts of input to the output of 295 watts that was shown was an example; of the basic testing of the EttCM coils used in that example only; ( being said That was not the normal input to output range of this testing device for the coils normal power ratio;

That video ( The first was not for showing in the first place; ) it was a personal zoom meeting in order to show and teach Vinyasi the basic concepts FIRST before having a real meeting that where he would know the answers to the questions needed asking - NOTE: There was never a second meeting done; and no other videos made with him.

Because you my friend: are in the same dilemma as Vinyasi; Not understanding fully the concepts of the workings of the technology; relating in manor to such that do NOT work in the same as a normal electrical motor type design; The questions and answers you develop do not really pertain; for each equal; to normal and the EttCM energy technology systems;

first question how much input current watts ( rise ) does not apply ---- So the answer can not be answered that applies; in a normal application method; ( apples and lemons ) as such;
second - The prototype motor is designed as a testing system only at this point; ( The part of the output power produces on a next generation system is Classified ( of course )
(((( That information is worth billions and billions )))) A'm nice but not stupid --- Thank you; I wanted to be a millionaire from doing this - that has now changed
A billion and billions is now the goal; (( not asking much; just a small amount of the total would be nice;

But again; because I can't help myself; There have been many clues presented telling the total working of the next generation system shown on the internet; if understood as shown; -- of course ? ( That is the fun part of this projects - can one guess from the clues how it really works? )-- All the clues are there --- Somewhere ???

like a big puzzle; (( Oh; ya; the technology keeps transforming becoming better and better in design; That also I can't help myself; Everyday is a new development in fun;

Din - ma Tom - retired - in play-land - (( note; no one ever emails me to get a direct answer; That would make too much sense; ))

[Ve-Ter]

Here are files from Vinyasi's site regarding this: EttCM

Thanks Tom for allowing Vinyasi to post all of this publicly. Much to learn!

[Ve-Ter]

Here's a few more...

[Ve-Ter]

Here's more...

[Ve-Ter]

Another one.

[Ve-Ter]

The docs...