Tweet
Hi all,
During the past couple of years, I investigated many of your posts and tried to figure out what was going on. What I found out is that when you look at the dirty details of what we know as electricity, it is the electric field that really powers our circuits. While it seems like we convert mechanical energy into electrical energy by turning the shaft of a generator for example, in reality it is the electric field that powers our circuits. And because the electric field is the real energy source that powers all electrical circuits in the Universe, we can use that energy source for free, if only we manage to find the right tricks to do it.
With this knowledge, I investigated three independent inventions that claimed to be able to power cars seemingly out of nothing: Edwin Gray's "fuelless engine" and the "water powered cars" by both Stanley Meyer and Dr. Andrija Puharich. To my own surprise, I discovered they all used the same basic principles to extract power from the electric field itself, principles that can be explained from the bottom up without any difficulty using nothing but hard Electrical Engineering theories.
With the work of Professor Turtur, we know for certain that the electric field is a clean energy source that is free for the taking. We also know now how three independent inventions, of which two have been shown to work in public, used this energy source using the exact same set of tricks. So, either all three inventors were incredible frauds, or my theory explains how they did it.
So, I have started to write an article about what I found out:
Article:Free Electric Energy in Theory and Practice - PESWiki
The conlusions so far:
Since this stuff is being discussed all over the place and my thread on "the ultimate secret" is groing into something like a "food for thought" thread, I thought it would be a good idea to start a new thread to focus on the discussion of the theories I explained in my article.
Any feedback, suggestions, etc. is welcome here. It is my intention to work further on this stuff the "open source" way, according to Linus's Law:
A.k.a. "Release Early, Release Often." - See: http://www.catb.org/esr/writings/cat...r/ar01s04.html
During the past couple of years, I investigated many of your posts and tried to figure out what was going on. What I found out is that when you look at the dirty details of what we know as electricity, it is the electric field that really powers our circuits. While it seems like we convert mechanical energy into electrical energy by turning the shaft of a generator for example, in reality it is the electric field that powers our circuits. And because the electric field is the real energy source that powers all electrical circuits in the Universe, we can use that energy source for free, if only we manage to find the right tricks to do it.
With this knowledge, I investigated three independent inventions that claimed to be able to power cars seemingly out of nothing: Edwin Gray's "fuelless engine" and the "water powered cars" by both Stanley Meyer and Dr. Andrija Puharich. To my own surprise, I discovered they all used the same basic principles to extract power from the electric field itself, principles that can be explained from the bottom up without any difficulty using nothing but hard Electrical Engineering theories.
With the work of Professor Turtur, we know for certain that the electric field is a clean energy source that is free for the taking. We also know now how three independent inventions, of which two have been shown to work in public, used this energy source using the exact same set of tricks. So, either all three inventors were incredible frauds, or my theory explains how they did it.
So, I have started to write an article about what I found out:
Article:Free Electric Energy in Theory and Practice - PESWiki
The conlusions so far:
Based on my analysis of the systems built and demonstrated by Gray, Meyer and Puharich, I came to the conclusion that the basic principle is that you decouple load circuitry from driving circuitry in an unusual way, using a rectified carrier wave. By making sure that any frequencies the load circuitry may create are much lower than the carrier frequency, you separate the frequency bands wherein driving circuit and load circuitry are operating. Once you have done that, you can use a simple high pass filter to completely decouple load circuitry from driving circuitry in that sense that virtually no current goes back and forth between driving circuitry and load circuitry. So it's in essence a separation in the frequency domain combined with a high-pass filter trough which only the HF electric field from the carrier wave can pass. No charge carriers are actually exchanged between driving circuitry and load circuitry.
The basic theory for this is Tom Bearden's "don't kill the dipole" as described in this article. Basic conclusion of that: the electric field comes for free. Potential (voltage) comes for free as long as you don't influence the charge carriers that create your dipole, your voltage source. In the analysed systems, they all excite two inductive loads in series. Gray excited both terminals of the load train in phase, while Puharich and Meyer did this out of phase. This explains why Gray most likely used bifilar wound coils. To understand the basic principle, it is perhaps best to think in the line I have been following towards the solution of this mistery, which is as follows.
When you resonate an open coil in full wave resonance, you get high voltage, zero current at the terminals, in phase. So there you have the basic connection to using the voltage source for free, but you have to figure out a way to do that without disturbing the charge carriers that give you the voltage source.
With a single coil, the current stays inside the coil, so you can't use that. So, when you split the coil into two, you get the current in the middle for free, provided you don't disturb your voltage source, your driving circuit. So normally, when you use the current, you will disturb the resonance, which will eventually also disturb your driving circuit (because it is somehow coupled with it), so you still have to provide current to keep the system in resonance and pay the price.
And here's the trick: the driving signal is delivered to the coil on top of a half rectified carrier wave, which is fed into the circuit trough a high pass filter. Because the carrier is half rectified, you basically "touch" the coils into one direction, so you don't get any HF in there.
That way, you get the current and the power, but the disturbances caused by using the power, cannot reach the driving circuit, because of the high pass filter! And then you finally got what you want. You can use your voltage source, without disturbing it, so then you don't have to pay the price.
Once you have that clear, you can also imagine that you can drive this principle much further. As long as you make sure you have a proper decoupling between driving circuitry and load circuitry, you can most likely get by without driving the load train into resonance after all. At this moment, this still has to be experimentally verified.
If you would want do go beyond what these three did, the final trick would be to drive two identical loads in opposite phase, so the whole system is perfectly in balance and in resonance.
The basic theory for this is Tom Bearden's "don't kill the dipole" as described in this article. Basic conclusion of that: the electric field comes for free. Potential (voltage) comes for free as long as you don't influence the charge carriers that create your dipole, your voltage source. In the analysed systems, they all excite two inductive loads in series. Gray excited both terminals of the load train in phase, while Puharich and Meyer did this out of phase. This explains why Gray most likely used bifilar wound coils. To understand the basic principle, it is perhaps best to think in the line I have been following towards the solution of this mistery, which is as follows.
When you resonate an open coil in full wave resonance, you get high voltage, zero current at the terminals, in phase. So there you have the basic connection to using the voltage source for free, but you have to figure out a way to do that without disturbing the charge carriers that give you the voltage source.
With a single coil, the current stays inside the coil, so you can't use that. So, when you split the coil into two, you get the current in the middle for free, provided you don't disturb your voltage source, your driving circuit. So normally, when you use the current, you will disturb the resonance, which will eventually also disturb your driving circuit (because it is somehow coupled with it), so you still have to provide current to keep the system in resonance and pay the price.
And here's the trick: the driving signal is delivered to the coil on top of a half rectified carrier wave, which is fed into the circuit trough a high pass filter. Because the carrier is half rectified, you basically "touch" the coils into one direction, so you don't get any HF in there.
That way, you get the current and the power, but the disturbances caused by using the power, cannot reach the driving circuit, because of the high pass filter! And then you finally got what you want. You can use your voltage source, without disturbing it, so then you don't have to pay the price.
Once you have that clear, you can also imagine that you can drive this principle much further. As long as you make sure you have a proper decoupling between driving circuitry and load circuitry, you can most likely get by without driving the load train into resonance after all. At this moment, this still has to be experimentally verified.
If you would want do go beyond what these three did, the final trick would be to drive two identical loads in opposite phase, so the whole system is perfectly in balance and in resonance.
Any feedback, suggestions, etc. is welcome here. It is my intention to work further on this stuff the "open source" way, according to Linus's Law:
Given enough eyeballs, all bugs are shallow.
Comment