Originally posted by sebosfato
Your posts IMO says a lot more than you are aware of.
Sebosfato, I think you are very successful, successful at wasting my time.
You could have posted hard experimental evidence here, that others could use and value and give a link to a replicated experiment of yours, but you have not.
If you really are as smart as you claim to be, you have bad skills in communicating your wisdom.
I don't care to be unwanted here
Yes I see that. you don't respect other members.
I have used more than enough time on you, now you stay put on my ignore list.
Eric
. For now it is about Pantone reactor combined with sharp plasma cluster.







right? I have read just about all of Meyer's patents and kinda get them cunfused as to which one says what exactly. But all one has to do is make up a deffinition of terms of Meyer's words. Trust me it is a needed step to understanding what is actrually in the patents. Oh, and yes the technical brief is put together the same criptic way as each grouping of terms takes the technology into the mind of Meyers and away from the real world. It was a clever trick but it takes more than that to pull wool over my eyes.
Comment