Originally posted by Michael John Nunnerley
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Stanley Meyer
Collapse
X
-
Please do the same thing also.Originally posted by tutanka View PostPlease publish online photo or video of an working device that use your nanosecond discharge and make dissociation and burn the water at the same time ..
You just talk and talk for years now. Show something working. And if you don't want to, why do you even come here? Just to brag that you have something that others dont?It's better to wear off by working than to rust by doing nothing.
Comment
-
Dear... everyone can write and not me?Originally posted by Jetijs View PostPlease do the same thing also.
You just talk and talk for years now. Show something working. And if you don't want to, why do you even come here? Just to brag that you have something that others dont?
I have just answered that if nanosecond discharge can split easily water all our energy problems are solved. From my side my plasma chemical device work and work ONLY with HEAT!!
Comment
-
well ... even if nanopulses have huge amperage and big "impulse" the water mass is effectively a faraday cage , update: if the water is distilled there's no conduction and the electrons follow the discharge path.... .. tutanka are you sure the ions or molecules weren't moving ?Last edited by tachyon; 03-05-2014, 05:51 PM.The pure in heart will see the light.
Comment
-
Please answer to my question .. if nanopulses works as you think why nothing have used for water dissociation? There are some docs on internet about nanopulses on water steam but to the end no complete dissociation but just ionization or in part. In all case no sufficient for make an burner or run an engine. From my side using heat and catalyst is right way for obtain plasma from water and air and complete dissociation and combustion using the same method specified from Meyer.Originally posted by tachyon View Postwell ... even if nanopulses have huge amperage and big "impulse" the water mass is effectively a faraday cage , update: if the water is distilled there's no conduction and the electrons follow the discharge path.... .. tutanka are you sure the ions or molecules weren't moving ?Last edited by tutanka; 03-05-2014, 07:30 PM.
Comment
-
I didn't say nanopulses work , I don't know without experimenting, I said that ionized water forms an electric field shield that doesnt let ELECTRIC FIELDS pass inside... , in short nanopulses exploit the impulse of the electrons and atoms but are shielded that's why they won't work... in deionized not distilled water I don't know what will happen since theres no conduction .Originally posted by tutanka View PostPlease answer to my question .. if nanopulses works as you think why nothing have used for water dissociation? There are some docs on internet about nanopulses on water steam but to the end no complete dissociation but just ionization or in part. In all case no sufficient for make an burner or run an engine. From my side using heat and catalyst is right way for obtain plasma from water and air and complete dissociation and combustion using the same method specified from Meyer.Last edited by tachyon; 03-05-2014, 07:52 PM.The pure in heart will see the light.
Comment
-
Believe in me you don't need, just distilled water is ok and however the experience is the mother of all the certaintiesOriginally posted by tachyon View PostI didn't say nanopulses work , I don't know without experimenting, I said that ionized water forms an electric field shield that doesnt let ELECTRIC FIELDS pass inside... , in short nanopulses exploit the impulse of the electrons and atoms but are shielded that's why they won't work... in deionized not distilled water I don't know what will happen since theres no conduction .
Comment
-
claims - show your work
Ditto.Originally posted by Jetijs View PostPlease do the same thing also.
You just talk and talk for years now. Show something working. And if you don't want to, why do you even come here? Just to brag that you have something that others dont?
Please notice on my webpage for my Water Fuel Secrets booklet, it says this (this is an actual copy and paste):
I am NOT claiming I have a car running on water - so please make sure you understand this in no uncertain terms.
I'm NOT claiming I have "duplicated" or "replicated" Stan Meyer - so please also be clear that you understand this as well.
This is NOT a How-To guide telling you how to build anything either. So please also understand that.
What I AM claiming is to have Stan Meyer's own words explaining the nitrogen importance in many of his own documents and how it makes a useful synthetic fuel instead of having a quick "Brown's Gas" pop using HHO, which in an engine is completely worthless for anything other than a fuel supplement.Sincerely,
Aaron Murakami
Books, Videos, ESTC Conference Info, Blog, etc. https://emediapress.com
Comment
-
the discharge path should be from the inside to the outside to avoid the shielding effect.Originally posted by Michael John Nunnerley View PostSorry for the small images, I do not know why they turned out like that, I will see what I can do about it.
This is just part of a system, this just shows that nano pulses from what is basicly flyback induction (Similar to an induction driver), where the input may be low voltage and amperage, but the voltage at the electrode will depend on whether the water is distilled or with electrolyte eg: 1v in on the primary can give 600v at the electrode or 1v on the primary and a high molar electrolyte may give only 6v. This example shows that distilled water shows a higher efficiency, around 98%.
Now if with distilled water you apply an ionising system as well, you will have high voltage discharging through the ionisation route creating a huge amperage at no cost to the input, it will not be seen by the input. High voltage discharging quickly, nano secounds, creates a huge amperage.
There are many ways of skining the same cat
regards
Mike
The pure in heart will see the light.
Comment
-
-
OK and then? These documents are just informations and however we are talking every, using another mode, of electrolisys and not the direct dissociation of water. I repeat again... if nanopulse discharge was the way from 1995 at today our boiler (or car ) would work with water and not with the hydrocarbons like now.Originally posted by Michael John Nunnerley View Post
Comment
-
Alex the answer is very simple, no investment. We have the answer, as soon as a scientist is approached and tied up with the investment people, along comes the big buck buy out of the investor and no more is done, the investor has made a killing and he knew this before he was approached, this is how it works.Originally posted by tutanka View PostOK and then? These documents are just informations and however we are talking every, using another mode, of electrolisys and not the direct dissociation of water. I repeat again... if nanopulse discharge was the way from 1995 at today our boiler (or car ) would work with water and not with the hydrocarbons like now.
It is just not $ wise interesting to develope, too many people who now make a lot of money out of oil, NG etc see this as their doom, and they are right, their income will dry up in a couple of years, that goes for the governments as well, so they tie up the scientist and in doing so make a killing without any investment, Voila
regards
Mike
Comment
Comment