Rwgresearch - WFC Injector.. wrong design

[tutanka]

Here the image extracted from http://rwgresearch.com/wp-content/up...arch.com_1.bmp of WFC Injector of Meyer..

This is an wrong design.. that can't work!!!

Inside Meyer patents and documents some wrong informations

When you ionize the air you are dissociating the nitrogen and oxygen molecules producing more nitrogen oxide..

That is what you produce normally with an High Voltage ionization..

And that result is what Meyer use inside the injector..


BUT THE MAIN QUESTION IS..

WHY STANLEY MEYER WANT USE THAT????

[tachyon]

that depends on the voltage you're using.. you might as well dislodge some electrons..have you made tests, why make NO?

[tutanka]

that depends on the voltage you're using.. you might as well dislodge some electrons..have you made tests, why make NO?

Air ionization is maked with the gas processor. . Good question.. if the GP Stanley Meyer make (simply) just nitrogen oxides with high voltage what is the next usage?

[tutanka]

Ammonia again...

As I have written for more times into some threads Stanley Meyer make ammonia and burn immediately.. referring to NO the only possible reaction is NO + H2O = NH3 + O2. Unfortunately that reaction is possible ONLY with an high temperature.. But.. if you know the right chemical formula you can think how make the process. Just for informations I have make an working device for test my theory.. the device produce an energetic yellow flame. As Stanley Meyer wrote this device can be useful for heating or for powerup an engine.

[tutanka]

why an yellow flame..

Extracted from: The Ammonia Flame : Abstract : Nature



WHY STANLEY MEYER RECYCLE THE EXAUST GAS?? BECAUSE MAKE NO, O2 AND WATER AGAIN..



AN NEW ERA IS VERY NEAR? PROBABLY YES...

[tachyon]

Extracted from: The Ammonia Flame : Abstract : Nature



WHY STANLEY MEYER RECYCLE THE EXAUST GAS?? BECAUSE MAKE NO, O2 AND WATER AGAIN..



AN NEW ERA IS VERY NEAR? PROBABLY YES...

interesting

[tutanka]

it's nice..

it's nice to see how much interest there is in the technology of Stanley Meyer and how many people are interested in replicating it ..

[Wireguy]

Nitrogen Cycle

Trying to research and understand the Nitrogen Cycle that you describe. The only part that is somewhat unproven (at least I haven't found a reference as a of yet - nor had a chance to replicate) is the conversion of NO + H20 to NH3 and O2 (4NO + 6H2O + O2(Heat) = 4NH3 + 6O2?).

The other parts of the conversion as you stated all make sense.

Best regards, Wireguy

[tutanka]

Trying to research and understand the Nitrogen Cycle that you describe. The only part that is somewhat unproven (at least I haven't found a reference as a of yet - nor had a chance to replicate) is the conversion of NO + H20 to NH3 and O2 (4NO + 6H2O + O2(Heat) = 4NH3 + 6O2?).

The other parts of the conversion as you stated all make sense.

Best regards, Wireguy