COP 17 Heater | Rosemary Ainslie | Part 2

[ashtweth]

Courses updated (Feb 19, 2010):

http://www.panaceauniversity.org/Rosemary%20Ainslie%20COP17%20Heater%20Technology.pdf

Let me know if any tweaks needed.

Rose , all you new helpful posts are in there and acknowledged and thanks for that, I have forwarded all the info to Andrew, his email is the same.

Back to the farm for me for 3 days still working on the GEETS guy up to my behind

Ash

[witsend]

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/5417-cop-17-heres-why-result-predicted.html

I think this is the link to the new thread. I'll check it out when it's posted. OK - it's the right link.

This thread now will be for replicators who want to replicate and I shall keep an update here on the progress of our first 'boiler application'. I will also post links as I update the 'here's why the result was predicted' thread.

Golly some order coming out of the chaos. I think b4FreeEnergy will be pleased. LOL

[b4FreeEnergy]

[b4FreeEnergy]

[witsend]

LOL b4Free - it may not be 'free' but it certainly seemed limitless - unbounded? Fortunately nearly 12 hours later - so? It may be some small comfort but I dare to hope that it may be controllable. Who knows? I've also been enjoying some wine - and right now I'm ready for an early'ish night. Rare in my life. I'll get back here first thing in the morning. I need to speak to my friend to check some ideas I have about wire. Will get back on this sometime over the weekend.

Happy reading b4Free. I've come to depend on your posts here. Take care.

R.

[Jbignes5]

I don't know if this will help but appliance stores that fix old appliances might have suitable resistance wire as a replacements for electric dryers. Not sure if thats what you would need but I know most electric ones use a wire for a heating element.

[b4FreeEnergy]

I don't know if this will help but appliance stores that fix old appliances might have suitable resistance wire as a replacements for electric dryers. Not sure if thats what you would need but I know most electric ones use a wire for a heating element.

Hi Jbigness, thanks for the tip, might be a good idea.

[witsend]

Hi b4Free,

Have just been chatting to a colleague. The thinking is this. If you can't get thick gauge - say to 0.8mm or greater - then I don't think there would be any serious deterrent to the experiment to twist strands of thinner gauge together to get it into a single winding. In fact the suggestion is that this may reduce capacitance.

Just to get conformity to the initial effect I think it would also be as well to keep the core width 'girth' in the same ratio as Glen's. Thereafter I guess - one could begin experimenting with the different parameters. I am still inclined to think that the wider the core the better. But it may also need to run at faster frequencies to establish that resonance.

Anyway, hopefully that will open up your options better. Personally I'd go for a full 1.00 mm gauge - if possible. But that's your choice.

[witsend]

Guys, here's the first 'link' that gives the first overview to the explanation - why COP>17 was inevitable.

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/5417-cop-17-heres-why-result-predicted.html#post86031

That goes on for 30 odd small paragraphs - then some discussion - then again the second section more or less leading up to the introduction to the electromagnetic interaction - which - in turn - will give the 'explanation'.

Here's that link. I think you'll be thankful there's only 7 paragraphs here.

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/5417-cop-17-heres-why-result-predicted-3.html#post86290

From now I intend to get onto what you may find relevant. And to any readers that are also purists - abject apologies for the generalisations that I've indulged. It was only to extend the 'conceptual' nature of this field model and that, because it's my experience that most 'hands on' experimentalists here - are not that into theory.

And it's another HOT HOT DAY IN AFRICA. I very much doubt that my own energy levels will extend to much more work here today. But who knows what the cool of the evening brings. Perhaps I can, at least, update my diagrams.

[b4FreeEnergy]

Guys, here's the first 'link' that gives the first overview to the explanation - why COP>17 was inevitable.

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/5417-cop-17-heres-why-result-predicted.html#post86031

That goes on for 30 odd small paragraphs - then some discussion - then again the second section more or less leading up to the introduction to the electromagnetic interaction - which - in turn - will give the 'explanation'.

Here's that link. I think you'll be thankful there's only 7 paragraphs here.

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/5417-cop-17-heres-why-result-predicted-3.html#post86290

From now I intend to get onto what you may find relevant. And to any readers that are also purists - abject apologies for the generalisations that I've indulged. It was only to extend the 'conceptual' nature of this field model and that, because it's my experience that most 'hands on' experimentalists here - are not that into theory.

And it's another HOT HOT DAY IN AFRICA. I very much doubt that my own energy levels will extend to much more work here today. But who knows what the cool of the evening brings. Perhaps I can, at least, update my diagrams.

[b4FreeEnergy]

[witsend]

You make me curious with that 2kW boiler. You only need about 115 Watts from the grid to pull that off right?

Indeed - if we manage the same results as we reached on the working models. Frankly I'm expecting to get at least this much. Since we've been offered funding here - my intention is to experiment with those resistors so that we can also experiment with that required resonance. We've already done some crude tests and the numbers directly from an AC supply through a variac - look very promising. But there are downsides. The system is really, really noisy. Unacceptably so. We have to find a way to 'muffle' this.

But yes b4Free. The results should be at least as good as this experimental demo model.

[witsend]

Golly Guys,

I had to rescue this thread from page 2. I'm sure it's the first time in its history it 'sunk' so low. In any event - here's the update.

I have now assembled a 'team' to do the experimenting. The only question still in abeyance - is the actual 'platform' for the appliance. This will either be in the open laboratory of a local university laboratory - or in the 'locked' environment of the boilder manufacturer who will be working with us on this.

That choice will largely be the investor's but I still have to iron out a few more details here. I should be able to give a final account of this by tomorrow evening - Friday 26th.

[witsend]

Guys, I've now concluded the 'why this result was predicted'. I still need to elaborate on some aspects of broken strings and their effects but I think it's substantially explained.

Here's the link - but you may need to take the argument up from earlier posting. Not sure if anyone's interested - but I've at least advanced my 'explanation' for this in the simplest way I know how.

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/5417-cop-17-heres-why-result-predicted-4.html#post86965

[b4FreeEnergy]