Rosemary Ainslie | A Magnetic Field Model

[Aaron]

This thread is for the discussion of the magnetic field model of Rosemary Ainslie:

Her blog is here:
A MAGNETIC FIELD MODEL
Monday, September 8, 2008

The Patent

The filed patent can be found here.


Posted by Rosemary Ainslie




A MAGNETIC FIELD MODEL THAT LED TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN OPEN LOOP ELECTRIC CIRCUIT DEVICE THAT ENABLES BREACH OF UNITY A MAGNETIC FIELD MODEL

[jibbguy]

Choppers: From the days of "Easy Rider" hehehe

Great find, and fascinating theory.

But regarding the actual device, i am not understanding something.. Was one ever actually built? Or did she only Patent the circuit design (..just to get it into the public domain eventually when it expires as she said). On her blog she says she will not discuss the device, only the theory.

And it was fun to see the word "chopper" again in regards to electronics, lol. 28 years ago when i first was employed in electronics, some of the stuff that was already 15 years old then, that we still worked on, had choppers in them.

Like any mechanical oscillator or switching device such as relays, as all you techs out there know, they are the very first things to check because they go bad so often

As i recall choppers are not easy to get anymore. A couple years ago i was consulted for help re-building one of these 45 year-old "Brush Mark Two" oscillographic 8-channel chart recorders that NASA used to record telemetry from the Mercury and Gemini launches (lol a 200 pound ink-slinging monster, but state of the art in the early 60's).. We could still get the tubes used in them but not the choppers... And so we had to "cheat" to get it running again (...by substituting the "next generation", but still 35 year-old, design using first-generation discrete transistors.. Which were bad enough since their Beta's had to be matched by hand lol).

So it's interesting to see a circuit using choppers again.. But i cannot agree with the practicality

[Joit]

Well, it works. I made the same experiences with it too, when you loop back into the Coil, and interrupt it. You can gain more Energy that Way.
And you see the same use in the latest Joule Thief circuits, not in the Basic one,
and the Bedini is pretty close to it too.
You only need to compare the Parts, and where they are put in.

So its actually nothing new, but its like allways the Shame, that the Academics just ignore it and it gets supressed, when they cant calculate it.

Or Someone comes, to get a Dr Title when he discover something, what is allready known, and to call the Effect after hisself.
Like Corolis, what is plain simple Magnetism from Gravity at last.
Isnt that just simple Boast.

Edit i did forget about, Timing is importend for the Puls, and mostly depends, how the Coils are set up,
but i could control it with a Diode mostly, when i did turn it into the other Direction..

[boguslaw]

If positive feedback possible at all then everything is possible, and we know for sure ,that's the truth.

[Bob Smith]

Put a load in series with a battery and a switching device in series with the load. Then put a transformer in series with the switching device and finally take a feedback diode from the junction of the transformer and the load and put this back to the battery.

Aaron, thanks for starting this thread. I think this concept is probably similar to David Bowling's device and has elements in common with the Tesla switch. In any event, I don't quite understand the setup. The way I understand it is as follows:
Battery (pos) to load
Load to switching device
Switching device to transformer

But then she talks about the diode running from the junction between transformer and load. I thought the transformer is in series with the switching device. Does this mean the transformer is in parallel with the load?
Sorry, maybe I need a picture.

Bob

[Bob Smith]

Oops

Sorry, I just looked at the patent and diagram.

http://www.wipo.int/pctdb/images/PCT-IMAGES/29071999/IE9900005_29071999_pub_gex.g4-b.jpg

B

[lighty]

To make it easier to access the whole file with all figures here is a direct link to pdf: http://www.wipo.int/pctdb/images4/PC...7/99038247.pdf

[sigzidfit]

We Have a Winner.

Gets my vote.

PJ

[Ted Ewert]

I'm using a circuit that is almost the same as hers to test some coils I've been building lately. In mine I have the diode back across the coil from the transistor, instead of ground. And I have a capacitor at the top of the coil, which is insulated from the battery by a diode.
The pulses become twice as wide on the load coil, since the collapse adds width.
I read some of her theory on magnetic current, but she lost me when things got too complicated. She gets into all kinds of particles, and configurations, which to me is too complex.
Nature tends to be simple, and so should the explanations of her laws. If you have to make physics too complex, you're lost.

Ted

[Aaron]

Rosemary Ainslie

Hi Everyone,

I just wanted to bump this thread up.

Hopefully, Rosemary Ainslie will post more in her blog.

[Peter Lindemann]

Rosemary's Work

Hi Everyone,

I just wanted to bump this thread up.

Hopefully, Rosemary Ainslie will post more in her blog.

Aaron,

Thanks for re-invigorating this older thread. I was about to start a new thread about Rosemary's work. I have also posted her major contributions to a new page on my site at: Free Energy | Rosemary Ainslie On this page, I have collected her papers and put them all in simple, downloadable PDF files, for ease of handling.

This material clearly shows how to build an electric heating device that produces 17 times more heat than the "equivalent" amount of electricity. It accomplishes this by using a resistive heating element that also has inductive properties, and by "recycling" the energy of the inductive collapse.

Rosemary's original test circuit is shown in the article she tried to have published in a "refereed" scientific journal, but the submission was always rejected. In the last 5 months, I have had extensive email correspondence, and numerous telephone conversations with Rosemary, who lives in South Africa. After studying her work, I was absolutely thrilled with her discovery of the super-efficient heating effect. In mid-February of this year, I proposed to her an "idealized" schematic of her DC resonance circuit to produce the effects she had discovered. That circuit diagram is here:

Based on the circuits and work done in the Electric Motor Secrets thread, this circuit should be easy enough to understand.

For those that do not understand it, I will describe its function in a later post.

There are broad implications connected with the proper understanding of the functions of this circuit. We all owe Rosemary Ainslie a deep debt of gratitude, both for her discoveries, and for her willingness to publish her results for the betterment of Science and the human condition.

Peter

[Aaron]

replication attempt thread for COP 17 heater

Peter,

I went ahead and started a thread specific to replication attempts of the circuit:

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/4314-cop-17-heater-rosemary-ainslie.html

[Raui]

Thank you Aaron for creating/revitalizing this thread. I love threads like these with such a wealth of information and new possibilities! I will make sure I read through this after I get some stuff done

Good read, similarities with Leedskalnin in my opinion.

-Raui

[Peter Lindemann]

Magnetic Field Model

Peter,

I went ahead and started a thread specific to replication attempts of the circuit:

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...y-ainslie.html

Aaron,

Thanks for starting the other thread for the discussion of the Electric Heater Experiment by Rosemary. Just for clarity, we can continue to devote this thread to the discussion of Rosemary's Magnetic Field Model, which remains her main interest. The high COP of the Electric Heater Experiment was "predicted" by the Magnetic Field Model, and was produced in an attempt to gather evidence in support of the Model.

Aaron and I are arranging for Rosemary Ainslie to join the forum, so anyone interested in her Magnetic Field Model can address questions to her here.

Anyone interested in the experimental results of the Electric Heater Experiment, my variation on the circuit, replications or further developments, please use the other thread started for that purpose, linked above.

Thanks,

Peter

[DrStiffler]

Interesting Circuit

I think that this could be better accepted if the colorimetric testing was a bit more refined. I read the paper dated 02 Feb 2009 and had a few questions at once. What is the Specific Heat and Heat Capacity of the various materials alone with why can't the probe be placed on the exterior of the resistor instead of the confined interior of the ceramic? I also did not see where it stated if the core was parallel or perpendicular with horizontal?

I was successful with a bit of care in placing resistance in a water bath driven by an Exciter, I would think the community would be much more inclined to look at this if the test were a bit more conventional.

I'm sure they may have seen something, but to get academia to look at it they need a bit clearer data on how the heat measurement is taking place. Actual it may indeed benefit them if they put the whole device in a calorimeter, might produce better numbers.

Just happened across the thread and dropped in, hope its of value.