Peter, whatever happened with Eric P. Dollard?

[t-rex]

[t-rex]

[Pinwheel]

Does it go on from there?

[...]it may be asked, what of the product of the dielectric flux density, and the magnetic flux density?

The ratio of the dielectric flux density over the dielectric induction is the ... (I have no idea).

Or,

The ratio of the magnetic flux density over the magnetic induction is the ... (I have no idea).

Similar to how impedance and admittance were treated earlier?

Weber per Coulomb
Equals Ohms.

Coulomb per Weber
Equals Siemens.

Or perhaps,

Planck^4 / (either) phi or psi = something

Like, there's another set of dimensional relations and ratios that one would want to consider now that we are looking at the substantial properties of the electric field density in cm^4.

/edit -and now I realize I was reading it wrong - it's Planck/cm^4.

[Raui]

Eric,
Very informative post indeed! I'm going to read more of Transients in Space tonight (For anyone interested in doing the same it's located in Steinmetz - Theory and Calculation of Transient Electric Phenomena and Oscillations) I eagerly await your next transmission

Does it go on from there?




The ratio of the dielectric flux density over the dielectric induction is the ... (I have no idea).

Or,

The ratio of the magnetic flux density over the magnetic induction is the ... (I have no idea).

Similar to how impedance and admittance were treated earlier?



Or perhaps,

Planck^4 / (either) phi or psi = something

Like, there's another set of dimensional relations and ratios that one would want to consider now that we are looking at the substantial properties of the electric field density in cm^4.

/edit -and now I realize I was reading it wrong - it's Planck/cm^4.

Good to see your trying to thinking ahead but the ratio of dielectric field density to magnetic field density or visa versa is Impeadence (webers per coulomb) and Admittance (coulombs per weber) since the space to the 2nd power cancels when dividing. See an example here; WolframAlpha

[DanDMan]

I get it

I totally get it Eric. This has been my thought about the electrostatic for while, but knowing who to bring this to practical application has been hard for me. I have been working on a capacitor with one metal plate and one plasma plate. The idea to very capacitance over time at extreme frequencies. Am I headed in the right direction at all?

I have only now found your work. I gave up on understanding Tesla years ago, because I made the mistake of seeking education from Babylon. I have only now picked it up again. Tesla has been my primary hero since I was 10 years old. Your last post just broke my heart. I am so sorry. I have nothing to offer you, but if you ever need a place to stay the door is open.

There are years of time span in your work and I would guess that you have refined your ideas, but being at the beginning, I need a way to get to the relevant info and not wast time with outdated ideas. I assume from your frustration you have, like Tesla, already explained everything but have not been perceived. I beg this one request from you Eric in the name of Tesla and all that is Good. Can you please provide a list of your works and/or others which gives us the secrets of Tesla?

Having all the relevant material specifically listed in one place would greatly speed the learning/relearning curve! With this info I promise to learn it, build it, and teach it worldwide!

Right now, I don't even know where to look for all your data, math, ect..

[wizofid]

Might I suggest that cutting a pasting Eric's work alone - together in one place and reading it - in its entirety -may be the way to see this in a cohesive manner. It is one way to remove the disjointed thoughts.

That - and Eric has posted the textbooks that he started with. I some 35 years ago, found the very same thing, when I was reading Mech and EE Eng books, back in high school - The NEW texts, were 300 pages and left out all of the steps from question to solution. Going back 5 or 10 editions - and maybe 20 to 40 years of publishing, allowed me to find the very same questions, asked and answered - for 40 years. The simple truth was that during the 70's and 80's, Texts got cut 2 and 300 pages - but what was left on the floor was the math and word explanations - of how you sorted things out in "First Principles". I found - the older the book - the better the explanation.

[lamare]

Might I suggest that cutting a pasting Eric's work alone - together in one place and reading it - in its entirety -may be the way to see this in a cohesive manner. It is one way to remove the disjointed thoughts.

You may want to take a look here:
Tuks DrippingPedia : Energetic Form Posts

[Pinwheel]

I'm pretty sure Raui's forum signature is of use.

[t-rex]

[Raui]

Thanks for your transmission Eric!

I'm pretty sure Raui's forum signature is of use.

It's the artistic realization of a particular canon of Bach's. See Bach: Endlessly Rising Modulation Canon (with score!) - YouTube for the particular canon. The idea is discussed in greater detail (and is where I got the idea from) in Doug Hofstader's Godel, Escher, Bach and the Eternal Golden Braid. Basically the canon changes key by the time it gets to the end of the sequence and it seemlessly blends meaning it doesn't make the song tune sound off and can continue to be played over and over with every time corresponding to a heightening of the key. Same thing with Drawing Hands by Escher with this infinite loop type situation occuring. I don't fully understand how this ties in with what Eric is saying but I do know that it does.

DanDman,
I have assembled a list of freely downloadable books, alot of which Eric has referenced, here; http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...html#post97489 It contains every single book Eric has referenced on the forum with the exception of Ernst Guillemin's Communication Networks plus some references he has referenced in his books. I stress that anyone who is reading Eric's posts should check them out especially Heaviside's Electromagnetic Induction and its Propagation.

Raui

[barbosi]

Thank you, your input is always welcome.

[Pinwheel]

@Raui

I meant your signiture...

__________________
Scribd account; raui on Scribd | Scribd

as in people are looking to see all of EPD's stuff in one spot.

[Kempis]

thanks Eric for all your transmissions

[ashtweth]

I spoke to Tom B, and heard he donated 500 to Eric, (who should just open source BTW) i heard Eric is still an angry SOB thats okay we tolerate bothers with an attitude but only for so long hope he works with the open source community soon


Ash

[lamare]

I spoke to Tom B, and heard he donated 500 to Eric, (who should just open source BTW) i heard Eric is still an angry SOB thats okay we tolerate bothers with an attitude but only for so long hope he works with the open source community soon


Ash

@Ash: Eric gave me formal permission to publish his stuff:

<snip>

And finally, there is some good news. Eric gave me official permission to republish his material:

You have my official permission to publish whatever you want so long as you do not take credit for it, or do it for profit and exclude me from the returns.

What I intend to do is to release his work under more or less the creative commons non commercial license, but add a condition that allows Eric to get the returns of any work others may add to it. I have to think about this further, but the idea is that anyone is free to copy the material and improve on it freely for non-commercial purposes, but such that a printed version can be made that still includes those voluntary additions, while the returns do go to Eric.

Also see:

http://www.energeticforum.com/161118-post502.html

<snip>

Another point is how to make sure that any money that is being made with printed versions, and I would really like to see that happen, really goes to Eric and not to someone else.

My idea would be to ask the board of "Vrijschrift.org" foundation, of which I am a board member, to take care of managing any funds that result from the sale of printed versions and to make sure Eric gets his money:

<snip>

Since Vrijschrift also hosts projects that fall within the objectives, I have already asked the board if Vrijschrift would be prepared to host a site for Eric, but we have to wait what the other board members think of this idea. I hope they agree to hosting as well as to manage a fund for Eric should we get that far, because that way we can concentrate on getting the digitization work done and won't have to worry about legal issues and/or making sure Eric gets his money if they project is as succesfull as I hope it will be.

So, this is what I'm thinking about. Any comments and feedback is welcome, of course. All I want is to do the right thing for everyone, including Eric.

So far, I haven't got any reply on my request for hosting and/or fund management, so I'm afraid this will turn out to be a dead end. Maybe Panacea can do something here?

It would be nice if someone (Panacea?) could register a domain, like ericdollard.org, and provides at least some storage space. So far, I have published the (partially) digitized versions of Dollard's work at my site, using PmWiki (See a.o. Tuks DrippingPedia : Transmission Of Electricity and the side bar) , which is very flexible and a.o. supports Latex Math notation and has a module to generate a book out of some wiki pages. Since I have only 2 GB at my server, I cannot host video material, etc. But if we could host video material somewhere else and may be also move the raw document collection ( Directory contents of /pdf/Eric_Dollard_Document_Collection/ ), I think I could host the main (PmWwiki) site without any problems.