Peter, whatever happened with Eric P. Dollard?

[Sputins]

why should

[DavidE]

???

Friends of yours Peter?

Who can you trust these days....

[boguslaw]

I don't know why you are doing this ! Bearden theories are cryptic but actually the essential part is "not killing the dipole" and that is the truth, that one statement is all what is needed from Bearden teaching.
If he is teaching that , he is the honest guy, but because he do not teach how to accomplish that effect I suppose he is controlled and cannot speak freely.
He is pointing to the correct sources and only our laziness don't allow us to read and analyse those old texts.

He is doing the same as Don Smith - hiding a lot of tips among nonsense , cryptic statements.

[Dollard, E. P. (N6KPH)]

[Slovenia]

Thank You

Hi Eric,

Thanks for sharing with us again. Coyotes are very smart fellows, they have survived incredible odds against them. You are like having Tesla himself in our midst. Just having you present with us is nice.

Best Regards,
Slovenia

[Schpankme]

[baroutologos]

Its very nice to read from a man heavily involved in Tesla's work and overunity issues.

You explanations delight me as many others i suppose concerning the scalar and wave explanations. I am not a EE neither i know about equations but i can perceive a logical explanation when i hear one ( i think)

Mr Dollard,
this site is devoted to renewable energy via unorthodox methods as Tesla alleged ways of "free energy" etc.

Is there any way of achieving free energy that is way cost efficient than solar or wind power?
If yes, Are you in possition to teach a mostly uneducated crowd (myself included) to basic methodology results oriented?

In any case i will appreciate a straight answer.

Salutes,

[amigo]

Concerning the Excitation of Electrical Waves Through Parameter Changes (Russian 1934).pdf

My Russian is a bit rusty though, anyone else can volunteer for a translation?

[amigo]

Also,

Charles Steinmetz - Elementary Lectures on Electric Discharges, Waves and Impulses.pdf

[cody]

Holy cow, Dollard is on the forum

Mr Dollard what an honor it is to see you posting here. I really hope you will consider sticking around and giving some direction to all the experimenters here. Ive soaked up all i could from the few videos of you there are and am working on a project along those lines. You said enough in the videos to give a good start for experimenters i think, and im looking forward to working with high voltage and huge circulating currents. Anyways, thanks for sharing everything you have and i hope you will consider sharing more.

Thanks
Cody

[amigo]

Hi Eric,

I've been looking at this Heaviside equation and trying to understand what you wrote but I am rather unclear on something.

Looking from the purely mathematical point of view, the Propagation Constant is supposed to be a dimensionless value, or measured per unit such as per meter.

My understanding also is that it being a complex number, j(XG-RB) is the imaginary part referring to the phase, which people generally discard?

Wouldn't that imply that what remains (RG+XB) must be dimensionless to satisfy the equal sign requirement?

But if XB is a longitudinal component, an electric wave as you stated, then it itself must also be dimensionless?

Lastly, you said that X is a reactance in Henrys per second. Are we thus assuming that it is inductive in nature (X = wL = 2pifL)?

Thanks for your attention.

[Peter Lindemann]

No Guilt by Inuendo



Eric,

It is good to see you in this thread, helping people understand some of your vast knowledge. I was, however, deeply saddened to see my name associated with the episode quoted above. As you know, I was not a party to any of these transactions. I was not present, I did not put you in contact with these people, and I had nothing to do with what happened.

It is deeply disturbing to see my name associated with this account in your post, as if I was guilty of something I knew nothing about. In my own defense, I openly state that I have never done anything to cause any harm to your person, your property, or your reputation.

On behalf of the other participants in this forum, I also hope you stay and post more. You will find many people here who deeply respect you and your work. This forum has intelligent and skillful experimenters from all over the world, eager to learn the truth. To the best of my knowledge, you know more about the real nature of electricity than anyone alive today.

I think the world would be a better place if more people knew what you know. .........Think about it.

I wish you all the best!

Peter

[morpher44]

He ain't Heaviside -- He's my bro

Eric wrote:
>Hence (RG + XB) is what is going on in the room, the disinformers have >convinced you that this whole quantity (RB + XB) is scalar, RG is the only >scalar component. It is DC and has NO FREQUENCY, no WAVELENGTH and >thus NO WAVE! SCALER = NO WAVE - GET IT???

Resistance is not always scalar actually. A true physical resistor
isn't exactly linear. The resistance is one value when hot ... another
when cold. There is actually a curve there ... but for mathematical
convenience it is made linear (within a range), not unlike
the gain in a transistor only working in a range.
I would think that most electronic components are in fact NOT
linear .. but subject to certain curved responses.

So possibly the attitude should be that EVERYTHING is non-linear ...
which of course would make you need to go to some mathematics
that are a little bit more edgy ... ala Maxwell.

So isn't the message really to OVER-TURN Heaviside.
This is a Bearden mantra.

We are now in the age of parallel processing computers ... and
non-linear algorithms are something that can be modeled
in simulation. Yeah its not easy in tools like SPICE ...
so we need better tools.

Is there a SPICE equivalent that can operate in Quaternions ... and
Maxwell's equations only?

I think the answer to the question:

"How do I make my oscillator sustain with very little energy input?"

will come from an arrangement of NON-LINEAR components ... which
operate in a bounded chaos.

This is an intuitive thought only which I cannot back up with any proof,
or experience...
Wouldn't it be cool though.
-Morpher44

[stonewater]

where to start

Eric,

I just wanted to add my debt of gratitude for all you have done. time is too short, too much to learn, I just want to build something that works. I will keep studying your work!

Tom C

[Slovenia]

Intuitive Thinker

Eric,

It is good to see you in this thread, helping people understand some of your vast knowledge. I was, however, deeply saddened to see my name associated with the episode quoted above. As you know, I was not a party to any of these transactions. I was not present, I did not put you in contact with these people, and I had nothing to do with what happened.

It is deeply disturbing to see my name associated with this account in your post, as if I was guilty of something I knew nothing about. In my own defense, I openly state that I have never done anything to cause any harm to your person, your property, or your reputation.

On behalf of the other participants in this forum, I also hope you stay and post more. You will find many people here who deeply respect you and your work. This forum has intelligent and skillful experimenters from all over the world, eager to learn the truth. To the best of my knowledge, you know more about the real nature of electricity than anyone alive today.

I think the world would be a better place if more people knew what you know. .........Think about it.

I wish you all the best!

Peter

Peter,

It's always good to hear from you. You are a very bright intuitive thinker.

We don't hear from you as much as we would like.

Best Regards,
Slovenia