Peter, whatever happened with Eric P. Dollard?

[vrand]

link to video?

/edit - is that the one Lindeman built?

Here is the 1987 Santa Barbara Borderlands, 2 hrs long video:

Free Energy Research with Eric Dollard, Peter Lindemann and Thomas Brown on Vimeo



The 15 min. AC Faraday disk design starts at 45 min. into the video. That was a Worlds first AC Faraday disk design. Maybe with modern NIB magnets, the AC voltage output would be higher than the estimated 0.5 volts?

Peter Lindemann wrote a little about that AC Faraday Disk on this thread:

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...html#post88061


Cheers Mike

[Pinwheel]

I have a D.C. transmission line, the conductors are 2 inches in
diameter, spacing is 18 feet. How many ounces of force are developed
upon a 600 foot span of this line, for the following;
1. 1000 ampere line current.
2. For 1000 KV line potential?
I am waiting.

This must mean forces between the conductors(?) and not F = Work/Distance(?)

[LtBolo]

So it sounds to me like Mr. Dollard likes poking the hornets nest. Great fun. I don't hear any actionable intel here though.

I guess I qualify as one the idiots Eric. I'm not terribly smart and most of the math goes over my head. However I am quite gifted at taking real technology and producing real products that solve real problems. Been doing that for about 20 years now and have built a very nice life for myself and my employees. When your theories have been distilled to actionable technologies, I'd love to have the discussion on how that can become a benefit to humankind and a poke in the eye to the establishment.

In the meantime, I wish you all great success in the lab. Back to lurking.

[Pinwheel]

No one yet on how many Plancks constitute a Watt-second-second. Where is
an understandable quantity of this dimensional relation? Look at laser
light on white surface, notice all the tiny little Plancks? Well?

How many Plancks are in a Watt-second-second?

Well, a Planck per second is a joule. And a watt second is a joule...

Let me remind everybody that I would probably (likely) fail a high school math course if I were to take one... (not joking)

so... I'm left with 1 per second. Q/sec.

No?

I didn't do the laser part.

[Pinwheel]

link to video?

/edit - is that the one Lindeman built?

[vrand]

Hi Eric

Can you please suggest a simple experiment/device where we can build a free energy device to power our homes and cars? Around 10 kw power output?

Cheers Mike

Here is Eric's reply on his Yahoo egroup n6kph forum:
n6kph : N6KPH

Thank you Eric

Cheers Mike




>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

From: Eric Dollard
Sent: Friday, September 30, 2011 1:55 PM
To: [email protected]

[vrand]

Hi Eric

Can you please suggest a simple experiment/device where we can build a free energy device to power our homes and cars? Around 10 kw power output?

Cheers Mike

[t-rex]

[lamare]

Hi all,

I managed to disprove Einstein's relativity theory once and for all:
Tuks DrippingPedia : Ruins 96 Years Einstein Relativity

Last week the newspapers were filled with the discovery of "impossible" particles traveling faster than the speed of light. A month ago an "impossible" star was discovered and earlier the Pioneer space probes also refused to adhere to the law. This way, the scientific establishment will slowly but surely be forced to return to reality, the reality of the existence of a real, physical ether with fluid-like properties. The inevitable result of that will be that Einstein's relativity theory will go down in the history books as one of the biggest fallacies ever brought forth by science. In the future they will look back to relativity with equal disbelief as to the "Earth is flat" concept. The relativity theory not only goes against common sense, as Tesla already said in 1932, a fundamental thinking error has been made by Maxwell in his equations. This eventually lead to the erroneous relativity theory, as is proven in this article. It is therefore no exaggeration to state that the scientific establishment is going to have a religious experience.

This article has been published in Dutch on a few websites and an interview with me was published in a regional newspaper read by about 300.000 people about this.

Of course I referred to Eric's work in the article and I refer to this forum as "peer review"

Hopefully, the next stop will be the Keiser Report on RT:
Twitter

Keeping my fingers crossed...

Update: Now also posted on BeforeItsNews:
Before It's News - Electrical Engineer disproves Einsteins Relativity Theory

Please don't hesitate to comment there and may be return a couple of times (or use the F5 button) to increase popularity

[LtBolo]

@Pinwheel

It was our own design, based strictly on finding the most convenient method to alter inductance synchronously.

The first major revelation was that it took a *decrease* in inductance to cause an *increase* in current. Many had stated that it was an *increase* of inductance for an *increase* in current. Of course for a given amount of energy, that is exactly what you would expect...current must go up if inductance goes down. Obviously there must be some gain there, or the system would not ramp up to high power levels.

The second major revelation was that mechanically reducing inductance takes work, and work isn't your friend. From what we could tell, we were heading toward unity at best.

I had actually dug through the Russian document at the time and had already concluded that their motor was loading like ours. They were not using a ferrous core, so my guess is the parameter change mechanism is a magnetic field in the rotor created by eddy currents. Aluminum simply wouldn't provide enough of a permeability change to alter the inductance much. The aluminum would be very happy to oppose the magnetic field in the inductors via it's own field though. I don't have proof of that, but their statement that they were unable to go to higher current due to the motor limitation was a big clue. Magnetic damping gets bad fast.

It's clear that synchronous parameter change can be used to produce energy, and it may even be possible to do it without an offsetting bit of mechanical work...however...I suspect that it will require parameter change in some kind of light speed scenario. Meaning that the real answer to power synthesis is not directly in parameter change, but is in some kind of quadrant manipulation that shifts the action/reaction to 90 or 0 degrees instead of 180.

Resonant solenoids are standing wave devices where the operating frequency is inherently related to speed of light (if correctly tuned), whereas LC resonances are not necessarily so. As such, I suspect that the answer will not be found in the simple LC, but in the coil. I feel that the C implicit in the coil is not symmetrical, and that the asymmetry manifests increasingly as the standing wave amplitude increases. That may provide the parameter change in a quadrant friendly way, and if that is true, the coil may exhibit gain by parameter change without any external intervention other than normal excitation. Since the coil would be gaining energy during a portion of the cycle, and giving it back during the other, it would have to be externally harnessed and would not have the potential for internal runaway. A dual coil arrangement would offer the possibility of a runaway, if it could be phased correctly.

It is my hope that EPD is moving in the direction of eventually reducing the theory to 'when A, B, and C are true, reaction-less energy production D occurs'. My gut tells me the math will bear that out, but applications are our focus here, not theory.

[Pinwheel]

@LtBolo

Your variable induction parameter machine - was it your own build or was it an attempted replication of what is in the Russian paper? I thought I saw that you were building it before we had the English translation.

[Pinwheel]

The Big Bong Theory!

[t-rex]

[LtBolo]

Transmission received. Previous post has been removed for inciting violence ...
Please don't equate a lack of response to a lack of interest. Lamare, myself and I'm sure others have been diligently compiling what we can of your work, Lamare especially has done a lot in this area. This is his internet archive of your work if your in need of any copies for whatever reason

Directory contents of /pdf/Eric_Dollard_Document_Collection/

I definitely agree we're straying way off topic. People looking for a convenient filter can simply look for the T-Rex posts specifically, but perhaps we can contain the intervening discussion to Eric's theories specifically ... Also, the above document collection is a good place to start if anyone wants to get up to speed and save Eric some typing ...

Looking forward to the next T-Rex transmission

I'm not sure if EPD's comments were directed at my post or not, nor am I sure if yours is. I will say that my comments were offered in complete sincerity, and unlike much of what has been posted here, is based on much lab time and even more thought time.

Unlike many that post here, I have actually built a functional inductive parametric generator, and was able to power a load with it. The Mandelstam paper has been cited by several as proof that such a generator will 'synthesize' energy. That was not our experience, as the energy manifested was clearly offset by an increase in load on the drive motor. I think that was also borne out in the paper itself though, when on page 25 of the English translation of the paper, the author suggests that they were not able to increase the current output above 5A due in part to the drive motor capacity. That tells me that they too saw the motor load increasing with the output.

While that doesn't invalidate any of EPD's theories, it does suggest that the problem of 'synthesizing' power isn't simply related to synchronous parameter change alone. While parameter change may be capable of solving this, there is clearly more to the problem. If EPD has solved the full problem, I haven't yet seen the presentation that quantifies that. It is my hope that his recent postings are moving in that direction.

In my prior posting, I attempted to build a case, albeit clumsily perhaps, for a resonant solenoid to reach a point where the coil's internal capacity reaches what is effectively a saturation point, and in doing so will result in what amounts to a synchronously varying capacitance. I hardly consider that to be off-topic, as if true, would support the notion that the Magnifying Transmitter truly was 'magnifying' and its gain came from a capacitive parameter variation.

If any here would like to have that discussion, I would certainly love to as well. If you consider that a disruption, I will keep it to myself.

[MJL]

Information Overload

Transmission received. Previous post has been removed for inciting violence ...
Please don't equate a lack of response to a lack of interest. Lamare, myself and I'm sure others have been diligently compiling what we can of your work, Lamare especially has done a lot in this area. This is his internet archive of your work if your in need of any copies for whatever reason

Directory contents of /pdf/Eric_Dollard_Document_Collection/

I definitely agree we're straying way off topic. People looking for a convenient filter can simply look for the T-Rex posts specifically, but perhaps we can contain the intervening discussion to Eric's theories specifically ... Also, the above document collection is a good place to start if anyone wants to get up to speed and save Eric some typing ...

Looking forward to the next T-Rex transmission