Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Peter, whatever happened with Eric P. Dollard?

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Raui
    replied
    Originally posted by Pinwheel View Post
    So much drama, so little results.

    I think I'm joining the camp that acknowledges that the technology is dead. The bad guys won. Our champion is a crazy person. All is lost. This is not an awakening or some sort of revolutionary 2012 meme Morning Dawn. The bad guys won very thoroughly.

    Plan B would be an escape plan rather than the prevention plan that would appear to be plan A.

    Perhaps it was just my own misconception that made me think everyone was all about plan A. I have to readjust my own paradigm to realize that the strategy is about escape from captivity. "Operation Triage" - stop the hemorrhaging and treat the very worst first. Leave the dead.

    I see little to no evidence that the members of this group will be able to capitalize on EPD's communications so as to come up with a device or even a thorough understanding of the theory. EPD's ability to even communicate is really substandard. Imagine you sent your kid to school to learn pre-calculus but the catch is that he/she has to learn this somewhat advanced subject via the exact same way that the 5 dozen or so of us are supposed to be learning arcane and extinct, actively suppressed, and dead technologies. Your child would not learn pre-calculus would he/she? You wouldn't even blame them.

    But we're supposed to figure out aforementioned dead technology (with aforementioned active suppression) via this method of spotty and exclusively 1 way transmissions? I would hazard a guess that one way Morse Code that we were supposed to pick up during our dreams would be about as effective. It's a joke. Learning isn't just data availability - it's also facilitation of that data. That's why your school staff is called a "Faculty". EPD is actually incapable of effective data facilitation as it pertains to this current medium.

    Perhaps I'm just in a depressed mood after reading the nonsense in the Yahoo group (which I unsubscribed from), but I find the over all scope of what I see here to be lame. I feel it prudent to acknowledge failure and move on to plan B. Cut your losses. Help EPD finish any valuable communications while he still has coherence (triage). Plan for escape from tyranny rather then the revolutionary 2012 blabla overthrow meme. Maybe in 30 years somebody will be able to have some very preliminary results.
    Each to their own, but I feel your roll over and die attitude won't get you far. What we are trying to do IS 'escape from captivity' as you put it and just because you don't see results straight away does not mean nothing is happening. Trees don't grow overnight and our intelligence grows in the same way as a tree grows, slowly and with care. If your not willing to invest time into this you will never see fruits for your labor.

    I do agree that we need to get a 2 way flow of information for us to learn correctly though, in the same way as living things don't live by only breathing in we don't learn without feedback. You don't need Eric for feedback though, it is very likely that if you actually read the publications Eric references to your understanding about what Eric is trying to portray would be better than what it is now and Internet Archive: Digital Library of Free Books, Movies, Music & Wayback Machine is as far as you'll need to go to get just about every one of these. There is a lot going on behind the scenes where a group of us are trying to correct the situation somewhat but for the time being Eric has said that if you write him a letter he will respond but it seems you've already made your mind up..

    Raui

    Leave a comment:


  • Aether
    replied
    Please, speak for yourself and not myself! Honestly though, the information is there, pioneered by all the men Eric has referenced, it is all a matter of dedicating your time to it to understand what has already been established so long ago, being negative will only lead to one result. Do the work! Nothing is free.
    Last edited by Aether; 11-12-2011, 07:51 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pinwheel
    replied
    So much drama, so little results.

    I think I'm joining the camp that acknowledges that the technology is dead. The bad guys won. Our champion is a crazy person. All is lost. This is not an awakening or some sort of revolutionary 2012 meme Morning Dawn. The bad guys won very thoroughly.

    Plan B would be an escape plan rather than the prevention plan that would appear to be plan A.

    Perhaps it was just my own misconception that made me think everyone was all about plan A. I have to readjust my own paradigm to realize that the strategy is about escape from captivity. "Operation Triage" - stop the hemorrhaging and treat the very worst first. Leave the dead.

    I see little to no evidence that the members of this group will be able to capitalize on EPD's communications so as to come up with a device or even a thorough understanding of the theory. EPD's ability to even communicate is really substandard. Imagine you sent your kid to school to learn pre-calculus but the catch is that he/she has to learn this somewhat advanced subject via the exact same way that the 5 dozen or so of us are supposed to be learning arcane and extinct, actively suppressed, and dead technologies. Your child would not learn pre-calculus would he/she? You wouldn't even blame them.

    But we're supposed to figure out aforementioned dead technology (with aforementioned active suppression) via this method of spotty and exclusively 1 way transmissions? I would hazard a guess that one way Morse Code that we were supposed to pick up during our dreams would be about as effective. It's a joke. Learning isn't just data availability - it's also facilitation of that data. That's why your school staff is called a "Faculty". EPD is actually incapable of effective data facilitation as it pertains to this current medium.

    Perhaps I'm just in a depressed mood after reading the nonsense in the Yahoo group (which I unsubscribed from), but I find the over all scope of what I see here to be lame. I feel it prudent to acknowledge failure and move on to plan B. Cut your losses. Help EPD finish any valuable communications while he still has coherence (triage). Plan for escape from tyranny rather then the revolutionary 2012 blabla overthrow meme. Maybe in 30 years somebody will be able to have some very preliminary results.

    Leave a comment:


  • tao
    replied

    I made this image to show in better detail, what I was getting at with my prior post.


    edit: I updated the image...


    Last edited by tao; 11-11-2011, 05:32 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • tao
    replied
    Further parameter variations...




    An INCREASING INDUCTANCE OVER TIME is akin to a POSITIVE RESISTANCE
    increasing dL/dt = R

    A DECREASING INDUCTANCE OVER TIME is akin to a NEGATIVE RESISTANCE
    decreasing dL/dt = -R

    An INCREASING CAPACITANCE OVER TIME is akin to a POSITIVE CONDUCTANCE
    increasing dC/dt = G

    A DECREASING CAPACITANCE OVER TIME is akin to a NEGATIVE CONDUCTANCE
    decreasing dC/dt = -G


    Taking these much further...

    Depending on the 'structure'/'shape' of the 'variations' in inductance and capacitance, you can produce many more relations.

    For instance...

    The second derivative of inductance L is akin to an ELASTANCE (inverse of capacitance).
    d2L/dt2 = 1/C
    so, an increasing d2L/dt2 = 1/C, a positive ELASTANCE
    and a decreasing d2L/dt2 = -1/C, a negative ELASTANCE

    Taking it further...

    The third derivative of inductance L is akin to CAPACITIVE REACTANCE (ELASTANCE OVER TIME).
    d3L/dt3 = 1/C*t = XC
    so, an increasing d3L/dt3 = XC , a positive capacitive reactance
    and a decreasing d3L/dt3 = -XC, a negative capacitive reactance


    If it helps, you can view/relate the second and third derivatives in terms of motional physics. The second derivative could be viewed as the 'acceleration' of the inductance L, and the third derivative could be viewed as the 'jump/jerk' of the inductance L, and of course, the first derivativee of the inductance L could be viewed as the 'velocity' of L.

    One interesting note, when upon pondering the above, you find that L could be considered the 'seat' or 'core' of all these parameter variations, and that, resistance, conductance, capacitance, elastance, etc can be viewed as CHANGES in L with respect to time, I find that rather interesting. Not only that, but that ELASTANCE fits more NICELY with the 'natural progression' in the complex changes in L with respect to time than does CAPACITANCE.

    There are many other relations that can be made, whether ultimately correct or not, is still a work in progress.

    Any insights would be fruitful Eric.

    Thanks.
    Last edited by tao; 11-08-2011, 07:53 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Kokomoj0
    replied
    Thanks FH,

    and someone wanted to know about prof wheatstones 288mps, it appears he was discharging a leyden jar over a 1/2 mile long wire.

    So hie measurement would be the speed of static electricity.




    The papers of Joseph Henry - Joseph Henry, Nathan Reingold - Google Books
    Last edited by Kokomoj0; 11-07-2011, 04:16 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Farmhand
    replied
    Originally posted by Kokomoj0 View Post
    Nice paper though if I am putting this together correctly it does not appear as if they paid particular attention to insuring 1/4wave resonance, good grounding, tuning etc? Do you know what frequency the tesla tower was intended to operate at that he felt he could transmit power any distance? Exponential transmission loss is not a very good showing.

    Is this moon shot really going to take place? I would be very interested in the set up etc.
    On the frequency I found this, it says about 25 Khz tops, no shorter.


    Uploaded with ImageShack.us

    Cheers

    Leave a comment:


  • Kokomoj0
    replied
    Nice paper though if I am putting this together correctly it does not appear as if they paid particular attention to insuring 1/4wave resonance, good grounding, tuning etc? Do you know what frequency the tesla tower was intended to operate at that he felt he could transmit power any distance? Exponential transmission loss is not a very good showing.

    Is this moon shot really going to take place? I would be very interested in the set up etc.

    Leave a comment:


  • lamare
    replied
    Originally posted by hoggel View Post
    has the discussion moved elsewhere? or why is it so quiet in here?....just wondering.
    I'm kind of busy with other things. It crossed my mind that indeed the propagation speed of longitudinal waves as well as the static electric field is pi/2 x c, and therefore a longitudinal moon bounce would be THE final blow against the great Einsteinan lie:


    So, I theorized a bit further on that idea and started contacting radio amateurs. Now I have an interesting discussion on the forum of a Dutch association of radio amateurs:
    Zendamateur.COM - Toon onderwerp - Wie voert de eerste longitudinale moon-bounce uit??

    It would be so cool if we could pull this off. It ain't a ride in the park, but I'm sure it can and will be done. It is just a question of time before someone pulls this off.

    Last edited by lamare; 11-05-2011, 06:58 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • viruskiller
    replied
    Message for Mister Lindemann

    Hello, Mr lindemann,

    I want to know, where i can have plans of the tesla coil on your book secret of cold electricity. Eric dollard don't sell the plans.

    Because, I search to reproduct this coil.

    Thank you.

    Leave a comment:


  • Web000x
    replied
    Originally posted by hoggel View Post
    has the discussion moved elsewhere? or why is it so quiet in here?....just wondering.
    I am reading everything that is posted and would love to spend my time discussing. But I'm busy building a synchronous belt driven power generation setup. I will have two alternators with pulleys of different ratios driving them so that I may investigate Eric's suggestion of using magamps for energy synthesis. I have pulleys for the alternators at a 2/1 and 3/1 ratio so that I may look into modulated an Alexanderson magamp at 2nd and 3rd harmonic. Eric told me that modulation at the 2nd harmonic represents power and at the 3rd harmonic represents energy. I shall investigate and report my findings.


    Dave

    Leave a comment:


  • hoggel
    replied
    has the discussion moved elsewhere? or why is it so quiet in here?....just wondering.

    Leave a comment:


  • Aether
    replied
    Originally posted by Raui View Post
    @All,
    Also I have looked high and low for a chapter in Electric Discharges, Waves and Impulses and cannot find a section on Velocity Measure but I can swear I have seen it before. I have looked in a lot of his other works and cannot find it either. Does anybody have a copy of the edition with this chapter in it?

    Raui
    After doing a quick search on google I found this:

    Lectures on Electrical Engineering - Charles Proteus Steinmetz - Google Books

    Which is in the Chapter "Line Oscillations" in Electric Discharges, Waves and Impulses on pg 83.

    Leave a comment:


  • t-rex
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • KurtNalty
    replied
    Online Equation Typesetter

    Thanks for the link to the online equation typsetter.

    In the meanwhile, I've posted a PDF for the math at

    Attached Files
    Last edited by KurtNalty; 11-01-2011, 07:56 PM. Reason: Added equations in PNG format as attachments

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X