Extrapolation of dialectricity and the now discovered magnetic polar vortex in perman

[TheoriaApophasis]

. It was JJ Thompson who discovered and theorized the existence of one type of charge (the electron) which is a "corpuscle of electricity"

Thomson RESOUNDINGLY rejected the notion of the electron = particle for a LONG TIME until his fame of his "discovery" forced him to concede to same.

. Everyone from Steinmetz to Heaviside used the concept, EVEN Tesla!

NOPE, Wrong.......Tesla USED the term "electron" however (like Dollard) he utterly did NOT in any way make reference to same as a 'particle' or a 'charge mediator point/particle'.


Suggest you look HERE for illumination:
The Electron

. Motion of "charge" is magnetism, stationary accumulation of charges is electrostatics,

NOPE, there is no such entity as a "stationary field" or charge. It doesnt exist anywhere in nature.

dielectricity, or the centripetal inertial plane, same as the circular divergent centrifugal (and centripetal on return) magnetic field are always in motion, and pressure equalization.


You lack a fundamental understanding of magnetism, but that is OK, most people are in the same boat. Magnetism nowhere ever has existed BY ITSELF, rather only attributionally to a mass, in the magneto-dilelectric inter-atomic, or in the case of Dielectro-electromagnetism (or conventionally and wrongly thought of as TEM).

Flush any notion of a "stationary charge" from your mind. No such Unicorn exists. Period.

[TheoriaApophasis]

Your concept of electricity actually goes against Eric Dollard's theories, which requires there to be charge for electric and magnetic fields to exist

That is a unique claim, however there is no such evidence, nor do I anywhere "go against Dollard's theories"......however HIS theories are condensations of the theories of the "gods of electricity" Tesla, Steinmetz, Heaviside etc etc........ with many additions of course.

Ive stated ENDLESSLY in my book that a "magnet" isnt a magnet, rather a dielectric 'object'....... I suggest you read it. www.kathodos.com/magnetism.pdf

Magnetism is the termination OF electricity OR (resultantly THRU) conjugate to dielectricity in the inter-atomic.
There isn't even 1% difference in what I state in my book on magnetism that is different from what Dollard himself states.

IN FACT it reinforces it, gives it MUCH BROADER insight (as per magnetism specifically). So, your statement only proves you have neither read my book NOR compared it to Dollards works.

for which Eric Dollard's half-baked "theory" is based upon.

I am afraid you have no "cred" (much less evidences) to make such a hyperbolic and absurd statement.

Energy is not the same as electricity: charge moves in insulators and conductors,

You are confusing Energy, tension, and induction, and Force, and Field-pressures with "energy"
Charges and induction are utterly MASS FREE,.... magnetic induction (over time, as attributional to a field) has nothing to do with insulators or "conductors".

INDUCING a charge, and having the magnetic induction present FOR A (potential) charge are two diff. things.

"insulators and conductors" are FIELD boundary plane reflectors and capacitant materials for focusing and directing charges which are just a conceptual reification in speaking about field-modality interactions.

but energy moves outside the wire, or more precisely between bounding conductors of the circuital loop.

Electrification as the product of magnetism and dielectricity "moves between the wires" yes.

Loop?......Nope, dielectricity , or the dielectric inertial plane in a "magnet" is centripetal and radial. there is no "loop"
NOR are there same in longitudinal waves. LOOP is a spatial construct and rectification of field pressure boundaries.

Generally, charge is considered as being "carried" by certain atomic particles or molecules.

"GENERALLY" people believe in angels and old men sitting on a throne in the sky. This is a bandwagon fallacy.
Your position (as is easily deduced) pure Greek Atomism, or atomistic.

Energy is a MASS/PARTICLE free principle of field pressures and conjugate inductions. There are no "particles" mediating INSTANT induction at a distance, MUCH LESS in particle free space.
It is possible (however insanely difficult) to beam a TERAWATT from space to the surface of the moon and bake the ever loving HELL out of "X"

This, of course,......has nothing at all to do with "unicorn" "charged" particles.

[TheoriaApophasis]

*accidental duplicate post

[mikrovolt]

Often time a planetary alignment affects the flux around the earth.
The dielectric field could be modeled. you can drag the earth around and see the time and date.

Solar System Scope

[TheoriaApophasis]

Often time a planetary alignment affects the flux around the earth.
The dielectric field could be modeled. you can drag the earth around and see the time and date.

Solar System Scope

Eric Dollard talks about this in his video , and how RCA was buggered to understand why there were transmission line issues etc etc during certainly planetary alignments.


just like lining up magnetic fields in phase, only dielectric, OR a combo of both.

[mikrovolt]

Yes the magnets alignment is important. This is why I mention detaching snap of flux lines and lightning that there is mathematical basis.

Looking at the solar system you can see that as saturn moves a distance away from earth that we begin to see lightning strikes in higher elevations, for example in Colorado rocky mountain state park.

As flux lines detach and the earth get into a clearing the natural flowering of the polar vortex begins. We should experience cooler nights. Also as we get another view of the cosmic inductor phenomena in evacuated globes hope we can see formation of a one dimentional plane that cuts hemispheres.

[TheoriaApophasis]

Yes the magnets alignment is important. This is why I mention detaching snap of flux lines and lightning that there is mathematical basis.

Looking at the solar system you can see that as saturn moves a distance away from earth that we begin to see lightning strikes in higher elevations, for example in Colorado rocky mountain state park.

As flux lines detach and the earth get into a clearing the natural flowering of the polar vortex begins. We should experience cooler nights. Also as we get another view of the cosmic inductor phenomena in evacuated globes hope we can see formation of a one dimentional plane that cuts hemispheres.

true true, but most of it is driven by dielectricity.


As discovered, in any "perfect" magnet, its 3.23606 units of dielectricity to 1 part magnetism.




Quantum nonsense and relativity have ruined the past 80 years of what COULD have been genuine discovery and insight into electricity.


Now we have "unicorn" 'virtual particles' as explanations for "how things work"

and how fields work.


and by explanations, I mean BS

[Kokomoj0]

true true, but most of it is driven by dielectricity.


As discovered, in any "perfect" magnet, its 3.23606 units of dielectricity to 1 part magnetism.




Quantum nonsense and relativity have ruined the past 80 years of what COULD have been genuine discovery and insight into electricity.


Now we have "unicorn" 'virtual particles' as explanations for "how things work"

and how fields work.


and by explanations, I mean BS

these vortex experiments really need to be done with 'only' bubbles to be conclusive

[TheoriaApophasis]

these vortex experiments really need to be done with 'only' bubbles to be conclusive

Ive got 12 diff testing methods that have NOTHING to do with zapping a magnet.

I have and use suspensions, ferrofluid lenses, lasers with beam splitters

Well, I wrote the last section on the missing secret of TEM, which is NOT (entirely) electromagnetic, but has a Z axis radial dielectric. I wrote that section for a reason based upon Heavisides implications on the genuine nature of light. However even he didnt ever "get it".


We have established a "device" using 3 to 6 wavelength lasers (I will not specify) but here is ONE channel at a wavelength of 635 nm , and only snapshots off a video,.....NO VIDEO will be posted (I will not post it until things are locked in).

Nobody here can/will figure out how the device works since it uses a good bit of equipment ;D, splitter, a special lens, XXXXX, and yes, (obviously) a special spinning prism

But, suffice to say, I can reproduce (obviously using lasers) the magneto-dielectric field of a strong magnet in some amazing details.

It still blows my mind to see a laser, a single channel form a vortex as it 'paints' the field within which the magnetism of the magnet displaces the dielectric component of light, or along the dielectric where the magnetism is torn asunder in the light

This is ONE device out of 5 nobody ANYWHERE (except for 3 of us) has ever seen before to show magnetic field reciprocation, and using ALL channels, easily shows the dielectric, the centripetal and centrifugal 'working' together as you twist the magnet, and move the broadcast beams.

















Also---------


See HIS videos here that I inspired:

See last 7 videos he made

https://www.youtube.com/user/TinManPower/videos

[madhatter]

Someone needs to ask Dollard what is emitted from either pole of a magnet in that demonstration video.


Dielectric vortex?

its certainly not magnetic

Oxygen is paramagnetic, what you're seeing is simple physics.

[TheoriaApophasis]

Oxygen is paramagnetic, what you're seeing is simple physics.

descriptions are NOT explanations



Yeah, they say MAGNETISM is "simple" , ....


but nobody on earth explained what magnetism IS until I wrote the book on same.


sounds egotistical? Maybe it is,........its also accurate.