Eric P. Dollard

[David G Dawson]

Various

Gabriel Kron 'Tensors For Circuits:

Tensors for Circuits : Gabriel Kron : Free Download & Streaming : Internet Archive

[Nhopa]

Testing the secondary

Thank you "jake" I much appreciate your help, Nhopa.

[David G Dawson]

TMT Math

A confirmation that the Secondary and Extra are nearly of the same length as I am attempting to inform everyone:

TESLA METAMORPHOSIS , Tesla Healing Metamorphosis, Tesla Light Body Metamorphosis, Anya Petrovic, Nikola Tesla, free energy, Anja Petrovic, Tesla metamorfoza zdravlja, Tesla metamorfoza svetlosnog tela

http://users.beotel.net/~gmarjanovic/Tesla_waves.pdf

George Van Tassel:
Interesting video but all I came away with was the size of the Armature being 57' as the picture was removed from his hands by the Interviewer so that he could not explain further and was more interested in the sensationalism aspect.
This is where I came to the conclusion that this armature which is not a wheel type but more a track type would be rotating at 404.59 Hz to keep in synchronism with the Earth's rotation.
Would that be correct?

Unconventional physics

ZPEnergy.com - Does free energy couple at 400hz?

Have been collecting detail on the Integratron for quite some time as it would make an ideal replication subject.
Would like to know more about the Armature but very little information is available.
I have been keeping a Fisher & Paykel washing machine Armature and electronics here as it would make a good working base with modification as it would be of a similar design.
I believe this rotation is what George was referring to in the Video when he explained seeing the old TV shows from his 'Time Machine' that they were experimenting with in Chicago.
All of the above information should be of some value with regard to the CRI.

It might be just that easy to see a wheel being rotated at that frequency with an active spark gap operating across some 60 electromagnets (see the spikes that stick out from the middle structure of the Integratron) - TV reruns anyone?

Smokey

[Armagdn03]

This may be of some help to people who have the equipment to see.

A while back I was researching "eccentric transformers" where the windings are wound about separate centers. This fit in nicely with some work Dr. Stiffler was doing with his SEC technology and we explored this on a private forum for a while.

Something very important was found after looking at dozens of coils.

Say you have two coils, different physical dimensions, but same quarter wave resonance. Throw these onto a spectrum analyzer and take note of the "harmonic family". Like most would expect there will be the usual multiples of the fundamental, but there will also be peaks which are NOT expected. These can differ depending on geometry. These can even be confusing because they may not easily mathematically relate to the fundamental....what are they? Where do they come from?

Two coils, supposedly identical in terms of fundamental,, display very different responses in the frequency domain, with unexpected responses.

Dr. Stiffler eventually discovered that the strange peaks were harmonically related to the 1.094 Mhz Meter value given by researcher Frank Znidarsic. This is the relation where the phonon, and photon travel with the same speed within the nuclear structure. It is a zone where the sound and light converge. This is obviously on a micro scale, but there is no reason to believe that this cannot be done macroscopically.

What it looks like, is that Frank outlined the theory, and Dr Stiffler successfully (though from a separate path) developed technology which takes advantage of the observations. Dr. Stiffler wrote a paper on the subject showing his coils matching the 1.094mhz meters multiplier to a very high a accuracy (I believe it was less than one percent error). I promised I would never give this paper out per the good Dr's request, but interesting none the less.

[madhatter]

To address the need for a field display generated by a program for the L,M,C & K. There are a few program solvers that may be able to do this unfortunately they are hyper expensive. The shareware programs only display false color images for magnetic field intensity based on current, no electrostatic fields or charge lines.

I have some field solvers but they do not display a graphical result.

I do wonder how accurate the 'field' display is to begin with. It's assumed to be 'free space' due to it's interaction, it may be in counter-space and only manifest in the presence of a conductor or director.

[OrionLightShip]

Purely Electrostatic Displacement Wave

Eric, could you please weigh in on this.

[jake]

KVOS Webster Reports: The Extraordinary Equation of George Van Tassel - YouTube

In this video George Van Tassel speaking about his experiences with Aliens at the Integratron. This is an extension of what I've been talking about.

73 DE N6KPH

Van Tassel said F=1/T


By JasterMake at 2012-05-24

SQRT(LC)=T=1/F
Hhmmmm

[t-rex]

Orion, LS

The Tesla Transformer is only a component, such as a resistor or condenser. A simple condenser can force an A.C. wave out of existence, but it can also magnify it to enormous magnitudes. The Tesla Transformer is an impedance to admittance converter. It can also be a phase converter from conventional bi phasic currents to, or from, monophasic currents.

A dielectric translation through space is not a wave. Ultimately it is uni-directional, no magnetic field is expected. See the writings of Vassilatos in "Secrets of Cold War Technology", the Tesla chapter.

The longitudinal analog network that I made known can do some of what the Tesla Transformer can. Later on I came up with a more advanced plan resulting in a complete lumped component network equivalent of a mono-polar transforming Tesla Transformer but that work is now lost. Mutual Inductance is the major complication, as has been recently discussed here. For the most part a simple series resonant circuit of very large inductance and minimal capacitance will produce the results sought after in a specific engineering application. This series circuit, a form of M/C network must be driven by a constant potential source of negligible internal impedance in order to get full magnification and rise in output potential. It can be dangerous.

73 DE N6KPH

[t-rex]

Madhatter,

Faraday did not have a computer and knew not of volts and amps. But Faraday did have iron powder. Something like Lycodium powder was used for the dielectric, see dust types of Lichtenburg patterns. A current based program is fine, 100 amps, one fourth inch, 3 inch spacing, one for opposing, another for aiding. Through the cross products of L/K and C/M the equipotential lines are defining the dielectric lines. This can be seen in the figures thus far provided. A field map can also be integrated from magnetic and dielectric compasses. Maxwell describes field mapping in his book.

73 DE N6KPH

[t-rex]

Integratron

After looking at Van Tassel talk on the old black and white, my interest is a bit renewed in this enigmatic apparatus.

I had spent 2 years in the direct study of the Van Tassel Integratron, from a hands on position. Lockwood and myself had managed to restore the installation which Van Tassel operated in Landers, California. It was brought back into the form in which it existed at the time of Van Tassel's death in 1978. His second wife Doris furiously opposed our efforts for some reason and they say "she killed George". By good fortune his son in law, Daniel Boone, who was present at the visitation by the E.T., was very helpful. I had developed the notion that providence provided the union of E.P. Dollard and D. Boone in order to bring the Integratron to life (about 1984). Other people had a different plan so now it is just another conspiracy story at best. Today the installation is disfigured, all technical apparatus gone, and operates as a self worship temple for the "divine Sheva". So what is new, just like RCA Bolinas, etc.

The Integratron operated in the following manner:
Three basic components made up the Integratron.
1) A rotating Di-Rod electrostatic generator which encircled the main deck of the Integratron the projecting aluminum studs are the parametric condensers to energize it, 100 Kilovolts DC out.

2) An electro static condenser consisting of a large wooden hemisphere with an interior aluminum leaving. This was charged to 100 Kv.

3) A large Caduceus transformer of flat spiral form wound upon the ceiling of the transformer, or lower deck.

The armature was to be driven by compressed air rolling on a massive integral roller bearing of teflon rollers and races.

Because compressed air can be sent through pipes of dielectric material this served not only motive power but also control air. Four air driven mechanical switches around the periphery alternately engaged the charged dome and the transformer windings. The opposite ends of the windings capacitively terminated on a hollow central core where a special network would be lowered into it from the main deck above. Four spark gaps outside collected from the rotor/dome and sparked to the air controlled switches. The entire network operated with a space hysteresis angle of Pi over eight radians (22.5 degree) or a 16th order versor.

Break, more to follow

[Nhopa]

Extra coil tuning

Data provided as requested by Eric.
Extra coil was made for 20 turn secondary for 1,188 Kc.
Extra coil dia. 26 cm
N=124.25 turns
Wounding height 19 cm
Wire #25 AWG, .0184" dia
These are the results using Eric's recommended tuning setup.
Function generator Wavetek FG2 A, set to 1M sine wave
Universal counter Wavetek UC 10A
1. Variable air capacitor set at 14 pF (low end value of capacitor)
Can 5 cm from end of coil 912 Kc 95 uA
Can 10 cm from end of coil 922 Kc 74 uA
Can 20 cm from end of coil 932 Kc 42 uA
2. Variable air capacitor set at 50 pF
Can 5 cm from end of coil 853 Kc 100+ uA
Can 10 cm from end of coil 870 Kc 90 uA
Can 20 cm from end of coil 886 Kc 55 uA
2. Omitted air capacitor, function generator direct connected to beginning of
extra coil
Can 5 cm from end of coil 802 Kc 100+ uA
Can 10 cm from end of coil 822 Kc 92 uA
Can 20 cm from end of coil 840 Kc 60 uA
Due to the coil frame construction, the closest I could get to the coil free end with the can was 5 cm.
Also note that using the ground connection did not make any difference in the readings. So the question is what do all these data mean?

Next I will attempt to tune the secondary coil. The secondary coil is 20 turns designed for 1,188 Kc.
Coil is 62 cm dia., wire used is about #17 AWG, .048" dia., coil height 6 cm. I have about 4 cm between the top of primary and the bottom of the secondary, since the instrument's impedance is 50 Ohms I will wound a 1 turn test coil in this space. What dia wire should I use for the test coil?Should I remove the primary prior to testing?
Eric recommended glass and copper for the primary's capacitor. Would polypropylene be acceptable in lieu of glass?

[madhatter]

Madhatter,

Faraday did not have a computer and knew not of volts and amps. But Faraday did have iron powder. Something like Lycodium powder was used for the dielectric, see dust types of Lichtenburg patterns. A current based program is fine, 100 amps, one fourth inch, 3 inch spacing, one for opposing, another for aiding. Through the cross products of L/K and C/M the equipotential lines are defining the dielectric lines. This can be seen in the figures thus far provided. A field map can also be integrated from magnetic and dielectric compasses. Maxwell describes field mapping in his book.

73 DE N6KPH

oh yes, the very useful Lycopodium powder, great for 'flash' 'bangs' too high fat content.

The fields can be modeled well enough, although I like the option of a hands on approach. The dielectric charge in free space would be possible, I do wonder though if inferring the magnetic field in free space is truly correct; without a differential conductor present. computer generated fields are only as good as the equations that drive them and of the few I've used they can vary and conflict.

I'll try and put something together this weekend.

[madhatter]

Integratron

After looking at Van Tassel talk on the old black and white, my interest is a bit renewed in this enigmatic apparatus.

I had spent 2 years in the direct study of the Van Tassel Integratron, from a hands on position. Lockwood and myself had managed to restore the installation which Van Tassel operated in Landers, California. It was brought back into the form in which it existed at the time of Van Tassel's death in 1978. His second wife Doris furiously opposed our efforts for some reason and they say "she killed George". By good fortune his son in law, Daniel Boone, who was present at the visitation by the E.T., was very helpful. I had developed the notion that providence provided the union of E.P. Dollard and D. Boone in order to bring the Integratron to life (about 1984). Other people had a different plan so now it is just another conspiracy story at best. Today the installation is disfigured, all technical apparatus gone, and operates as a self worship temple for the "divine Sheva". So what is new, just like RCA Bolinas, etc.

The Integratron operated in the following manner:
Three basic components made up the Integratron.
1) A rotating Di-Rod electrostatic generator which encircled the main deck of the Integratron the projecting aluminum studs are the parametric condensers to energize it, 100 Kilovolts DC out.

2) An electro static condenser consisting of a large wooden hemisphere with an interior aluminum leaving. This was charged to 100 Kv.

3) A large Caduceus transformer of flat spiral form wound upon the ceiling of the transformer, or lower deck.

The armature was to be driven by compressed air rolling on a massive integral roller bearing of teflon rollers and races.

Because compressed air can be sent through pipes of dielectric material this served not only motive power but also control air. Four air driven mechanical switches around the periphery alternately engaged the charged dome and the transformer windings. The opposite ends of the windings capacitively terminated on a hollow central core where a special network would be lowered into it from the main deck above. Four spark gaps outside collected from the rotor/dome and sparked to the air controlled switches. The entire network operated with a space hysteresis angle of Pi over eight radians (22.5 degree) or a 16th order versor.

Break, more to follow

Fascinating, eagerly awaiting to read more

when operating was the generation of such high potential electrostatic fields noticeable in the atmospheric pressure?

[madhatter]

Eric recommended glass and copper for the primary's capacitor. Would polypropylene be acceptable in lieu of glass?

while any dielectric poly-plastic will work, best results would be obtained with borosilicate glass, it has some interesting properties. Volume charge due to it's porosity, there has also been a proton conducting hybrid of borosilicate glass made utilizing the hydrogen bonds.

I personally prototype with poly-plastics as the glass is prohibitively expensive to prototype with.

[garrettm4]

The Dielectric Field; The Primary Agent of the Electric Field?

As I was doing my usual workout routine this morning, my mind started to wander while doing the repetitive physical exercises, and all of a sudden I started to think about the Dielectric field and its associated relations to the electric circuit and the Electric Field as well. While having what an alcoholic would term a "moment of clarity", I came to some interesting personal conclusions (via inductive logic) of which I would like to share and have others more qualified than myself critique. (I would like to say that I am most likely wrong in almost all of what is about to be said, so read with your gift of discernment)

I have been thinking a lot about what Mr. Steinmetz had to say on the subject of dielectric energy, lines of force and the "ionic theory" of electricity:





To give some sort of starting point, lets consider that J.J. Thompson thought of an electron as an "end-terminal" for "charge" or (1000 lines of) dielectric energy. Also, following what Mr. Steinmetz had to say (in the article above), we can say that this view is corroborated and extended further saying that electrons are "FREE" (to move) NEGATIVE end-terminals of dielectric energy (or charge).

It should be pointed out that electrons ARE NOT the only "charge" carriers, they are just the most abundant and most "free" to move of all the so called carriers. Ions, protons and other particles can also "carry" dielectric energy (or charge). Or more aptly dielectric energy can terminate on the surface of many different end-terminals or "charged particles", and cause them to be pulled along (or move) when you "close the circuit".

Furthermore, we can "isolate" "negative" and "positive" "charges", this substantiates that there are two types of lines of dielectric energy. Also, this leads one to believe that they don't have to be paired with one another.





This is quite the interesting result, which I believe helps explain why you can "separate charges". Also, this means that you don't have to have a balance of negative and positive lines of dielectric energy when contemplating a dielectric circuit, this is something that has had me "hung-up" for a while now. All you have to have, is an imbalance of positive or negative lines of force in a local area to create a potential, which can then cause a "flow" of current as a result. (i.e. all you need are negative charges on one side, or you can have BOTH positive and negative charges, separated of course, to cause a greater difference in potential)

Moving on, the Dielectric Field, as Mr. Dollard has stated, seems to be the primary agent of the Electric Field. The Magnetic Field seems to be a byproduct of the flow of "charged particles" due to the pulling action of the lines of dielectric energy. So it would seem that Dielectric energy is primary and Magnetic energy is secondary when contemplating the Electric Field in general.

From what I gather from the "modern view", "current flow" is said to be "the movement of charge" (Coulombs per second). If we examine what charge is, we find that it is an immaterial substance which is carried or moved along by particles of mass such as electrons, ions and protons. If we dig deeper we find that the so called "charge", lies merely on the surface of these so called carriers. I feel this description directly parallels the "old" lines of force concepts of Thompson and Steinmetz.

Continuing further, if we examine "the movement of charge" we find that we produce a magnetic field when a current is allowed to flow. A current is derived from "closing the circuit" of a potential difference. Here, dielectric energy (or electro-static energy) is allowed to collapse in on itself, or move.

If we believe the "old timers", the dielectric energy is NOT stored in the wire, but is OUTSIDE the wire, the field lines terminate on the bounding conductors present (or more precisely the inter-molecular end-terminals such as the free electrons on the metals surface), such as the plates of a capacitor. However, when the discharge takes place (closing of the circuit), the dielectric field lines bound between the two terminals (stored in the dielectric) can now flow freely in the metal inter-connection. However, the dielectric field lines don't directly move in the wire, instead the free end-terminals (electrons) move. This is caused by the unique property of the field lines wanting to naturally constrict or contract to a singularity, which can be now termed dissipation of dielectric energy.

Thus we have a dual interaction taking place; the electron being pulled along, by their ability to move freely, and the natural constriction of the dielectric field lines, wanting to assume as short a length as possible, with a singularity as the ideal stable length. This results in the so called "conduction current", or flow of charge through a wire. Here we have a new phenomena, when dielectric energy is allowed to move (i.e. dissipate) (or more aptly constrict back to a singularity by the allowance of the electrons free movement) it forms a secondary energy, Magnetism.

(notes, it is assumed that metals have a very large permittivity, which is subject to great change, due to frequency. Also the Drude Gas Model of the electron, if I am not mistaken, describes the transference of charge from one electron to the next, much like kinetic energy transferred from one billiard ball to the next, so electrons don't have to physically move very far in the wire for the lines of dielectric energy to constrict.)

The modern theory, is that ANY TIME a charge flows (or dielectric energy is allowed to move) a magnetic field accompanies the movement. As we know very well, this is the case in conductors, but what about an insulator? I don't feel there can be a magnetic field associated with a displacement current inside the insulator or more precisely, a flow of current outside a "conductor". To be more exact, if there are no charged particles of mass being moved, yet the lines of dielectric energy are traveling do we really have a magnetic field?


(I may add more to this later, I lost my focus half-way through!)

Garrett M