Eric P. Dollard

[David G Dawson]

Thank You,
and understood



6SN7: prices vary on ebay $5-50 does anyone know what the difference in brands is regarding tubes. What do I want, what do I stay away from??

I was waiting for a reason to work with tubes..

Jake,
Think you know I am heavy into this stuff because of my age.
The 6SN7 is a Twin Medium Mu Triode which means you have a dual or parallel path if needed.
Would suggest any brand would be Ok but I do have preferences and RCA Radiotron, Sylvania, Raytheon, Philips, Mullard come to mind but as long as the Vacuum Tube has been tested and certified working then, no problems.
I have 3 in my stash and these were bought on Ebay and probably cost 5$ each.
Appreciate Eric giving us this information as I too am following.

Smokey

[David G Dawson]

Rebuilt Extra Coil

The rebuilt Extra Coil is now working and the only thing different is 5 more turns and in harmony with the Primary and Secondary as all are now wound CCW (14awg and 55 turns).
Am amble to pick up the AM Radio signal from 20" away from the Extra Coil but best at about 8" away.
AM Station is 2 Kw and 7 kms away due south.
Signal is louder without the top load tin can capacitor and louder again from turn # 17 on the Secondary.
A hand near the Extra kills the signal and also touching the top of the Secondary.
Have tapped the turns at the top of the Extra but was unable to tune.
Will now make taps on the Secondary for tuning purposes.
Going to set up the integrated Primary condenser to see if I can't get the Primary involved.
Will also do some probing with the Sig Gen.

Smokey

[t-rex]

QRT on T-Brown

If T-Brown is such a sweet heart why do so many here in America despise him? If I multiply everything by k, then I do cause my own problems, since as a "street person" I invariably get involved with criminal, violent, or mentally deranged people. And since I have no recourse they turn around and take me for a ride. This will never change, Roy Stolti and Landers, Eric Johnson and my dog, etc, etc. This is the American way of doing business Edison States, take what you want without regard and then violently lie about it. No more on this.

QRT DE N6KPH

[t-rex]

} (Velocity)

(III) Space

[t-rex]

F,
or Radians per Second,

And the hyperbolic operator is expressed in one of two forms;

Decibels per Second, dB,
or Nepers per Second, u.

Radians and Nepers are the proper expressions for use as exponents of the natural log based epsilon, Epsilon is defined by the relations





where
.

This infinite series gives a pair of numerical values for Epsilon,







(7) In contemporary engineering mathematics the circular and hyperbolic functions are derived by means of the natural log base. The circular functions are derived from the infinite series as powers of the square root of negative one

[t-rex]

Symbolic Operators; Steinmetz to Pythagoras, Backward in Time: (Part 3 of 4)



The hyperbolic functions are derived from the infinite series as powers of the square root of positive one,







The functions of the natural log base, , introduces the limitation that operation is only possible in Cartesian relations, that is, a system of rectangular co-ordinates or the octaves thereof. This log-base and its related functions, sin, cos, etc. are incapable of expressing numerical versor divisions not derived from the log-periodic series of the octave,





and it's versor operators,





Therefore a division of three units such as encountered in three phase electrical systems cannot be expressed as exponents or functions of the natural log base, . The poly phase operator must first be reduced to its Cartesian equivalents. The three phase operator is given symbolically as









In Cartesian equivalents it is

[t-rex]

Symbolic Operators; Steinmetz to Pythagoras, Backward in Time: (Part 4 of 4)







where j is the Steinmetz quadrantal operator.



(8) Expressions for the depth of penetration of electro-magnetic induction into metallic substances involve an octic (8) versor relation. This gives rise to a pair of somewhat incongruous results. From the versor expression



is derived the unit octic (8) versor of the lag in metallic back E.M.F.



However in vector Cartesian form the symbolic expression for an octic is,



where

and the derived unit octic lag of 45 degrees is given by



where ja + jbnumberdisruption

[fefish]

Regarding the "TESLA'S BIG MISTAKE?" article

Hi,

I recently came across an article, titled "Tesla's Big Mistake?". I guess this is nothing new for you, but it was for me (from now on, I will assume that you have read that article). My first reaction after reading it was like "OK, I'll have to give up". But after some reflection upon what the article actually states, I realized that as it indeed gives a reasonable explanation of why Tesla's transmission weren't wireless (in the sense of "flying through air") as well as how single-wire transmission might work (due to some old article), it does not give a satisfying explanation (actually NO explanation) on why EM waves would follow an insulated wire (never heard of any EM wave property that would enable such a behaviour). Therefore, what I think, is that the setup that the author provides in order to discredit(?) Tesla technology, actually describes a way of investigate the existence and propagation of what could be longitudinal waves.



The above image presents that setup (for details about it, see the article itself, linked above). What also came into my mind is that the conic shapes applied onto the cable (as shown in the picture) resemble the conic shapes used to propagate longitudinal waves in the air (like megaphones, etc). So, making this "spontaneous" observation, I suspect that this could result in generation of longitudinal waves. HOWEVER, I don't know if I can trust that article. I really would like to make that experiment, but that includes some work/money (not least on getting something that could generate GHz signals), therefore, I would be very happy if you could give me some input on what you think about this (before I waste/spend days/weeks and money).

Cheers,
fefish

[t-rex]

The writing "Tesla's big mistake" is a misrepresentation of Tesla's work. The diagram shown has nothing to do with Tesla, but is actually a strange wave called a boundary wave. Ernst Guillemen discusses this in the introductory chapter of his second volume of "Communications Networks".

73 DE N6KPH

[Armagdn03]

Eric....

I have been quite interested lately in the concept of the ring circuit, or a circular waveguide. Through directional coupling of the wave to the guide, unidirectional propagation can be achieved.

One could inject two frequencies, obviously creating side band frequencies (beat frequencies). These could be phi ratio apart for example. the resultants would also be ratios of phi. Because these circularly and uni directionally propagate, they encounter their products over and over creating an ever expanding sequence of frequencies, much like your log periodic antenna.

what do you think of this topology over a finite section of log periodic design?

[t-rex]

A circular waveguide is a linear system it does not generate sidebands. What it does do is there's a mode called TE02 which exhibits some extremely bizarre propogation characteristics and defies excitation. If a circular resonator is brought into a complex oscillation it will produce an un-musical enharmonic series, much like the waveforms produced by a drum. No log periodic series exists here.

73 DE N6KPH

[garrettm4]

Versor Operators

Mr. Dollard, I really appreciate the recent versor operator transmissions you have given out lately, especially the recent clarification of the Circular and the (enigmatic) Hyperbolic type versors. I think I am starting to see how they may alleviate the cumbersome use of calculus differentials with relatively manageable algebra and trigonometry. I get the feeling that if one were to get a good grasp on the versor operators they would be able to "see" electrical phenomena that would otherwise be mathematically occluded from view, or at least connect seemingly disjointed phenomena. Which may be paramount in understanding the works of Tesla, Steinmetz, ect.

I have also been looking into "projective geometry" and "counter space algebras" developed by Rudolf Steiner, George Adams and Lawrence Edwards which appear to parallel certain elements of the log periodic antennae you are discussing.

On a "side note", I am getting the impression from personal experiments that Impulses and Dampened waves (oscillations) have strange effects on living subjects and may actually be dangerous to play around with if experimented with unscrupulously. There may very well be a connection with Lakhovsky/Rife and these generally unused waveforms. I also get the impression that continuous waves don't exhibit the same effects that the prior produce. It would seem that continuous waves are more useful for industrial use (power transmission, communication, ect.) rather than for use with living systems.

I would like to thank you for your continued interest in sharing your unique and fascinating information to everyone here on the energetic forum,

Garrett M

[Raui]

Eric,
A physics professor told me something very interesting last night He described an experiment where he measured the acceleration due to gravity with a precise pendulum apparatus both outside and inside the pyramid at Giza and found that there was a ever-so slight difference between the two. He said he couldn't think of any reason why it would be so I believe he must have meant that it was smaller inside the pyramid since you could easily argue that there was material under the pyramid making it higher. This lends credence to the cosmic ray theory of gravity as you spoke about in the 2007 lecture at the SFTS. Oh while I'm on the topic of SFTS have you heard about the 16 hours worth of footage that they have of you lecturing? I would really love to watch all that footage..multiple times.

Also I've come to an interesting insight into mutual inductance and that is that mutual inductance and magnetic reluctance are one and the same;
Henry = Weber/Ampere = L
Mutual Inductance = 1/L = M
Reluctance = Ampere/Weber = M
I'm going to meditate on this and see what interesting things I can take from this relationship but thought I'd post it so that others can too see this correlation. Interesting thing about reluctance is that it is actually the magnetic equivalent of electric resistance. So here we have the relationship similar, but not the same as, reactive and real power flows. L is when the energy is stored in the space (storage/return, related to induction factor?). You say that M is when energy is transferred but it can also be thought of as magnetic resistance so (dissipation/production, related to power factor?). Any input would be much appreciated as mutual inductance is something which is still mysterious to me.

Edit:

A circular waveguide is a linear system it does not generate sidebands. What it does do is there's a mode called TE02 which exhibits some extremely bizarre propogation characteristics and defies excitation. If a circular resonator is brought into a complex oscillation it will produce an un-musical enharmonic series, much like the waveforms produced by a drum. No log periodic series exists here.

73 DE N6KPH

I'm just thinking out loud here but could you go with an elliptical ring circuit then with the ratio of the abscissa and ordinate being that of the golden ratio?

Raui

[Web000x]

Oh while I'm on the topic of SFTS have you heard about the 16 hours worth of footage that they have of you lecturing? I would really love to watch all that footage..multiple times.

When I spoke to George Gaboury, SFTS operator, on 4/30/12, he said that he had a target date to have all of Eric's work cleaned up (quality editing) and released one month from that date. If 5/30/12 rolls around and I still don't have copies posted to youtube, I suggest that anybody interested in these videos politely email the SFTS and let George know that you can't wait to see Eric's presentations. He doesn't sound like he is squatting on them, just unwilling to publish something like the previous lecture that is full of poor audio and random missing parts. I feel like he is an honest person.

Also I've come to an interesting insight into mutual inductance and that is that mutual inductance and magnetic reluctance are one and the same;
Henry = Weber/Ampere = L
Mutual Inductance = 1/L = M
Reluctance = Ampere/Weber = M
I'm going to meditate on this and see what interesting things I can take from this relationship but thought I'd post it so that others can too see this correlation. Interesting thing about reluctance is that it is actually the magnetic equivalent of electric resistance. So here we have the relationship similar, but not the same as, reactive and real power flows. L is when the energy is stored in the space (storage/return, related to induction factor?). You say that M is when energy is transferred but it can also be thought of as magnetic resistance so (dissipation/production, related to power factor?). Any input would be much appreciated as mutual inductance is something which is still mysterious to me.

Raui

Yeah, I am beginning to feel like I have confusion about mutual induction. For example, in the SBARC Ham Radio video with Chris and Eric, Chris starts trying to explain the workings of a transformer by stating that the magnetic flux is for the most part directed into the magnetic material of the transformer and hardly any flux from the primary cuts the windings of the secondary. In my mind, I see the magnetic flux lines of this mutual induction starting as a small bubble arising at the primary and having to inflate as a balloon until it sees the rest of the ferromagnetic core. According to Faraday's theory that all magnetic lines of force must be closed upon themselves, these lines must cut thru the secondary winding as they expand and contract.

How can a line of force that is closed upon itself instantly appear within the magnetic path of a transformer without cutting the lines of the secondary? For Chris's explanation to ring true with me, the magnetic lines of force must travel down the magnetic path until they meet where they connect, but this would mean that they, for a brief moment, are not always closed loops... Maybe Eric can help clarify.

Dave

[Raui]

Thanks for the update Dave! Good to hear that they're being helpful.

As for the problem with transformers I see that the transfer of energy between two coils could potentially be carried by a dielectric field possibly. If you have a core magnetized then you have the dielectric lines at 90 degrees and it is these lines which could influence the secondary. Here is a article which gets one thinking; SCIENCE HOBBYIST: Right Angle Circuitry

Raui